Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Omarosa Should Face Charges
On Sunday morning, former White House official and reality star Omarosa dropped a bombshell:
This is crazy: Omarosa secretly recorded Chief of Staff John Kelly IN THE SITUATION ROOM pic.twitter.com/08AWjEpqJb
— Robert Maguire (@RobertMaguire_) August 12, 2018
I have a lot of questions about this recording, and here they are, in no particular order:
- What was she even doing in the Situation Room?
- Does anyone know what her job actually was? (This is a great profile on her time in the White House)
- This is illegal, right? There is no way this is not illegal.
- Why would she admit to breaking federal law on Meet the Press in order to sell copies of her book?
- How did she have a recording device in the room?
- If she used a cell phone, do we know if foreign governments or organizations were able to listen in as well?
- Who is in charge of security for the Situation Room? Will they face consequences for this breach?
- Is there any way to verify this was indeed recorded in the Situation Room?
- Will everyone (justifiably) upset about the casual disregard Hillary Clinton showed for security with her email server demand an inquiry?
This is an incredibly troubling sign from a White House marked by disarray and disorganization. It’s been hoped that despite the constant upheaval, there are officials within the military and security establishment upholding standards to ensure something like this incident never takes place. This isn’t a reality show, and there were supposed to be individuals (even if they aren’t the President and his staff) who were responsible for maintaining a level of professionalism required of the executive branch.
A very clear message needs to be sent in response to this announcement: Heads should roll among those responsible for staffing and security the White House and Situation Room, and charges should be filed against Omarosa. The White House isn’t a reality show, and you don’t get to flagrantly break federal law in order to sell a few more copies of a book.
Published in Politics
She’s a product of Trump’s reality TV venture, so he should have known what he was getting. Amidst the wealth of jumping to conclusions on this, it seems pretty clear that giving her a position in the White House wasn’t a great idea.
Who pray tell recommended Trump hire a former contestant on his reality tv show who also worked for him post tv fame?
According to the recording from Omorosa it seems like John Kelly is in control of firing staff. As previous examples like Bannon, Manafort, and Scaramucci have shown Trump does not seem to care too much about the details when people are hired onto his staff. He did not have a loyal and experienced staff during the primary or general campaigns and he didn’t start with one in the White House.
Its quite interesting, to say the least, that some people do not want to admit to this laziness on Trump’s part in hiring staff. There is only so much time in the day and Trump usually puts it to tweets, campaign rallies, and obsessing over the mainstream media.
To be fair, he has to deal with the MSM daily. Why, this coming Thursday they are coordinating a campaign (in the spirit of Journolist) to print anti-Trump editorials in at least 100 papers.
It took Omarosa a year to write a book. She is actually low threat.
Investigating this incident (hello, FBI) would be one way to get out in front of the book. Omarosa has made some representations that expose her to a degree of jeopardy, and those can be checked out. If she lied (or “exaggerated”), the Administration should want that out there.
What divisions does the MSM command? It is typed both here on Ricochet and by trump supporting/friendly pundits that the MSM have been losing or have lost all credibility already and thus are not even a threat. So if they don’t actually pose a threat why does Trump obsess about them? Is he that insecure? I hope not.
I haven’t read the book so I don’t know the details. But even if it did take a year what if it has accurate and salacious details that paint a sad picture of the administration? It could and the fact that she recorded at least one meeting and had it played on national television could mean she has more primary evidence to use.
But as I typed before the real question is whether there were other staff in the White House recording meetings at will for their own uses or another party’s. That is a literal matter of national security.
Does anyone else wonder why so many Trump associates feel the need to record conversations? It’s…weird right?
I believe it goes more to the “character issue” of those recording than any atmosphere of paranoia engendered by Trump. Still, the former raises questions about Trump’s appointment process. I doubt, however, that General Kelly, for example, has a personal hard drive loaded with recorded conversations.
Lots of news divisions the Three-letter MSM- plus the Associated (with Terrorists) Press, not to mention the Beeb and Reuters.
Approximately 50% percent of all Americans get their news from TV.
Their threat is countered by push-back. He is the first POTUS with an R who has done it. They have made it a part the job.
The threat they pose (leftist tyranny) has gained ground because his predecessors wouldn’t push back. He does. If eventually they do not “actually pose a threat” it’s not from the lack of push-back, but from more of it. And he appears to be well suited for that job.
If a third-rate reality “star” can secretly record conversations inside the freakin’ White House, one has to wonder how many foreign spies are doing far worse.
She’ll get away with it, because of her race.
Actually, no. If one has any inclination towards established facts, one might wonder what the h*** you’re talking about. Not that you’d ever respond.
1) What is your source for that 50% statistic?
2) 50% of people watching tv news does not mean that all tv stations have opposing coverage of the President.
3) Watching mainstream media does not make one a leftist. I grew up watching CBS and can never remember being of a left-wing political orientation.
4) Is there a link between watching certain news and voting or does your voting affect what news you watch?
5) When did the press become terrorists?
You have presented little evidence to corroborate your claim that the MSM is a threat to Trump. Especially so if he is the great communicator that many allege him to be.
What is their threat? How is Trump “pushing back” exactly? How have the MSM made it their job to be this threat?
How does the MSM pose the possibility of creating tyranny again?
So you assume the MSM to automatically possess a threat to create tyranny then? How do? By what metric is Trump “pushing back” and what metrics measure his success in that? Lot of unspoken assumptions in all of this.
Well, we’ll go back to “this war is lost” when it wasn’t–i.e. fake news.
The threat is leftist tyranny which the MSM pushes–i.e. normalizing deviancy.
The push-back is Twitter.
And they have made it his job because their reporting on jobs and 4.1 growth is the elephant in the room.
They represent sexual dysfunction as the norm, Hillary did nothing wrong, and Russia penetrated the last election.
Hands up was a lie. And what have you heard about Venezuela ? And Nicaragua ? And the recent vote in Argentina ? Melania not holding his hand is more important ! Or, the shoes she wears.
Please give us poor deplorables a break–tolerance for our ignorance.
His next tweet will be their bigger obsession than the Holy Fire.
Do you really believe MSM is fair and balanced ? The leftist agenda they regurgitate is good for our country ?
You make good points. If I managed a secured information facility I would have everyone check personal phones/devices at the door.
But maybe in the “modern” world that is unreasonable.
You’re right, of course. Trump hiring a contestant from his reality show whose qualification was … being a contestant on his reality show played no role in this.
The President, of course, is not ultimately responsible for what goes on in his own White House. It’s not a sign of incompetence or mismanagement. He’s just a plastic bag blowing in the wind.
If anyone thinks that and acts on it, they’re a fool.
There’s plenty of cases in the last decade where the book was thrown at people for that.
Let’s go to the videotape to see the post (#5, above) that I was responding to since, for some odd reason, it was clipped from the above.
So . . . colossal management failure . . . wholly unfit for the job. And all of that generated in response to a single incident perpetrated by, and characterized by, someone else outside of Trump’s presence. Did I say hyperbolic already?
Everyone does this. The problem arises when the person answers back with, “I left it in the car” or other answer. I have yet to be subject to a pat down entering such a room. The warning and consequences are enough of a deterrent for most people.
“The Situation Room is smaller than I imagined.”
“It’s small but vitally important, Ms Omarosa.”
“And why are there so many brooms and cleaning supplies on the shelves?”
“We are prepared for any situation in the Situation Room.”
You’re right. This is a single incident. It’s not just the latest in a long line of train wrecks in the area of personnel and management. It’s not as if there’s been a series of high profile resignations and firings associated with the Trump administration and Trump White House.
There is no other evidence of management failure and unfitness? None?
I dont think I ever heard … What exactly was her job tittle in the White House?
Perhaps you could ask Dianne Feinstein about that.
As opposed to doubling the national debt in 8 years. You’d think that “man” was wholly unfit for the job.
If you were any good at math, that is.
I wonder if he has secret, non-secure servers out there, somewhere, like in NY, maybe Trump Tower, where he’s been sharing classified information to people who somehow have his secret userid, and they use that to correspond with him, secretly.
Because that seems like that would really be bad, and get you disqualified for a presidency, or any other public office, or any position in the federal government that has even the lowest levels of security clearance.
I mean, it certainly seems like that would be bad.
No, you’re right. When someone says “everything about the situation . . .” in a thread about a single situation, I should not jump to the conclusion that they’re actually talking about a single incident under discussion. Silly me.
Not the issue here. See #59 above, despite Mr. Cole’s best efforts at moving the goal posts.