The GOP Needs To ‘Primary’ The “Old” Strategists/Commentators

 

So … we find that the veteran (experience is not a strength if it is all bad) political class of “strategists, commentators and consultants” (join us on our next cruise … please, clap) and their fans are gearing up for another failed run in 2020. Oh my, but they are gaining in confidence once again, listening to each other in their extremely comfortable echo chamber. Mitt! Jeb! John (my dad was a postman)!

Seriously?! C’Mon Man!

President Reagan is rolling over in his grave … “There you go again”.

It’s bad enough that they are regurgitating all of the old, tired and losing ideas of their conventional “wisdom” (lol, how many times do they need to lose to learn from their loserdom), but once again they embrace the corpse of President Reagan to wrap themselves in, as if they ever had anything to do with President Reagan’s policies, popularity or prosperity. No, they fought him in 1976 and 1980 and only embraced him after he defeated them, all merely in order to claim his personal successes as theirs and to promptly turn around and end the legacy he had built. ‘Conservatism’ to them was, and is, icky. They say it needs a “thousand points of light” or “compassion” (wretch) to accompany it, or it is a nasty thing to be avoided. Nah Baby, nah.

President Reagan’s policies and perspective on government are much closer to President Trump’s, than to the failed rhetoric of the GOP, Inc. losers and their handlers. Limited government, lower taxes, peace through strength and the fact that America is a country of exceptional people and the freest country on the face of the earth. Make it great again indeed.

And what is with all of this pretentious and emotional fixation on the person? The failed GOP commentariat and their zombie sycophants are obsessed with Trump, the person. Trump, Trump, Trump. And they conversely focus on their “ideal” profile of a candidate. To them, it’s all about the person, the elitist chin and the image (vomit). People! That’s what the Dems do. And they do it better than Kristol, Murphy & Co.’s ‘socialism lite’. You are playing a losing game to follow their lead. Again.

No one knows who will be running in 2020. It is light years away, politically speaking. President Trump is unconventional in every way. He is not predictable and most especially to this collection of GOP, Inc. buffoons genius’. He may not even run for re-election. Peggy Noonan (a NeverTrumper who still can make good observations) writes last week that he could say … “I accomplished in four years what other guys couldn’t do in eight!” … “My work is done!” But make no mistake, if he goes this route, he will select his successor and set them up for victory in 2020, unlike W, who basically set his party, and country, up for failure in 2008 and the imposition of Obama socialism for eight years.

But whether the candidate is the re-election of President Trump, or his hand-picked apprentice, GOP, Inc. better get on board with the winning direction and message for their voters. MAGA, version 2.0. Voters equal ‘populism’ and populism is not a bad thing. President Reagan was a populist. That is only a dirty word to the GOP, Inc. elitists. The only future success of the GOP is to be the proudly American party and the bold and courageous opposition to the Socialist Democrats. That means ditch Mitt, John. Jeff, Ben and whatever other milquetoast ‘magic ponies’ Kristol/Murphy come up with. There is a lesson to be learned with the demise of the Weakly Standard. The party and magic pony of Kristol/Murphy is dead.

2020 is either the re-election of President Trump or it is a continuation of the Trump policies and his Apprentice ticket. Elect Mike Pence/Nikki Haley if the President chooses not to run. And it’s all about the policies, not the person.

Get with the program, GOP. Or lose again.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 184 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. CarolJoy, Above Top Secret Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret
    @CarolJoy

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret (View Comment):

    American Intelligence Media addressed this question of yours with a very fine program relating to the Senior Executive Services:

    https://aim4truth.org/2018/01/03/deep-state-shadow-government-revealed-senior-executive-service/

    This is the text presentation – you can listen to the entire audio podcast on youtube by clicking on the link in the first sentence or so of the document.

    I endorse your suggestion for Ricochet members who are not otherwise familiar with the Senior Executive Service to learn about it. I was a GS-15 career civil service employee when the SES was established in 1979. Before that the senior executives in the government were in grades GS-16 through GS18. There were also many technical (non-managerial) positions in the GS-16 through GS-18 levels and they remained General Schedule. Within the executive positions GS-16 through GS-18, before the creation of the SES designation, were career positions as well as Schedule C political appointments. SNIP

    The new SES system, which I entered in 1983, was a perfect opportunity for abuse in the sense of bringing in political types as Schedule C SES and later moving them into career SES positions. I’m certain the Obama Administration made pretty much a clean sweep in this fashion and it then became very much more difficult to get these people replaced when the Trump Administration came in, even to identify who they are.

    This is really a bad thing to have let happen.

    I did not know about this, and I should have.

    @caroljoy posted this so I going to relate some things pertinent. First, I have no idea why you say you should have known about this. This absorption into the permanent senior career management bureaucracy affects all parts of the federal government. Where it really hurts though is in intelligence agencies and law enforcement. Ray McGovern, a principal in Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) along with William Binney, have made a second career fighting the result of the SES transformation, a result that has led to the intelligence assessment being what the intelligence agency management wants the POTUS to have, not what is actually happening. We have just witnessed a period in the DoJ and the FBI where the same thing has happened.

    The acceptance of the revealing of this condition is still very much in doubt.

    I can read two separate meanings into your last sentence.

    One meaning would be that we are all so blase that we accept anything. A second meaning would be that people who should get worked up about what is being revealed are not sur4e that it is yet a “thing.” Can you clarify? (With appreciation in advance.)

    • #181
  2. CarolJoy, Above Top Secret Coolidge
    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret
    @CarolJoy

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Neil Hansen (Klaatu) (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    Why does anyone think the GOP was ever effectively conservative in the last 30 years?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/02/conservativism-achievements-obama-era/

    Okay that is a great article. Every single word.

    What are people complaining about?

    How do you get Democrats to switch to Republican?

    Just making a comment so I can read the linked to article later.

    • #182
  3. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Neil Hansen (Klaatu) (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    Why does anyone think the GOP was ever effectively conservative in the last 30 years?

    https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/02/conservativism-achievements-obama-era/

    Okay that is a great article. Every single word.

    What are people complaining about?

    How do you get Democrats to switch to Republican?

    Just making a comment so I can read the linked to article later.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6KQY5gbEAM    <———Then watch this. 

    • #183
  4. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    CarolJoy, Above Top Secret (View Comment):

    American Intelligence Media addressed this question of yours with a very fine program relating to the Senior Executive Services:

    https://aim4truth.org/2018/01/03/deep-state-shadow-government-revealed-senior-executive-service/

    This is the text presentation – you can listen to the entire audio podcast on youtube by clicking on the link in the first sentence or so of the document.

    SNIP

    The new SES system, which I entered in 1983, was a perfect opportunity for abuse in the sense of bringing in political types as Schedule C SES and later moving them into career SES positions. I’m certain the Obama Administration made pretty much a clean sweep in this fashion and it then became very much more difficult to get these people replaced when the Trump Administration came in, even to identify who they are.

    This is really a bad thing to have let happen.

    I did not know about this, and I should have.

    @caroljoy posted this so I going to relate some things pertinent. First, I have no idea why you say you should have known about this. This absorption into the permanent senior career management bureaucracy affects all parts of the federal government. Where it really hurts though is in intelligence agencies and law enforcement. Ray McGovern, a principal in Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) along with William Binney, have made a second career fighting the result of the SES transformation, a result that has led to the intelligence assessment being what the intelligence agency management wants the POTUS to have, not what is actually happening. We have just witnessed a period in the DoJ and the FBI where the same thing has happened.

    The acceptance of the revealing of this condition is still very much in doubt.

    I can read two separate meanings into your last sentence.

    One meaning would be that we are all so blase that we accept anything. A second meaning would be that people who should get worked up about what is being revealed are not sur4e that it is yet a “thing.” Can you clarify? (With appreciation in advance.)

    More to the second meaning. First, I think it is probably a relatively small subset of our people who even pay any attention to this sort of thing day-to-day. Second, I think many of those on whom the above rely to pay attention to these matters, don’t. Ray McGovern and I are probably at different ends of the spectrum in terms of how we think of government, but we may be close to agreement here. That is that intelligence units like the CIA develop their own organizational viewpoint on policy and that guides how they formulate intelligence assessments briefed to POTUS. This can very well oppose a POTUS elected specifically to take us in a different direction.

    • #184
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.