My Book Was Reviewed

 

The American Academy of Religion has a website for reviews of religion books. I (ignorant moron that I am) didn’t know about the site until I got an email announcing they’d reviewed The Conversion and Therapy of Desire, which I remind you is cheap on Kindle. A classics prof from UT Austin said some nice things:

In this fascinating and meticulously researched study of Augustine’s Cassiciacum dialogues, Mark Boone shows Augustinian scholars a productive way forward for better understanding how these philosophical texts can and should be analyzed both on their own terms and as part of Augustine’s evolving ideas about ancient philosophy and Christian theology. This is very much a book by a philosopher, about philosophy, written for philosophers. Still, its arguments will be easily comprehensible to any non-philosopher with a basic grounding in Augustinian thought. Of particular value to the general Augustinian scholar are the excellent close readings of the individual dialogues in the book’s main chapters….

Boone’s work is a valuable contribution to Augustinian studies, and especially to the study of the Cassiciacum dialogues. It is carefully researched, well-written (though, at times, the signposting of the argument seems overdone), and easy to follow even by a generalist Augustinian scholar…

Full review available here.

Hey, did I mention that this book is cheap on Kindle?

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 34 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    Brian Wolf (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    Brian Wolf (View Comment):
    Also I think you might have trouble reading your book. Would not reading it stimulate thoughts that you might want to add or bring up points you want to expand? It would seem like torture to have to read only the text when you would so much like to say more. Not sure that would be your problem.

    I got a big smile out of this, Brian. I’ve never thought about this phenomenon, but now that you bring it up, it would surely be common.

    And “not sure that would be your problem”?? We know enough about the intellectual horsepower under the hood of the Boone-mobile to be sure that he would want to pause after every spoken sentence, and write another book.

    I did not want to come on too strong and seem like was insulting my friend. So, I put in little weasel room! Saint Augustine could could a short book or long essay out of nearly every word…

    COL*!!!

    * Chortling Out Loud

    • #31
  2. TempTime Member
    TempTime
    @TempTime

    @saintaugustine, I am quite certain a book written by you could never be correctly categorized as ‘cheap’, inexpensive perhaps, but never cheap.  :-)

    Thanks for sharing.  It’s in the cart!  

    • #32
  3. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    TempTime (View Comment):

    @saintaugustine, I am quite certain a book written by you could never be correctly categorized as ‘cheap’, inexpensive perhaps, but never cheap. :-)

    Thanks for sharing. It’s in the cart!

    Thank you.  I’m honored.

    • #33
  4. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    Aug,

    First, congratulations! I think you have worked very hard on this and you deserve every bit of praise. It is a good choice when people are having trouble relating to Religion to go back to a formative epoch and explore what is now just assumed as doctrine.

    I don’t want to get you burned at the stake but I have an idea for you. I have an old friend who teaches philosophy. He wrote a book and teaches a course that answers philosophical questions using three different philosophers. He uses Kant, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche. He does this to get the freshman excited and arguing. Better that they have an opinion, wrong or right, than their eyes glaze over and you lose them entirely. I wonder if you could do this with Augustine? Again please don’t get yourself burned at the stake but what if you had Augustine, Pelagius, and Arius answering theological questions. Certainly, that would stir the pot (maybe too much) and get the conversation going.

    Again, congratulations and all the best.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #34
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.