Democrats Prefer to Fight Faux Foes and Ignore Real Ones

 

From day one, it was blindingly obvious to everyone, including China, that crossing Donald Trump was a bad idea.  Anytime anyone attacked him, he hit back twice as hard.  He often seemed to do this for sport, retaliating against unimportant people, like basketball players or actors, simply for the fun of it.  It was also obvious that Trump loves America, and considered it his responsibility to act on behalf of Americans.  These traits of toughness and love of country are much less obvious in Joe Biden.  And this has not gone unnoticed by, for example, China.  So China has understandably been much less interested in what America thinks about, well, anything.  Which has allowed China to do whatever it wants.  Which has created increasing tension around the world.

For some reason, President Biden has decided to have a ‘virtual summit’ with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, for our virtual president to discuss his concerns about China’s more aggressive recent actions.  Donald Trump, of course, did not need a summit to convince China that they should not cross him.  They knew already.  Just like they know already that they can cross President Biden all they want with no fear of repercussions.  They don’t need a summit to figure that out, either.

The idea of President Biden intimidating anybody – especially a thug like Xi Jinping – in a meeting of any kind is ludicrous.  Which I’m sure is as obvious to Biden and his handlers as it is to Xi Jinping.  The only way that President Biden could possibly convince Xi that he means business would be through direct military action.  Which is why wars are created by displays of weakness rather than strength.

What I find fascinating here, though, is that Biden appears to be indirectly acknowledging that China is not our friend.  Perhaps, even, our enemy.  This is quite an admission from someone who says that the greatest threat to America is white supremacists in rural American states.

How many militant white supremacists are there in America?  Very hard to say.  Some, I suppose.  But if there are more than a few hundred, they keep an astonishingly low profile.  And this low profile calls into question the “militant” part.  But whatever.

How many servicemen are in the Chinese military?  Around 2.2 million.  Plus untold millions of reserves.  And they do not keep a low profile.

So why do Democrats fret about the domestic threat of white supremacists that few people have ever encountered, while ignoring the obvious threat of a hostile Chinese military with clear imperialistic goals?

First, remember that Democrats openly state that their goal is to “fundamentally transform America” into something other than what it is now.  Democrats have moved from closet liberals to open socialists in the past several years, and socialism does not fit with our Constitution or our culture.  So before Democrats can build the socialist Utopia they dream of, they must first destroy American culture as it is now.  And they have been openly working at this for some years now.

China has similar goals to American Democrats.  They find American culture etc to be a threat to their dreams of world domination.  America is not an imperialistic country – we briefly took over Iraq, Afghanistan, and other hotspots in the interest of safety, but they gave those countries back to their people.  China does things a bit differently.

But they can’t build a Chinese Utopia across the world until they first destroy American culture as it is now.

The Democrats understandably feel that the enemy of their enemy is their friend.  So they minimize our natural conflict with the Chinese.

But anyone who seeks to grab power needs an enemy.  Preferably an enemy that poses no real threat.  So white supremacists are a reasonable alternative for the Democrats.  After all, who cares if you lose a few hundred votes in the next election?

All of this probably makes sense in the Democrat strategy meetings in the nice, secure conference rooms of nice, secure hotels.  Meetings that are run by Ivy League graduates who all believe the one-world kumbaya peace movement stuff they were taught from kindergarten through graduate school.  So they ignore the Chinese, and attack whatever straw man seems least threatening at the time.  Makes sense.

Until the Chinese notice.  Then, feces gets real.

Even Jimmy Carter eventually figured out that his fellow socialists in the Soviet Union were not his friends.  Jimmy Carter.

Will Joe Biden and his handlers figure this out in time?

Clarence Thomas and I are not optimistic…

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 38 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Old Bathos (View Comment):
    Lefties don’t want there to be genuine external enemies. They loved to huff and puff about apartheid South Africa or Pinochet but confronting those who might hit back is too real, too outside comfortable narratives.

    Those were genuine external enemies. To the Left. Apartheid South Africa was a very active opponent of the USSR, and Pinochet took down a major Leftist advance in the Americas.

    Stina (View Comment):
    China has never been OUR friend, but it has not been clear until recently that China was an enemy of the globalist initiative. Xi’s recent statements on instating nationalist values to inform their policies places them in direct opposition to the global WEF or whatever is animating the destructive march towards a border less world

    The transnational fascists of the Party of Davos  can get along with national fascists Xi and his ilk a lot better than either can with Western nationalism. I think that Xi’s ambitions are less. . . global. The globalists and Xi use, or are developing, similar means of controlling their populations.  Each has their allies in the legislatures and administrative apparatuses of the EU, its members, as well as in the US Congress, the US intelligence establishment, the Federal bureaucracy, and many if not most of the large state legislatures and their organs of the administrative state. Both also have major influence on K-12 and higher education throughout the West. Both are fine with exploiting the developing world, and neither has much compunction about killing a lot of people. They may, ultimately, have an existential struggle, but for now, the transnational criminal organizations are likely to divvy up the globe into two or three spheres of influence without too much trouble.

    Think of this DEA map:DEA map cartel influence in US

    Of course,

    . . .operatives for the Sinaloa cartel and Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación interviewed by Insider said their organizations maintained “only clients or helpers” across the border and “not members of our organization.” They spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal.

    “You would never see anyone in the US saying they are part of the organization because that is bulls—,” a Sinaloa cartel operative told Insider. “The members and leaders of the organization are in Mexico, not in the US. What we have there are clients or associates, people helping transport, or gang members working with us.”

    The operative said most of the gangs or “associates” in the US worked as independents.

    Others say that at present, the cartels do operate across the US, but with a different business structure that emphasizes brand identity rather than paramilitary control.

    And that the map is DEA [expletive] used to justify the DEA’s budget.

    • #31
  2. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Lefties don’t want there to be genuine external enemies. They loved to huff and puff about apartheid South Africa or Pinochet but confronting those who might hit back is too real, too outside comfortable narratives. If there are real enemies out there then patriotism might matter, military service might be more important than academic tenure or fake moral superiority and the whole reality thing might intrude on the word games about social constructs. Worst of all, they would be merely on one side instead of presumed judges of all things, hauled down into being mere Americans under shared threat.

    This could be it’s own post. Wonderfully stated.

    • #32
  3. GlennAmurgis Coolidge
    GlennAmurgis
    @GlennAmurgis

    Makes you wonder what the CCP have on Hunter Biden

     

    • #33
  4. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    Dr. Bastiat: But anyone who seeks to grab power needs an enemy.  Preferably an enemy that poses no real threat.  So white supremacists are a reasonable alternative for the Democrats.  After all, who cares if you lose a few hundred votes in the next election?

    Brilliant insight.  (I’m going to steal it.)

    • #34
  5. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    MILITANT white supremacists? Well, if they have half a brain they will do every thing they can to keep it hidden – so I can’t really address your guesstimate.

    I don’t know white supremacists. I would appreciate if you describe them to me.

    They look a lot like for folks running the DOJ, the FBI, and the IRS.

    • #35
  6. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Reminds me of a quick story about this guy.

    We were drinking around the fire behind his trailer on another night, and he said, “I’ll bet you $5 that you can cut that beer can in half, and I can weld it back together, and it won’t leak.”

    He’s a welder, and I know he’s good at his job. But geez. So I take the bet.

    He was so drunk that he stumbled as he pulled the gear out of his truck. But he did it. He welded aluminum that is so thin that you can tear it with your hands. Amazing.

    Unrelated, but amazing.

    Never mind…

    Impressive.  And while stumbling drunk?  He must be a welder’s Mozart.

    • #36
  7. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Reminds me of a quick story about this guy.

    We were drinking around the fire behind his trailer on another night, and he said, “I’ll bet you $5 that you can cut that beer can in half, and I can weld it back together, and it won’t leak.”

    He’s a welder, and I know he’s good at his job. But geez. So I take the bet.

    He was so drunk that he stumbled as he pulled the gear out of his truck. But he did it. He welded aluminum that is so thin that you can tear it with your hands. Amazing.

    Unrelated, but amazing.

    Never mind…

    Impressive. And while stumbling drunk? He must be a welder’s Mozart.

    It was amazing to watch.  The dude is good.

    He welds all sorts of specialty metals in power plants and places like that.  

    • #37
  8. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Reminds me of a quick story about this guy.

    We were drinking around the fire behind his trailer on another night, and he said, “I’ll bet you $5 that you can cut that beer can in half, and I can weld it back together, and it won’t leak.”

    He’s a welder, and I know he’s good at his job. But geez. So I take the bet.

    He was so drunk that he stumbled as he pulled the gear out of his truck. But he did it. He welded aluminum that is so thin that you can tear it with your hands. Amazing.

    Unrelated, but amazing.

    Never mind…

    Impressive. And while stumbling drunk? He must be a welder’s Mozart.

    It was amazing to watch.  The dude is good.

    He welds all sorts of specialty metals in power plants and places like that.  

    • #38
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.