Russia to Seize Hundreds of Leased Airliners

 

According to Joe Blogs, Russia has just passed a law allowing Russian airline operators to simply declare themselves the owners of commercial aircraft leased from western companies.  Ireland likely hardest hit, IIRC.  These are Airbus and Boeing aircraft owned by leasing companies, but the deals are off, and the planes are due to be repossessed.  How?  Aye, there’s the rub.

Over 500 aircraft worth over $10 Billion may simply be swiped from the western owners.  This is another destruction of wealth, not just a transfer.  The aircraft are no longer supported with parts and inspections from manufacturers and owners.  And a great number of the planes are grounded anyway — Russian airlines don’t have as many destinations to go to these days.

This may be an expensive way to find out what can and cannot be done.  We shall see.

Published in General
Tags: ,

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 69 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Retail Lawyer Member
    Retail Lawyer
    @RetailLawyer

    Please, no more bailouts!  The lessors of these planes made a big mistake operating under the control of Putin.  Let them bear the costs.

    • #31
  2. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    I could use a bailout.  Everybody seems to be getting sweet government money but me.  Starting to get annoying 

    • #32
  3. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    Russia seems to want Ukraine for its farmland and its fresh water. If that’s accurate, then irradiating the place wouldn’t make sense.

    It’s sorta kinda why I haven’t been too worried about China invading Taiwan, because such an invasion would destroy the very assets that make Taiwan a valuable prize.

    But let’s remember what Hamlet respected in Fortinbras: He was willing to go to war and sacrifice many lives on a point of honor. No economic or military advantage. Nothing but honor. If some point of honor, mere pride, some sense of national heritage or destiny requires control of a bit of land, economic or strategic advantage may take a backseat.

    Lives are cheap to a warlord, but there’s no point destroying the very soil you seek to annex. Rome wouldn’t have salted Carthage if Rome had wanted the land for itself. Is Putin’s goal to destroy Ukraine or to annex it?

    Lives are always cheap as long as they are not you and yours.

    • #33
  4. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    Russia seems to want Ukraine for its farmland and its fresh water. If that’s accurate, then irradiating the place wouldn’t make sense.

    It’s sorta kinda why I haven’t been too worried about China invading Taiwan, because such an invasion would destroy the very assets that make Taiwan a valuable prize.

    But let’s remember what Hamlet respected in Fortinbras: He was willing to go to war and sacrifice many lives on a point of honor. No economic or military advantage. Nothing but honor. If some point of honor, mere pride, some sense of national heritage or destiny requires control of a bit of land, economic or strategic advantage may take a backseat.

    Lives are cheap to a warlord, but there’s no point destroying the very soil you seek to annex. Rome wouldn’t have salted Carthage if Rome had wanted the land for itself. Is Putin’s goal to destroy Ukraine or to annex it?

    Lives are always cheap as long as they are not you and yours.

    Someone posted a meme on another thread recently, showing some kind of general or something smiling in front of the ribbons and stuff on his wall, and a mother sitting in a chair looking sadly at photos of her (presumably dead) sons on the wall.

    Wish I could find it now.

     

    • #34
  5. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Perhaps this may be a short term gain for Russia, but in the long run they would have lost the confidence of the international markets.  It will not end well for Russia if this is how it stays.

    • #35
  6. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    Russia seems to want Ukraine for its farmland and its fresh water. If that’s accurate, then irradiating the place wouldn’t make sense.

    It’s sorta kinda why I haven’t been too worried about China invading Taiwan, because such an invasion would destroy the very assets that make Taiwan a valuable prize.

    But let’s remember what Hamlet respected in Fortinbras: He was willing to go to war and sacrifice many lives on a point of honor. No economic or military advantage. Nothing but honor. If some point of honor, mere pride, or some sense of national heritage or destiny requires control of a bit of land, economic or strategic advantage may take a backseat.

    • #36
  7. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Someone posted a meme on another thread recently, showing some kind of general or something smiling in front of the ribbons and stuff on his wall, and a mother sitting in a chair looking sadly at photos of her (presumably dead) sons on the wall.

    Each and every one for participation in a training exercise, likely.

    • #37
  8. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    Someone posted a meme on another thread recently, showing some kind of general or something smiling in front of the ribbons and stuff on his wall, and a mother sitting in a chair looking sadly at photos of her (presumably dead) sons on the wall.

    Each and every one for participation in a training exercise, likely.

    No, one of them was for having the most medals.

    • #38
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Google image search was useless.  If someone remembers it or they’re the one who did it before, I hope they put it here too so I can save it for later.

    • #39
  10. James Lileks Contributor
    James Lileks
    @jameslileks

    Manny (View Comment):

    Perhaps this may be a short term gain for Russia, but in the long run they would have lost the confidence of the international markets. It will not end well for Russia if this is how it stays.

    Who goes back in when this is over? Russia’s participation in the boons of the West was predicated on a consensual aspiration: they will not, at the end of the day, do that thing where they act like Russia. There was money to be made, and everyone was happy to see the banners of Apple and Ikea hoisted over the graveyard of the Communist empire. In time they would moderate, seeing the advantages of economic integration that would lead to a lasting order. Your whole end-o-history thing. (See also, China.) Putin –  and more subtly, Xi – had other ideas. 

    Russia has burned its bridges now, and far from returning to its imagined state as a terribly great power that hasn’t spent the last century cocking up nearly everything it attempted, it will be sold off in chunks and crumbs to China. To paraphrase what they used to say about the capitalists: Russia will sell China the pen used to sign away their economy. Except the pen doesn’t work, and so China sighs, and produces its own pen, made in China, based on designs stolen from the West. 

    I wonder if we underestimate the number of people in the Russian Government who’d turn on Putin the moment it seems doable, because they’ll be damned if they give up trips to Italy and London for trips to China. The wife, she loves Milan. She went to Beijing once and hated it. 

    • #40
  11. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Locke On (View Comment):
    Putin could always order such a nuke used to make a point, but operationally it wouldn’t make much sense, while creating a real risk of escalation.  An anti-city/population attack would seem to make even less sense, since it would wreck a transportation nexus that Russia would need for further advances (remember they are stuck on roads during the mud season), while further upping the escalation risk.

    IMHO, if Putin uses a nuke (“one nuke only, Vasily”), it will be in Europe, not Ukraine, and it will be in a city.  That’s how you make a point.  And on cue, the West will make peace.

    What would cause him to use a nuke?  If the Ukraine thing drags on and he must decide whether to go bankrupt or go home.  The combination of sanctions and Ukrainistan could destabilize Russia with a here today, gone tomorrow quickness.

    • #41
  12. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):

    Locke On (View Comment):

    Random thoughts on the Russian nukes:

    Soviet doctrine was to use battlefield nukes to blow a hole in NATO’s defense through which to advance armored columns. That doesn’t make much sense in Ukraine, where Russia’s logistics are having trouble supporting their existing positions, let alone a deep advance. (I’ve seen estimates by those who seem to know their business that Russian troops are effectively on half-supply once they are over 100 miles from a rail head, due to lack/inefficiency of truck transport.)

    Putin could always order such a nuke used to make a point, but operationally it wouldn’t make much sense, while creating a real risk of escalation. An anti-city/population attack would seem to make even less sense, since it would wreck a transportation nexus that Russia would need for further advances (remember they are stuck on roads during the mud season), while further upping the escalation risk.

    If a nuke does go off, I wouldn’t necessarily expect NATO/the US to respond in kind. Russia has other assets that can be put at risk much more easily. For instance, destroying the Russian Navy in the Med and Black Sea could probably be done with little or no US/NATO loss, given Russia’s lack of naval aviation.

     

    Russia seems to want Ukraine for its farmland and its fresh water. If that’s accurate, then irradiating the place wouldn’t make sense.

    It’s sorta kinda why I haven’t been too worried about China invading Taiwan, because such an invasion would destroy the very assets that make Taiwan a valuable prize.

    Russia doesn;t care about farmland and water — they have more of both than anybody in the world.  And China doesn;t need Taiwan’s stuff.  In both cases these are chokepoints for the larger nations’ military aims, and galling, embarrassing, failures that make them look like also-rans.  Russia cannot stomach Ukraine any more than China can stomach Taiwan.  Food or not, people or not, water or not.  None of that matters.  Just geography and national authority.

    • #42
  13. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    MarciN (View Comment):
    We should impose and enforce a no-fly zone. At least the Ukrainians would have a fighting chance.

    This is a recipe for Vietnam. In order to not escalate too too too much, we would have to effectively promise to not attack any Russian thing outside of Ukraine — no motherland hits. That means get ’em when they’re up, not on the ground, not in the launchers, but only on your tail.

    We can argue that Poland is NATO and Russia is Russia, and only Ukraine is in play. But Russia’s position will be that Ukraine is Russia, and Poland is therefore in play.

    A no-fly zone is as good as a no-kidding war in this case. If we are to no-fly them, then we should just wipe out Russia, which is famously easier said than done, even before nukes.

    And consider this: If you are Putin, you will launch exactly one nuke and dare the world to retaliate. Putin wins. We will never take the shot. As a deterrent, our nukes are useless, while Putin’s are effective, because he has a way to use one.

    Or we could test in the ocean off the shores of Alaska. Our nuke, our land, our point.

    Russia’s nuke will be in a European city.  We will fold.

    • #43
  14. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    BDB (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    MarciN (View Comment):
    We should impose and enforce a no-fly zone. At least the Ukrainians would have a fighting chance.

    This is a recipe for Vietnam. In order to not escalate too too too much, we would have to effectively promise to not attack any Russian thing outside of Ukraine — no motherland hits. That means get ’em when they’re up, not on the ground, not in the launchers, but only on your tail.

    We can argue that Poland is NATO and Russia is Russia, and only Ukraine is in play. But Russia’s position will be that Ukraine is Russia, and Poland is therefore in play.

    A no-fly zone is as good as a no-kidding war in this case. If we are to no-fly them, then we should just wipe out Russia, which is famously easier said than done, even before nukes.

    And consider this: If you are Putin, you will launch exactly one nuke and dare the world to retaliate. Putin wins. We will never take the shot. As a deterrent, our nukes are useless, while Putin’s are effective, because he has a way to use one.

    Or we could test in the ocean off the shores of Alaska. Our nuke, our land, our point.

    Russia’s nuke will be in a European city. We will fold.

    Like a cheap suit?  Or, rather, a cheap Biden?

    • #44
  15. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    kedavis (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    BDB (View Comment):

    MarciN (View Comment):
    We should impose and enforce a no-fly zone. At least the Ukrainians would have a fighting chance.

    This is a recipe for Vietnam. In order to not escalate too too too much, we would have to effectively promise to not attack any Russian thing outside of Ukraine — no motherland hits. That means get ’em when they’re up, not on the ground, not in the launchers, but only on your tail.

    We can argue that Poland is NATO and Russia is Russia, and only Ukraine is in play. But Russia’s position will be that Ukraine is Russia, and Poland is therefore in play.

    A no-fly zone is as good as a no-kidding war in this case. If we are to no-fly them, then we should just wipe out Russia, which is famously easier said than done, even before nukes.

    And consider this: If you are Putin, you will launch exactly one nuke and dare the world to retaliate. Putin wins. We will never take the shot. As a deterrent, our nukes are useless, while Putin’s are effective, because he has a way to use one.

    Or we could test in the ocean off the shores of Alaska. Our nuke, our land, our point.

    Russia’s nuke will be in a European city. We will fold.

    Like a cheap suit? Or, rather, a cheap Biden?

    Like catching a liver kick:

    • #45
  16. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    Just a reminder – Obama cancelled the missile defense shield in Poland as part of his Russian reset plan

    • #46
  17. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    MarciN (View Comment):
    I think Putin does not want to preside over the death of Russia. So I don’t think we need to worry about his using nuclear weapons as much as we do, at least that’s what I got out of the podcast with John O’Sullivan.

    Putin may.  But I seriously doubt the rest of the leadership and the oligarchs behind him are willing to die in a fire for his failed ambition.

    • #47
  18. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    Obviously, I don’t know if this report is true. If so, it raises an interesting question — did the people who advocated, and carried out, seizure of Russian assets in the West not realize that the Russians might do the same thing?

    Of course they did.  The asymmetry is the problem for Putler.  Russias economy is a dwarf, about the size of Italys and based on commodity exports and little else. The West can absorb these loses as little more than a bump in the road. By doing things like this and nationalizing foreign assets he will ensure no one is going to want to invest in his little empire for the foreseeable future.   So Russia will spiral back to where it was in about 1995.   It’s future will be as a gas and grocery store for China, which has wonderful historical claims on vast territories in the far east.  And is just as predatory as good old Mother Russia is.   

    • #48
  19. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Retail Lawyer (View Comment):

    Please, no more bailouts! The lessors of these planes made a big mistake operating under the control of Putin. Let them bear the costs.

    My understanding is that many of the companies that lease these aircraft have insurance for just such a loss.

    • #49
  20. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    it will be sold off in chunks and crumbs to China. To paraphrase what they used to say about the capitalists: Russia will sell China the pen used to sign away their economy. Except the pen doesn’t work, and so China sighs, and produces its own pen, made in China, based on designs stolen from the West. 

    Russia can look forward to being China’s discount gas and grocery store. And China will want to collect in that yummy almost empty land in the far East that it has the kind of historical claims on that Russia makes on Ukraine.

     

    • #50
  21. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Kozak (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    it will be sold off in chunks and crumbs to China. To paraphrase what they used to say about the capitalists: Russia will sell China the pen used to sign away their economy. Except the pen doesn’t work, and so China sighs, and produces its own pen, made in China, based on designs stolen from the West.

    Russia can look forward to being China’s discount gas and grocery store. And China will want to collect in that yummy almost empty land in the far East that it has the kind of historical claims on that Russia makes on Ukraine.

     

    Twenty years ago (working on an idea for a book) I noted that China had excess male population while Russia had dwindling male population and land.

    Thought I had come up with a stirring scene until I realized I stole it straight out of the movie Firefox (but with a rocket).  Sigh.

    • #51
  22. Ekosj Member
    Ekosj
    @Ekosj

    James Lileks (View Comment)

    I wonder if we underestimate the number of people in the Russian Government who’d turn on Putin the moment it seems doable, because they’ll be damned if they give up trips to Italy and London for trips to China. The wife, she loves Milan. She went to Beijing once and hated it.

    Excellent point.   I’m  reminded of a quip from back in the day by an old Soviet hand who said Soviet politics was like watching men wrestle under a tarpaulin – you could tell there was lots of activity but not who was winning.

    There are, I think, competing interests.   Putin (and his inner clique) dreams of a unipolar EurAsian empire.   The oligarchs and the Security Services chieftains nod along in agreement with that because Putin has made them fabulously wealthy.  (Putin is not the oligarchs’ man, they are his oligarchs)  

    Xi too dreams of a unipolar EurAsian empire.   Both plan to use the other as a cudgel against the West.   

    Both can’t be right.  One will move against the other eventually.   Unfortunately for us, that won’t be until after one of them believes the West is neutralized.

    • #52
  23. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    Obviously, I don’t know if this report is true. If so, it raises an interesting question — did the people who advocated, and carried out, seizure of Russian assets in the West not realize that the Russians might do the same thing?

    Those people couldnt think two seconds ahead.  Which is why they are trying to make a deal with Iran and Venezuela.

     

    Meanwhile India is going to exchange Rupies for Rubles.  I was assured by Commentary that kicking Russia off Swift would prevent this from happening!

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/forex/india-is-considering-rupee-payments-for-trade-with-russia/articleshow/90153264.cms

    • #53
  24. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    iWe (View Comment):

    The Russians will keep the planes flying, sourcing parts creatively around the world. But those planes will never be accepted back by the lessors again (if sanctions continue for another 2-3 months). Which means that the lessors have now lost them. A huge hit for aircraft lessors.

    In the long run, Russian aviation becomes much less safe. And nobody will extend credit to them in the future, accelerating Russia’s decline as a country. Russia desperately needs commercial air service, or the country unknits.

     

    Pfft.  The country that should be concerned about not getting credit right now is the US of A and Europe.  Plenty of countries around the world are backing Russia’s play.  Starting with China.  Then India.  In fact Russia could easily make the case the seizure of these planes is partial recompense for the EU/USA illegally seizing there bank deposits.  What act of Congress authorized the President to do that again eh?

    If you dont think thats already affecting the US standing in the world.  Well I dont know what to say.

    • #54
  25. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    MarciN (View Comment):

    From the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 signed by Bill Clinton, Boris Yeltsin, and John Major:

    1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.

    2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defense or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

    3. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the Principles of the CSCE Final Act, to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind.

    It would have been wholly appropriate for the civilized world to have imposed a no-fly zone the moment Russia attacked.

    Then we all would be dead.  The Russians would Nuke us.  Or first more than likely they would destroy our air forces and kill hundreds if not thousands of NATO and US personnel.  Then the USA would probably retaliate with Nuclear weapons.  

    I wish we had. I can’t imagine what Putin is planning to do with those planes he just stole, but I’m sure whatever it is will inflict more pain on Ukraine.

    Points 4 and 5, below, suggest that if Putin were to attack Ukraine with nuclear weapons, the United States and the United Kingdom would be honor bound to obliterate Russia.

    And we would be dead.  The entire world would be dead.  So much for your honor.   Every human being on planet Earth is now dead.  Congratulations.

    4. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used.

    5. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state.

    I think Putin does not want to preside over the death of Russia. So I don’t think we need to worry about his using nuclear weapons as much as we do, at least that’s what I got out of the podcast with John O’Sullivan.

    We should impose and enforce a no-fly zone. At least the Ukrainians would have a fighting chance.

    I think this is foolishness of the highest order, and I am glad that someone like you isnt at the top of our governments. 

    • #55
  26. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    MarciN (View Comment):

    Then we all would be dead. The Russians would Nuke us. Or first more than likely they would destroy our air forces and kill hundreds if not thousands of NATO and US personnel. Then the USA would probably retaliate with Nuclear weapons.

     

    And we would be dead. The entire world would be dead. So much for your honor. Every human being on planet Earth is now dead. Congratulations.

     

    I think this is foolishness of the highest order, and I am glad that someone like you isnt at the top of our governments.

    You too, with the way you just nuked Marci.

    • #56
  27. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… (View Comment):

    Obviously, I don’t know if this report is true. If so, it raises an interesting question — did the people who advocated, and carried out, seizure of Russian assets in the West not realize that the Russians might do the same thing?

    Of course they did. The asymmetry is the problem for Putler. Russias economy is a dwarf, about the size of Italys and based on commodity exports and little else. The West can absorb these loses as little more than a bump in the road. By doing things like this and nationalizing foreign assets he will ensure no one is going to want to invest in his little empire for the foreseeable future. So Russia will spiral back to where it was in about 1995. It’s future will be as a gas and grocery store for China, which has wonderful historical claims on vast territories in the far east. And is just as predatory as good old Mother Russia is.

    Ooh, a taste of their own medicine?  How subtle!

    • #57
  28. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Ekosj (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment)

    I wonder if we underestimate the number of people in the Russian Government who’d turn on Putin the moment it seems doable, because they’ll be damned if they give up trips to Italy and London for trips to China. The wife, she loves Milan. She went to Beijing once and hated it.

    Excellent point. I’m reminded of a quip from back in the day by an old Soviet hand who said Soviet politics was like watching men wrestle under a tarpaulin – you could tell there was lots of activity but not who was winning.

    There are, I think, competing interests. Putin (and his inner clique) dreams of a unipolar EurAsian empire. The oligarchs and the Security Services chieftains nod along in agreement with that because Putin has made them fabulously wealthy. (Putin is not the oligarchs’ man, they are his oligarchs)

    Xi too dreams of a unipolar EurAsian empire. Both plan to use the other as a cudgel against the West.

    Both can’t be right. One will move against the other eventually. Unfortunately for us, that won’t be until after one of them believes the West is neutralized.

    You mean “electing” Biden wasn’t enough?

    • #58
  29. Ekosj Member
    Ekosj
    @Ekosj

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    MarciN (View Comment):

    From the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 signed by Bill Clinton, Boris Yeltsin, and John Major:

    1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the CSCE Final Act, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.

    Then we all would be dead. The Russians would Nuke us. Or first more than likely they would destroy our air forces and kill hundreds if not thousands of NATO and US personnel. Then the USA would probably retaliate with Nuclear weapons.

    I wish we had. I can’t imagine what Putin is planning to do with those planes he just stole, but I’m sure whatever it is will inflict more pain on Ukraine.

    Points 4 and 5, below, suggest that if Putin were to attack Ukraine with nuclear weapons, the United States and the United Kingdom would be honor bound to obliterate Russia.

    And we would be dead. The entire world would be dead. So much for your honor. Every human being on planet Earth is now dead. Congratulations.

    4. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used.

    5. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a state in association or alliance with a nuclear weapon state.

    I think Putin does not want to preside over the death of Russia. So I don’t think we need to worry about his using nuclear weapons as much as we do, at least that’s what I got out of the podcast with John O’Sullivan.

    We should impose and enforce a no-fly zone. At least the Ukrainians would have a fighting chance.

    I think this is foolishness of the highest order, and I am glad that someone like you isnt at the top of our governments.

    Does this mean that deterrence based on Mutually Assured Destruction has failed?   Putin believes it is possible to fight and win  a nuclear war?   If that’s true then we have a MUCH bigger problem than Ukraine, and we are, all of us, de facto hostages to Putin.

    • #59
  30. BDB Inactive
    BDB
    @BDB

    Ekosj (View Comment):

    Does this mean that deterrence based on Mutually Assured Destruction has failed? Putin believes it is possible to fight and win a nuclear war? If that’s true then we have a MUCH bigger problem than Ukraine, and we are, all of us, de facto hostages to Putin.

    Magic 8-Ball says highly likely.

    MAD is based on expected reactions or “bluffs”.  We have no leadership — we have no bluff to call.  The Commiecrats have taken over, and we will never loose a nuclear shot to defend the US or freedom anywhere (etc), as these are not the interests our Alinskyite friends will protect.

    Putin could vaporize a middling city in Europe and while the outcry would be loud and irritating, nobody would nuke him back.  He would then have a free hand to take whatever he “needs”, like Poland, East Germany, and so forth.  Many of those non-nuke countries would fight like Hell, but at the same time, they will see that the US’ bluff has been called, and we folded.  On them.

    What matters is Putin’s appetite for war and conquest — not ours.

     

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.