Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Remembering Lot’s Wife with Every Offering
Sodom is being destroyed. Lot and his family are fleeing, and they have been strictly instructed to not look back. But Lot’s wife, for one reason or another, cannot control herself, and she is famously turned into a pillar of salt.
It sounds like a tragic but odd, and perhaps even irrelevant, story. After all, what can we learn from this vignette?
Quite a lot, it seems. Much later in the Torah, G-d instructs:
עַ֥ל כׇּל־קׇרְבָּנְךָ֖ תַּקְרִ֥יב מֶֽלַח׃ {ס} with all your offerings you must bring salt.
Why salt? With every single offering? What possible meaning is there in it?
The story of Lot’s wife gives us the answer: she looked back. And therein is our answer, because every sacrifice is always about finding a way to move forward – whether in thanksgiving or in atonement or for any of the other reasons we bring sacrifices. The G-d of the Torah is always interested in the future, and commands us to do similarly: it is one reason, for example, we are barred from marking mark ourselves for the dead.
We can only grow if we are able to put the past behind us, focus on doing better, and keeping our eyes focused on the goal. And to do that, we have salt present at every offering, to remind us of what happens when we decide to copy Lot’s wife by looking back at where we come from, instead of staying focused on where we need to go.
Remember, of course, that sacrifices are not for G-d – they are for us. To G-d, sacrifices are mere gestures, symbols of what we are feeling. The purpose of a sacrifice is to be able to grow from the past, to build a relationship going forward. And for that, we need to be reminded to keep our eyes on the future. We have salt present at each offering to help us remember that when we instead choose to live in the past, we are choosing what is ultimately a dead end.
[an @iwe and @blessedblacksmith work]
Published in General
Indeed.
Kol ha’kavod.
As we are reminded in the first chapter of Boston’s new Testament:
I’m no scholar, but I always took the story of Lot’s wife as an injunction against becoming paralyzed with indecision, hesitation, lack of commitment to a decision once made. You cannot leap a chasm in two short hops.
Lot’s wife is a foreshadow of the Exodus. Remember the grumbling in the wilderness? They wanted to go back. But you can’t go back, so stop looking back.
Also, see Luke 9:62.
Such great songs go with Lot and the Wilderness and now they are in my head.
So you want to go back to Egypt – Keith green
Painting Pictures of Egypt – Sara Groves
Burn the Ships – King & Country
Well, faith is in short order
And I thought this post was going to be about Washington.
Disappointed!
Too much salt is bad for you?
Interesting. At the same time, we are being destroyed by those who want to erase the past and gaze only at the future, a distant future to be sure and a familiar one, but a future free of accumulated human wisdom.
How bad are things that you would miss Sodom and Gomorrah and look back wistfully. In the worst neighborhoods in the poorest cities in the US do neighbors pound on the door and demand that your dinner guests be turned over to them for a gang rape? Yeah, but the schools had great SAT results and then there’s the shopping and the museums and the nightlife and I will really miss my therapist and my yoga instructor…
I never read much in the story of Lot’s wife except for the message that direct, precise, unambiguous divine instructions need to be followed.
I saw what you did there. It is a rather large metaphor for a sound philosophical concept. But there is more. The present is also fraught with horror. People are haunted by the past, but paralyzed by the present. Focus on the future; that is the only way to live. Faith is itself a dedication to the future; that whatever the future holds for us, if there is faith, good will prevail no matter how painful the present may be. Never despair.
I think it’s a story about how sexual abuse is bad. But I am not a Biblical literalist.
You notice how after Sodom and Gomorra, Lot has sex with his daughters? So there was horrible and systematic sexual abuse, the wife does not absolutely turn away from sexual abuse and when she dies Lott abuses his daughters.
As an amateur psychotherapist, I see a pattern similar to sexual abuse in a family and as an amateur anthropologist, I see the Jews turning away from a culture of raping boys. Go Jews!
The Torah does depict an Evil, vengeful God. Fortunately, it’s a fictional God.
HeavyWater has not read the Torah or has only done so superficially. Also, really, HW, what’s the point of making the other crack? Must you be the skunk at the garden party? I don’t understand entering a thread with a serious discussion on a religious topic to tell us how mad you are at God. In truth, that’s the only reason that makes sense. If you don’t believe, why comment among believers except to call attention to yourself for…why?
Dude. What’s the point?
He’s signaling the virtue he doesn’t have. He imagines himself intellectually superior. Try not to laugh.
Actually Lot doesn’t abuse his daughters (though offering them to the crowd wasn’t very fatherly). As the story goes, the daughters, fearing that the world has again been destroyed, think they need to repopulate it. On subsequent nights they get their father drunk and “lie” with him, producing the tribes of Moab and Ammon.
That’s a good point. Why did the women initiate horrible sexual practices? It’s a pretty odd story.
It’s possible Lot stopped trying to find them husbands. That’s left out of the story, though. Regardless, the women believed they would never be married and became desperate to provide for themselves. That’s what sons were – providers for their mothers.
Read it carefully. Lot closes the door behind him – he is mocking the crowd, telling them “I would just as soon offer you my daughters as give up my guests.”
Otherwise he would have brought them out for evaluation, or at least left the door open.
And it explains why the crowd responds NOT with “No, thank you. We’ll take the guests,” but with “How dare you!”
My brother argues that Sodom had lost interest in procreation, in investing in the future. So the daughters truly feared that there was nobody who was interested in making babies.
Their decision was poor, but it reflects the mindset of the town.
Fascinating.