Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Biden Has to Go
When Joe Biden assumed the presidency one year ago, America had finally achieved energy independence. Iran was in chaos, fearing that its nuclear ambitions had been dashed. A year later, it’s America’s interests that have been dashed.
Biden campaigned on a pledge to rejoin the Iran nuclear accord and work on its weaknesses later. He seemed to believe that reinstituting deference and tacit assurances of eventual nuclear power status to Shiite Muslims would win concessions from the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. It didn’t work out.
Monitoring for compliance allowed under the treaty was notably lax. Still, at the end of 2020, the United Nations watchdog agency was investigating Iran for cheating on nuclear materials and production with a pending referral to the UN Security Council. Economic sanctions under the treaty had produced an economic crisis with mass protests throughout the country. Iran was reeling.
Biden came to the rescue. Instead of cracking down on Iran’s noncompliance with the treaty, he pressured America’s allies to pull back a censure resolution, sending a clear message to Iran that the US no longer minded that they were hiding nuclear sites and materials, in violation of the treaty and global nonproliferation agreements.
Iran immediately begins investigating the new limits of America’s tolerance. The regime refused UN access to nuclear sites and increased uranium enrichment to 60%, far beyond the level required for peaceful nuclear power production.
Meanwhile, Iranians stepped up their violence in the region, including drone and rocket attacks on American forces. Biden not only refused to respond militarily to the terrorist attacks, he ended support for a Saudi-led campaign against the Iran-backed Houthis and removed America’s defense missiles from Saudi Arabia.
As Iran accelerated its nuclear program and regional military aggression, Biden inexplicably helped avoid a financial crisis too. He suspended sanctions, giving Iran accessibility to frozen funds and to Chinese oil imports.
Iran is up and running. We better hope that the mullahs are just kidding with their “Death to America” chants.
Biden’s response to America’s energy needs has been similarly woke and pathetic. At the conclusion of the Trump presidency, America had achieved energy independence for the first time in 50 years.
Trump encouraged the shale oil and gas revolution. He lifted restrictions on drilling, especially in remote areas. He permitted vitally needed pipelines. He blocked extreme environmental regulations that intentionally reduced our gas and oil supplies. As a result, America had surplus fuel supplies and no longer had to import oil from Arabs, Russians, Iranians, or Mexicans.
Biden promptly, inexplicably (simple Trump hatred?) reversed all the Trump policies when in office. We’re importing again. The economic cost of losing our energy independence is about $50 billion annually.
Now Biden has to grovel, unsuccessfully, with OPEC to increase production. Once again, we have to be mindful of our energy needs when dealing with foreign actors.
Moreover, even if you believe only massive carbon reduction mandates can keep the planet from burning, none of this affects climate change. The Biden reforms don’t affect which fuels we consume, only whether we buy them from our own producers or overseas, where power plants are often more polluting than ours.
America’s worst enemy could hardly have inflicted more damage than has our own president. In thrall to a tiny faction of far-left ideologues, Biden has suffered multiple other failures, too, including immigration, inflation, urban crime, and school closures.
Unfortunately, here’s where it gets partisan and divisive. The solemn duty of the Republican Party is to remove this person and his ilk from office before they do more irreversible harm to the republic. That duty includes nominating the quality candidates most likely to win elections, which may not always be the ones most popular with Republicans.
In 2020, Trump lost an election to an exceptionally weak candidate who hardly campaigned and who was uninspiring even to his own supporters. Considering historical precedent and his record in office, Trump deserved to win in a landslide.
Instead, he lost. Hard as it may be to accept, many voters wanted somebody, anybody who “wasn’t Trump.”
In service to their country and posterity, Republicans need to be more strategic, starting now. It’s important.
Published in General
First, none of this has anything to with that cardboard cut-out Biden. He’s the most blameless man in Washington. To focus on Biden is to miss the whole point. It’s like watching television. I agree with most of what you say up until…
… the last four paragraphs. So (second), the stolen election is becoming increasingly visible to ever more “reasonable” people. There’s a through line from Benghazi to Ukraine with about three major “subplots”, to use the TV terminology.
Granted, the half-life in this particular decay from fringe, kooker nonsense to “old news” is long enough that the damage is just plain done. Still, it’s nice to see facts come out from time to time. Russian Collusion and abuse of power vis-a-vis Ukraine were both Democrat sins. The investigation IS the cover-up. Durham is years late (not his fault I guess — Mueller), but it’s nice to see. Watch that space.
As you said, that’s where the partisan and divisive comes in.
Your larger point about this administration being an engineered disaster (if I paraphrase you correctly) is right on. It just doesn’t have anything to do with Biden. Nothing does.
Note that Biden doesn’t have to grovel to OPEC. He could simply return to Trump-era policies and we could all experience the relief that comes from lower energy costs.
That he does not tells you that higher energy costs (hitting the poor and middle class hardest) is exactly what this administration wants. This is deliberate.
Yes and to belabor a point, it’s not him personally who intends it. Not where it matters.
The appropriate punishment for putting him in office is four full years of suffering no matter how bad the spectacle becomes…for both sides of the aisle.
The R side can and should oppose his agenda as appropriate every step of the way but removing him from office is the responsibility of his own party for now. If a group of them want to take a trip to the Oval Office to have that talk then that should be played out under bright lights and the attention of the country…and the world. If they won’t do that then, well…”To the pain”, as they say.
I agree. I imagine the Big Guy has to go a lot, given his age and demented urinary tract.