The Drinker Cognate to Burge’s Axiom

 

David Burge has economically described the process by which leftists seize institutions.

The pattern has played out countless times as the left carried out the march through the institutions; taking over academia, media, deep state bureaucracies, until even the Boy Scouts, corporate boardrooms, and even churches have embraced left-wing social ideologies. Why do these institutions embrace the very people who have sworn their destruction? I can’t imagine. It’s like saying, “This is a lovely house, but what it really needs is a nest of scorpions in the living room.

As The Critical Drinker points out, this same sort of pattern has happened to formerly popular intellectual properties (Star Wars, Star Trek, James Bond, Terminator) courtesy of a left-wing Hollywood more interested in servicing The Agenda than providing entertainment.

Step. 1: Pick your target. (A popular cultural entertainment property with a legacy fan base)

Step 2: Lie about your attention. (Promise to “keep the spirit of what made it great” or something like that.)

Step 3: Modernize it. (Eviscerate the things that made the property popular, and replace it with representative intersectional marginalized characters and woke storylines.)

Step 4: When the reboot fails, blame the fans for being racist, sexist, or whatever.

Step 5: Move onto the next intellectual property, rinse and repeat.

.

Published in Entertainment
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 16 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    A profound insight expressed elegantly.

    • #1
  2. Kevin Schulte Member
    Kevin Schulte
    @KevinSchulte

    The left likes to remake everything in their image. So does Satan incidentally. Everything they touch ends up in hell on earth or hell in hell. Then they both blame the opposite side for their failings. I really believe the modern left is Satan’s emissary’s. They just don’t know it yet, but they will.  

    • #2
  3. Mark Alexander Inactive
    Mark Alexander
    @MarkAlexander

    • #3
  4. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    I think this is all spot on.

     

    That’s all I’ve got.

    Go away Now.

     

     

    • #4
  5. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Notice how the left rarely creates its own entities to compete with existing institutions.

    My guess is because once the left’s system is up and running against an existing thing, the average person can easily compare the two and see how flawed the leftist system really is.  Therefore, the goal is to take over the existing institution and kill it from within, while at the same time remolding it into what it wants (the “wearing of the skin”).

    This is why the Boy Scouts went gay, then coed.  I’m sure trans fits in there somewhere too.

     

    • #5
  6. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Victor Tango Kilo: Step 2: Lie about your attention. (Promise to “keep the spirit of what made it great” or something like that.)

    I think you mean “intention”. Attention is similar to noticing things. Intention is more analogous to the examples you cite.

    • #6
  7. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo: Step 2: Lie about your attention. (Promise to “keep the spirit of what made it great” or something like that.)

    I think you mean “intention”. Attention is similar to noticing things. Intention is more analogous to the examples you cite.

    It’s okay.  I use the wong word every now and them myself . . .

    • #7
  8. Kephalithos Member
    Kephalithos
    @Kephalithos

    There’s also a fifth step: Describe any criticism of this process as “anti-American.” Point at conservatives who complain about it and say, “Look! They’re not conservatives! See? Conservatives want to conserve things, and these so-called ‘conservatives’ just want to burn them down.” Get David French to write something to this effect.

    • #8
  9. Stina Inactive
    Stina
    @CM

    Kephalithos (View Comment):

    There’s also a fifth step: Describe any criticism of this process as “anti-American.” Point at conservatives who complain about it and say, “Look! They’re not conservatives! See? Conservatives want to conserve things, and these so-called ‘conservatives’ just want to burn them down.” Get David French to write something to this effect.

    Yup. And there certainly exist conservatives who will fight to conserve corrupt institutions because they think the institution is too important even if it is corrupt. McCarthy vs the FBI is a great example of this.

    • #9
  10. Rightfromthestart Coolidge
    Rightfromthestart
    @Rightfromthestart

    They demand entry to these institutions on the grounds of ‘fairness’ , that their views are not bring represented. With good intentions the institutions say ‘come in, we’re open to all views’. Once in they use the same technique to gain control. Once in control they only hire their own and lock the door to all other views on the grounds that those views are  of racist , sexist , xenophobic etc. 

    • #10
  11. Mark Alexander Inactive
    Mark Alexander
    @MarkAlexander

    From Iowahawk’s Twitter feed.

    • #11
  12. Ammo.com Member
    Ammo.com
    @ammodotcom

    Kevin Schulte (View Comment):

    The left likes to remake everything in their image. So does Satan incidentally. Everything they touch ends up in hell on earth or hell in hell. Then they both blame the opposite side for their failings. I really believe the modern left is Satan’s emissary’s. They just don’t know it yet, but they will.

    The ones calling the shots know it perfectly. The blind followers, who do fervently do evil under the impression that they are doing good, are probably too dull to ever have a moment of truth.

    • #12
  13. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Victor Tango Kilo: James Bond

    Who is now a woman, apparently.

    • #13
  14. Kevin Schulte Member
    Kevin Schulte
    @KevinSchulte

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo: James Bond

    Who is now a woman, apparently.

    I will throw that one with the rest of the woke crap in my mental incinerator.

    Hell no , not now, not ever.

    • #14
  15. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo: James Bond

    Who is now a woman, apparently.

    No doubt systemic racism will be blamed if the film flops.  Just like the all-female version of Ghostbusters . . .

    • #15
  16. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Victor Tango Kilo: James Bond

    Who is now a woman, apparently.

    Ah, but will she still be a ladies girl? (or however they phrase it.)

    • #16
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.