Whither Biden and the Democrats?

 

What are these people going to do?

Forget the Vice President’s peculiar peccadilloes vis a vis touching and sniffing and (allegedly) forcing himself on women. There’s an easy way around that: the Democratic press can simply ignore it, knowing full well that the Republicans have a glass houses problem when it comes to sexual misadventure and so can’t throw many stones.

The real problem is that Mr. Biden is pretty clearly mentally incompetent; not merely to be a good President, he’s always been that, but even to successfully compete for the office.

I think it is extraordinarily doubtful that this man, who now seems unable to utter a diagrammable sentence of more than three words with or without a teleprompter, can take part in any debate that doesn’t immediately make his growing mental disability obvious even to his supporters. The current epidemic provides him a convenient excuse to hide from the cameras, but that can’t last indefinitely. When he eventually surfaces, the contrast in energy, coherence, and focus between him and President Trump will be glaringly evident.

It seems to me that long before November one of two things has to happen: either Vice President Biden must be gently escorted from the stage, probably with a modest acknowledgment on his part that his failing health leaves him no longer up to the task or he has to strategically choose a running mate with the explicit understanding that the running mate, and not Joe Biden, will be the de facto President.

I don’t know if that last is possible, politically speaking. But I don’t think this is something the Democrats can do with a knowing wink; I think they have to make it very clear that the ticket on the ballot is printed upside-down, and that Biden will relinquish the top position as soon as practical once assuming office. Because if that isn’t widely understood and acknowledged, the charge that the Democrats are knowingly running a mental incompetent for the highest office will stick, and that’s not a good look.

It seems likely to me that Biden will step down before November, probably well before. That brings up the Bernie problem: if he’s still sorta kinda in the running, how bad will the collateral damage be if someone other than everyone’s favorite unreconstructed communist gets the nod?

My own thinking is that someone perceived as popular and charismatic and suitably identitarian will be pulled in, Michelle Obama being the obvious and extraordinarily unpleasant pick. That’s my personal nightmare scenario, that we’ll get an awful person with high name recognition but an essentially opaque past, who will then enjoy a campaign season honeymoon and hagiography that will last as long as the press can sustain it, while the Republican opposition is savaged with ever more unhinged ferocity by a deeply and now openly corrupt press.

Not that I’ve called an election right in the last ten years, of course.

Published in Elections
Tags:

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 97 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Henry Racette: the charge that the Democrats are knowingly running a mental incompetent for the highest office will stick, and that’s not a good look.

    But they think the same of our candidate.

    Yeah, but there’s senile and there’s senile. Trump is often random and inarticulate, but you can always pretty much understand what he’s saying, and he doesn’t inject a lot of long pauses while he’s trying to remember what he was just talking about. That last is a killer.

    Is it? Biden did fine all through out the primary process. Everyone predicting his demise because of his gaffs and in ability to string three sentences together that make for a complete paragraph. I think it is clear by now that the American people (whoever the heck they actually are) don’t actually pay attention to what any politician says. At least not close enough to be bothered by lack of syntax, clarity, or logic. I mean look at Trump… he basically blathers most of his thoughts in an incoherent jumble of words, with about half the words being repeated over and over again.

    repetitive, but Biden hasn’t suggest injecting people with bleach to cure the virus. Biden is old, Trump is old and fat. Biden has cheap hair plugs, Trump has his ridiculous comb-over.

    At last count there were 8 women accusing Biden. Then there are all those creepy pictures…

    As to Trump’s accusers, I will look at them once the rabid media finds some substance to their claims. With all the smears, hoaxes and unfair and unsubstantiated attacks on Trump, apparently they were unable to present a compelling enough case for these supposed victims. And we’ve seen how they can make molehills into mountains, so if there was a there, there, I would certainly have heard about it.

    You are also factually incorrect. He never claimed he “grabbed” any woman by anything. He said, referring to a certain type of woman, “if you are rich and famous, they’ll let you grab them by the pussy”. It was an observation which has quite a bit of merit actually, and profoundly embarrassing for feminists because they know it’s true and they don’t want to face it. 

    Personally, I don’t think 20 or 30 year-old claims should have any credence. I understand the situation various women were in, but as a practical matter the statute of limitations should prevail. After a certain amount of time has passed, it’s impossible to determine if something happened or didn’t with any accuracy.

    I would welcome Biden as the nominee. He will lose badly. It looks to me your analysis is narrow and emotional. Biden is more of a loser than McCain, Romney, Kerry and Dukakis. He’s a pathetic candidate – and that’s not counting his possible mental decline. 

     

    • #61
  2. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Henry Racette: knowing full well that the Republicans have a glass houses problem when it comes to sexual misadventure and so can’t throw many stones.

    Because saying it, is the same as doing it.

    Leaving aside Trump’s proclivities, do we have credible evidence that he forced himself on staffers (or anyone else, for that matter)? That’s an honest question. Has he pushed a woman up against a wall, put his mouth on her, and his fingers….?

    Sex is its own little universe, Spin, and it all blends together. I picked my words carefully: the President has a history of sexual misadventure. Almost certainly, there will never be proof that Vice President Biden raped a woman, though that’s the allegation. People aren’t going to be nuanced about which man is beyond the pale when it comes to sexual misbehavior, they’ll just point at the other guy and say “well, he exploits women too, so what’s your point?”

    I think sexual misconduct is off the table. That, unfortunately, is a cost of electing a man of loose morals.

    [ Disclaimer: I voted for Trump, and will vote for him again. I support him, I wear the Trump2020 hat, and I defend him enthusiastically. I think he’s done a pretty good job. ]

    I couldn’t disagree more.  I have my views about what is and is not “beyond the pale” when it comes to sex.  But you do you (and whoever else’ll have you).  

    There’s worlds of difference between weird sexual behavior with willing partners and normal sexual behavior with unwilling partners.  Getting golden showers (if that ever happened, what do I know?) is just plain weird.  But if thats what you want and you can get someone to do it to you without forcing them against their will…well, that’s between the two of you.  We can have a conversation about what that means about character.  It’s something altogether different when you force your mouth on an unwilling victim, and force your fingers up inside that same willing victim.  As to evidence, well the left don’t seem to require it unless it’s a Democrat.

    So until someone can show me credible evidence that Trump has done this, beyond him just talking like a middle schooler about it, then I’ll maintain that we Republicans aren’t living in glass houses on the subject.  

    • #62
  3. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Trump cannot control himself to not utter inanities like musing about the use is a disinfectant inside the body.

    Another blatent lie…

    • #63
  4. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I think they will force him out before the convention, and pick someone there.

    They will get strong pushback on that from Biden, who likely knows where some bodies are buried. He has also received endorsements, however lukewarm, from people who would have to reverse themselves. There may be a route there with the Tara Reade accusations, but I don’t think that’s enough yet.

    I am on the record of saying that Justices Thomas and Kavanaugh should not have been disqualified by allegations. Biden should not be disqualified either.

    Really, the focus right now by a majority of people on the right is more on the double-standard of the media and Democrats in how they handled Christine Ford’s allegations, and those of other women in the Kavanaugh hearings, versus how they’re handling the Tara Reade allegations right now. That’s why Friday morning’s interview by Mika Brzezinski was such a surprise, both to conservatives and to Joseph R. Biden (and why Mika is getting such angry push-back and is having to defend herself on Twitter for treating wacky-but-lovable Uncle Joe like a Republican politician):

    The bible says, and I paraphrase:  “Do not judge.  For the manner in which you judge is the manner in which you’ll be judged.”  I’ll continue to judge Democrats the way they judge.  Biden did it, and no amount of denial is enough to say he didn’t.  Now…maybe he didn’t do it.  But that doesn’t matter, does it?  Because in the meta…he did do it.  Because all of us old white dudes do it.  Right?  

    • #64
  5. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    By the way, Trump didn’t “suggest injecting people with bleach to cure the virus.” That’s just something people say to demonstrate that television news has made them stupid.

    That’s goin’ on Facebook, Henry.  

    • #65
  6. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Franco (View Comment):
    Personally, I don’t think 20 or 30 year-old claims should have any credence. I understand the situation various women were in, but as a practical matter the statute of limitations should prevail. After a certain amount of time has passed, it’s impossible to determine if something happened or didn’t with any accuracy.

    The difference here is that she told many people about it at the time.

    • #66
  7. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Buckpasser (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    I think Biden is being somewhat undersold. Or possibly I think the ability of others to de facto manage a candidate and/or POTUS is being undersold.

    Yes, it’s pressure job–leader of the free world, etc. But, even when you factor in a well-managed campaign, it does not have to be “physical” in a way that’s disqualifying for Biden. I’s sure that, by now, he has some handlers that are pretty skilled at knowing what he can and can’t do, and Biden–being a career politician–will listen to his staff.

    Yes, he has made gaffes and those gaffes have been magnified by the media that we tend to listen to. But he will have the MSM on his side and a base obsessed with beating his opponent. He’s capable of going into full politician mode for the required periods of time.

    I’m not convinced that he’s capable of going into full politician mode for eight minutes. I’m not sure he can make it to November if he refuses to debate or speak extemporaneously for a few minutes.

    He did what had to be done during the primaries, and that will be the model. One can belittle his competition all one wants, but a couple of them had committed bases. He will not refuse to debate .

    The key is “short periods of time”. The debates with President Trump (if they take place) will not be the debates with eleventy six or how many people on the stage. It will just be two and there is no way that Biden can hold up for ninety minutes without his dementia showing.

    “[D]ementia” I am not a medical doctor or psychologist. Are you?

    I am and it sounds like you are trying to prop up Biden.

    • #67
  8. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    “[D]ementia” I am not a medical doctor or psychologist. Are you?

    I am and it sounds like you are trying to prop up Biden.

    SmackDown!  It’s awun!  It’s awun like dawnkey kawng!

    • #68
  9. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):
    Personally, I don’t think 20 or 30 year-old claims should have any credence. I understand the situation various women were in, but as a practical matter the statute of limitations should prevail. After a certain amount of time has passed, it’s impossible to determine if something happened or didn’t with any accuracy.

    The difference here is that she told many people about it at the time.

    I recognize her credibility. Much stronger case – by far – than the Blasey-Ford  allegations. I believe her as a human – from the picture I’ve been presented – but I’d like to be more informed of her political affiliations. She could still be a Democrat or maybe she transformed into a conservative, possibly as a result of her horrible experience with a powerful Democrat who ultimately presumes himself worthy of the nation’s highest office. 
    However, I cannot agree that any crime committed over seven years ago unreported, is worthy of prosecutorial efforts.

    For sex crimes, personal assaults, and such, the window should be narrower. This would encourage prompt reporting. Should it not be the duty of every rape victim to file a report for the sake of future victims?

    • #69
  10. TC Chef Inactive
    TC Chef
    @williamallen

    Two thoughts:

    If Biden actually gets on the debate stage with Trump expect him to chemically enhanced. Steroids work and won’t even be illegal if a doctor says he needs some. I think he was juiced this morning for his Morning Joe appearance.

    Speaking of nightmare scenarios, if Biden was elected and shuffled off after inauguration then who would move up to the empty VP slot? Nancy Pelosi, a heartbeat away from being President.

    Arghhhh!

    • #70
  11. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Franco (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):
    Personally, I don’t think 20 or 30 year-old claims should have any credence. I understand the situation various women were in, but as a practical matter the statute of limitations should prevail. After a certain amount of time has passed, it’s impossible to determine if something happened or didn’t with any accuracy.

    The difference here is that she told many people about it at the time.

    I recognize her credibility. Much stronger case – by far – than the Blasey-Ford allegations. I believe her as a human – from the picture I’ve been presented – but I’d like to be more informed of her political affiliations. She could still be a Democrat or maybe she transformed into a conservative, possibly as a result of her horrible experience with a powerful Democrat who ultimately presumes himself worthy of the nation’s highest office.
    However, I cannot agree that any crime committed over seven years ago unreported, is worthy of prosecutorial efforts.

    For sex crimes, personal assaults, and such, the window should be narrower. This would encourage prompt reporting. Should it not be the duty of every rape victim to file a report for the sake of future victims?

    She was, at least, a Democrat.  I read some of her statements and she indicated that she’d always looked up to Biden, and worked for him.  

    • #71
  12. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    It was as though MSNBC broke some sort of blood oath by not covering up for Biden, and therein lies the problem with the current state of journalism — too many outlets have decided to only target their news toward niche readers and viewers, mainly urban upper-middle class progressives. When one outlet gets out of line, it leaves the readers and viewers of that outlet, including other news outlets, angry and confused The Narrative’s being broken.

    And any departure from the Narrative must be punished immediately, for the same reason you have to patch the cracks in a concrete dam. Biden’s unfitness for any office is manifest, yet the Front Row must still hew to the Party Line.

    We have a cartoon media. You can see the little thought bubbles over their heads sometimes. Jake Tapper’s is written in shaky fear-drenched characters, it says “No!! Telling the truth might be habit forming! All must bow down!” 

    • #72
  13. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Spin (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):
    Personally, I don’t think 20 or 30 year-old claims should have any credence. I understand the situation various women were in, but as a practical matter the statute of limitations should prevail. After a certain amount of time has passed, it’s impossible to determine if something happened or didn’t with any accuracy.

    The difference here is that she told many people about it at the time.

    I recognize her credibility. Much stronger case – by far – than the Blasey-Ford allegations. I believe her as a human – from the picture I’ve been presented – but I’d like to be more informed of her political affiliations. She could still be a Democrat or maybe she transformed into a conservative, possibly as a result of her horrible experience with a powerful Democrat who ultimately presumes himself worthy of the nation’s highest office.
    However, I cannot agree that any crime committed over seven years ago unreported, is worthy of prosecutorial efforts.

    For sex crimes, personal assaults, and such, the window should be narrower. This would encourage prompt reporting. Should it not be the duty of every rape victim to file a report for the sake of future victims?

    She was, at least, a Democrat. I read some of her statements and she indicated that she’d always looked up to Biden, and worked for him.

    Reade apparently was to the left of Biden in her support during the primaries, backing Liz Warren first and then Sanders. I suppose if you want to conspiracy theory it, she could be some deep cover MAGA supporter, but odds are better if she timed her complaint to hurt Biden, she did it as a last-ditch effort to save Bernie’s campaign, not to help Trump in the general election.

    • #73
  14. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):
    Personally, I don’t think 20 or 30 year-old claims should have any credence. I understand the situation various women were in, but as a practical matter the statute of limitations should prevail. After a certain amount of time has passed, it’s impossible to determine if something happened or didn’t with any accuracy.

    The difference here is that she told many people about it at the time.

    I recognize her credibility. Much stronger case – by far – than the Blasey-Ford allegations. I believe her as a human – from the picture I’ve been presented – but I’d like to be more informed of her political affiliations. She could still be a Democrat or maybe she transformed into a conservative, possibly as a result of her horrible experience with a powerful Democrat who ultimately presumes himself worthy of the nation’s highest office.
    However, I cannot agree that any crime committed over seven years ago unreported, is worthy of prosecutorial efforts.

    For sex crimes, personal assaults, and such, the window should be narrower. This would encourage prompt reporting. Should it not be the duty of every rape victim to file a report for the sake of future victims?

    She was, at least, a Democrat. I read some of her statements and she indicated that she’d always looked up to Biden, and worked for him.

    Reade apparently was to the left of Biden in her support during the primaries, backing Liz Warren first and then Sanders. I suppose if you want to conspiracy theory it, she could be some deep cover MAGA supporter, but odds are better if she timed her complaint to hurt Biden, she did it as a last-ditch effort to save Bernie’s campaign, not to help Trump in the general election.

    I’m perfectly willing to presume Biden innocent. His hair-sniffing and handy-ness never struck me as a big deal anyway, and it’ll take some serious evidence to convince me that he’s a rapist.

    The big store is the media’s flamboyant bankruptcy. There are still good journalists out there, but journalism is dying.

    • #74
  15. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):

     

    I recognize her credibility. Much stronger case – by far – than the Blasey-Ford allegations. I believe her as a human – from the picture I’ve been presented – but I’d like to be more informed of her political affiliations. She could still be a Democrat or maybe she transformed into a conservative, possibly as a result of her horrible experience with a powerful Democrat who ultimately presumes himself worthy of the nation’s highest office.
    However, I cannot agree that any crime committed over seven years ago unreported, is worthy of prosecutorial efforts.

    For sex crimes, personal assaults, and such, the window should be narrower. This would encourage prompt reporting. Should it not be the duty of every rape victim to file a report for the sake of future victims?

    She was, at least, a Democrat. I read some of her statements and she indicated that she’d always looked up to Biden, and worked for him.

    Reade apparently was to the left of Biden in her support during the primaries, backing Liz Warren first and then Sanders. I suppose if you want to conspiracy theory it, she could be some deep cover MAGA supporter, but odds are better if she timed her complaint to hurt Biden, she did it as a last-ditch effort to save Bernie’s campaign, not to help Trump in the general election.

    I’m perfectly willing to presume Biden innocent. His hair-sniffing and handy-ness never struck me as a big deal anyway, and it’ll take some serious evidence to convince me that he’s a rapist.

    The big store is the media’s flamboyant bankruptcy. There are still good journalists out there, but journalism is dying.

    Journalism’s ‘cleaner’ at the local levels, because too many people go to Washington specifically to be advocacy journalists, and too many networks and news outlets there, in New York and other major cities support that type of point-of-view journalism that picks winners and losers before the story is written.

    • #75
  16. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):

     

    I recognize her credibility. Much stronger case – by far – than the Blasey-Ford allegations. I believe her as a human – from the picture I’ve been presented – but I’d like to be more informed of her political affiliations. She could still be a Democrat or maybe she transformed into a conservative, possibly as a result of her horrible experience with a powerful Democrat who ultimately presumes himself worthy of the nation’s highest office.
    However, I cannot agree that any crime committed over seven years ago unreported, is worthy of prosecutorial efforts.

    For sex crimes, personal assaults, and such, the window should be narrower. This would encourage prompt reporting. Should it not be the duty of every rape victim to file a report for the sake of future victims?

    She was, at least, a Democrat. I read some of her statements and she indicated that she’d always looked up to Biden, and worked for him.

    Reade apparently was to the left of Biden in her support during the primaries, backing Liz Warren first and then Sanders. I suppose if you want to conspiracy theory it, she could be some deep cover MAGA supporter, but odds are better if she timed her complaint to hurt Biden, she did it as a last-ditch effort to save Bernie’s campaign, not to help Trump in the general election.

    I’m perfectly willing to presume Biden innocent. His hair-sniffing and handy-ness never struck me as a big deal anyway, and it’ll take some serious evidence to convince me that he’s a rapist.

    The big store is the media’s flamboyant bankruptcy. There are still good journalists out there, but journalism is dying.

    Journalism’s ‘cleaner’ at the local levels, because too many people go to Washington specifically to be advocacy journalists, and too many networks and news outlets there, in New York and other major cities support that type of point-of-view journalism that picks winners and losers before the story is written.

    Sadly, journalism is dying even faster at the local levels. I think that’s a big part of the problem, and there’s probably no one to blame for that. Online advertising challenges local media revenue, which make hiring local reporters problematic. Gone are the days of the 1950’s reporter on the beat, and that’s a shame.

    Thank G-d we’ve still got James Lileks, last of a dying breed.

    • #76
  17. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

     

    I’m perfectly willing to presume Biden innocent. His hair-sniffing and handy-ness never struck me as a big deal anyway, and it’ll take some serious evidence to convince me that he’s a rapist.

    The big store is the media’s flamboyant bankruptcy. There are still good journalists out there, but journalism is dying.

    Journalism’s ‘cleaner’ at the local levels, because too many people go to Washington specifically to be advocacy journalists, and too many networks and news outlets there, in New York and other major cities support that type of point-of-view journalism that picks winners and losers before the story is written.

    Sadly, journalism is dying even faster at the local levels. I think that’s a big part of the problem, and there’s probably no one to blame for that. Online advertising challenges local media revenue, which make hiring local reporters problematic. Gone are the days of the 1950’s reporter on the beat, and that’s a shame.

    Thank G-d we’ve still got James Lileks, last of a dying breed.

    I think the main thing is the more local a news story is, the less anyone can put spin on it, because they’ll have readers in their back yard who are close to the story, while it’s easier to put a narrative on a Washington report and never get called on it. You’ve seen that in the past few years with the Stoneman-Dougulas shootings and the Jussie Smollett assault claim — in both cases, the national media was perfectly fine parachuting in and taking Sheriff Israel and Jussie at their word, because that fit the national narrative the big media outlets wanted to use. It was the local media outlets in Miami and Chicago that exposed the truth, in part because it would have been tougher for the local media outlets to lie to their readers and viewers who knew the truth. The Washington/New York based people could have cared less about that.

     

    • #77
  18. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    TC Chef (View Comment):
    Speaking of nightmare scenarios, if Biden was elected and shuffled off after inauguration then who would move up to the empty VP slot? Nancy Pelosi, a heartbeat away from being President.

    Incorrect. Nancy would be first in line until such time as a new VPotUS were nominated by the new president (Joe’s VP) and confirmed. Nancy would still be Speaker of the House unless she were the nominee as VP.

    • #78
  19. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Is it? Biden did fine all through out the primary process.

    I don’t see that Biden did at all well in the primary process. He neither said, nor did, anything of note. He offered no workable plans or proposals of note. He drew tiny audiences.

    Biden did well in the primary election results based on name recognition, and not being a communist. As the choice was pretty much evenly split between Vice President Biden, a communist, and 27 people who are not Biden.

    Biden also got help from the large number of other candidates, who took each other out leaving Sleepy Joe and Comrade Bernie.   Although Bernie more likely reflected their beliefs, the Dem elites realized Bernie as the nominee would sink the Democrat ticket faster than leaving a girl in a sinking car to drown.

    No, the Dems are stuck with Joe, but it wouldn’t surprise me if there are plans behind discussed in (purple) smoke-filled rooms . . .

    • #79
  20. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Franco (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):
    Personally, I don’t think 20 or 30 year-old claims should have any credence. I understand the situation various women were in, but as a practical matter the statute of limitations should prevail. After a certain amount of time has passed, it’s impossible to determine if something happened or didn’t with any accuracy.

    The difference here is that she told many people about it at the time.

    I recognize her credibility. Much stronger case – by far – than the Blasey-Ford allegations. I believe her as a human – from the picture I’ve been presented – but I’d like to be more informed of her political affiliations. She could still be a Democrat or maybe she transformed into a conservative, possibly as a result of her horrible experience with a powerful Democrat who ultimately presumes himself worthy of the nation’s highest office.
    However, I cannot agree that any crime committed over seven years ago unreported, is worthy of prosecutorial efforts.

    For sex crimes, personal assaults, and such, the window should be narrower. This would encourage prompt reporting. Should it not be the duty of every rape victim to file a report for the sake of future victims?

    There is something to be said for a young woman in Washington trying to accuse a powerful man. Mary Jo Kopechne cannot be reached for comment. Nor can the waitress in the “waitress sandwich.”

    • #80
  21. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

     

    I’m perfectly willing to presume Biden innocent. His hair-sniffing and handy-ness never struck me as a big deal anyway, and it’ll take some serious evidence to convince me that he’s a rapist.

    The big store is the media’s flamboyant bankruptcy. There are still good journalists out there, but journalism is dying.

    Journalism’s ‘cleaner’ at the local levels, because too many people go to Washington specifically to be advocacy journalists, and too many networks and news outlets there, in New York and other major cities support that type of point-of-view journalism that picks winners and losers before the story is written.

    Sadly, journalism is dying even faster at the local levels. I think that’s a big part of the problem, and there’s probably no one to blame for that. Online advertising challenges local media revenue, which make hiring local reporters problematic. Gone are the days of the 1950’s reporter on the beat, and that’s a shame.

    Thank G-d we’ve still got James Lileks, last of a dying breed.

    I think the main thing is the more local a news story is, the less anyone can put spin on it, because they’ll have readers in their back yard who are close to the story, while it’s easier to put a narrative on a Washington report and never get called on it. You’ve seen that in the past few years with the Stoneman-Dougulas shootings and the Jussie Smollett assault claim — in both cases, the national media was perfectly fine parachuting in and taking Sheriff Israel and Jussie at their word, because that fit the national narrative the big media outlets wanted to use. It was the local media outlets in Miami and Chicago that exposed the truth, in part because it would have been tougher for the local media outlets to lie to their readers and viewers who knew the truth. The Washington/New York based people could have cared less about that.

     

    The Minneapolis Star News has had no problem ignoring the antics of Congress critter Omar.

    • #81
  22. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):

     

    Journalism’s ‘cleaner’ at the local levels, because too many people go to Washington specifically to be advocacy journalists, and too many networks and news outlets there, in New York and other major cities support that type of point-of-view journalism that picks winners and losers before the story is written.

    Sadly, journalism is dying even faster at the local levels. I think that’s a big part of the problem, and there’s probably no one to blame for that. Online advertising challenges local media revenue, which make hiring local reporters problematic. Gone are the days of the 1950’s reporter on the beat, and that’s a shame.

    Thank G-d we’ve still got James Lileks, last of a dying breed.

    I think the main thing is the more local a news story is, the less anyone can put spin on it, because they’ll have readers in their back yard who are close to the story, while it’s easier to put a narrative on a Washington report and never get called on it. You’ve seen that in the past few years with the Stoneman-Dougulas shootings and the Jussie Smollett assault claim — in both cases, the national media was perfectly fine parachuting in and taking Sheriff Israel and Jussie at their word, because that fit the national narrative the big media outlets wanted to use. It was the local media outlets in Miami and Chicago that exposed the truth, in part because it would have been tougher for the local media outlets to lie to their readers and viewers who knew the truth. The Washington/New York based people could have cared less about that.

     

    The Minneapolis Star News has had no problem ignoring the antics of Congress critter Omar.

    True, but Minneapolis is one of those places, like Austin, that has lots of media people who really want to be part of the bi-coastal cool kids club, and not stuck surrounded by Flyover country troglodyte dweebs.

     

    • #82
  23. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    There is something to be said for a young woman in Washington trying to accuse a powerful man. Mary Jo Kopechne cannot be reached for comment. Nor can the waitress in the “waitress sandwich.”

    Speaking of which, Chris Dodd is back.  Heading the Biden VP “search committee.”  You cannot make this stuff up.

     

    • #83
  24. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Hoyacon (View Comment):
    Speaking of which, Chris Dodd is back. Heading the Biden VP “search committee.”

    😲 How is that search being conducted?

    • #84
  25. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    All we have to do to know that the plan to replace Biden is on, is to look at how he gets treated by the DNC PR outlets MSNBC, CNN, the New York Times…It looks like it has begun.

    Timing is important too. They have to complete the swap before the convention. They can best do it by waiting for Biden ( and the deep state) to select his VP, then nudge him out and have him endorse the VP. 

    When they start ‘reporting’ on these #metoo scandals, or any other scandals involving Joe, it’s a giant tell. Hillary and the DNC control these outlets. Metoo is their #goto method to undermine their enemies and opponents.

    Other scandals are tricky to play up because they are all implicated. So the metoo thing will dominate, plus his diminished mental capacities.

     

     

    • #85
  26. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):
    Speaking of which, Chris Dodd is back. Heading the Biden VP “search committee.”

    😲 How is that search being conducted?

    Biden team: “Well, we know we need a female on the ticket–so let’s let Dodd pick!”

    • #86
  27. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):
    Speaking of which, Chris Dodd is back. Heading the Biden VP “search committee.”

    😲 How is that search being conducted?

    Biden team: “Well, we know we need a female on the ticket–so let’s let Dodd pick!”

    Edward M. Kennedy was unavailable for comment.

    • #87
  28. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    If you contrast Trump of today to Trump of 2000, the cognitive decline is obvious on its face.

    You’re definitely seeing something very different than what the rest of us see.

    • #88
  29. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    If you contrast Trump of today to Trump of 2000, the cognitive decline is obvious on its face.

    You’re definitely seeing something very different than what the rest of us see.

    That’s pretty much the sine qua non of the anti-Trump right.

     

    • #89
  30. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

    This is Joe before the decline. He can put sentences together, but this is the real Joe, a braggart,  a blusterer and a bully. Also an exaggerator to the point of lying. Here he tells a series of lies about his past, his placement, his awards. It’s quite a display.

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.