When Every Death Is a Morality Play

 

One of the worst parts of the pandemic was its timing. Had it occurred at any time other than an election year things may have been remarkably different. It may not have been done in a conspiratorial manner, but it was universally accepted that part of the story was going to be told to maximize Covid-19’s political impact.

Every failure point had to be framed as being due to Donald Trump’s incompetence, therefore every death from the disease was going to be portrayed as a preventable human tragedy. Trump did not follow the science and now these people are dead. And we will tell you each of their stories, every single one as an individual morality play and all with the same moral: Trump kills.

Then something happened. Operation Warp Speed actually produced three “vaccines.” I use that word in quotes because they are not vaccines as we traditionally understood them, but rather an artificially produced prophylactic trick. The introduction of this “miracle” was delayed until after the election lest the news impact voting in Trump’s favor.

But there is a problem. Now that Biden (or whoever is really in charge) is ensconced in the White House, how do you dismiss deathly reactions to the vaccines as insignificant when you’ve already established that every single death is a moral tragedy? Take these two stories:

“Unvaxxed mother other of two, 35, dies of Covid, urges others to get vaccinated with dying breath”

“Mother of three, 35, dies of stroke after second jab, husband says she was forced to take vaccine”

Two deaths, two widowers, all motherless children. If every death is a moral failing, how does one make a case that the latter is more insignificant than the former?

If Trump had won, it would have been so much easier. “See, the vaccines don’t work! Trump’s incompetence forced these to market too quickly! It’s all Trump’s fault because he is ignorant of science! Everybody knows it takes a minimum of six years to get a vaccine safely to market! The idiot!” So all they can do is downplay the adverse reactions and pretend they don’t exist.

This has happened before. As we gear up to vaccinate children and adolescents, Saskatchewan-based blogger Kate McMillan reminds us of the great Canadian Blood Scandal. At the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, public health officials in Canada ignored the evidence that HIV and Hepatitis C were rampant in the medical blood supply chain and they weren’t doing enough to screen it out. Journalist Vic Parsons watched as his son David, a hemophiliac, first learned that he was HIV-positive in 1986 at the tender age of 15.

In a review of Parson’s book, Bad Blood, the Canadian Encyclopedia contains this passage:

Safety was second to budget trimming, Parsons contends. Turf wars buried scientific data that alerted blood agencies to potential dangers. Hemophiliacs, who became the miners’ canaries of the blood system, were themselves self-destructively passive. At every turn, writes Parsons, “eyes were shut to mounting evidence, until it was too late.”

And so McMillan asks the following, “Should it come to pass – say in five years time – that there’s a spike in leukemia, rare cancers, autoimmune disease or other long term side effects in these children that no one could have foreseen (because no one did long term trials) — what’s the game plan?

“I mean, surely there’s a game plan?”

Will this become a morality play or just a game of statistics?

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 38 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Percival (View Comment):

    Notice they use both the terms “equity and equality”.  Maybe they’re just touching all rhetorical bases. But I wonder if Psaki could explain for us the difference.

    • #31
  2. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Steven Seward (View Comment):

    I think Biden is backed into a Coronavirus corner from which he cannot escape. The Democrats and the media have so successfully convinced the American public of the terrifying dangers of Covid, that Biden can never declare victory over the virus. If he does, millions of lefties will be up in arms over his endangering the public. Thus, the “revolution” against this scourge must continue in perpetuity, the same way that Castro had to continue his “revolution” into the 21st Century, even though he won the war 50 years earlier. Same phenomenon with Global Warming. The fight must continue no matter what the outcome, even if the World gets too cold. It is the fight and unwarranted panic that keeps leftists voting, not any demonstrably beneficial outcomes.

    That’s an interesting thought. I’ve always figured that all the government would have to do was spend a month suggesting and the telling people that the pandemic is waning and success is being gauged in lives saved rather than lives lost (or some such) and people would be happy to go back to their normal lives.

    But you sound like you’re saying covid is more like a department or an entitlement or a bureaucracy, that once opened, it can’t be shut down. That means that people would really rather maintain their secondary gains, as they’re called, then return to normal.

    Yes! I like your characterization in the part that I bolded. I don’t think democrats can unravel themselves from the mess they’ve made. I know too many democrats, even in my own family, that are permanently spooked by the hype of the pandemic, and they may or may not ever go back to their normal way of life again. For many people, the genie cannot be put back into the bottle. Biden (and some democrat governors) simply can never claim an end to the pandemic because their base would cry bloody murder. They must continue the “Revolucion!”

    If this is so, you understand this a sickness, right? :)

    Well, didn’t Michael Savage write a book called “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder?”

    Got me.  I didn’t believe him then.

    • #32
  3. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Flicker (View Comment):
    That’s an interesting thought.  I’ve always figured that all the government would have to do was spend a month suggesting and the telling people that the pandemic is waning and success is being gauged in lives saved rather than lives lost (or some such) and people would be happy to go back to their normal lives.

    I fully expected that in November last year. The press pegged the fear needle for seven months and helped steal the election for their guy. Now, I assumed, they’d want to prepare the battlefield for their conquering hero to save the day. As EJ mentioned, the vaccine announcement was delayed until the Monday after election day. The press needed to let off the pedal and begin bringing people off the ledge. That way, by January people wouldn’t be as afraid of Kung Flu and by February Biden would have saved the nation. Instead they kept the pedal down and now Brandon Weinstein has implemented his No Jab, No Job policy.

    • #33
  4. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    In updated news, the FDA approved EUA vaccines for ages 5-11. They admitted to not knowing the long term effects and said how could they if they don’t do this?

    We’re now lab rats.

    True fact. I understand that European nations are watching to see how our kids react before jabbing theirs.

    Giving children — who are least-likely to suffer any effects from COVID — these “vaccines” is monstrous.

    I weep for the children whose parents anxiously await their opportunity to force these damn things on their kids.

    • #34
  5. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf: I weep for the children whose parents anxiously await their opportunity to force these damn things on their kids.

    And when the first of those parents tries to sue Big Pharma for the side effects and they’re told there is no legal recourse?

    • #35
  6. Annefy Member
    Annefy
    @Annefy

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    In updated news, the FDA approved EUA vaccines for ages 5-11. They admitted to not knowing the long term effects and said how could they if they don’t do this?

    We’re now lab rats.

    True fact. I understand that European nations are watching to see how our kids react before jabbing theirs.

    Giving children — who are least-likely to suffer any effects from COVID — these “vaccines” is monstrous.

    I weep for the children whose parents anxiously await their opportunity to force these damn things on their kids.

    I have a friend with a daughter who is as Covid paranoid as anyone I’ve met or heard of. My friend has gone along with all her daughter’s ridiculous demands without complaint (grandchildren are a helluva blackmail)

    My friend is horrified that her daughter plans to get the children (4 and 2) vaccinated as soon as possible. But after going along to get along for so long, there’s nothing that can be said to change her mind.

    Horrifying.

    • #36
  7. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    EJHill (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf: I weep for the children whose parents anxiously await their opportunity to force these damn things on their kids.

    And when the first of those parents tries to sue Big Pharma for the side effects and they’re told there is no legal recourse?

    It ain’t gonna be pretty.

    May a trillion lawsuits bloom!

    • #37
  8. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Annefy (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):

    In updated news, the FDA approved EUA vaccines for ages 5-11. They admitted to not knowing the long term effects and said how could they if they don’t do this?

    We’re now lab rats.

    True fact. I understand that European nations are watching to see how our kids react before jabbing theirs.

    Giving children — who are least-likely to suffer any effects from COVID — these “vaccines” is monstrous.

    I weep for the children whose parents anxiously await their opportunity to force these damn things on their kids.

    I have a friend with a daughter who is as Covid paranoid as anyone I’ve met or heard of. My friend has gone along with all her daughter’s ridiculous demands without complaint (grandchildren are a helluva blackmail)

    My friend is horrified that her daughter plans to get the children (4 and 2) vaccinated as soon as possible. But after going along to get along for so long, there’s nothing that can be said to change her mind.

    Children are the least likely to be affected by COVID, but the ones most affected by the ridiculous edicts our Ruling Class has concocted.

     

     

    • #38
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.