Hollywood Revolution: Conservative Spinoffs

 

Proceeding from Gary’s revolution (let’s be sure to pin it all on him and Titus, if there’s trouble), this should be a fun and hopefully productive prompt. What is a film or TV show premise that you had high hopes for but was spoiled by leftism or by any heavy-handed propaganda?

As you know, no challenge is so daunting as a blank slate. “Hey, you should make a conservative film!” Well, that’s … not helpful. We can’t all be script writers. But let’s at least attempt to get the ball rolling with some ideas.

The goal is not to come up with overtly political stories. Rather, it’s to present familiar tales in ways more amenable to the Right’s values.

For example, maybe you enjoy grandiose disaster movies and you just want one without the theme of climate change.

Perhaps you would like a spacefaring story that doesn’t claim we had to leave Earth because humanity stinks and we ruin everything. Maybe curiosity and ambition are reasons enough to search the stars.

Or you might want a romance in which characters don’t jump into bed just because they enjoyed a day together.

The more specific you can be, the better. Name a film or two that had great but wasted potential. Name a show that started out well but fell apart when the usual bunch took over in later seasons. What stories are worth retelling … only without the nonsense this time?

Published in Entertainment
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 85 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    The Black Code

    Black museum director and PBS host Myles Graff DeTyrone is a fixture of the Manhattan social scene, rich, famous, and all but worshipped as America’s foremost popularizer of the sciences. But all of that starts coming apart and crashing around him when he starts investigating a cryptic note from his grandfather, an early civil rights leader. The one legible word, written in Cyrillic–“chorny”–means black in Russian.

    One of the earliest accusations thrown at the civil rights movement in the Fifties and Sixties was that it was a Communist-funded plot to disrupt America. To his growing horror, DeTyrone discovers that in fact, that’s correct–tens of millions of dollars were spent by the Russians to influence the 1968 presidential elections, defeating Nixon. If the proof still exists, it’s in a secret vault, a hundred feet below the Martin Luther King Jr Library in Atlanta.

    He must know the truth. He must get inside that vault. But by risking the reputation of a sacred cause, DeTyrone is breaking the “Black code” that demands solidarity at all costs.

    I would humbly suggest that Code Black would be a better title. 

    • #31
  2. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Brain implants calibrated for increases in concentration, pain blocking, etc. lead to addiction/other wierd behaviors. Poss. they can kill the brain by remote. 

    • #32
  3. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    TBA (View Comment):

    Brain implants calibrated for increases in concentration, pain blocking, etc. lead to addiction/other wierd behaviors. Poss. they can kill the brain by remote.

    Sounds like an it could be an adaptation of Terminal Man by Micheal Crichton (1972)

    • #33
  4. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Hilliard, OH (a cable-style streamer that’s cultish, comic, ironic and eerie) is about a real life museum of television, located in a small Ohio suburb. The museum manager lives in a house behind the modest-looking premises. At night, the sets light up with the spirits of long vanished Americans who comment on real life, and each other (think of the jars of presidential heads in Futurama). 

    • #34
  5. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    The Lady Decides (Made for Ricochet’s OWN Women’s Lifetime Network)

    It’s not a mansion, but it’s one of the nicest lakeside houses in a country retreat. Clare Boothe Luce–pioneering Thirties author, conservative columnist, Forties Congresswoman and in the Fifties, our first female ambassador–is spending the last days of summer 1986, aware that it’s likely to be her last, that she’ll soon die. Old friends come by, and old memories are stirred by a phonograph record brought by a friend, of a rousing, funny speech of Clare’s at the Republican Convention of 1944. A young reporter, a woman from Time magazine, is totally clueless about this one-time tigress who ruled her husband’s Time and Life magazine empire. Clare is tartly amused, but softens and brings her up to date on her life, what she’s seen, and why her version of feminism is so at odds with the version that’s evolved by then.

    This is actually not a high budget story; you need a nice waterside home, and if your community doesn’t have one, something that’s impressive but not the Taj Mahal will do just fine. Like Downton Abbey, only your exteriors need to be filmed there, anyway. It’s mostly actors in “old” makeup talking, to introduce them decades younger, coming to the house to cajole or confront her. Luce had an amazing life, and what’s most amazing is today’s feminists have totally disowned and forgotten her.

    • #35
  6. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    How about a story where a young attractive woman who is a successful Chicago attorney goes back to her hometown for the holidays and discovers her ex-boyfriend is about to move most of the town manufacturing jobs to Communist China? The spark is still there but she goes all MAGA on him, leading the crusade to save American jobs. 

    If you want to capture suburban women, you have to go full Hallmark. 

    • #36
  7. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    I always thought The Good Wife petered out at the end.

    • #37
  8. Songwriter Inactive
    Songwriter
    @user_19450

    Some related, but somewhat random, thoughts and observations:

    1. Watched Season 1 of Altered Carbon, a futuristic whodunit that combined themes from Minority Report with cloning and class warfare.  It had a pretty dark (conservative) slant on the foolishness of transferring our minds into other bodies (“sleeves”) with the pursuit of what would essentially be eternal life.
    2. It’s been my observation that almost any TV drama series that runs past three seasons begins to drift off the rails, generally to the Left.  
    3. Any series created by David E. Kelley will be brilliant the first two seasons, okay in the 3rd season, and unwatchable by season four. The most maddening TV creator – ever.
    4. Any drama created by Aaron Sorkin will be filled with the smartest foolish characters imaginable.  They will all speak in brilliant run-on sentences, worthy of the Apostle Paul, and speak some of the most naive nonsense ever uttered by a human since the dawn of time. (And for the record, Col. Jessup was the good guy in “A Few Good Men.”)
    5. I’ve written a lot of commercialized music in my career.  I’ve written songs (words and music), radio ID themes, film cues, musical numbers, musical librettos, TV production music, podcast themes, and jingles to sell everything from tacos to airline tickets. But the single hardest creative task I ever tried my hand at was writing an original screenplay with a solid beginning, middle, and ending. So any body that can write a TV series, even a bad one, gets some (grudging) respect from me.

     

    • #38
  9. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    Aaron Miller (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):
    Any script writer can supply the plot ideas and write the characters and any composer/arranger can do the theme music, better than we ordinary people can.

    One reason for this conversation is that Ricochet doesn’t just include ordinary people. It includes people who have published novels, produced films, etc. I myself like to think that I could draft a script or novel, but I won’t claim to be a writer until I do.

    OK then, that makes sense. Let the writers write.

    Another reason is that all writers, whatever their motivations,inevitably infuse their works with assumptions and themes particular to their own worldviews and interests. People are commonly blind to such assumptions until the ideas are pointed out by contrary parties. Leftists, being culturally dominant in popular media, can avoid such conflict and so often remain unaware of their biases. Or, like me, they believe one’s own biases can be reasonable and important enough to maintain in expression despite the aggravation.

    This part I didn’t get. We need writers fighting on our side. All the writers, gaffers, best boys, etc. are currently working for them.

    In short, most professional scriptwriters lean Left and we would do better to foster our own than attempt to persuade them to abandon their beliefs in their art. We need to make our own stories.

    That’s the point I was trying to make. We need execution. Hire our own scriptwriters. We already have the ideas. Our ideas even have a strategic strength: they are true, and the ideas of the Hollywood proggies are all pure romantic-sounding lies. If some gaffer, prop person, or assistant executive producer doesn’t understand the flaws in Marxist facts and logic, call me and I will explain it during his or her lunch break. But I don’t think there is much marginal return to my labor. Like any well-insured husband, I’d be worth more to the cause dead.

     

    On the contrary, you provide the marginal return we’re all waiting for: you’re energized and understand the problem. You’re a spark plug, a potential activist: alive, you’re worth a million bucks to the movement. 

    Here’s the deal with Hollywood: we don’t have an issue with gaffers (electricians), grips (big tough guys who lift stuff), drivers, guards, or catering. We don’t have an issue with the camera crew, whose leader escaped from Ukraine in 1983. Technicians are fairly conservative. Even the actors are a mixed bunch: don’t forget, it’s a business built on looks, which can come from anywhere. Those tall, corn-fed blondes grew up in some conservative places and some liberal ones. 

    The writers are leftist. Directors and writers hate each other, so the directors will sometimes take conservative positions just to keep the aggravation going. 

    The financiers are not leftists. Almost all could be classified as social liberals, but that’s not due to Hollywood; that’s due to the increasing tendency for America’s rich to support woke causes that won’t cost them money directly. 

    • #39
  10. Jim Kearney Member
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    Insofar as TV concepts ruined by left wing execution, so many choices, so little space.

    Seated next to this retired TV critic/professor, my wife hears about all of them, from lines of dialogue to big picture full-on lectures. She had an elderly aunt who used to tell the same few stories over and over, including one about the culinary value of chicken fat, or schmaltz. As I grow older, my “schmaltz story” is how Law & Order went from savvy mysteries to left wing polemics around the time the writers were traumatized by the 2000 election.

    Here are three others which really nettle.

    1. The District aired on CBS from 2000-2004. It was supposedly based on Jack Maple’s book The Crime Fighter, which documented the pioneering policing techniques which Deputy Commissioner Maple, PC William Bratton, and Mayor Giuliani used to conquer street crime in New York City. The mediocre TV show moved the setting to Washington, reversed the racial politics inside out, fictionalized all the characters from scratch, never figured out how to work Craig Nelson’s PC into the stories, and dropped Maple’s character completely — a telegenic opportunity lost. Worst of all, the series wasted the perfect property for telling an important story with historical accuracy. This could have been to law enforcement storytelling what HBO’s From the Earth to the Moon was to the Apollo program, a very consequential story told with respect for history, and utterly without regard to political correctness.
    2. The West Wing. Okay, their side got to give their fictionalized version of Washington. No complaints, free speech, I barely watched it, but many did. It proved that a soft franchise like politics could find a prime time audience. So where’s ours? You think we don’t have an audience? Hello, ever heard of Rush Limbaugh? Ronald Reagan? President Trump?
    3. House of Cards, the Netflix/Kevin Spacey version. This was worth watching, at least early on, with the strongest plot points coming directly from the superior British original starring Ian Richardson, and its wonderful sequel, To Play the King. In the Brit version, Francis Urquhart is a Conservative M.P. He’s just as ruthless as Spacey’s Frank Underwood, but lots more charming. Why did the writers have to make him a Democrat? Maybe Hollywood writers just can’t countenance slightly sympathetic (however murderous) Republican anti-heroes.

    There are also countless minor quibbles about individual characters and plot points which really would have worked much better another way. For instance, in David Milch’s brilliant Deadwood, the character George Hearst was an evil villain. Historically, not so. I know evil businessmen are a prime time staple, but David Milch is better than that. That family’s had enough bad press, and created much along the way, but George was a brilliant mining genius and … oh, maybe that’s why Hollywood gave him the shaft.

    Okay, one more. The Americans. Again, a well produced show, but not the great American cold war spy drama, which is yet to be told. The Soviets did have a special school to train spies in how to be American, and they did plant sleeper agents here for decades. That much is true, and kind of funny if you think about exam week in spy school. True or false, Mel Allen announced Dodger games? What are Barbie’s hollow parts? What’s the difference between Fats Domino and Chubby Checker? But you know what I’d like for a really good story twist? Show us the Soviet sleeper agents left over after 1989, and make one a Presidential candidate’s spouse. That’s what the great espionage author Charles McCarry did in Lucky Bastard, and I think it would make a wonderful and controversial television adaptation if Netflix, Amazon, or Epix would dare. Which they probably wouldn’t.

    • #40
  11. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Brain implants calibrated for increases in concentration, pain blocking, etc. lead to addiction/other wierd behaviors. Poss. they can kill the brain by remote.

    Sounds like an it could be an adaptation of Terminal Man by Micheal Crichton (1972)

    “HAVE A GORILLA.” 

    • #41
  12. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    TBA (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Brain implants calibrated for increases in concentration, pain blocking, etc. lead to addiction/other wierd behaviors. Poss. they can kill the brain by remote.

    Sounds like an it could be an adaptation of Terminal Man by Micheal Crichton (1972)

    “HAVE A GORILLA.”

    No thanks, trying to cut back.

    • #42
  13. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Jim KearneyHouse of Cards, the Netflix/Kevin Spacey version. This was worth watching, at least early on, with the strongest plot points coming directly from the superior British original…

    But they lost me when they couldn’t quite make the translation to the realities of American politics. The episode that did it was the nationwide teacher’s strike. You can pull that off in the UK but not in the States. There are 13.5K individual school districts in the states, each with their own contracts for teachers. A nationwide strike would fall like a, uh… er… house of cards. 

    • #43
  14. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    When “Battlestar Galactica” (a show that back in the 70s had overtly religious–and Mormon–themes) became an indictment on America, George Bush, and the Iraq war, I quit watching.

    Were you in on this thread? I confess that I don’t recall.

    I don’t think I saw that one.

    • #44
  15. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Jim Kearney (View Comment):

    Insofar as TV concepts ruined by left wing execution, so many choices, so little space.

    Seated next to this retired TV critic/professor, my wife hears about all of them, from lines of dialogue to big picture full-on lectures. She had an elderly aunt who used to tell the same few stories over and over, including one about the culinary value of chicken fat, or schmaltz. As I grow older, my “schmaltz story” is how Law & Order went from savvy mysteries to left wing polemics around the time the writers were traumatized by the 2000 election.

    Here are three others which really nettle.

    1. The District aired on CBS from 2000-2004. It was supposedly based on Jack Maple’s book The Crime Fighter, which documented the pioneering policing techniques which Deputy Commissioner Maple, PC William Bratton, and Mayor Giuliani used to conquer street crime in New York City. The mediocre TV show moved the setting to Washington, reversed the racial politics inside out, fictionalized all the characters from scratch, never figured out how to work Craig Nelson’s PC into the stories, and dropped Maple’s character completely — a telegenic opportunity lost. Worst of all, the series wasted the perfect property for telling an important story with historical accuracy. This could have been to law enforcement storytelling what HBO’s From the Earth to the Moon was to the Apollo program, a very consequential story told with respect for history, and utterly without regard to political correctness.
    2. The West Wing. Okay, their side got to give their fictionalized version of Washington. No complaints, free speech, I barely watched it, but many did. It proved that a soft franchise like politics could find a prime time audience. So where’s ours? You think we don’t have an audience? Hello, ever heard of Rush Limbaugh? Ronald Reagan? President Trump?
    3. House of Cards, the Netflix/Kevin Spacey version. This was worth watching, at least early on, with the strongest plot points coming directly from the superior British original starring Ian Richardson, and its wonderful sequel, To Play the King. In the Brit version, Francis Urquhart is a Conservative M.P. He’s just as ruthless as Spacey’s Frank Underwood, but lots more charming. Why did the writers have to make him a Democrat? Maybe Hollywood writers just can’t countenance slightly sympathetic (however murderous) Republican anti-heroes.

    There are also countless minor quibbles about individual characters and plot points which really would have worked much better another way. For instance, in David Milch’s brilliant Deadwood, the character George Hearst was an evil villain. Historically, not so. I know evil businessmen are a prime time staple, but David Milch is better than that. That family’s had enough bad press, and created much along the way, but George was a brilliant mining genius and … oh, maybe that’s why Hollywood gave him the shaft.

    Okay, one more. The Americans. Again, a well produced show, but not the great American cold war spy drama, which is yet to be told. The Soviets did have a special school to train spies in how to be American, and they did plant sleeper agents here for decades. That much is true, and kind of funny if you think about exam week in spy school. True or false, Mel Allen announced Dodger games? What are Barbie’s hollow parts? What’s the difference between Fats Domino and Chubby Checker? But you know what I’d like for a really good story twist? Show us the Soviet sleeper agents left over after 1989, and make one a Presidential candidate’s spouse. That’s what the great espionage author Charles McCarry did in Lucky Bastard, and I think it would make a wonderful and controversial television adaptation if Netflix, Amazon, or Epix would dare. Which they probably wouldn’t.

    There’s a tale to be told about the hastily made mid-series revisions on “The Untouchables” (1959-63), once ballyhooed and condemned as the most violent show on TV, which in truth it probably was. Desi Arnaz was getting the complaints on all sides, and Desilu wilted a little.

    Look at an early episode. Every opening features violence, often unusually personal, even sadistic. Par for the course today; not in 1959, outside of Mickey Spillane. Every show ends in a shootout. The show had a unique moody look, often filmed “night for night”–real darkness, which is a pain, production wise, and raises costs.

    After the networks got raked over the coals in Congress, Desilu didn’t neuter the show, but they made some careful trims. The openings dropped the cruel, Tarantino-esque shock effect. Shootouts were briefer. Women were brought in as social workers to express concern for gangsters’ children. More shows were set in daytime.

    Superficial graphics changes had a subtle effect. The background behind the credits was now newspaper headlines, and each episode opened, still-framed, on the pages of a book, “The Depression, 1929-36”, as if to say, this isn’t just a bunch of thugs; this is US history.

    • #45
  16. :thinking: no superfluity of n… Member
    :thinking: no superfluity of n…
    @TheRoyalFamily

    I want to say The Simpsons, but I think its politicking is more a symptom of the lack of ideas and talent than anything else. 

    Star Trek has always had a lean to the left, at least in comparison to the eras in which it was created, but Discovery was a hot mess, in large part because it tried to substitute wokeness for good writing. Like many people that know about Trek, but don’t know Trek, the writers thought that Trek was supposed to be a lefty message show, as opposed to The Twilight Zone On a Spaceship.  

    I’m not really hip to many shows and movies, especially these days, but I do know that a lot of video games have caught the bug too. The Wolfenstein series went from a generic shooter about shooting Nazis to SJW message shooter games about shooting Nazis. The Civilization series also has gone woke with the latest game; where the loading screens and encyclopedia entries in Civ V have important and/or relevant historical quotes from philosophers, leaders, inventors, and scientists, all narrated by Morgan Sheppard, in Civ VI there are pithy, barely-related, and/or comedic quotes from actors, modern politicians, comedians, and other nobodies, narrated by Sean Bean (who not only lacks the gravitas and dignity of Sheppard’s performance, but also can’t pronounce some of the stuff). This on top of the global warming events in the recent updates, or the attempted balance of male and female in civilization leaders (leading to situations like Catherine de’Medici  being France’s representative). And all that’s just the tip of the iceberg. 

    • #46
  17. Jim Kearney Member
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    Gary McVey (View Comment):
    “The Untouchables” (1959-63), which was once ballyhooed and condemned as the most violent show on TV

    Were you somehow allowed to watch it, Gary?

    The nun made it clear we weren’t to watch on account of excessive violence.

    [Same nun periodically took 6th graders into closet; SFX SLAPPING SOUNDS; student emerges with red finger marks on face; Sister follows, rolling down sleeves of her black habit.]

     

    • #47
  18. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    So the book I want to see as a movie is called Dawn of Wonder. It is a fantasy coming-of-age story about a boy who’s female best-friend was kidnapped from her small village by slavers intent on using her for a special sacrifice that civilization practices.

    In his desire to prevent others from meeting her fate, he seeks skills to help protect people and overcomes fears born from his own personal traumas, all while making new friends, pulling pranks, exploring where he shouldn’t, and building relationships with his mentors and teachers.

    It’s a great book. And some of the imagery in the book could translate easily to the big screen (or even as a limited series for tv).

    • #48
  19. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Jim Kearney (View Comment):

    Gary McVey (View Comment):
    “The Untouchables” (1959-63), which was once ballyhooed and condemned as the most violent show on TV

    Were you somehow allowed to watch it, Gary?

    The nun made it clear we weren’t to watch on account of excessive violence.

    [Same nun periodically took 6th graders into closet; SFX SLAPPING SOUNDS; student emerges with red finger marks on face; Sister follows, rolling down sleeves of her black habit.]

     

    I went to Catholic school in first grade, the year John XXIII was elected Pope. After that, not until high school, where the nuns exclusively beat up girls. My parents were honest-to-goodness Catholics, not Catholic Lite, but they didn’t care much about TV violence.  In NYC at that time, cops-vs.-mob action was an intramural sport. If our parish, St. Luke’s R.C. Church had come down too hard on the mafia, weekly collections would have dropped off sharply. 

    • #49
  20. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    EJHill (View Comment):
    There are 13.5K individual school districts in the states, each with their own contracts for teachers. A nationwide strike would fall like a, uh… er… house of cards. 

    There’s the problem. It ought to be about 50K individual school districts. 

    Make a series about that

    • #50
  21. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Mark Camp (View Comment):
    What is needed right now is just execution.

    Yes!  Wholeheartedly agree.

     

    Do-ers, producers, directors, fund-raisers, aggressive activist lawyers (our own, pro-freedom Lawfare conspiracy to mine the legal harbors and sap their legalistic fortifications).

    Oh, you meant that kind of execution…

     

    • #51
  22. Fake John/Jane Galt Coolidge
    Fake John/Jane Galt
    @FakeJohnJaneGalt

    I find it interesting that films and Tv can spend millions on advisors for space, physics, medical so they can get the technical aspects of those professions realistic but can’t be bothered to visit clergy to get any aspect of Christianity or Catholic priests even remotely correct.  

    • #52
  23. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    I find it interesting that films and Tv can spend millions on advisors for space, physics, medical so they can get the technical aspects of those professions realistic but can’t be bothered to visit clergy to get any aspect of Christianity or Catholic priests even remotely correct.

    You’re assuming they are interested in getting that right.

    • #53
  24. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    The usual problem with movie and TV clergy isn’t hostility, but ignorance and sappy cliches. Nuns always speak in “god talk”, a wondrous vapor of happiness, providence, and rainbows. BTW, don’t think for a minute that Judaism gets any more of an in depth treatment. 

    • #54
  25. Jim Kearney Member
    Jim Kearney
    @JimKearney

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    I find it interesting that films and Tv can spend millions on advisors for space, physics, medical so they can get the technical aspects of those professions realistic but can’t be bothered to visit clergy to get any aspect of Christianity or Catholic priests even remotely correct.

    Just to be completely accurate, film/TV in the aggregate may approach the million dollar mark for consultants over time, but outside series TV consultants need to spend years working themselves up inside the writing and producing staff ranks to match what other writers earn. Consultants IMHO are historically underpaid, relative to how much they raise the quality of the shows. TV needs to go back and use them again as they did in the realistic 1990’s, and in doing so go back to the traditional law enforcement and prosecutor franchises where the rooting interest is with the true good guys.

    As for priests, I don’t know if Blue Bloods uses a consultant, but the Stacy Keach character Cardinal Kearns seems 100% human and real to me. He’s a personal friend of PC Frank Reagan, and they talk like real male friends with jobs which can strain the friendship. I also think the Reagans’ religious practices reflect the well on Catholicism. The whole family says grace together before every Sunday dinner in every episode; ceremonial/sacramental occasions can naturally take a story into church; and several characters strive for ethical decision making, especially Tom Selleck’s. There’s no gratuitously shoehorned dialogue of a religious nature, so the show is welcoming to all. For a more directly religious high quality TV drama, try the 1991 Australian show Brides of Christ if you have a PAL compatible DVD player or can find it streaming online someplace.

    [Catholics who yearn for priests who don’t come off as phony and sanctimonious on TV can at least offer thanks that real life DC Cardinals McCarrick and Wuerl are no long regular holiday visitors on Fox News Sunday.]

    Without endorsing her political noise, I must praise Meryl Streep for her spot on portrayal of a traditional Sister of Charity in the period film drama Doubt. I couldn’t tell you whether writer John Patrick Shanley used consultants or relied on his personal experience in a Catholic high school to form his characters, but he deserves high praise along with his Pulitzer Prize and Tony for his work. As for the character of Father Flynn, following Shanley’s example I’ll leave the judgement to the audience.

    • #55
  26. Petty Boozswha Inactive
    Petty Boozswha
    @PettyBoozswha

    Films that conservatives could make:

    Take another shot at Bonfire of the Vanities, I believe it was the most successful popular novel after The Godfather and is the perfect examination race hustling, wealth inequality and left wing nonsense written. Future generations will look at the affirmative action Nobel Prize given to Toni Morrison when Tom Wolfe and Norman Mailer were still available and wonder what we were thinking.

    I think I’ve mentioned this before, but I think an updated version of The Searchers, showing just why the Comanches had to be exterminated for civilization to survive, would be shocking to our indigenous loving public.

    • #56
  27. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Fake John/Jane Galt (View Comment):

    I find it interesting that films and Tv can spend millions on advisors for space, physics, medical so they can get the technical aspects of those professions realistic but can’t be bothered to visit clergy to get any aspect of Christianity or Catholic priests even remotely correct.

    In watching a couple of Polish movie trailers recently, I got the impression that they have the same problem over there.   

    • #57
  28. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Petty Boozswha (View Comment):

    Films that conservatives could make:

    Take another shot at Bonfire of the Vanities, I believe it was the most successful popular novel after The Godfather and is the perfect examination race hustling, wealth inequality and left wing nonsense written. Future generations will look at the affirmative action Nobel Prize given to Toni Morrison when Tom Wolfe and Norman Mailer were still available and wonder what we were thinking.

    I think I’ve mentioned this before, but I think an updated version of The Searchers, showing just why the Comanches had to be exterminated for civilization to survive, would be shocking to our indigenous loving public.

    What do you think of the filmabilty of I am Charlotte Simmons? 

    • #58
  29. Petty Boozswha Inactive
    Petty Boozswha
    @PettyBoozswha

    TBA (View Comment):

    Petty Boozswha (View Comment):

    Films that conservatives could make:

    Take another shot at Bonfire of the Vanities, I believe it was the most successful popular novel after The Godfather and is the perfect examination race hustling, wealth inequality and left wing nonsense written. Future generations will look at the affirmative action Nobel Prize given to Toni Morrison when Tom Wolfe and Norman Mailer were still available and wonder what we were thinking.

    I think I’ve mentioned this before, but I think an updated version of The Searchers, showing just why the Comanches had to be exterminated for civilization to survive, would be shocking to our indigenous loving public.

    What do you think of the filmabilty of I am Charlotte Simmons?

    Only read a chapter before I got sidetracked – I should go back to it. Thanks for the reminder.

    • #59
  30. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Was Once an Eagle ever adapted? Talk about famous…

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.