The Senate Should Vote to Dismiss the Two Impeachment Counts

 

The Constitution states: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

The house charged Trump with:

  • Abuse of Powers
  • Obstruction of Congress

The House considered impeaching Trump on counts that are included such as bribery but instead proceeded on these two counts. Can’t the Senate vote to dismiss the charges since they don’t meet the criteria for impeachment? There’s no need for the House managers to appear. I realize that it would be useful to investigate how the standards for a whistleblower were suddenly modified and it would be helpful to know about the connections between Schiff and the supposed whistleblower. But there’s no need for the Senate to have deliberate these ridiculous unconstitutional grounds for impeachment.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 42 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Here are the Articles of Impeachment.  If they are proven to be true, Trump should be convicted and removed.

    ARTICLE I: ABUSE OF POWER

    The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” and that the President “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. In his conduct of the office of President of the United States—and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—Donald J. Trump has abused the powers of the Presidency, in that:

    Using the powers of his high office, President Trump solicited the interference of a foreign government, Ukraine, in the 2020 United States Presidential election. He did so through a scheme or course of conduct that included soliciting the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations that would benefit his reelection, harm the election prospects of a political opponent, and influence the 2020 United States Presidential election to his advantage. President Trump also sought to pressure the Government of Ukraine to take these steps by conditioning official United States Government acts of significant value to Ukraine on its public announcement of the investigations. President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct for corrupt purposes in pursuit of personal political benefit. In so doing, President Trump used the powers of the Presidency in a manner that compromised the national security of the United States and undermined the integrity of the United States democratic process. He thus ignored and injured the interests of the Nation.

    President Trump engaged in this scheme or course of conduct through the following means:

    (1) President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents Within and Outside the United States Government corruptly solicited the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into—

    (A) a political opponent, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden,; and

    (B) a discredited theory promoted by Russia alleging that Ukraine—rather than Russia—interfered in the 2016 United States Presidential election.

    (2) With the same corrupt motives, President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents within and outside the United States Government—conditioned two official acts on the public announcements that he had requested—

    (A) the release of $391 million of United States taxpayer funds that Congress had appropriated on a bipartisan basis for the purpose of providing vital military and security assistance to Ukraine to oppose Russian aggression and which President Trump had ordered suspended; and

    (B) a head of state meeting at the White House, which the President of Ukraine sought to demonstrate continued United States support for the Government of Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.

    (3) Faced with the public revelation of his actions, President Trump ultimately released the military and security assistance to the Government of Ukraine, but has persisted in openly and corruptly urging and soliciting Ukraine to undertake investigations for his personal political benefit.

    These actions were consistent with President Trump’s previous invitations of foreign interference in United States elections.

    In all of this, President Trump abused the powers of the Presidency by ignoring and injuring national security and other vital national interests to obtain an improper personal political benefit. He has also betrayed the Nation by abusing his high office to enlist a foreign power in corrupting democratic elections.

    Wherefore President Trump, by such conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national security and the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law. President Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

    ARTICLE II: OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS

    The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives “shall have the sole Power of Impeachment” and that the President “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. In his conduct of the office of President of the United States and in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed—Donald J. Trump has directed the unprecedented, categorical, and indiscriminate defiance of subpoenas issued by the House of Representatives pursuant to its “sole Power of Impeachment”. President Trump has abused the powers of the Presidency in a manner offensive to, and subversive of, the Constitution, in that:

    The House of Representatives has engaged in an impeachment inquiry focused on President Trump’s corrupt solicitation of the Government of Ukraine to interfere in the 2020 United States Presidential election. As part of this impeachment inquiry, the Committees undertaking the investigation served subpoenas seeking documents and testimony deemed vital to the inquiry from various Executive Branch agencies and offices, and current and former officials.

    In response, without lawful cause or excuse, President Trump directed Executive Branch agencies, offices, and officials not to comply with those subpoenas. President Trump thus interposed the powers of the Presidency against the lawful subpoenas of the House of Representatives, and assumed to himself functions and judgments necessary to the exercise of the “sole Power of Impeachment” vested by the Constitution in the House of Representatives.

    President Trump abused the powers of his high office through the following means:

    (1) Directing the White House to defy a lawful subpoena by withholding the production of documents sought therein by the Committees.

    (2) Directing other Executive Branch agencies and offices to defy lawful subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees—in response to which the Department of State, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Energy, and Department of Defense refused to produce a single document or record.

    (3) Directing current and former Executive Branch officials not to cooperate with the Committees—in response to which nine Administration officials defied subpoenas for testimony, namely John Michael “Mick” Mulvaney, Robert B. Blair, John A. Eisenberg, Michael Ellis, Preston Wells Griffith, Russell T. Vought, Michael Duffey, Brian McCormack, and T. Ulrich Brechbuhl.

    These actions were consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections.

    Through these actions, President Trump sought to arrogate to himself the right to determine the propriety, scope, and nature of an impeachment inquiry into his own conduct, as well as the unilateral prerogative to deny any and all information to the House of Representatives in the exercise of its “sole Power of Impeachment”. In the history of the Republic, no President has ever ordered the complete defiance of an impeachment inquiry or sought to obstruct and impede so comprehensively the ability of the House of Representatives to investigate “high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. This abuse of office served to cover up the President’s own repeated misconduct and to seize and control the power of impeachment—and thus to nullify a vital constitutional safeguard vested solely in the House of Representatives.

    In all of this, President Trump has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice, and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.

    Wherefore, President Trump, by such conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law. President Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

    • #31
  2. Bishop Wash, Blk X-man/Wh pilot Member
    Bishop Wash, Blk X-man/Wh pilot
    @BishopWash

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Wherefore, President Trump, by such conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to the Constitution if allowed to remain in office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with self-governance and the rule of law. President Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

    That’s why Pelosi copied the last impeachment proceedings by sending the articles of impeachment over the same afternoon they were passed so the threat could potentially be removed quickly sat on the articles for weeks.

    • #32
  3. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    I’m glad I got to read the articles.  They’re garbage.

    • #33
  4. OldPhil Coolidge
    OldPhil
    @OldPhil

    Absolutely nothing. Zilch. Nada. Less than zero. Flailing inanities.

    • #34
  5. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Manny (View Comment):

    I’m glad I got to read the articles. They’re garbage.

    Thanks Gary!

    • #35
  6. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    (A) a political opponent, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden,

    Not yet. 

    So maybe we should wait – If Bernie gets the nomination then this becomes moot.

    Nah, just kidding.

    Dismiss them already.

    • #36
  7. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    I have thought and have written for =quite a while that the sham impeachment is aboiut trying to block Trump’s nomination of a replacement for RBG. Kamala Harris has just proven me right.

    Now that the Democrats’ partisan impeachment has reached the Senate, failed 2020 presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Kamala Harris is making a similar argument to put the brakes on Trump’s making the judiciary great again. “Today, the United States Senate will receive articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump and begin to determine whether the president’s actions warrant his removal from office,” Harris said in a statement. “The president is charged with high crimes and misdemeanors, and the Senate must take seriously its constitutional role in this process. During the time when articles of impeachment are before the Senate, it would be wholly inappropriate to advance the president’s nominees to the federal judiciary.”

    https://pjmedia.com/trending/kamala-harris-just-proved-that-impeachment-is-about-blocking-trumps-judicial-nominees/

     

    Nope. Not in the constitution. Convict him or shut up.

    A case can be made that since he impeached that his judges need to be removed

    Nope. confirmed by the Senate.

    • #37
  8. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Here are the Articles of Impeachment. If they are proven to be true, Trump should be convicted and removed.

    They aren’t.

    The Senate should just vote and dismiss them.

     

    • #38
  9. MichaelKennedy Inactive
    MichaelKennedy
    @MichaelKennedy

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    The Dims are replaying the Kavanaugh hearings. Start with a very strained accusation in order to open the floodgates to even more preposterous accusations. They will throw the kitchen sink at Trump in order to hurt his re-election prospects.

    Exactly correct.

    I think this why Trump is keeping his tax returns private. There is nothing wrong there, but tax law is so complex and opinions vary so widely on tax strategies, that he doesnt want public investigations opened up = nor does he want his business acumen smeared by pundits.

    As long as the pundits have no data, everything pundits say on the topic is rank speculation and can be easily dismissed without comment.

    It was hilarious when some IRS “resister” leaked a copy of his 1995 tax return to Maddow. She waved it at the camera and got ready for a big scoop. Then she noticed he had paid $25 million in taxes that year.  Ooops !  Never to be seen again.

    • #39
  10. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    The Dims are replaying the Kavanaugh hearings. Start with a very strained accusation in order to open the floodgates to even more preposterous accusations. They will throw the kitchen sink at Trump in order to hurt his re-election prospects.

    Exactly correct.

    I think this why Trump is keeping his tax returns private. There is nothing wrong there, but tax law is so complex and opinions vary so widely on tax strategies, that he doesnt want public investigations opened up = nor does he want his business acumen smeared by pundits.

    As long as the pundits have no data, everything pundits say on the topic is rank speculation and can be easily dismissed without comment.

    It was hilarious when some IRS “resister” leaked a copy of his 1995 tax return to Maddow. She waved it at the camera and got ready for a big scoop. Then she noticed he had paid $25 million in taxes that year. Ooops ! Never to be seen again.

    Yes, she knew what she had from the get go. She built it up all day for ratings, and is probably a reason she has lost so much now.

    This maybe why the 1995 tax return was selected for leaking – if it had been a year when Trump had paid near zero taxes – it would have been a 3 ring media circus for months.

    • #40
  11. Franco Member
    Franco
    @Franco

     

     

    • #41
  12. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    (1) President Trump—acting both directly and through his agents Within and Outside the United States Government corruptly solicited the Government of Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into—

    (A) a political opponent, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden,;

    I’m sure you of course are clamoring for Senators Warren, Sanders and Klobuchar to recuse themselves as they have an obvious conflict of interest.

    • #42
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.