Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
13 Republican Congressmen Save Pelosi, Biden on $1.2T Infrastructure Vote
Six Democrats voted against the $1.2 trillion Bipartisan Infrastructure Plan (BIF) late Friday night, which should have killed the legislation. Instead, 13 Republicans rode to Nancy Pelosi’s rescue and voted yes. The BIF passed the Senate nearly two months ago, so the legislation will head straight to the White House for the President’s signature.
Here are the Republicans for Pelosi:
- Rep. Don Bacon (R–NE)
- Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R–PA)
- Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R–NY)
- Rep. Anthony Gonzalez (R–OH)
- Rep. John Katko (R–NY)
- Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R–IL)
- Rep. Nicole Malliatokis (R–NY)
- Rep. David McKinley (R–WV)
- Rep. Tom Reed (R–NY)
- Rep. Chris Smith (R–NJ)
- Rep. Fred Upton (R–MI)
- Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R–NJ)
- Rep. Don Young (R–AK)
Despite Democrats not having the necessary support, the final vote was 228-206 thanks to these 13 Republicans. Each should be primaried, at least those who aren’t retiring. And it’s time for Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R–CA) to be removed as House Minority Leader since he has demonstrated brutal incompetence.
For the record, here are the six Democrats who voted against the bill:
- Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D–NY)
- Rep. Cori Bush (D–MO)
- Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–NY)
- Rep. Ilhan Omar (D–MN)
- Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D–MA)
- Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D–MI)
That’s a good story. I’m sure he was an extremely unpleasant person.
a combination of both.
That is how it should be done.
It could also be that instead of worshipping the market, they exploit it.
The idea that pork is all wasteful spending is wrong. It is used to get votes, but the projects often have merit.
The problem is we don’t have free markets.
He is a fool for thinking that welfare has much to do with that. Also, I wouldn’t call China communist. The US also has low birth-rates, and an outside observer could say, “Young people in America don’t want to procreate because they decided they are going to work minimally and not procreate workers for a corporation or small business tyrant.”
Fair enough, China is really a bunch of effing mafia. For the purposes of this conversation, I don’t think it matters. I am only repeating what one analyst said about the term lying flat. You are making some great big deal comparison between the United States and China and I am not. It’s gratuitous.
ChinaCop.
It doesn’t take out the political element. It only disguises it as a computer issue. The computer program needs instructions as to which factors to consider, and those are political choices. And then what do you do when the computer program comes up with ten possible redistrictings that all meet the politically agreed-upon criteria? Start tossing a coin?
They need to double the size of the house of representatives.
I have zero faith in any initiative which changes anything anywhere. Our own party is co-opted by the Democrats — everything which changes will just turn to garbage. There is no one to bell the cat.
Delegate it to a panel of academics with the computer and allow for the legislature to vote on it. If it fails to get a majority vote, then leave the districts unchanged. Are there any legal issues with this?
This is EXACTLY the wrong idea for a Republic.
BFD. In China, fascists call themselves “Communists”. In the U.S., fascists call themselves “progressives”.
I think the Chinese government is most realistically described as fascist or mafia. Nobody ever talks like that, though.
You’ve just described about 1% of all welfare cases. The overwhelming amount of welfare goes to people who either don’t feel like getting off their ass to go find a job, or who don’t need the money in the first place. Fully 1/3 of all Americans are receiving welfare from the government currently. That specifically does not include Social Security payments. Entitlement programs take up 2/3rds of the Federal spending. This is appalling. We have grown into a European-type welfare state, just not to the level that Europeans have so far.
That would include what supports? It sounds quite high.
Lots of people receive food stamps, not so much “direct payments” or “cash.”
I have no idea what your sentence means or has to do with the topic.
Democrats today support a huge centralized federal government that controls every little stinkin’ aspect of people’s lives. This is at odds with freedom. They wish to impose their dominion and their will over everyone (Blacks included) to an inordinate degree. The only two areas where Democrats support freedom is the freedom to take narcotic drugs (except cigarettes of course!) and the freedom to murder unborn children (though it has accelerated now into support for killing newborn infants). You might even include the freedom to “loot and riot” now.
https://www.realvision.com/shows/mike-green-in-conversation/videos/is-the-golden-age-of-liberal-capitalism-over
That would be big news to just about every other person on Earth.
China really is authoritarian capitalist with some socialist history and lag these days.
The U.S. doesn’t have particularly low birth rates. They are just a smidgen below or at replacement rate. And most of the people having babies are not rich. The birth rate among the rich in America is very low.
I’m enjoying the Commie-splaining that China isn’t Communist.
You said that the only difference was that Democrats wanted to impose their dominion over Blacks at the federal level instead of at the state level, which would imply that you think the Democratic Party still wants small government and an alliance with classical liberals.
When I first discovered this, I was blown away, too. But nobody else seems to care about it and so it is not widely publicized. Even when I’ve mentioned it before on this forum nobody seems to notice. Here are just a couple of links to back this up.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2012/09/romney-says-47-percent-of-americans-receive-direct-government-assistance-is-that-true.html
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/521-percent-kids-live-households-getting-means-tested-government/
Forbes magazine estimates that if you include entitlement programs like Social Security, then more than half of Americans are now getting payments from the government as of 2014.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/merrillmatthews/2014/07/02/weve-crossed-the-tipping-point-most-americans-now-receive-government-benefits/?sh=29df9f2f3e6c
I live in a poor big city, which is not representative of the rest of America (though it is of big cities), but at my local grocery store, fully half of all shoppers pay for their food with a government credit card. but don’t take my word on this. Go looking up the statistics for yourself. It is eye-opening!
It doesn’t matter if it is in the form of cash or food stamps. It is still a transfer of real wealth to individuals who did not earn it.
Though not perfect, that might actually be better than the political gerrymandering that we have now(?)