In praise of authoritarianism

 

Not from me; I say it’s spinach, and to hell with it. But others find it a good election message:

I don’t know if Ms. Berlinski endorses the particulars of D muthafargery. I don’t know if she just liked the  swinging’-Richard coq-of-the-walk posture of muthafargery from an internet videosthat cherrypick moments from charismatic politicians who really said some things, y’all.  But she’s on to something; weakness is not an effective message in 2020.

Still,  it’s hard not to infer a trill of joy that the Ds are doing this, and hence will win. So. 

Is it just me, but when the Ds have embraced every statist “solution” and intrusion into the economy, elevated identity politics to a religion, let cities burn, lost their voice when it came to condemning mobs that spatter every civic structure with obscenities, shrug at Jew-hatred when the popular people say it, promise to make citizens of illegal aliens, and recast the national narrative to conform to the 1619 project – complete with witch trials and struggle sessions for anyone who does not parrot the new history – well, perhaps your enthusiasm for competent, ruthless people might be less than enthusiastic?

Maybe it’s just me! But I’m trying to imagine a scenario in which ruthless statists is a concept that makes conservatives stand up and cheer. 

Competent, ruthless people weld people’s doors shut to keep them inside when Covid strikes. Competent, ruthless people billyclub citizens who do not wear masks.

Competent, ruthless people enforce compliance with their ideas with every tool in the arsenal – legal, social, economic –  because after all, the personal is the political. 

Competent, ruthless people pack the Supreme Court.

Competent, ruthless people gun down protestors.

Sorry, reductio ad absurdum there, utterly unmoored from history. Sorry! It’s different in this context, because “ruthless” in American politics means an unwavering desire to pursue the necessary policies through the established system by whatever means necessary, yet scrupulously adhering to laws, norms, and conventions. That’s all!

Whatever: at least we have a standard. Competency is not enough. The necessity of defeating Trump requires not just the absence of ruth but its abolition. It needs a hard, pitiless heart, and this sentiment is best expressed with Quentin Tarantino dialogue to make sure we get the point. You know people are serious when they use the really bad swears.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 177 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    JamesL,

    You know I like Dr. Berlinski. However, there is a limit to liking. No matter the IQ, no matter the talent, when the content of your character descends to what I consider the 14-year-old-boy level then I make a full reevaluation. If life past 40 has taught you nothing. If you have the same sophomoric shallow soul that sent you vagabonding around for a decade or two and now past the age of fifty, then there is nothing that tolerance or understanding can do. For such hopelessly twisted opinions, we already have Jennifer Rubin & Rick Wilson. Dr. Berlinski is wasting her life on garbage.

    I have never published anything. However, her point of view reminds me of me when I was 14. By the time I was 16, I realized that it was crazy garbage and the world wasn’t like that. If she is the real professional simply on the basis of facile performance, no thanks. I’ll retain my amateur standing if you don’t mind. Even if I never publish a thing there are some destinies that are worse than that. I have no intention of giving in to those demons. Worse yet, I have no intention of assisting those demons do massive damage to this world.

    Good post JamesL.

    Live and learn.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #151
  2. The Cynthonian Inactive
    The Cynthonian
    @TheCynthonian

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Kevin Creighton (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Rapporteur (View Comment):

    It’s almost enough to make one wish that Claire would follow the sage advice found in the “How to Write A Great Post: 11 Tips” article linked in the footer of every R> page. Specifically:

    4) A big huge trade secret: Contrary to the point above, but curiously simultaneously true, nothing good is dashed-off. What I write sounds dashed-off, but it takes a huge amount of editing to make it sound that way. Everything I write, including this, is edited, maybe a hundred times.

    (Spoiler alert for the irony-impaired … look at who wrote the “…Great Post” article.)

    Hah! Everything I publish is “dashed off.” If you work in a daily medium you learn to get it right the first time. Writing is like spontaneous combustion.

    Good. Glad to know I’m not the only one who writes like that.

    One of my sisters is severely ADHD. She’s also a biologist. One of the most interesting things she learned about ADHD brains is that they do exceptionally well at last-minute work because the pressures of the moment provide the right stimulation to provide focus, and aid the mind in tuning out the sorts of distractions that cripple such people when there are too many competing priorities. A looming deadline, sufficiently looming, drowns out those other priorities.

    This is tremendous comfort for those of us who write best under pressure, dashing off in order to get something to press – contrary to Berlinski’s assertion, not only is it no moral failing to be last-minute, it’s a damned evolutionary adaptation that helps us thrive!

    In the ADHD world, this adaptation is called “hyperfocus.”   I’ve seen it and it’s real.  

    • #152
  3. Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) Member
    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing)
    @Sisyphus

    James Gawron (View Comment):
    If you have the same sophomoric shallow soul that sent you vagabonding around for a decade or two and now past the age of fifty, then there is nothing that tolerance or understanding can do.

    Her father lives in Paris. That may be as close a thing to home that she has at this point. And being a Jew in Paris when the argument is just how fascist is the latest Le Pen during the 2017 election campaign can be a volatilizing experience. The notion that Trump is a Euro-style nationalist/Fascist is ludicrous on its face, but if you are reading the Paris press that would not be obvious. She has the resources to do better, she hasn’t. She has demons.

    Let’s call her out on it when she makes a mistake, and she has made many, but there is no call to make it personal.

    May He forgive us all. 

    • #153
  4. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    Unsk (View Comment):
    We just won’t call it a Crusade but we all know what it will be !

    It’s a vacation with weapons.

    And as many souvenirs as you can carry! 

    • #154
  5. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    The other thing I’ve noticed is, it’s absolutely impossible for her to say something intelligent and non-hysterical about COVID-19 policy in the United States.

    • #155
  6. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    I liked Claire when she was active here, and I still do.

    But I don’t like, and will not vote for, “competent, ruthless” statists who have no respect for the Constitution, particularly the first two amendments.

    Question for Claire: will competence and ruthlessness cancel out the 4th, the 5th, and the 6th Amendments too?

    This is intended to be rhetorical, I assume. (?)

    Isn’t Ms. Berlinski in the category of those who, at some point, decided it was inconvenient to interact with the membership?

    She was and is very nice, although she did call me a “Turkish ultra-nationalist Islamist” once.

    I always took you for a Crusader.

    Now that the Turks have turned Hagia Sophia back into a mosque I’m ready to sign up for a Crusade.

    Seriously, whats going to happen to the beautiful mosiacs in Hagia Sophia now that the Muslim Iconoclasts are defiling it again?

    It was a mosque from 1453 to 1931, and most of that stuff is still there. In any event, short of mounting a crusade, what’s your plan?

    The “stuff” was painted and plastered  over and had to be restored.   It was only in the 1930’s and beyond when it was a museum that the mosaics were recovered.    

    How about the fact it’s under the “protection” of the UN as a World Heritage Site.  How about we start a campaign to pressure the Turks to leave it alone.   

    • #156
  7. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    I liked Claire when she was active here, and I still do.

    But I don’t like, and will not vote for, “competent, ruthless” statists who have no respect for the Constitution, particularly the first two amendments.

    Question for Claire: will competence and ruthlessness cancel out the 4th, the 5th, and the 6th Amendments too?

    This is intended to be rhetorical, I assume. (?)

    Isn’t Ms. Berlinski in the category of those who, at some point, decided it was inconvenient to interact with the membership?

    She was and is very nice, although she did call me a “Turkish ultra-nationalist Islamist” once.

    I always took you for a Crusader.

    Now that the Turks have turned Hagia Sophia back into a mosque I’m ready to sign up for a Crusade.

    Seriously, whats going to happen to the beautiful mosiacs in Hagia Sophia now that the Muslim Iconoclasts are defiling it again?

    It was a mosque from 1453 to 1931, and most of that stuff is still there. In any event, short of mounting a crusade, what’s your plan?

    The “stuff” was painted and plastered over and had to be restored. It was only in the 1930’s and beyond when it was a museum that the mosaics were recovered.

    How about the fact it’s under the “protection” of the UN as a World Heritage Site. How about we start a campaign to pressure the Turks to leave it alone.

    Being a World Heritage Site explicitly says “don’t mess with this.” They should at a minimum lose that when the first bucket of plaster is mixed.

    Tourism is a major part of Istanbul’s economy. Be a pity if something was to happen to that. If you want to express your dislike of the change in status, don’t go.

    • #157
  8. Buckpasser Member
    Buckpasser
    @Buckpasser

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    I liked Claire when she was active here, and I still do.

    But I don’t like, and will not vote for, “competent, ruthless” statists who have no respect for the Constitution, particularly the first two amendments.

    Question for Claire: will competence and ruthlessness cancel out the 4th, the 5th, and the 6th Amendments too?

    This is intended to be rhetorical, I assume. (?)

    Isn’t Ms. Berlinski in the category of those who, at some point, decided it was inconvenient to interact with the membership?

    She was and is very nice, although she did call me a “Turkish ultra-nationalist Islamist” once.

    I always took you for a Crusader.

    Now that the Turks have turned Hagia Sophia back into a mosque I’m ready to sign up for a Crusade.

    Seriously, whats going to happen to the beautiful mosiacs in Hagia Sophia now that the Muslim Iconoclasts are defiling it again?

    It was a mosque from 1453 to 1931, and most of that stuff is still there. In any event, short of mounting a crusade, what’s your plan?

    The “stuff” was painted and plastered over and had to be restored. It was only in the 1930’s and beyond when it was a museum that the mosaics were recovered.

    How about the fact it’s under the “protection” of the UN as a World Heritage Site. How about we start a campaign to pressure the Turks to leave it alone.

    Being a World Heritage Site explicitly says “don’t mess with this.” They should at a minimum lose that when the first bucket of plaster is mixed.

    Tourism is a major part of Istanbul’s economy. Be a pity if something was to happen to that. If you want to express your dislike of the change in status, don’t go.

    But Islam is a religion of peace.

    • #158
  9. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    I liked Claire when she was active here, and I still do.

    But I don’t like, and will not vote for, “competent, ruthless” statists who have no respect for the Constitution, particularly the first two amendments.

    Question for Claire: will competence and ruthlessness cancel out the 4th, the 5th, and the 6th Amendments too?

    This is intended to be rhetorical, I assume. (?)

    Isn’t Ms. Berlinski in the category of those who, at some point, decided it was inconvenient to interact with the membership?

    She was and is very nice, although she did call me a “Turkish ultra-nationalist Islamist” once.

    I always took you for a Crusader.

    Now that the Turks have turned Hagia Sophia back into a mosque I’m ready to sign up for a Crusade.

    Seriously, whats going to happen to the beautiful mosiacs in Hagia Sophia now that the Muslim Iconoclasts are defiling it again?

    It was a mosque from 1453 to 1931, and most of that stuff is still there. In any event, short of mounting a crusade, what’s your plan?

    The “stuff” was painted and plastered over and had to be restored. It was only in the 1930’s and beyond when it was a museum that the mosaics were recovered.

    How about the fact it’s under the “protection” of the UN as a World Heritage Site. How about we start a campaign to pressure the Turks to leave it alone.

    Being a World Heritage Site explicitly says “don’t mess with this.” They should at a minimum lose that when the first bucket of plaster is mixed.

    Tourism is a major part of Istanbul’s economy. Be a pity if something was to happen to that. If you want to express your dislike of the change in status, don’t go.

    But Islam is a religion of peace.

    Another World Heritage Site.

    • #159
  10. Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) Member
    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing)
    @Sisyphus

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Samuel Block (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    I liked Claire when she was active here, and I still do.

    But I don’t like, and will not vote for, “competent, ruthless” statists who have no respect for the Constitution, particularly the first two amendments.

    Question for Claire: will competence and ruthlessness cancel out the 4th, the 5th, and the 6th Amendments too?

    This is intended to be rhetorical, I assume. (?)

    Isn’t Ms. Berlinski in the category of those who, at some point, decided it was inconvenient to interact with the membership?

    She was and is very nice, although she did call me a “Turkish ultra-nationalist Islamist” once.

    I always took you for a Crusader.

    Now that the Turks have turned Hagia Sophia back into a mosque I’m ready to sign up for a Crusade.

    Seriously, whats going to happen to the beautiful mosiacs in Hagia Sophia now that the Muslim Iconoclasts are defiling it again?

    It was a mosque from 1453 to 1931, and most of that stuff is still there. In any event, short of mounting a crusade, what’s your plan?

    The “stuff” was painted and plastered over and had to be restored. It was only in the 1930’s and beyond when it was a museum that the mosaics were recovered.

    How about the fact it’s under the “protection” of the UN as a World Heritage Site. How about we start a campaign to pressure the Turks to leave it alone.

    Being a World Heritage Site explicitly says “don’t mess with this.” They should at a minimum lose that when the first bucket of plaster is mixed.

    Tourism is a major part of Istanbul’s economy. Be a pity if something was to happen to that. If you want to express your dislike of the change in status, don’t go.

    But Islam is a religion of peace.

    Never lose that sense of humor.

    • #160
  11. SkipSul Inactive
    SkipSul
    @skipsul

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    James Lileks:

    Is it just me, but when the Ds have embraced every statist “solution” and intrusion into the economy, elevated identity politics to a religion, let cities burn, lost their voice when it came to condemning mobs that spatter every civic structure with obscenities, shrug at Jew-hatred when the popular people say it, promise to make citizens of illegal aliens, and recast the national narrative to conform to the 1619 project – complete with witch trials and struggle sessions for anyone who does not parrot the new history – well, perhaps your enthusiasm for competent, ruthless people might be less than enthusiastic?

     

    BTW, this is an 18th century-level run-on sentence. It should be written on parchment, in calligraphy, with every third or fourth word capitalized.

    In the 18th century they didn’t write for people with short attention spans.

    You make a good point – in the current environment, short attention spa[TLDR]….

    Sorry, couldn’t resist.

    • #161
  12. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    James Gawron (View Comment):
    If you have the same sophomoric shallow soul that sent you vagabonding around for a decade or two and now past the age of fifty, then there is nothing that tolerance or understanding can do.

    Her father lives in Paris. That may be as close a thing to home that she has at this point. And being a Jew in Paris when the argument is just how fascist is the latest Le Pen during the 2017 election campaign can be a volatilizing experience. The notion that Trump is a Euro-style nationalist/Fascist is ludicrous on its face, but if you are reading the Paris press that would not be obvious. She has the resources to do better, she hasn’t. She has demons.

    Let’s call her out on it when she makes a mistake, and she has made many, but there is no call to make it personal.

    May He forgive us all.

    Sisyphus,

    I appreciate your human concern for Dr. Berlinski. I too have been concerned but maybe too concerned. It was this over concern for her that was personal. My complaint is objective. She has written many books to critical acclaim. She doesn’t need to be coddled. Instead of following her major success, the Thatcher biography, with other biographies of female heads of state, she chooses to continue down a left of center path while exhibiting extreme TDS. I’m sure her followers are pleased with this. My question is why should Claire be pleased with this. If your followers are still rebelling like left-wing college students why must you waste your time pleasing them?

    She is better than this. Much better. I wish I could wake her up.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #162
  13. Theodoric of Freiberg Inactive
    Theodoric of Freiberg
    @TheodoricofFreiberg

    MarciN (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in today’s world.

    He hated the Communists. In fact, he forcefully criticized the Eisenhower administration for not supporting Taiwan (Formosa) sufficiently. Reading the debates between Kennedy and Nixon is startling today.

    Joe, Jack’s father, was soft on Hitler and Stalin and Communism. He was a loathsome despicable human being. The story about what he did to his oldest daughter Rosemary has forever placed him beyond redemption as far as I’m concerned. But Jack was the exact opposite politically.

    You didn’t mention how he earned his fortune. Sick.

    • #163
  14. Theodoric of Freiberg Inactive
    Theodoric of Freiberg
    @TheodoricofFreiberg

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in todays world.

     

    Sure he would. He would have changed as required.

    Yeah. Kennedy was no saint.

    • #164
  15. Theodoric of Freiberg Inactive
    Theodoric of Freiberg
    @TheodoricofFreiberg

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in todays world.

     

    Sure he would. He would have changed as required.

    I’m not so sure about that. Kennedy came into office cock-sure that he knew everything, that Eisenhower had been an overly cautious idiot who had caused our Cold War with the USSR, and that Kennedy’s youth and “clean slate” would set a new bar.

    Berlin and Cuba and quickly proved the reality of Eisenhower’s positions, and Kennedy wised up. We’ll never know how much, but he did change in office, he did grow.

    The guy CAUSED the Cuban Missile Crisis. Krushev sized him up and decided he was inexperienced and weak. If Nixon had been elected, that “crisis” would have never occurred.

    • #165
  16. Theodoric of Freiberg Inactive
    Theodoric of Freiberg
    @TheodoricofFreiberg

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    I liked Claire when she was active here, and I still do.

    But I don’t like, and will not vote for, “competent, ruthless” statists who have no respect for the Constitution, particularly the first two amendments.

    Question for Claire: will competence and ruthlessness cancel out the 4th, the 5th, and the 6th Amendments too?

    This is intended to be rhetorical, I assume. (?)

    Isn’t Ms. Berlinski in the category of those who, at some point, decided it was inconvenient to interact with the membership?

    She went emeritus so as to work on her book… which it seems is never going to come to fruition as it has devolved into a moving target, valiantly fighting phantoms and ghosts.

    I’ve personally been wondering if it’s more that she found it inconvenient to interact with Americans on American soil.

    My father in law is English, but a naturalized citizen here. He was back in Blighty last fall to visit with his family (until COVID, this was at least an annual meetup), and he was aghast at the way the media portrays the US. Even his more conservative relatives could not describe Trump in terms other than venomous, but the reasons they gave were ill informed. He sat down those who would listen and laid it out. “Believe nothing about the US, or especially about Trump, if it comes from your media,” and he walked them through several examples. He’s not sure he convinced anyone, but at least he sowed some doubts.

    I cannot help but think that Claire is likewise in that same bubble, unable to see things here except through the venom and spite and a bunch of snot-nosed European reporters who hate being stuck here.

    I noticed that she is still listed as a contributor on the City Journal site, but I can’t recall the last time I saw anything by her there or in the magazine.

    Claire is now a complete non-entity. Out of touch and out of mind.

    • #166
  17. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Comment):

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in todays world.

     

    Sure he would. He would have changed as required.

    I’m not so sure about that. Kennedy came into office cock-sure that he knew everything, that Eisenhower had been an overly cautious idiot who had caused our Cold War with the USSR, and that Kennedy’s youth and “clean slate” would set a new bar.

    Berlin and Cuba and quickly proved the reality of Eisenhower’s positions, and Kennedy wised up. We’ll never know how much, but he did change in office, he did grow.

    The guy CAUSED the Cuban Missile Crisis. Krushev sized him up and decided he was inexperienced and weak. If Nixon had been elected, that “crisis” would have never occurred.

    He CAUSED it, by… being elected?  Sounds to me like Krushchev caused it by “misunderestimating” him.

    • #167
  18. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Comment):

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in todays world.

     

    Sure he would. He would have changed as required.

    I’m not so sure about that. Kennedy came into office cock-sure that he knew everything, that Eisenhower had been an overly cautious idiot who had caused our Cold War with the USSR, and that Kennedy’s youth and “clean slate” would set a new bar.

    Berlin and Cuba and quickly proved the reality of Eisenhower’s positions, and Kennedy wised up. We’ll never know how much, but he did change in office, he did grow.

    The guy CAUSED the Cuban Missile Crisis. Krushev sized him up and decided he was inexperienced and weak. If Nixon had been elected, that “crisis” would have never occurred.

    He CAUSED it, by… being elected? Sounds to me like Krushchev caused it by “misunderestimating” him.

    I have never heard that that wasn’t a fair analysis that Kennedy caused it by showing weakness in the prior meeting.

    • #168
  19. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Comment):

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in todays world.

     

    Sure he would. He would have changed as required.

    I’m not so sure about that. Kennedy came into office cock-sure that he knew everything, that Eisenhower had been an overly cautious idiot who had caused our Cold War with the USSR, and that Kennedy’s youth and “clean slate” would set a new bar.

    Berlin and Cuba and quickly proved the reality of Eisenhower’s positions, and Kennedy wised up. We’ll never know how much, but he did change in office, he did grow.

    The guy CAUSED the Cuban Missile Crisis. Krushev sized him up and decided he was inexperienced and weak. If Nixon had been elected, that “crisis” would have never occurred.

    He CAUSED it, by… being elected? Sounds to me like Krushchev caused it by “misunderestimating” him.

    I have never heard that that wasn’t a fair analysis that Kennedy caused it by showing weakness in the prior meeting.

    That might be fair.  It may not have seemed that far out of line to think/hope that relations could be more cordial on both sides, but we know now a lot more about how the Soviets actually were the whole time.

    • #169
  20. SkipSul Inactive
    SkipSul
    @skipsul

    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Comment):

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in todays world.

     

    Sure he would. He would have changed as required.

    I’m not so sure about that. Kennedy came into office cock-sure that he knew everything, that Eisenhower had been an overly cautious idiot who had caused our Cold War with the USSR, and that Kennedy’s youth and “clean slate” would set a new bar.

    Berlin and Cuba and quickly proved the reality of Eisenhower’s positions, and Kennedy wised up. We’ll never know how much, but he did change in office, he did grow.

    The guy CAUSED the Cuban Missile Crisis. Krushev sized him up and decided he was inexperienced and weak. If Nixon had been elected, that “crisis” would have never occurred.

    Right, because Nixon also would not have allowed for the Berlin Wall.  Khrushchev was using Cuba as a bargaining chip to flip the rest of Berlin.

    • #170
  21. Patrick McClure Coolidge
    Patrick McClure
    @Patrickb63

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    If the riots and stuff aren’t sufficient, I don’t know that any campaign ad would make a difference.

    The battle is for the interpretation of the riots. Is it all anti-Trump feee speech or insurrectionists attempting to terrify ordinary Americans and sow chaos.

    B, definitely B.

    • #171
  22. SkipSul Inactive
    SkipSul
    @skipsul

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Theodoric of Freiberg (View Comment):

    SkipSul (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    And Kennedy would not be a Democrat in todays world.

     

    Sure he would. He would have changed as required.

    I’m not so sure about that. Kennedy came into office cock-sure that he knew everything, that Eisenhower had been an overly cautious idiot who had caused our Cold War with the USSR, and that Kennedy’s youth and “clean slate” would set a new bar.

    Berlin and Cuba and quickly proved the reality of Eisenhower’s positions, and Kennedy wised up. We’ll never know how much, but he did change in office, he did grow.

    The guy CAUSED the Cuban Missile Crisis. Krushev sized him up and decided he was inexperienced and weak. If Nixon had been elected, that “crisis” would have never occurred.

    He CAUSED it, by… being elected? Sounds to me like Krushchev caused it by “misunderestimating” him.

    I cannot recommend this book highly enough for a full understanding of Kennedy, Berlin, and Cuba.

    http://ricochet.com/443004/archives/book-review-berlin-1961-kennedy-khrushchev-and-the-most-dangerous-place-on-earth/

    • #172
  23. Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) Member
    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing)
    @Sisyphus

    Patrick McClure (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    If the riots and stuff aren’t sufficient, I don’t know that any campaign ad would make a difference.

    The battle is for the interpretation of the riots. Is it all anti-Trump feee speech or insurrectionists attempting to terrify ordinary Americans and sow chaos.

    B, definitely B.

    And how would the Morning Joe crowd ever come to notice that?

    • #173
  24. Patrick McClure Coolidge
    Patrick McClure
    @Patrickb63

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    Patrick McClure (View Comment):

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):
    If the riots and stuff aren’t sufficient, I don’t know that any campaign ad would make a difference.

    The battle is for the interpretation of the riots. Is it all anti-Trump feee speech or insurrectionists attempting to terrify ordinary Americans and sow chaos.

    B, definitely B.

    And how would the Morning Joe crowd ever come to notice that?

    They would not. That’s why we have to hope the middle does and encourage ads they will understand.

    • #174
  25. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    The last time I got a letter from her it was a note where she insulted Newt Gingrich repeatedly for having the temerity for being a subscriber of hers and recommending people read her newsletter on Fox news.

    It was pretty disgusting.

    • #175
  26. dukenaltum Inactive
    dukenaltum
    @dukenaltum

    Odd that authoritarian and fascistic methods are frequently defined as “competent” when they are the inverse.  It is an irrefutable proof of incompetence in a civilized society to resort to barbaric repression because you can’t win an argument.

    • #176
  27. Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) Member
    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing)
    @Sisyphus

    dukenaltum (View Comment):

    Odd that authoritarian and fascistic methods are frequently defined as “competent” when they are inverse. It is an irrefutable proof of incompetence in a civilized society to resort to barbaric repression because you can’t win an argument.

    And to punish adverse information that is required for your success.

    • #177
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.