Quote of the Day: Originalism and the Constitution

 

“Our cases acknowledge the [option of imposing a lesser sentence than the death penalty], but they say that the content of the Eighth Amendment changes from age to age, to reflect (and I quote) ‘the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.’ You will note the wide-eyed, youthful meliorism in this sentiment: every day, in every way, we get better and better. Societies always mature; they never rot. This despite the twentieth century’s evidence of concentration camps and gas ovens in one of the most advanced and civilized nations of the world. Of course the whole premise of a constitution in general, and of a bill of rights in particular, is the very opposite of this.” — Antonin Scalia, Scalia Speaks: Reflections on Law, Faith and Life Well-Lived

Justice Scalia was a widely lauded originalist in his understanding of the Constitution, and his explanation of originalism in this book is enlightening. But his comment about the Left trying to justify their interpretations of the Constitution is profound. They demonstrate, over and over again, their naivete, arrogance, and ignorance about human nature that dominates their thinking in a way that endangers our Constitutional democracy.

I’ve been watching a free online course from Hillsdale College that focuses on the historical workings of Congress and the invasion of Progressivism. With the creation of the administrative state and the reliance on the Supreme Court to legislate, the checks and balances of government have been dangerously compromised.

Let’s hope the current Supreme Court is more interested in ruling on cases than legislating, and in relying on the wisdom and writing of the Founders.

Published in Law
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 32 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    TBA (View Comment):

    Beowulf was written down c. 1000 A. D. and is unreadable to a non-scholar.

    Shakespeare wrote on the cusp of the 1500s – 1600s and contains many words that either have partial or completely different meanings than they do today, as anyone who has ever had the plays as assigned readings is aware.

    The Constitution of the United States was written only two hundred years after Shakespeare’s plays.

    We live two hundred years after that. Only a fool would believe that you could just casually read it with no regard to word-shift or what the Founders meant.

    It is a disgrace that we even have a word like ‘Originalist’, as if there could be any other kind of Supreme Court Justice. If the very structure and charter of our nation is subject to the vagaries of language and ‘evolving standards’, then we are unmoored from our foundation.

    And it was such clear and careful writing too.

    Like I said in response to Objection 5 here.

    • #31
  2. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    Beowulf was written down c. 1000 A. D. and is unreadable to a non-scholar.

    Shakespeare wrote on the cusp of the 1500s – 1600s and contains many words that either have partial or completely different meanings than they do today, as anyone who has ever had the plays as assigned readings is aware.

    The Constitution of the United States was written only two hundred years after Shakespeare’s plays.

    We live two hundred years after that. Only a fool would believe that you could just casually read it with no regard to word-shift or what the Founders meant.

    It is a disgrace that we even have a word like ‘Originalist’, as if there could be any other kind of Supreme Court Justice. If the very structure and charter of our nation is subject to the vagaries of language and ‘evolving standards’, then we are unmoored from our foundation.

    And it was such clear and careful writing too.

    Like I said in response to Objection 5 here.

    Well done. 

    • #32
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.