“The Man in the High Castle” Season 3: The Good, the Bad, and the Meh

 

The new season of “The Man in the High Castle” dropped on Friday and I finished it Tuesday night. I’d like to share my thoughts to hopefully encourage others to watch this season and the whole show if they haven’t seen it. I will stay vague to avoid spoilers but I’ll discuss themes and plot points that are shown in the trailer.

Quick primer on the series: it’s 1963 in an alternate universe where the Axis powers won WWII. America is has been divided basically along time-zone lines, where the Eastern and Central regions are controlled by the Nazis, the Pacific region is controlled by the Japanese, and the Rockies are a lawless Neutral Zone where both empires agree to not conduct operations. Our main characters are:

  • Ubergruppenfuhrer John Smith, an all-American family man and a powerful member of the American Nazi government;
  • Joe Blake, a young man of Nazi heritage;
  • Trade Minister Tagomi, one of the highest-ranking Japanese officials in San Francisco;
  • Inspector Kido, a Kempeitai agent (the Kempeitai being the Japanese equivalent of the SS);
  • Juliana Crane, a young woman living in San Francisco galvanized into joining the Resistance;
  • Frank Frink, Juliana’s fiance and a secret Jew.

At the end of season 2, John had performed a great service to the Reich, but at the same moment he was being honored, his son made a decision both in accordance with the Nazi ideology he had been taught and emotionally devastating to his parents. Trade Minister Tagomi broke some rules but averted a war. Frank set off a bomb that killed one of Inspector Kido’s loyal subordinates, and Juliana Crane had quite an emotional surprise. So with that basic scene set, here are my thoughts on the new season.

The Good

  • So many characters have absolutely amazing actors and go through incredible emotional arcs as they face the consequences of what happened in the two prior seasons. John and Helen Smith, Kido, Tagomi, and Joe all do an amazing job making you believe in the dilemmas of these characters. Each is trapped in some way by their choices, their principles, and their roles in their world, and the tensions are writ on all their faces at different points.
  • Part of John’s emotional state is shown through dream sequences, and I have to give major props to the show for making the sequences incredibly disturbing without relying on gore. The evil of the Nazi regime of which John has been a willing participant is shown by being casual, not bloodily graphic.
  • The world has become more filled in, with more locations and more new but real characters. Edgar Hoover is one of Smith’s subordinates, and George Lincoln Rockwell is a powerful member of the Reich’s government in America. (This was hinted at in a previous season showing that JFK airport was named after him instead.) Moreover, we now have characters from Okinawa, Hawaii, and Ireland; Manchuria is mentioned as a punishment station for Japanese officials who have fallen out of favor. We even get to see Denver, Poconos, PA, and Cuba as settings.
  • The end of episode 6 has an amazing montage of two thematically opposite ceremonies being juxtaposed. Anything more would spoil it, but you’ll know it when you see it.
  • There has to be a closeted conservative or two on the writing staff. Previous seasons revolved around Mutually Assured Destruction via atomic weapons as a way of keeping the peace; this one doubles down by adding to that theme the ability of free trade to prevent war. Previous seasons had left-wing talking points about America’s genocide of the Indians and the Founding Fathers being nothing but hypocritical slave-owners in Nazi mouths; this season, the big Nazi push is the destruction of America’s historical monuments to make way for “Jahr Null” — Year Zero. And the Nazi youth raised on uncontested propaganda are to be looked to as the moral guides for this new age after the end of history — any of this sound familiar?

The Bad

  • Despite the best efforts of the writing staff, Juliana Crane remains the least interesting character. This is primarily because every male character except for John Smith seems to fall in love — romantic or platonic — with her at first sight and despite how much pain and misery she brings into the lives of everyone around her. It’s not good when I’m watching her ask another character “Why are you helping me?” and I want to scream at the TV “Because the plot demands it!” Moreover, they try to push a “chosen one” aspect, that fate has given her a special role to play, combined with abilities no other character has.
  • The stakes are upped rather gratuitously. One would think that overthrowing the fascist empires that murder people by the job lot would be a serious enough goal, but no, the Nazis have a secret plan that must be stopped at all costs! One that’s been done before, in fact. (Warning: the linked video will spoil the secret plan.)
  • At the end of episode 4, there’s a bombshell bit of information. However, the person saying it has been severely tortured and can barely wheeze out the words, so you will completely miss it if you don’t have the subtitles on.

The Meh

  • The homosexuality factor has been upped quite a bit, and it wasn’t really necessary. One male character is given a boyfriend who has the same function in the story as a girlfriend would in any other story; two female characters are made lovers for no apparent purpose other than to make a “Nazis hate gays” point. It could easily have been a “Nazis hate infidelity” subplot instead. That being said, while it’s unnecessary, it’s not graphic or particularly obnoxious — the same-sex couples exchange kisses, but it’s not like “Game of Thrones” which shows sex acts. In fact, the closest we get to gay sex is implied in a scene of the women covered by sheets and smoking in bed, and judging by the pure white sheets and flawless makeup on both of them, they couldn’t have been doing anything beforehand anyway.
  • That being said, we do get a male/female pair of very hands-on dancers in nothing but g-strings in a rather gratuitous dance club scene, so don’t confuse “not graphically homosexual” with “appropriate for all ages.” And of course, there are lots of shootings, stabbings, bombs, torture, and foul language. We are dealing with two of the evilest political entities that ever existed, after all.

The show isn’t perfect, but if you find the premise intriguing and like solid drama, it’s a good place to spend some TV time.

Published in Entertainment
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 44 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    Amy Schley (View Comment):

    ToryWarWriter (View Comment):

    The other problem I have with the show is that its written with the conceit of the 60’s and the far less knowledge available to the public about the war than we have now. The idea that the UK could be wiped out and the Soviets all conquered by 45 even without the support of America is quite ridiculous given our now modern understanding of the conditions during the war.

     

    Yeah, but as noted a few weeks ago, the idea that humans could travel faster than light is equally ridiculous. So long as the show is internally consistent, I can suspend my disbelief.

    That’s the conceit of the show (and the book, sort of): “What if this happened? What would happen then?”

    • #31
  2. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    <spoiler alert>

    I really, really want to see how they explain the ending. Because Philip K. Dick didn’t.

    </spoilers>

    I thought it was a multiverse kinda thing? I thought the entire book was cast in an alternative time line? Like a star trek mirror universe?

    • #32
  3. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    <spoiler alert>

    I really, really want to see how they explain the ending. Because Philip K. Dick didn’t.

    </spoilers>

    I thought it was a multiverse kinda thing? I thought the entire book was cast in an alternative time line? Like a star trek mirror universe?

    Yes, and no. And yes.

    I don’t want to say more because <spoilers>.

    • #33
  4. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    <spoiler alert>

    I really, really want to see how they explain the ending. Because Philip K. Dick didn’t.

    </spoilers>

    I thought it was a multiverse kinda thing? I thought the entire book was cast in an alternative time line? Like a star trek mirror universe?

    Yes, and no. And yes.

    I don’t want to say more because <spoilers>.

    The shows producers have deviated from the book, which means until they air it, the ending could have been changed.

    I have only seen the first episode of the series back when it first started. I may consider signing up for amazon just to see this.

    Everyone seems to think that the shipping is worth Amazon Prime alone – but if I am not a user of Amazon, is the streaming service worth it alone?

    • #34
  5. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    <spoiler alert>

    I really, really want to see how they explain the ending. Because Philip K. Dick didn’t.

    </spoilers>

    I thought it was a multiverse kinda thing? I thought the entire book was cast in an alternative time line? Like a star trek mirror universe?

    Yes, and no. And yes.

    I don’t want to say more because <spoilers>.

    The shows producers have deviated from the book, which means until they air it, the ending could have been changed.

    I have only seen the first episode of the series back when it first started. I may consider signing up for amazon just to see this.

    Everyone seems to think that the shipping is worth Amazon Prime alone – but if I am not a user of Amazon, is the streaming service worth it alone?

    Possibly. Sign up for the free month and see if there’s enough to keep you.

    But the shipping alone is enough for me.

    • #35
  6. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    <spoiler alert>

    I really, really want to see how they explain the ending. Because Philip K. Dick didn’t.

    </spoilers>

    I thought it was a multiverse kinda thing? I thought the entire book was cast in an alternative time line? Like a star trek mirror universe?

    Yes, and no. And yes.

    I don’t want to say more because <spoilers>.

    The shows producers have deviated from the book, which means until they air it, the ending could have been changed.

    I have only seen the first episode of the series back when it first started. I may consider signing up for amazon just to see this.

    Everyone seems to think that the shipping is worth Amazon Prime alone – but if I am not a user of Amazon, is the streaming service worth it alone?

    Well, they’ve certainly added to the book, but (and I’ve only seen episode one of season two, because my better half deemed it “boring”–but like Better Call Saul, I will forge ahead) I’ve not seen any place where they actually changed the basic concept. (I was about to type “plot”, but PKD doesn’t do “plot”.)

    That said, I sincerely hope they don’t lose the plot. I know actually seeing PKD’s ending through will bring finality to the story (trying to avoid <spoilers>) and the show, it’s such a good way to end things.

    I’d hate for a follow-on show like “After the Man in the High Castle”. That’s kinda PKD’s point.

    • #36
  7. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    <spoiler alert>

    I really, really want to see how they explain the ending. Because Philip K. Dick didn’t.

    </spoilers>

    I thought it was a multiverse kinda thing? I thought the entire book was cast in an alternative time line? Like a star trek mirror universe?

    Yes, and no. And yes.

    I don’t want to say more because <spoilers>.

    The shows producers have deviated from the book, which means until they air it, the ending could have been changed.

    I have only seen the first episode of the series back when it first started. I may consider signing up for amazon just to see this.

    Everyone seems to think that the shipping is worth Amazon Prime alone – but if I am not a user of Amazon, is the streaming service worth it alone?

    Well, they’ve certainly added to the book, but (and I’ve only seen episode one of season two, because my better half deemed it “boring”–but like Better Call Saul, I will forge ahead) I’ve not seen any place where they actually changed the basic concept. (I was about to type “plot”, but PKD doesn’t do “plot”.)

    That said, I sincerely hope they don’t lose the plot. I know actually seeing PKD’s ending through will bring finality to the story (trying to avoid <spoilers>) and the show, it’s such a good way to end things.

    I’d hate for a follow-on show like “After the Man in the High Castle”. That’s kinda PKD’s point.

    Spoiler alert: I told my wife the ending three episodes in. <spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler>. And she said “How can that be so? Why is everyone living that way? (trying to be as vague as possible)”

    My only answer was, “because”. Which is, honestly, the answer to most PKD “plots”.

    And I love reading the situations PKD sets up. But his actual follow-through is always lacking. He’s the one author I don’t mind Hollywood taking on, because, like Bladerunner or even Total Recall, they add to the story, rather than missing it. Not the recent remake of Total Recall. That was awful.

    Amazon’s recent anthology series based on PKD is pretty good, though uneven Like his books.

    • #37
  8. Weeping Inactive
    Weeping
    @Weeping

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    OccupantCDN (View Comment):

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    <spoiler alert>

    I really, really want to see how they explain the ending. Because Philip K. Dick didn’t.

    </spoilers>

    I thought it was a multiverse kinda thing? I thought the entire book was cast in an alternative time line? Like a star trek mirror universe?

    Yes, and no. And yes.

    I don’t want to say more because <spoilers>.

    The shows producers have deviated from the book, which means until they air it, the ending could have been changed.

    I have only seen the first episode of the series back when it first started. I may consider signing up for amazon just to see this.

    Everyone seems to think that the shipping is worth Amazon Prime alone – but if I am not a user of Amazon, is the streaming service worth it alone?

    It is in my opinion. In addition to having a lot of “free” prime shows and movies, they also offer various channels that you can subscribe to as a prime member (Starz, Showtime, HBO, PBS Masterpiece, etc.) and have more “free” choices that way. I think it’s definitely worth it.

    • #38
  9. Amy Schley Coolidge
    Amy Schley
    @AmySchley

    dnewlander (View Comment):

    Spoiler alert: I told my wife the ending three episodes in. <spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler spoiler>. And she said “How can that be so? Why is everyone living that way? (trying to be as vague as possible)”

    My only answer was, “because”. Which is, honestly, the answer to most PKD “plots”.

     Now that we’re on page two, I don’t mind the spoilers so much. 

    <SPOILER>Not having read the book, I don’t know if this was its solution, but in the show, people can only travel to other worlds in the multiverse if their corresponding counterpart is dead. Which does a nice job explaining why all the suffering characters don’t meditate themselves out of their world. 

    It does run into the midichlorian problem that the more you explain, the more questions get raised. How does the meditation pick what things travel with you? Clothes and films travel, but blankets and examination tables one is strapped to don’t. Can you travel in space as well as dimension? If not, is someone going to materialize inside an abandoned mine or someone else’s house? Is time flowing at an equal pace in all worlds? If so, how can there be films of things that haven’t happened yet? How do you aim for any particular world in the multiverse? If all existence has been around for 18 billion years or so, how in that infinity of possible universes do you find one that only diverged from your own thirty or so years prior and is still recognizable? 

     

    • #39
  10. Steve C. Member
    Steve C.
    @user_531302

    I’m a bit confused by some of the comments about the story vice the series. Granted it’s been a while since I read the book.

    Without meaning to give anything away, the book ends when Julianna finally tracks down and meets the author, ie the character known as The Man in The High Castle. So unless I’m misremembering, we’ve gone way past the source material.

    Is that opaque enough?

     

    • #40
  11. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    Steve C. (View Comment):

    I’m a bit confused by some of the comments about the story vice the series. Granted it’s been a while since I read the book.

    Without meaning to give anything away, the book ends when Julianna finally tracks down and meets the author, ie the character known as The Man in The High Castle. So unless I’m misremembering, we’ve gone way past the source material.

    Is that opaque enough?

     

    It’s what The Man in the High Castle reveals to Julia that’s important, and I don’t think that’s happened in the series yet.

    Again, I don’t know how that revelation will play out on screen. It’s basically a big “what?! whoa!!” in the book, and then it’s over (albeit with a little explication as to how things happened).  Playing it like that will come across an awful lot like the ninth season of Dallas.

    • #41
  12. ToryWarWriter Coolidge
    ToryWarWriter
    @ToryWarWriter

    I once ran a very interesting game where we had multiple universes in it.  The way I said it was, that most universes had one parallel adjacent to it.  So despite the fact there was infinite worlds you could only travel to so many adjacent ones.  

    I was looking forward to seeing the Group for Soviet Forces Germany crashing through the Reich and taking out those Nazi scum so I am very dissapointed with the rules of interdimensional travel.  

    • #42
  13. Tex929rr Coolidge
    Tex929rr
    @Tex929rr

    Is it just me or is Juliana now a killing machine?  

    • #43
  14. Amy Schley Coolidge
    Amy Schley
    @AmySchley

    Tex929rr (View Comment):

    Is it just me or is Juliana now a killing machine?

    She’s definitely turned into a sharpshooter without much evidence of practice. That being said, she began the series as a student of aikido, and by season 3 she’s been an outlaw long enough that if she had access to bullets, she could have developed that skill. 

    • #44
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.