Care to Make It Interesting?

 

sportsbook-lg-01“Candidate Casino” looks like such fun on Special Report that I thought Ricochet could use a version. Instead of focusing on the chips, however, let’s go with the odds. Bet amongst yourselves.

[A side note: I’m a little rusty. The last time I made book was 1977, for the network media buyers at an ad agency. On Tuesdays, the House took a 50 share for Happy Days, Laverne and Shirley, and Three’s Company. A 49 or 51 paid 2-1; a 48 or 52 paid 3-1, etc. Only my boss, the head of research, beat the House. The buyer who did best was a new guy, but not so long later he was running the department. The profits paid for the Christmas party.]

Okay, here’s my first draft for the Nominee Derby. Tell me where I’m wrong.

Walker 3-1
Rubio 3-1
Bush 7-2
Perry 5-1
Cruz 10-1
Paul 12-1
Christie 15-1
Fiorina 20-1
Kasich 25-1
Huckabee 30-1
Graham 50-1
Santorum 75-1
Carson 100-1
Jindal 100-1
Pataki 200-1
Trump 6 No Trump

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 14 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Herbert Woodbery Member
    Herbert Woodbery
    @Herbert

    I would move Walker to 4 to 1, Cruze to 50-1, Graham to 200-1, Jindal up to 30-1 Kasich up to 15 to 1 Looks good otherwise.

    • #1
  2. Jim Kearney Member
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    Herbert Woodbery:I would move Walker to 4 to 1, Cruze to 50-1, Graham to 200-1, Jindal up to 30-1 Kasich up to 15 to 1 Looks good otherwise.

    Just saw today’s polling numbers, and you may be right about Walker.

    Trying to be objective — what could be, not what should be — I just don’t foresee anyone getting ginned up for Jindal. Kasich would have short odds for VP, we’ll see if he even bothers running for President. May stay in Ohio and let the Party come to him.

    He’s one of a group whose best chance to head the ticket might be a deadlocked convention.

    • #2
  3. Z in MT Member
    Z in MT
    @ZinMT

    Here are the odds on Paddy Power (this is for president).

    Hillary is at even odds. Jeb Bush is at 4/1 and Walker is at 9/1. Cruz is 33/1.

    Let’s hope the market starts moving away from Hillary.

    • #3
  4. Z in MT Member
    Z in MT
    @ZinMT

    Here are the odds for just the Republican nomination.

    • #4
  5. Z in MT Member
    Z in MT
    @ZinMT

    Kim Kardashian has 1000/1 odds!

    • #5
  6. user_2505 Contributor
    user_2505
    @GaryMcVey

    Looks like a decent lineup, though I’d jump Paul over Cruz and bump Jindal past Santorum.

    • #6
  7. Jason Rudert Inactive
    Jason Rudert
    @JasonRudert

    It’s funny because I was just reading about prediction markets, and how wall street used to have instruments that were essentially bets on elections–they generally outperformed polls in their predictive ability.

    • #7
  8. Jason Rudert Inactive
    Jason Rudert
    @JasonRudert

    Main quibble I have with your table is that it’s too smooth between the frontrunners and the long shots–my split between these categories being between Christie and Fiorina–so she should be more like 200:1 and everyone below her should be worse.

    Paddy Power’s numbers seem more reasonable to me, though I’m astonished to see Ben Carson at 16:1.

    • #8
  9. Jim Kearney Member
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    Paddy Power seems to  think Mike Bloomberg has been welcomed back into the Republican party.

    No pint for you, Paddy!

    • #9
  10. Mr. Dart Inactive
    Mr. Dart
    @MrDart

    FWIW Betfair odds currently are:

    1. Bush  3.5/1

    2. Rubio  5/1

    2. Walker 5/1

    4. Paul    7/1

    5. Christie  8/1

    Those 5 constitute the top tier.

    Huckabee and Cruz make up the entire 2nd tier.

    • #10
  11. Herbert Woodbery Member
    Herbert Woodbery
    @Herbert

    It’s funny because I was just reading about prediction markets, and how wall street used to have instruments that were essentially bets on elections–they generally outperformed polls in their predictive ability.

    Yes, you used to be able to bet on it through intrade, there was some propping up of Romney right before the election that went contra to all the other polling…

    • #11
  12. James Of England Inactive
    James Of England
    @JamesOfEngland

    Gary McVey:Looks like a decent lineup, though I’d jump Paul over Cruz and bump Jindal past Santorum.

    I’d jump Paul, Christie, Fiorina, Kasich, Jindal and Huckabee over Cruz.

    I’d put Jindal above Graham.

    • #12
  13. Jim Kearney Member
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    I wonder what the VP odds would be?

    Walker 3-1

    Kasich 5-1

    Rubio 6-1

    Paul 7-1

    Fiorina 10-1

    Portman 15-1

    Bolton 25-1

    Bush 100-1

    • #13
  14. Herbert Woodbery Member
    Herbert Woodbery
    @Herbert

    I’d move fiorina up and Paul way back. Bush off the board…

    • #14
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.