BRCC False Flag Operation: I Thought So

 

When the uproar started about Black Rifle Coffee Company’s CEO supposedly badmouthing conservatives, I thought it smelled like a typical false flag operation designed to tear down a conservative company or institution. Now it seems that the NY Times interview of CEO Evan Hafer was selectively edited to change the context of his words…surprise, surprise.

The interviewer got Hafer talking about when he was personally attacked for having a Jewish-sounding last name, and then used his words to make it seem Hafer was talking about conservatives in general.

When are we going to learn? Robert Heinlein wrote about exactly this sort of stuff in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, for crying out loud.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 57 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Goldgeller Member
    Goldgeller
    @Goldgeller

     

    Douglas Pratt (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Before today, I’d never heard of this guy or his coffee, I just stumbled on this issue because I heard him being interviewed this morning. But man, folks can get all worked up over a coffee company, especially folks who don’t even drink coffee. I’m thinking of trying some, just to see if it’s any good.

     

    What roasts do you like? I like their Silencer Smooth. And I have a stash of CAF for days that require it.

    I do Silencer Smooth and Just Black and I’ve enjoyed them.

    • #31
  2. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Make good coffee. And keep your mouth shut.

    • #32
  3. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    At the end of the day the company retweeted the article. By definition if you retweet an article you support and advertise that article.

    If you don’t support that article then what you should say is somebody in our social media department or the social media company we employ retweeted that as a matter of course but we now disavow that article.

    He is the CEO and he is responsible for everything that his company does

     CEOs responsible for everything their companies do and if you’re not willing to accept that responsibility is the CEO frankly you have no business being a CEO.

    • #33
  4. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    And for such a bunch of hard guys they’re Twitter is busy blocking people for criticism.

    So you have people who trade on being veterans and making a big deal about being veterans but they are blocking people on Twitter who say things they don’t like. 

    Unless all of those people are unblocked unless they’re Twitter reflects the rest of the message that they’re saying I don’t believe them.

     

    • #34
  5. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    At the end of the day the company retweeted the article. By definition if you retweet an article you support and advertise that article.

    Or mock it and offer it up for ridicule?

    • #35
  6. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    At the end of the day the company retweeted the article. By definition if you retweet an article you support and advertise that article.

    Or mock it and offer it up for ridicule?

    That is not what they did.

    • #36
  7. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Barfly (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):
    I don’t know of Black Rifle was trying to brand itself conservative or if it simply had an appeal to conservatives.

    C’mon, man. It’s not the Birkenstock and Prius Coffee Co.

    You have a point.

    • #37
  8. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    At the end of the day the company retweeted the article. By definition if you retweet an article you support and advertise that article.

    Or mock it and offer it up for ridicule?

    That is not what they did.

    I was taking issue with your definition that a retweet necessarily implies agreement with the retweeted tweet. I can’t believe I just wrote that.

    • #38
  9. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    At the end of the day the company retweeted the article. By definition if you retweet an article you support and advertise that article.

    Or mock it and offer it up for ridicule?

    That is not what they did.

    I was taking issue with your definition that a retweet necessarily implies agreement with the retweeted tweet. I can’t believe I just wrote that.

    A blind retweet. Sort of thought that part went without saying. I forget how pedantic Ricochet members are. Points for your gotcha.

    • #39
  10. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    At the end of the day the company retweeted the article. By definition if you retweet an article you support and advertise that article.

    Or mock it and offer it up for ridicule?

    That is not what they did.

    I was taking issue with your definition that a retweet necessarily implies agreement with the retweeted tweet. I can’t believe I just wrote that.

    A blind retweet. Sort of thought that part went without saying. I forget how pedantic Ricochet members are. Points for your gotcha.

    Nous?

    • #40
  11. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Hafer is playing a dangerous game and not playing it all that well. His company is a lifestyle brand that will flop the moment the buzz and image about the company stop comporting with its actions. My personal view is that any conservative giving an interview to the New York Times or Washington Post deserves whatever happens to them. In this case, the variance between Hafer’s version of events and the article is serious enough that some sort of clarification needs to be issued in writing by someone. On the plus side, you can see the traces of Hafer’s version of events in the New York Times Magazine story, but they aren’t always easy to find. The question is, how much longer will Black Rifle Coffee’s customers continue to take Hafer at his word?

    After their response to the Rittenhouse situation, no one should take them at at their word.  Its like believing John McCain when he said ‘build the dang fence’ or ‘I oppose Obamacare’.

     

     

    • #41
  12. Graham Witt Coolidge
    Graham Witt
    @hoowitts

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    His company is a lifestyle brand that will flop the moment the buzz and image about the company stop comporting with its actions. My personal view is that any conservative giving an interview to the New York Times or Washington Post deserves whatever happens to them.

    I am surprised by the level of ‘benefit of the doubt’ being expressed for BRCC.  These are not a bunch of twits running a company who are new to the game.  Established in 2014, they’ve actively and consciously built their brand through two divisive elections, intentionally marketing to one side of our country’s current political divide. As someone who’s sucked down way too much coffee in a Humvee, that advertising connection was unmistakable and effective. But so is their business acumen, at least up to this point.  WTH were they thinking?  Even a cursory overview of NYT reporting on conservatives show they do not operate in good faith. Question anything the NYT or Wapo prints – absolutely. But I lack any sympathy for BRCC providing opportunity to a known quantity.  This was either the biggest brain-fart ever or we now are witnessing their true convictions. I don’t see another option.  Either way they can find sympathy between s#!+ and syphilis in the dictionary.

    • #42
  13. Eugene Kriegsmann Member
    Eugene Kriegsmann
    @EugeneKriegsmann

    I buy my coffee beans from an outfit in Minnesota. I have no idea what their politics are, nor do I care. The beans are roasted and shipped with 24 hours of when I place my order. They arrive at my home in 2 to 3 days. They make the best espresso I have ever made, and they are less expensive the BRCC. My sense is that BRCC set itself up to be a counter to Starbucks. Their approach to marketing is similar but aimed at the other end of the political spectrum which includes cups and other related equipment with the brand proudly displayed. 

    I don’t make a habit of advertising my politics or my various forms of self-defense. I find the entire display thing to be a bit gauche. Anyone who would like to test my security systems is welcome to find out what I have available, though I wouldn’t particularly recommend it.

    I think that it is likely that Hafer was deliberately misquoted, but, frankly, I don’t care. I don’t care much about his company. I find his advertising a bit too much, an obvious ploy to use political issues to sell a product completely unrelated to politics. I don’t like that approach no matter which side chooses to use it. I don’t drink Coke or the company’s other products, but not because of its political stance. What I buy is the best product in any given arena based on its proven performance, not the politics of its management. I am really tired of the entire corruption of our system into a them vs. us contest.

    • #43
  14. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Graham Witt (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    His company is a lifestyle brand that will flop the moment the buzz and image about the company stop comporting with its actions. My personal view is that any conservative giving an interview to the New York Times or Washington Post deserves whatever happens to them.

    I am surprised by the level of ‘benefit of the doubt’ being expressed for BRCC. These are not a bunch of twits running a company who are new to the game. Established in 2014, they’ve actively and consciously built their brand through two divisive elections, intentionally marketing to one side of our country’s current political divide. As someone who’s sucked down way too much coffee in a Humvee, that advertising connection was unmistakable and effective. But so is their business acumen, at least up to this point. WTH were they thinking? Even a cursory overview of NYT reporting on conservatives show they do not operate in good faith. Question anything the NYT or Wapo prints – absolutely. But I lack any sympathy for BRCC providing opportunity to a known quantity. This was either the biggest brain-fart ever or we now are witnessing their true convictions. I don’t see another option. Either way they can find sympathy between s#!+ and syphilis in the dictionary.

    Yep

    • #44
  15. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    These guys are ex-military.  The military supports the government and those in power / control of it.  So the military is effectively ran by the Democrats.  It proved that this past January when it sent 30k soldiers to install Biden as POTUS.  Anybody that thinks the military or any of its personnel current or former support conservatives when push comes to shove is mistaken.   

    • #45
  16. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    I just watched 10 minutes ago Robert Barnes, Kyle Rittenhouse’s public relations lawyer call out BRCC as an exploitive shill who is attempting to do damage control, and fully blamed them for throwing KR under the bus.

    Seems pretty case closed to me that BRCC is being faux-right wing.  Blocking Cernovich and Schlicter on Twitter is pretty much game over for that company.

    • #46
  17. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    I just watched 10 minutes ago Robert Barnes, Kyle Rittenhouse’s public relations lawyer call out BRCC as an exploitive shill who is attempting to do damage control, and fully blamed them for throwing KR under the bus.

    Seems pretty case closed to me that BRCC is being faux-right wing. Blocking Cernovich and Schlicter on Twitter is pretty much game over for that company.

    Is Robert Barnes representing Kyle Rittenhouse?  I was very worried for him when Robert Barnes turned out to be right about Lin Wood, but I feel a little better if Barnes is representing his interests (and advising him on defense attorneys).

    Frankly, at this point only a full-throated endorsement of Kyle Rittenhouse’s innocence (and partial funding for his defense) would redeem the brand in my eyes-its too late for them to claim that they want to keep out of politics, they already crossed the line.

    • #47
  18. Rightfromthestart Coolidge
    Rightfromthestart
    @Rightfromthestart

    That was my first thought also. 

    • #48
  19. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    And for such a bunch of hard guys they’re Twitter is busy blocking people for criticism.

    So you have people who trade on being veterans and making a big deal about being veterans but they are blocking people on Twitter who say things they don’t like.

    Buh buh but vetewans habe feewings too-oo!

    • #49
  20. Graham Witt Coolidge
    Graham Witt
    @hoowitts

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    And for such a bunch of hard guys they’re Twitter is busy blocking people for criticism.

    So you have people who trade on being veterans and making a big deal about being veterans but they are blocking people on Twitter who say things they don’t like.

    Buh buh but vetewans habe feewings too-oo!

    Fits right in with the new Woke doctrine. Taking notes from CIA recruitment for new dog tags: ” I am a cisgender millennial who’s been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder. I am intersectional, but my existence is not a box-checking exercise.”

    • #50
  21. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    I just watched 10 minutes ago Robert Barnes, Kyle Rittenhouse’s public relations lawyer call out BRCC as an exploitive shill who is attempting to do damage control, and fully blamed them for throwing KR under the bus.

    Seems pretty case closed to me that BRCC is being faux-right wing. Blocking Cernovich and Schlicter on Twitter is pretty much game over for that company.

    This says it for me too. 

    By their actions I shall know them.

    They went after a market by lying. Kind of like a GOP politician lying to get through the primary.

    • #51
  22. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    I just watched 10 minutes ago Robert Barnes, Kyle Rittenhouse’s public relations lawyer call out BRCC as an exploitive shill who is attempting to do damage control, and fully blamed them for throwing KR under the bus.

    Seems pretty case closed to me that BRCC is being faux-right wing. Blocking Cernovich and Schlicter on Twitter is pretty much game over for that company.

    Is Robert Barnes representing Kyle Rittenhouse? I was very worried for him when Robert Barnes turned out to be right about Lin Wood, but I feel a little better if Barnes is representing his interests (and advising him on defense attorneys).

    Frankly, at this point only a full-throated endorsement of Kyle Rittenhouse’s innocence (and partial funding for his defense) would redeem the brand in my eyes-its too late for them to claim that they want to keep out of politics, they already crossed the line.

    Yep

    • #52
  23. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Graham Witt (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    And for such a bunch of hard guys they’re Twitter is busy blocking people for criticism.

    So you have people who trade on being veterans and making a big deal about being veterans but they are blocking people on Twitter who say things they don’t like.

    Buh buh but vetewans habe feewings too-oo!

    Fits right in with the new Woke doctrine. Taking notes from CIA recruitment for new dog tags: ” I am a cisgender millennial who’s been diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder. I am intersectional, but my existence is not a box-checking exercise.”

    Amen

    • #53
  24. Roderic Coolidge
    Roderic
    @rhfabian

    Douglas Pratt: Now it seems that the NY Times interview of CEO Evan Hafer was selectively edited to change the context of his words…surprise, surprise.

    BRC reminds me of Christian Brothers Auto, an automotive repair shop chain here in Texas that makes a big deal out of their Christian identity, including having big open Bibles on the counter top in their reception area.  Then they overcharge you for all the work they do.  

    Forgetaboutit.  I’ll buy Peet’s coffee regardless of the politics.  And I don’t want to know about the religious identity of the auto repair shop I use.

    • #54
  25. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    DonG (2+2=5. Say it!) (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):
    I heard him interviewed on Larry O’Connor’s WMAL show this morning, and he said his company is not “political;” neither conservative nor liberal. He said he doesn’t check into the political donations of his employees.

    Are we at a point where being apolitical is actually a political stance?

    In the Soviet Union, being apolitical was a way to get your music group banned.

    • #55
  26. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Douglas Pratt (View Comment):

    OldPhil (View Comment):

    Before today, I’d never heard of this guy or his coffee, I just stumbled on this issue because I heard him being interviewed this morning. But man, folks can get all worked up over a coffee company, especially folks who don’t even drink coffee. I’m thinking of trying some, just to see if it’s any good.

     

    What roasts do you like? I like their Silencer Smooth. And I have a stash of CAF for days that require it.

    My wife and I especially like the “Papua New Guinea Baroida Morita” in my most recent order from Gillespie Coffee.  In addition to roasting coffee to order (roasting your batch when you order and shipping immediately) Gillespie is a full-time Lutheran pastor of the LCMS. LCMS pastors tend to be conservative, but some are more so than others. Dunno if he has any guns, but I have known a lot of Lutheran pastors who do.  Gillespie coffee is expensive, so we don’t order it all the time.  The coffees I are often $16 for 12 oz., and $46 for 2.2 lb.  In my latest order I got 12 oz of the Papua New Guinea, and 2.2 lb of “Burundi Monge Murambi Hill.”  I should have done it the other way around, but it’s OK. 

    I alternate between fresh-roasted coffee from Gillespie and S&W Craft Roasting, which is good, too, and not quite as expensive. It’s a bigger operation, and I suspect (judging by the roast dates on our bags of coffee) that they interpret “roast to order” a little more generously, in their own favor.

    And in between times we sometimes get single-origin coffee from Meijer’s Grocery Store. That isn’t fresh roasted, but is cheaper and sometimes is decent enough. Our Rep. Peter Meijer is a GOPe-style Republican. Dunno about where he stands on 2A, but I would be wary.  He will have primary opponents, and I will be giving them a close look.  (He was censored by our county GOP organization because of his vote to impeach Trump, but I suspect some of the same people who voted to censor him will vote for him for re-election.  It may depend on the quality of his primary opponents.)

    Also, a neighbor down the road now roasts coffee, which he sells in 8 oz bags for $8.  Sometimes his lighter roasts are pretty good, up there with the best. He and his wife have a roadside stand at which they sell miscellaneous veggies and free-range eggs, so we get all our eggs there now. If I want coffee I just text him to ask if he has any fresh roasted, and if so he puts it out for me.  They also sell at a couple of local farmers markets, but they don’t do mail order.  They don’t seem like 2A people, but I really don’t know.  We haven’t had a chance to meet them in person yet. 

    • #56
  27. Douglas Pratt Coolidge
    Douglas Pratt
    @DouglasPratt

    We have a really good local roaster, Joe Bean in Rochester. They single source directly from farmers, and I get a bag of their beans when they come up with something new. They tend to be lighter roasts but they are very good.

    I also have the advantage of a son who runs a production line at the Starbucks factory in Seattle. I get CARE packages on a regular basis. Life is good.

     

    • #57
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.