Be Still My Beating Heart…

 

The White House has released a plan that details some pretty sweeping changes to the Executive Branch of our government. I have not yet had a chance to read the entire document from the OMB, but included are the following major changes:

  1. Combine the Departments of Education and Labor streamlining the bureaucracy and eliminating many redundancies.
  2. Consolidate the many different Food Safety agencies into one department into the USDA eliminating the FDA and HHS oversight of these areas — again eliminating many redundancies and reducing the bureaucracy.
  3. Divest and privatize the energy transmission GSAs in the Department of Energy such as the Tennessee Valley Authority and the Western Area Power Administration eliminating federal involvement in owning and operating energy transmission assets.
  4. Privatize the Postal Service.
  5. Ending the conservatorship of Fannie and Freddie and reducing their overall impact on the mortgage and housing market

There are more. Mostly small-ball stuff compared to these five rather major changes (unless I’m misreading; again I haven’t read through the entire document) but I have to say: Wow! Be still my beating heart. This is the kind of conservative reform we should all get behind, and kudos to POTUS and the rest of his staff for proposing these kinds of reforms.

Then again this sort of thing has been tried before, by better men, and failed. Still, nothing ventured nothing gained. We should all support President Trump and his administration in their mission to streamline and eliminate parts of the federal bureaucracy.

Published in Domestic Policy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 115 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. KiminWI Member
    KiminWI
    @KiminWI

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly.  Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it.  “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    • #91
  2. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    KiminWI (View Comment):

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly. Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it. “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    What is the point of education if not to prepare you for gainful employment?

    • #92
  3. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    KiminWI (View Comment):

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly. Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it. “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    I personally think the only reason for government involvement in training or teaching people things should be to qualify individuals to function in society. Education is a different matter altogether.

    • #93
  4. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    KiminWI (View Comment):

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly. Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it. “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    What is the point of education if not to prepare you for gainful employment?

    This is the appropriate role for the government in what we commonly refer to as ‘public education’. I would label it ‘public training’ and reserve the term education for other things.

     

    • #94
  5. KiminWI Member
    KiminWI
    @KiminWI

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    KiminWI (View Comment):

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly. Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it. “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    What is the point of education if not to prepare you for gainful employment?

    It’s a quibble but I think the point of education is to develop the mind for maturity not just for employment.  That maturity, along with skills and raw knowledge then prepare one for gainful employment.  The needed skills aren’t limited to ones taught in school and the specific skills and specific knowledge required for a job are best and most efficiently delivered by any private entity other than government.  As long as we do conflate education and  training for corporate citizenship the education of a free mind tends to be devalued and discarded.   And then we get ludicrous man-on-the-street interviews with people who don’t know the basics of government and supposedly educated people ridiculing constitutional recognition of certain inalienable rights. 

    • #95
  6. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Jamie deserves credit here. I liked his post, and support what he has to say. I am not now going to fuss on other things, and, I expect to argue with Jamie again on stuff in the future. 

     

     

    • #96
  7. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Jamie deserves credit here. I liked his post, and support what he has to say. I am not now going to fuss on other things, and, I expect to argue with Jamie again on stuff in the future.

     

     

    Agreed. But I am a little concerned…next thing we know, Jamie is going to label Trump his BBF and start posting about their new bromance.

    • #97
  8. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    cdor (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Jamie deserves credit here. I liked his post, and support what he has to say. I am not now going to fuss on other things, and, I expect to argue with Jamie again on stuff in the future.

     

     

    Agreed. But I am a little concerned…next thing we know, Jamie is going to label Trump his BBF and start posting about their new bromance.

     

    If Jamie is starting an unexpected bormance, it better be with me!

     

    • #98
  9. Nick H Coolidge
    Nick H
    @NickH

    TBA (View Comment):

    Doug Kimball (View Comment):

    I must have gone to sleep and awakened in a parallel universe.

    If Pence has a beard it’s for sure a parallel universe.

    Only if it’s a goatee. 

    • #99
  10. cdor Member
    cdor
    @cdor

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    cdor (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Jamie deserves credit here. I liked his post, and support what he has to say. I am not now going to fuss on other things, and, I expect to argue with Jamie again on stuff in the future.

     

     

    Agreed. But I am a little concerned…next thing we know, Jamie is going to label Trump his BBF and start posting about their new bromance.

     

    If Jamie is starting an unexpected bormance, it better be with me!

     

    Let’s not get all pouty, Bryan

    • #100
  11. Steve C. Member
    Steve C.
    @user_531302

    Spin (View Comment):

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad (View Comment):

    Hammer, The (Ryan M) (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Hammer, The (Ryan M) (View Comment):

    Spin (View Comment):

    Jamie Lockett: by better men

    You just can’t resist taking a swipe at the Trump supporters, can you? (clown nose off)

    Nah- Reagan is a free pass in my book. Of course he’s the better man. But I agree with Jamie, and am hoping that this agenda succeeds. It would be amazing.

    Nobody ever knows when I’m joking. To quote someone else I recently read: “…its not my fault.”

    I have the same problem! :)

    I know it kills the humor, but maybe if you took the time to explain your jokes…

    no.

    Jokes are like classified information. I could explain it to you, but then…..I’d have to kill you!

    • #101
  12. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    KiminWI (View Comment):
    Education” does not equal job training.

    That may be one of the ideas wherein our schools have fallen into a death trap. A truly educated person can adapt to a variety of jobs or tasks. 

    • #102
  13. Guruforhire Inactive
    Guruforhire
    @Guruforhire

    Before this is all over even rob long will be doing the never come down in a MAGA hat.

     

     

    • #103
  14. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    JudithannCampbell (View Comment):

    They call me PJ Boy or they ca… (View Comment):
    In particular and in comparison to Carter, Clinton (both), and “BJ” Obama, I am finding The Donald quite admirable.

    Exactly! One of my relatives is always saying that Trump is a sociopath. I want to ask him how Trump is more of a sociopath than Bill and Hillary Clinton. I don’t ask, for the sake of keeping the peace, and because I figure the less I know about his political opinions, the better off everyone will be. But I don’t understand how anyone could consider Hillary better in the character department than Trump.

    Calling the President a sociopath is tantamount to declaring to the world, “I am not a psychiatrist, much less Trump’s psychiatrist, but I like using words I don’t understand to describe people I don’t know.” 

     

    • #104
  15. JudithannCampbell Member
    JudithannCampbell
    @

    TBA (View Comment):

    JudithannCampbell (View Comment):

    They call me PJ Boy or they ca… (View Comment):
    In particular and in comparison to Carter, Clinton (both), and “BJ” Obama, I am finding The Donald quite admirable.

    Exactly! One of my relatives is always saying that Trump is a sociopath. I want to ask him how Trump is more of a sociopath than Bill and Hillary Clinton. I don’t ask, for the sake of keeping the peace, and because I figure the less I know about his political opinions, the better off everyone will be. But I don’t understand how anyone could consider Hillary better in the character department than Trump.

    Calling the President a sociopath is tantamount to declaring to the world, “I am not a psychiatrist, much less Trump’s psychiatrist, but I like using words I don’t understand to describe people I don’t know.”

     

    I know. Apparently, he claims to have read all of Donald Trump’s books, and his diagnosis is based on that: I haven’t read any of Donald Trump’s books, and don’t intend to, which is why I don’t bother getting into it. 

    • #105
  16. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    KiminWI (View Comment):

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly. Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it. “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    What is the point of education if not to prepare you for gainful employment?

    Learning stuff.  

    • #106
  17. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    KiminWI (View Comment):

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly. Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it. “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    What is the point of education if not to prepare you for gainful employment?

    Learning stuff.

    Fair enough. But what is the point of other people paying for your education if not to prepare you for gainful employment? 

    • #107
  18. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    TBA (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    KiminWI (View Comment):

    #2-5 are great of course.

    But combining the Departments of Labor and Education is a huge folly. Not only does it give fresh cover to the cockroaches but it sends an appalling message about the nature of education and the government’s interest in it. “Education” does not equal job training. They should absolutely not be conflated in this way so as to encourage even the best of politicians in this fallacious assumption.

    What is the point of education if not to prepare you for gainful employment?

    Learning stuff.

    Fair enough. But what is the point of other people paying for your education if not to prepare you for gainful employment?

    I’m not against some of my tax dollars being paid for people to learn stuff. If it’s just for gainful employment, the private sector should do it and the govt should butt out. If it’s learning for the sake of learning, it’s appropriate for some public help, although IMO it has become way too dependent on federal funding these days.  (BTW, I think people like Margaret Thatcher, Newt Gingrich, and C. Northcote Parkinson all made the same point with respect to funding for research.) 

    • #108
  19. CarolJoy Coolidge
    CarolJoy
    @CarolJoy

    They call me PJ Boy or they ca… (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    …exceeded by getting government out of health insurance/care.

    The Trump admin. plan is great.

    Any progress on the Stupid Party’s promise/ “effort” to end O-care? Don’t we ‘control’ 2 of 3 branches of gov? What is the cotton-picken’ hold up?

    The cotton pick’in hold up was with three Republicans in Congress who voted with the Dems. (One being  McCain, the other was Susan of New England, I’m forgetting the third.)

    • #109
  20. Umbra of Nex Inactive
    Umbra of Nex
    @UmbraFractus

    CarolJoy (View Comment):

    They call me PJ Boy or they ca… (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    …exceeded by getting government out of health insurance/care.

    The Trump admin. plan is great.

    Any progress on the Stupid Party’s promise/ “effort” to end O-care? Don’t we ‘control’ 2 of 3 branches of gov? What is the cotton-picken’ hold up?

    The cotton pick’in hold up was with three Republicans in Congress who voted with the Dems. (One being McCain, the other was Susan of New England, I’m forgetting the third.)

    Rand “It didn’t go far enough” Paul

    • #110
  21. They call me PJ Boy or they ca… Member
    They call me PJ Boy or they ca…
    @

    CarolJoy (View Comment):

    They call me PJ Boy or they ca… (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    …exceeded by getting government out of health insurance/care.

    The Trump admin. plan is great.

    Any progress on the Stupid Party’s promise/ “effort” to end O-care? Don’t we ‘control’ 2 of 3 branches of gov? What is the cotton-picken’ hold up?

    The cotton pick’in hold up was with three Republicans in Congress who voted with the Dems. (One being McCain, the other was Susan of New England, I’m forgetting the third.)

    Thanks.  Hard for me to keep up from overseas.

    • #111
  22. They call me PJ Boy or they ca… Member
    They call me PJ Boy or they ca…
    @

    Umbra of Nex (View Comment):

    CarolJoy (View Comment):

    They call me PJ Boy or they ca… (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    …exceeded by getting government out of health insurance/care.

    The Trump admin. plan is great.

    Any progress on the Stupid Party’s promise/ “effort” to end O-care? Don’t we ‘control’ 2 of 3 branches of gov? What is the cotton-picken’ hold up?

    The cotton pick’in hold up was with three Republicans in Congress who voted with the Dems. (One being McCain, the other was Susan of New England, I’m forgetting the third.)

    Rand “It didn’t go far enough” Paul

    Thank you too.

    • #112
  23. They call me PJ Boy or they ca… Member
    They call me PJ Boy or they ca…
    @

    Umbra of Nex (View Comment):

    CarolJoy (View Comment):

    They call me PJ Boy or they ca… (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    …exceeded by getting government out of health insurance/care.

    The Trump admin. plan is great.

    Any progress on the Stupid Party’s promise/ “effort” to end O-care? Don’t we ‘control’ 2 of 3 branches of gov? What is the cotton-picken’ hold up?

    The cotton pick’in hold up was with three Republicans in Congress who voted with the Dems. (One being McCain, the other was Susan of New England, I’m forgetting the third.)

    Rand “It didn’t go far enough” Paul

    Hard to believe about him.  I thought he had enough common sense to take victories where you can get them.  S.A.D.

    • #113
  24. Nanda Pajama-Tantrum Member
    Nanda Pajama-Tantrum
    @

    I’m quite happy about his personnel choices…(The more Marine minds, the better, etc.)

    • #114
  25. Umbra of Nex Inactive
    Umbra of Nex
    @UmbraFractus

    Nanda Pajama-Tantrum (View Comment):

    I’m quite happy about his personnel choices…(The more Marine minds, the better, etc.)

    That’s an oxymoron if I ever heard one. ;-)

    • #115
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.