Quote of the Day: Waging War on our Schools

 

“If the state-operated schools are now waging war on the nation’s moral, historical, philosophical, and religious foundations, then they would seem to have forfeited their legitimacy as the proper vehicle to carry out the mission with which the American People have charged them.”  — Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr

At first glance, we might not be willing to blame the state school administrators and unions for hijacking our schools so drastically and at so many levels. But, in fact, they have armed themselves with Leftist rhetoric, distortions of history, substituted an American philosophy with a racist ideology and regularly denigrated and undermined religion in multiple ways.

We tend to focus on the latest hot topic of school abuse: at the moment, Critical Race Theory is at the forefront. For many years this topic was taught without the parents or general public even knowing what children were being taught. Then some parents learned what was happening, most recently in Loudoun County in Virginia, and began protesting the brainwashing of their children with this propaganda. At first, the Left tried to explain what they were “actually” teaching; their explanations only inflamed parents. Then they denied they were teaching what parents insisted they were teaching. Now, they are trying to make believe that there’s nothing untoward going on; they are silent as protests continue. But their silence only validates their anti-American intentions.

Meanwhile, attacks abound on the other fronts mentioned: traditional morality is openly ridiculed in the face of moral relativism; the 1619 project continues to be part of the curriculum indoctrination, even though respected historians have pointed out its many omissions and errors; philosophy is buried in the doctrine of the Leftist ideology of equity, inclusion, and diversity; and religion is discredited as primitive myth. Essentially, school children are being flooded at every level of their education, which not only undermines the education process but creates tensions between the students and their parents, as both groups try to make sense of what is going on.

One thing is certain: public schools’ powers need to be denied or circumvented if we are to survive this assault on our beliefs and practices. It will be difficult, but we have no choice. We can no longer sit back and hope for the best. To the most ardent Leftist, this is the best way to transform America

By controlling our children.

Published in Education
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 76 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    Chuck (View Comment):

    Didn’t this start with John Dewey back in the 19th century?

    But under what common circumstance is it now reasonable to allow the state to take over the parent’s duty an responsibility for their children’s education?

    I regularly hear parents say how it’s not like that at my kid’s school: Really? Are you sure? How do you know?

    I ask. And I frequently discuss what they learned in class. And I see what their homework and study guides say. Part of my earlier comment is based on the fact that my kids are in fact learning math, science, reading, writing, history, music, art and languages. The bias can creep in, but there is still a curriculum focused on the subject matter they are supposed to learn. Even in the blue county we left, that was the case. The bias was quite obviously there anyway. In Texas, there was really only incident of bias that my daughter told me about and it was pretty mild (assuming the poet at the presidential inauguration was good). Believe me, her antennae are up. 

    • #31
  2. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Interesting take here. You can ban CRT, but it won’t matter, because its advocates will still be running the system.

    Governments Have a Right to Ban Critical Race Theory, But It Doesn’t Matter if They Do

    Liberals want to teach Critical Race Theory because they think it is true, while others want to ban teaching it because they think it’s false. I can understand both positions. In contrast, the position “this is all pernicious lies but nobody should do anything about it” is puzzling to me. Nonetheless, I don’t think banning CRT will have much of an effect, and may actually make the ideas behind it more popular in schools, given the political preferences and attitudes of teachers and administrators.

     

     

    • #32
  3. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    I agree with your post overall, but I do wish that we could point to specifics more often in trying to pin down what’s actually happening. My sense is that the biggest problems are in “blue” states or cities, where the parents may support this kind of teaching. I’m watching out for it in our children’s new public schools, but it really doesn’t seem to be happening in Texas where we are. Of course, I think the activists have their sights on expanding as far into Ted states as they can.

    There needs to be some type of national data base that collects concrete examples of racial bias in education.  I don’ t care who does it, but it needs to include any written teaching materials, study guides, slides, recordings of spoken words, etc.  Abstract gripes without corroboration are not going to get it done.

    • #33
  4. Capt. Spaulding Member
    Capt. Spaulding
    @CaptSpaulding

    Chuck said “Didn’t this start with John Dewey back in the 19th century?”

    Here’s my John Dewey story, @Chuckles. I’m in 10th grade, 1962. We have a student teacher in English period who has been reading T.S. Eliot to us, among other modern poets. This day he has a portable record player. He puts on a record, the music from “Oliver.” We’re listening to this, he says, instead of today’s lesson. He starts the record. Then he walks to the blackboard and writes in huge letters “JOHN DEWEY.” He stalks out of the room. We kids cast baffled looks to one another. Years later I came to admire the young man’s guts.

     

    • #34
  5. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Hoyacon (View Comment):
    concrete examples

    I got excited there for a minute.  I thought you just meant concrete examples.

    • #35
  6. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Illiniguy (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    It’s a start. However, they can post whatever they want, but teach something else entirely different . . .

    Not if your resident Illinois legislator does a tight enough job of drafting his bill.

    Teachers will still need supervision, and the legislators and parents will still need some sort of feedback the new laws are working . . .

    • #36
  7. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Has Texas banned CRT? I thought Abbott might have done that. I know that DeSantis has here in FL.

    Yes, Texas passed a law that is among receiving criticism from supposed conservatives or right-leaning thinkers. Here’s Christopher Rufo’s op-ed in response to those critiques. While I am glad to have the law on our side in Texas, I assume these laws will be (already are being?) challenged. I also don’t think it’s good for our country to have divisive and anti-American ideas being taught in public schools where state laws prohibiting CRT will never be passed.

    • #37
  8. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Has Texas banned CRT? I thought Abbott might have done that. I know that DeSantis has here in FL.

    Yes, Texas passed a law that is among receiving criticism from supposed conservatives or right-leaning thinkers. Here’s Christopher Rufo’s op-ed in response to those critiques. While I am glad to have the law on our side in Texas, I assume these laws will be (already are being?) challenged. I also don’t think it’s good for our country to have divisive and anti-American ideas being taught in public schools where state laws prohibiting CRT will never be passed.

    I suppose we’re entitled to go and sit in the classrooms.  I can’t see any other way to tell if CRT is being taught.

    • #38
  9. Lilly B Coolidge
    Lilly B
    @LillyB

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    I agree with your post overall, but I do wish that we could point to specifics more often in trying to pin down what’s actually happening. My sense is that the biggest problems are in “blue” states or cities, where the parents may support this kind of teaching. I’m watching out for it in our children’s new public schools, but it really doesn’t seem to be happening in Texas where we are. Of course, I think the activists have their sights on expanding as far into Ted states as they can.

    There needs to be some type of national data base that collects concrete examples of racial bias in education. I don’ t care who does it, but it needs to include any written teaching materials, study guides, slides, recordings of spoken words, etc. Abstract gripes without corroboration are not going to get it done.

    I think there is. There is criticalrace.org for higher education and I think I saw somewhere that there is a similar site for K-12. Pretty sure it’s this from Parents Defending Education

    • #39
  10. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I suppose we’re entitled to go and sit in the classrooms. I can’t see any other way to tell if CRT is being taught.

    Schools used to encourage parents to do that. Now they try to prevent it.

    • #40
  11. Chuck Coolidge
    Chuck
    @Chuckles

    Capt. Spaulding (View Comment):

    Chuck said “Didn’t this start with John Dewey back in the 19th century?”

    Here’s my John Dewey story, @ Chuckles. I’m in 10th grade, 1962. We have a student teacher in English period who has been reading T.S. Eliot to us, among other modern poets. This day he has a portable record player. He puts on a record, the music from “Oliver.” We’re listening to this, he says, instead of today’s lesson. He starts the record. Then he walks to the blackboard and writes in huge letters “JOHN DEWEY.” He stalks out of the room. We kids cast baffled looks to one another. Years later I came to admire the young man’s guts.

     

    Ha.  Me, too (I think).  And I had a whole lot more important things on my mind back then.

    • #41
  12. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I suppose we’re entitled to go and sit in the classrooms. I can’t see any other way to tell if CRT is being taught.

    Schools used to encourage parents to do that. Now they try to prevent it.

    Back then, they were proud of the job they were doing.

    • #42
  13. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Has Texas banned CRT? I thought Abbott might have done that. I know that DeSantis has here in FL.

    Curriculum and conduct in public K-12 is not within the power of a governor. DeSantis urged action, but it was the Florida Board of Education that met and properly passed a rule. Encouragingly, or tellingly, the Texas Democrats did not flee the state to stop the anti-CRT. Governor Abbott signed the CRT soft ban into law, effective this new school year. So, on a state-by-state basis, the state-wide action is in the legislature or the elected or appointed office governing public K-12.

    • #43
  14. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    “…now waging war on the nation’s moral, historical, philosophical, and religious foundations…” -?

    Where has Bill Barr been for the last 50 years? In the 1970s I had an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist social studies teacher and later in college an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist philosophy professor. The gradual Marxist takeover of the academy and the schools has been well documented by former Marxists like David Horowitz and others. How did Bill Ayers become a professor given his criminal background as a domestic terrorist?

    Here’s a video with David Horowitz from 12 years ago.

    I agree this propaganda was happening in the universities, @ brianwatt, as David Horowitz has been saying for a long time. But I think it was later that it started to happen in the K-12 grades. Besides, at least Barr was speaking out about it. Who else has been calling out the problem? Anyone who does speak up, at any time, is to be celebrated in my book.

    Edit: the same goes for Jordan Peterson.

    Yes, bully for Barr that he feels woke enough now and compelled to jump into the spotlight and get attention on this issue. I do question why he is seeking the spotlight, though. Does he feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words “bullish*t”?

    Is it possible that this was one of the least corrupt election in our nation’s history and that Barr was accurate to say that Trump’s Big Lie as in his own words, “bullsh*t”?

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.

    This is interesting.  Brian starts this issue by saying in Comment #19 that the 2020 election was the “most” corrupt election in the nation’s history, and I respond in Comment #28 and suggested that the 2020 election was one of the “least” corrupt election in our nation’s history.  5 minutes later, Drew weighs in at Comment #29 and says in Bold and Italics “Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.”

    I guess that Drew is saying that if someone disagrees with him, that person is engaging in a “hijack” of a thread.

    Of note, if Brian will delete his sentence “Does he [Barr] feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words ‘bullish*t’?”, then I will happily delete my response, as well as this Comment.

    • #44
  15. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    A Ricochettee just informed me that the QOTD was from May 2021; however, Barr has spoken previously about the public schools:

    https://adflegal.org/william-barr-interview

    Here is the official transcript of the 2019 Norte Dame law school speech, with a section of remarks on public schools:

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-william-p-barr-delivers-remarks-law-school-and-de-nicola-center-ethics

    • #45
  16. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Gossamer Cat (View Comment):

    This just posted on Townhall:

    you need VIP access to read it, but apparently the DOE received 35000 comments objecting to grants to support teaching the 1619 project and they backed off. For now. The Heritage Foundation organized the campaign.

    Conservatives See a Win in Critical Race Theory Fight at the Federal Level

     

    Excellent! Thanks, GC!

    • #46
  17. Brian Watt Inactive
    Brian Watt
    @BrianWatt

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    “…now waging war on the nation’s moral, historical, philosophical, and religious foundations…” -?

    Where has Bill Barr been for the last 50 years? In the 1970s I had an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist social studies teacher and later in college an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist philosophy professor. The gradual Marxist takeover of the academy and the schools has been well documented by former Marxists like David Horowitz and others. How did Bill Ayers become a professor given his criminal background as a domestic terrorist?

    Yes, bully for Barr that he feels woke enough now and compelled to jump into the spotlight and get attention on this issue. I do question why he is seeking the spotlight, though. Does he feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words “bullish*t”?

    Is it possible that this was one of the least corrupt election in our nation’s history and that Barr was accurate to say that Trump’s Big Lie as in his own words, “bullsh*t”?

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.

    This is interesting. Brian starts this issue by saying in Comment #19 that the 2020 election was the most corrupt election in the nation’s history, and I respond in Comment #28 and suggested that the 2020 election was one of the least corrupt election in our nation’s history. 5 minutes later, Drew weighs in at Comment #29 and says in Bold and Italics “Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.”

    I guess that Drew is saying that if someone disagrees with him, that person is engaging in a “hijack” of a thread.

    Of note, if Brian will delete his sentence “Does he [Barr] feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words ‘bullish*t’?” If Brian deletes his attempted hijack, I will happily delete my response, as well as this Comment.

    I gave 5 examples of others who flagged the indoctrination of leftist/Marxist ideology in the school system many years before Barr had in his 2019 remarks at Notre Dame. As Susan now explains, the QOTD attributed to Barr is from May of this year. I’m not deleting anything. Have a nice day.

    • #47
  18. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    “…now waging war on the nation’s moral, historical, philosophical, and religious foundations…” -?

    Where has Bill Barr been for the last 50 years? In the 1970s I had an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist social studies teacher and later in college an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist philosophy professor. The gradual Marxist takeover of the academy and the schools has been well documented by former Marxists like David Horowitz and others. How did Bill Ayers become a professor given his criminal background as a domestic terrorist?

    Here’s a video with David Horowitz from 12 years ago.

    I agree this propaganda was happening in the universities, @ brianwatt, as David Horowitz has been saying for a long time. But I think it was later that it started to happen in the K-12 grades. Besides, at least Barr was speaking out about it. Who else has been calling out the problem? Anyone who does speak up, at any time, is to be celebrated in my book.

    Edit: the same goes for Jordan Peterson.

    Yes, bully for Barr that he feels woke enough now and compelled to jump into the spotlight and get attention on this issue. I do question why he is seeking the spotlight, though. Does he feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words “bullish*t”?

    Is it possible that this was one of the least corrupt election in our nation’s history and that Barr was accurate to say that Trump’s Big Lie as in his own words, “bullsh*t”?

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.

    This is interesting. Brian starts this issue by saying in Comment #19 that the 2020 election was the “most” corrupt election in the nation’s history, and I respond in Comment #28 and suggested that the 2020 election was one of the “least” corrupt election in our nation’s history. 5 minutes later, Drew weighs in at Comment #29 and says in Bold and Italics “Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.”

    I guess that Drew is saying that if someone disagrees with him, that person is engaging in a “hijack” of a thread.

    Of note, if Brian will delete his sentence “Does he [Barr] feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words ‘bullish*t’?”, then I will happily delete my response, as well as this Comment.

    Go away troll.

    • #48
  19. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Hang On (View Comment):
    Go away troll.

    You could also just ignore him, @hangon, rather than name-calling. Just sayin’ . . . 

    • #49
  20. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    The problem with relying on parents is they really aren’t in charge and they are unlikely to be vigilant over an extended period of time. The left will simply disappear until it all blows over and start where they started before. 

    There is an entire ecosystem. Teachers go to schools of education where they are indoctrinated. School boards are elected in elections with a small turn out so the teacher’s unions that spend lots of money get to pick who is going to sit on the school board. There is the administration of the schools. 

    And if it isn’t CRT or the 1620 Project, the cultural Marxists will figure out something else/ They are publicly funded. That is their true weakness and a means of blowing up their system needs to be found.

    • #50
  21. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Hang On (View Comment):

    The problem with relying on parents is they really aren’t in charge and they are unlikely to be vigilant over an extended period of time. The left will simply disappear until it all blows over and start where they started before.

    There is an entire ecosystem. Teachers go to schools of education where they are indoctrinated. School boards are elected in elections with a small turn out so the teacher’s unions that spend lots of money get to pick who is going to sit on the school board. There is the administration of the schools.

    And if it isn’t CRT or the 1620 Project, the cultural Marxists will figure out something else/ They are publicly funded. That is their true weakness and a means of blowing up their system needs to be found.

    I’m not arguing with this factually, but you gotta start somewhere.  I live close to ground zero–Loudoun County VA, and the parents have done very well.  School choice may well be the key, but, if we don’t have parents, who do we have?  As you note, not the teachers and not the bureaucrats.

    • #51
  22. WI Con Member
    WI Con
    @WICon

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    I agree with your post overall, but I do wish that we could point to specifics more often in trying to pin down what’s actually happening. My sense is that the biggest problems are in “blue” states or cities, where the parents may support this kind of teaching. I’m watching out for it in our children’s new public schools, but it really doesn’t seem to be happening in Texas where we are. Of course, I think the activists have their sights on expanding as far into Ted states as they can.

    You seem fortunate but I’d encourage you to really check your kid’s assignments and text books regardless. The rot is deep and nationwide. It is pernicious. It may surprise you the degree which your values are undermined. 

    Our public school district here in Wisconsin has been rated in the top 5 for 20+ years – it’s one of the only reasons we’ve stayed here in this town as long as we have.  I’ve honestly been pleasantly surprised by many of the subjects and authors my kids have been exposed to but also shocked at the nonsense they’ve also been exposed to. 

    I’m really at the point where I don’t want the schools teaching anything other than math, science, grammar and leave the rest to the parents. 

    • #52
  23. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    I always think it’s funny that when people run for school board, they always highlight things like “I’ve been a teacher for 47 years! I’ve worked in the education system for 100 years! I’ve been a school superintendent for 531 years! I’ve been president of the local chapter of BIG TEACHERS UNION 381 for a kajillion years!” . . .

    . . . and I wonder why they think that’s a selling point?

    Unfortunately, it seems to be.

    • #53
  24. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    Hoyacon (View Comment):
    I’m not arguing with this factually, but you gotta start somewhere.  I live close to ground zero–Loudoun County VA, and the parents have done very well.  School choice may well be the key, but, if we don’t have parents, who do we have?  As you note, not the teachers and not the bureaucrats.

    Parents DO have to be part of the solution. But they can’t be the entire solution and relying only on the parents may lead to short-term success, but is unlikely to do anything in the long-term. I don’t think we are that far apart and I wasn’t launching this as an attack. I just don’t think it went far enough.

     

    • #54
  25. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    I always think it’s funny that when people run for school board, they always highlight things like “I’ve been a teacher for 47 years! I’ve worked in the education system for 100 years! I’ve been a school superintendent for 531 years! I’ve been president of the local chapter of BIG TEACHERS UNION 381 for a kajillion years!” . . .

    . . . and I wonder why they think that’s a selling point?

    Unfortunately, it seems to be.

    It has to do with who the audience is. It’s not most parents. It’s other teachers and administrators who are those who are deeply invested in school board races.

    • #55
  26. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    “…now waging war on the nation’s moral, historical, philosophical, and religious foundations…” -?

    Where has Bill Barr been for the last 50 years? In the 1970s I had an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist social studies teacher and later in college an ardent propaganda-spewing socialist philosophy professor. The gradual Marxist takeover of the academy and the schools has been well documented by former Marxists like David Horowitz and others. How did Bill Ayers become a professor given his criminal background as a domestic terrorist?

    Yes, bully for Barr that he feels woke enough now and compelled to jump into the spotlight and get attention on this issue. I do question why he is seeking the spotlight, though. Does he feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words “bullish*t”?

    Is it possible that this was one of the least corrupt election in our nation’s history and that Barr was accurate to say that Trump’s Big Lie as in his own words, “bullsh*t”?

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.

    This is interesting. Brian starts this issue by saying in Comment #19 that the 2020 election was the most corrupt election in the nation’s history, and I respond in Comment #28 and suggested that the 2020 election was one of the least corrupt election in our nation’s history. 5 minutes later, Drew weighs in at Comment #29 and says in Bold and Italics “Please ignore the latest attempt to hijack another thread.”

    I guess that Drew is saying that if someone disagrees with him, that person is engaging in a “hijack” of a thread.

    Of note, if Brian will delete his sentence “Does he [Barr] feel he must solidify his conservative bona fides in the wake of the most corrupt election in the nation’s history and his declaration that any evidence of election fraud was in his words ‘bullish*t’?” If Brian deletes his attempted hijack, I will happily delete my response, as well as this Comment.

    I gave 5 examples of others who flagged the indoctrination of leftist/Marxist ideology in the school system many years before Barr had in his 2019 remarks at Notre Dame. As Susan now explains, the QOTD attributed to Barr is from May of this year. I’m not deleting anything. Have a nice day.

    Hi Brian,

    I have no problem with the points of CRT and the school districts.  You made great points that are valid and important.  

    My only problem is that you gratuitously threw in that the 2020 election was the “most” corrupt election in the nation’s history, and I called that out.  You are free to leave that in.  And, I will leave in my comment that the 2020 election was one of the “least” corrupt in history.  I hope that also have a nice day. 

    Gary

    • #56
  27. Illiniguy Member
    Illiniguy
    @Illiniguy

    Stad (View Comment):

    Illiniguy (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    It’s a start. However, they can post whatever they want, but teach something else entirely different . . .

    Not if your resident Illinois legislator does a tight enough job of drafting his bill.

    Teachers will still need supervision, and the legislators and parents will still need some sort of feedback the news laws are working . . .

    The bill I’m proposing will put a lot of responsibility on parents to follow up on what’s posted on the website, since it’ll be limited to posting course material (texts, reading lists and activities) by title and author and such other identifying information as to make it easily accessible online. I think this is an issue that parents are taking enough of an interest in that they’ll be more apt to follow up on what’s posted. I don’t want to control this from the floor of the legislature, but trust that this issue is important enough that giving parents the tools they need to hold their local school boards and administrators to account will bring out the type of local control over curriculum that will have a lasting impact.

    • #57
  28. DrewInWisconsin, Oaf Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Cameras in the classrooms!

    (Not just for monitoring for CRT, but to keep an eye on teachers bullying students, too.)

    • #58
  29. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    I always think it’s funny that when people run for school board, they always highlight things like “I’ve been a teacher for 47 years! I’ve worked in the education system for 100 years! I’ve been a school superintendent for 531 years! I’ve been president of the local chapter of BIG TEACHERS UNION 381 for a kajillion years!” . . .

    . . . and I wonder why they think that’s a selling point?

    Unfortunately, it seems to be.

    Thanks for making me chuckle, @drewinwisconsin. Even dark laughter counts nowadays . . . 

    • #59
  30. Annefy Member
    Annefy
    @Annefy

    DrewInWisconsin, Oaf (View Comment):

    Cameras in the classrooms!

    (Not just for monitoring for CRT, but to keep an eye on teachers bullying students, too.)

    I think this is the only solution.

     

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.