School Voucher Plans Can Stop the Propaganda Machines of the Left

 

Florida’s new governor, Ron DeSantis, has been going at warp speed to make changes in the state. His latest effort is to deal with a 14,000-student waiting list for a state tax credit scholarship program. But he’s getting resistance from the usual suspects—the school unions and traditional administrators. I realized, however, that the fight is about much more than union control; it’s about who controls the minds of our children.

Gov. Jeb Bush started the first-in-the-nation private voucher program, enacted in 1999. Unfortunately his efforts were stopped:

In a 5-2 ruling in 2006, justices ruled that Bush’s voucher [plan] violated language in the state constitution by giving children in the state’s lowest-rated public schools taxpayer money to attend private or parochial schools.

In the meantime, the state provided for corporations to receive tax credits for funds donated to a scholarship program for low-income students, a way to side-step the ruling:

About 100,000 lower-income, mostly black and Hispanic students in almost 1,800 private schools receive scholarships ranging from about $6,500 to just over $7,000 each. But Step Up for Students, the largest of two state-approved scholarship organizations, has seen a large waiting list grow for scholarships this year.

As a result, a new program called the Family Empowerment Scholarship, may have a better chance of succeeding in funding the voucher plan. And if the legislation is challenged in the courts, Gov. DeSantis has appointed three new justices to the state Supreme Court. The House Speaker Jose Oliva points to Bush in his support for the proposal:

‘I think we’re celebrating the 20th anniversary of the first step toward an education savings account,’ Oliva said, citing the term used for one method of giving parents public money and control over what kind of school their child will attend.

‘Through those two decades, there have been numerous attempts, and there have been legal fights and political fights, but I think ultimately, we have been always very clear. We feel the money should follow the student.’

Of course, critics of the legislation point to their usual concerns: taking money from the public schools; falsified fire and health inspections, run-down facilities and hiring teachers with criminal records and without college degrees. In contrast to these objections, substantial research has been done to validate the benefits of school choice programs. Although private schools are not required to report directly to the state, there are many ways to track violations.

What struck me is that no one has mentioned perhaps the most positive aspects of funding schools other than public schools: the public school leftist propaganda machine could be severely wounded.

Think about it: the Leftist educational establishment will not be able to dictate the curriculum for private and parochial schools. Certainly, some of the new schools could allow the Leftist agenda, but if enough schools and their administrators decide to take back the schools, who will stop them from offering a balanced curriculum?

Imagine having teachers encouraged, if not required, to speak about the Founders and the heroes of this nation. Imagine explaining the pluses and minuses not only of free enterprise but the failures of socialism. Consider that our students could actually learn how this country was formed, how it grew and how today it is the most successful country in the world.

In a poll taken by the Foundation for Excellence in Education in January, 80% of voters surveyed broadly support school choice, or options outside an assigned neighborhood school. The Foundation was started by Bush and has grown into the largest school-choice effort in the nation.

This could be one small step to taking back our education system, one state at a time.

I vote yes!

 

Published in Education
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 39 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):
    What seemed to be her strongest objection to private school vouchers was closely related to her sense that there was a cadre of corrupt people waiting to get their mitts on that voucher money and there is plenty of this type of behavior in Utah.

    So she was concerned that the money might be misused, because there are other areas of corruption in Utah? It seems like there should be some accountability for performance by students and/or the schools. Maybe audits need to be done by a third party. (I wouldn’t trust the state to audit, that’s for sure.)

    Utah has some really ‘innovative entrepreneurs’ who uncover unique opportunities to get their hands on other peoples’ money and many, or even most, Utah citizens are aware of this. I suspect the Utah public school teachers had a large role in publicizing fears that the voucher system would be corrupted. I have no idea if that threat was significant.

    • #31
  2. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    We must understand that accreditation processes and “approved” curricula have been entirely tainted, too. Hillsdale was reaccredited in the spring of last year and here’s what was said about it:

    The Department of Education now uses accreditation as the gatekeeper for offering federal financial aid, meaning accreditors not only hold schools to their own standards but to the standards of the government as well, Allen said.

    “It’s very unfair,” Arnn said, that Hillsdale must submit to these federal regulations through accreditors though it refuses to accept federal funds.

    Additional federal regulations — which have grown over the past two decades — have not affected practice or policy at Hillsdale College, Allen said. Mainly, they’ve just caused a headache, compiling additional forms and paperwork.

    For a while, Hillsdale was largely exempt from federal regulations because it doesn’t take federal funds, but in recent years, the Department of Education has borne down on accreditors, threatening their status if they don’t hold all schools to certain regulations — like meeting a specific definition of a credit hour and having a particular student-grievance reporting procedure, Whalen said.

    Folks, the public education system is rotten right down to the roots. There is no teacher or administrator interview process, no accreditation process, no curriculum development process that hasn’t been captured by lefties in academe and in government. If Americans only learn one thing this year (before the election of 2020), I hope it’s that the cost of all this “free” stuff is way, way too high. It costs us our national character, our freedom, our kids’ future, and, most importantly, the truth. The Left builds its house of cards on lies. And, sadly, when it comes tumbling down, it’s likely to take all of us with it.

    • #32
  3. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    We must understand that accreditation processes and “approved” curricula have been entirely tainted, too. Hillsdale was reaccredited in the spring of last year and here’s what was said about it:

    The Department of Education now uses accreditation as the gatekeeper for offering federal financial aid, meaning accreditors not only hold schools to their own standards but to the standards of the government as well, Allen said.

    “It’s very unfair,” Arnn said, that Hillsdale must submit to these federal regulations through accreditors though it refuses to accept federal funds.

    Additional federal regulations — which have grown over the past two decades — have not affected practice or policy at Hillsdale College, Allen said. Mainly, they’ve just caused a headache, compiling additional forms and paperwork.

    For a while, Hillsdale was largely exempt from federal regulations because it doesn’t take federal funds, but in recent years, the Department of Education has borne down on accreditors, threatening their status if they don’t hold all schools to certain regulations — like meeting a specific definition of a credit hour and having a particular student-grievance reporting procedure, Whalen said.

    Folks, the public education system is rotten right down to the roots. There is no teacher or administrator interview process, no accreditation process, no curriculum development process that hasn’t been captured by lefties in academe and in government. If Americans only learn one thing this year (before the election of 2020), I hope it’s that the cost of all this “free” stuff is way, way too high. It costs us our national character, our freedom, our kids’ future, and, most importantly, the truth. The Left builds its house of cards on lies. And, sadly, when it comes tumbling down, it’s likely to take all of us with it.

    Thank you for this.

    • #33
  4. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    We must understand that accreditation processes and “approved” curricula have been entirely tainted, too. Hillsdale was reaccredited in the spring of last year and here’s what was said about it:

    The Department of Education now uses accreditation as the gatekeeper for offering federal financial aid, meaning accreditors not only hold schools to their own standards but to the standards of the government as well, Allen said.

    “It’s very unfair,” Arnn said, that Hillsdale must submit to these federal regulations through accreditors though it refuses to accept federal funds.

    Additional federal regulations — which have grown over the past two decades — have not affected practice or policy at Hillsdale College, Allen said. Mainly, they’ve just caused a headache, compiling additional forms and paperwork.

    For a while, Hillsdale was largely exempt from federal regulations because it doesn’t take federal funds, but in recent years, the Department of Education has borne down on accreditors, threatening their status if they don’t hold all schools to certain regulations — like meeting a specific definition of a credit hour and having a particular student-grievance reporting procedure, Whalen said.

    Folks, the public education system is rotten right down to the roots. There is no teacher or administrator interview process, no accreditation process, no curriculum development process that hasn’t been captured by lefties in academe and in government. If Americans only learn one thing this year (before the election of 2020), I hope it’s that the cost of all this “free” stuff is way, way too high. It costs us our national character, our freedom, our kids’ future, and, most importantly, the truth. The Left builds its house of cards on lies. And, sadly, when it comes tumbling down, it’s likely to take all of us with it.

    WC, I didn’t know about the accreditors. That’s horrible! And so unfair. If she’s around long enough, could Betsy DeVos have some impact?

    • #34
  5. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):
    WC, I didn’t know about the accreditors. That’s horrible! And so unfair. If she’s around long enough, could Betsy DeVos have some impact?

    If you read the entire article, Hillsdale’s accreditors last year were quite fair and gave Hillsdale a 10-year certificate. They were probably extremely impressed with the consistency and coherence of Hillsdale’s presentation when they visited, and I was thinking as I read, “in which Hillsdale’s accreditors decide to send their kids to Hillsdale College!”

    You’re asking someone who believes the public education system should be burned to the ground and the smoldering earth left behind salted and then sprinkled with holy water what Betsy DeVos should do. Bearing that in mind, I would like her to free us to the point where the people with the greatest interest in how their kids are educated — the parents — have the power. Vouchers are a start, but they do not eradicate the left’s influence at all levels. After she empowers parents, the best thing she can do is turn off the lights at the Department of Education after the last person has left and then put a flame thrower to it. Salt. Holy water. Maybe an exorcist.

    • #35
  6. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):
    WC, I didn’t know about the accreditors. That’s horrible! And so unfair. If she’s around long enough, could Betsy DeVos have some impact?

    If you read the entire article, Hillsdale’s accreditors last year were quite fair and gave Hillsdale a 10-year certificate. They were probably extremely impressed with the consistency and coherence of Hillsdale’s presentation when they visited, and I was thinking as I read, “in which Hillsdale’s accreditors decide to send their kids to Hillsdale College!”

    You’re asking someone who believes the public education system should be burned to the ground and the smoldering earth left behind salted and then sprinkled with holy water what Betsy DeVos should do. Bearing that in mind, I would like her to free us to the point where the people with the greatest interest in how their kids are educated — the parents — have the power. Vouchers are a start, but they do not eradicate the left’s influence at all levels. After she empowers parents, the best thing she can do is turn off the lights at the Department of Education after the last person has left and then put a flame thrower to it. Salt. Holy water. Maybe an exorcist.

    I’m with you.

    • #36
  7. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    C. U. Douglas (View Comment):

    School choice is definitely the plum. Having worked for a private school and having two kids, one just starting school now, I know I’d prefer them far more over what the public system has to offer. Unfortunately, the unions have a rather tight grip on things. Utah, sometimes considered the reddest of red states actually had a voucher program (long before I moved here), but it was removed after some serious lobbying from the opposition.

    It’s an uphill battle just about anywhere. The unions and the bureaucrats have the language and default mindset on their side.

     And Republican losers are afraid to call it corporate greed. 

    • #37
  8. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    C. U. Douglas (View Comment):

    School choice is definitely the plum. Having worked for a private school and having two kids, one just starting school now, I know I’d prefer them far more over what the public system has to offer. Unfortunately, the unions have a rather tight grip on things. Utah, sometimes considered the reddest of red states actually had a voucher program (long before I moved here), but it was removed after some serious lobbying from the opposition.

    It’s an uphill battle just about anywhere. The unions and the bureaucrats have the language and default mindset on their side.

    And Republican losers are afraid to call it corporate greed.

    I’m not sure who Republican losers are? Those who join with the Democrats in supporting the bureaucracy and the corporate lobbyists? They are not afraid, they are just part of the greed. Republicans do divide into several different groups though but that may not be of much importance if we can keep the Trump movement doing right things. Republicans will be turned into something different from the past.

    • #38
  9. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    The legislation has made it through committee here in Florida. And remember, we have three new conservative judges on our state Supreme Court. It’s looking good!

    • #39
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.