Women’s College Bans the Word “Women”

 

I was at a restaurant recently and a waiter tripped over something and spilled a tray of drinks. I’m sure he was embarrassed, but I was uncomfortable as well. I was embarrassed for him. I’m not one who generally rejoices in watching someone make a fool of themselves. So I’m a little hesitant to admit how much I enjoyed this article on Fox News.

So the professors at a women’s college have been instructed not to use the word women (to avoid the appearance of thinking that there may be two genders). Perhaps next they won’t be allowed to use the word college (to avoid the appearance of thinking that there is some benefit to attending their institution). The left’s lack of any core principles (other than the ever-increasing acquisition of power) often leads to disconcerting conflicts. Disconcerting, and sometimes hilarious. The picture below is a good description of what’s happening on the left right now:

This is probably largely virtue signaling, but some of the “reasoning” behind banning the word “women” may be simply another example of the left thinking they can change reality by changing the language. Many of these people don’t live in reality, or at least they avoid it whenever possible. So their life is like the parable of the cave, in which they only see shadowy reflections of reality. Or someone else sees those reflections and then describes them to the students. Or something.

Or maybe I’m trying too hard to understand this. How do you seriously debate someone who does not take themselves, or anything else, seriously? I suppose I should at least consider the possibility that these people are just goofy.

Imagine Aristotle on a modern college campus. I would love to see his response to that memo…

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 106 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    Stad (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    I need to go lie down…

    Have a drink first . . .

    I can’t remember the last time I was drunk enough for this stuff to make sense.  

    Then again, if I ever did manage to achieve that level of inebriation, I suppose I probably wouldn’t remember it…

    • #91
  2. Misthiocracy, Joke Pending Member
    Misthiocracy, Joke Pending
    @Misthiocracy

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):
    So basically, if a man wants to go there, all he has to do is check the box on the admissions form that says he identifies as female. Once he shows up, he can just say he’s changed his mind since he applied and now chooses a “male gender identity.”

    Yeah, but why would he want to? Go there, that is.

    Minority quota?

    • #92
  3. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Misthiocracy, Joke Pending (View Comment):

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):
    So basically, if a man wants to go there, all he has to do is check the box on the admissions form that says he identifies as female. Once he shows up, he can just say he’s changed his mind since he applied and now chooses a “male gender identity.”

    Yeah, but why would he want to? Go there, that is.

    Minority quota?

    To meet chicks? Well, probably not.

    • #93
  4. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy, Joke Pending (View Comment):

    drlorentz (View Comment):

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):
    So basically, if a man wants to go there, all he has to do is check the box on the admissions form that says he identifies as female. Once he shows up, he can just say he’s changed his mind since he applied and now chooses a “male gender identity.”

    Yeah, but why would he want to? Go there, that is.

    Minority quota?

    To meet chicks? Well, probably not.

    Meeting a few of them might be enough to drive him to consider changing his sexual orientation…

     

    • #94
  5. Nanda Panjandrum Member
    Nanda Panjandrum
    @

    Can they use the neologism: womyn, instead? Curiouser and curiouser…

    • #95
  6. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Nanda Panjandrum (View Comment):

    Can they use the neologism: womyn, instead? Curiouser and curiouser…

    Sure… if they want to abandon all pretense of scholarship, adulthood, and seriousness. ;)

    • #96
  7. Nanda Panjandrum Member
    Nanda Panjandrum
    @

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Nanda Panjandrum (View Comment):

    Can they use the neologism: womyn, instead? Curiouser and curiouser…

    Sure… if they want to abandon all pretense of scholarship, adulthood, and seriousness. ;)

    Which this action shows they’re more than willing to do; in pursuit of woebegone “wokeness”…Sigh.

    • #97
  8. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    I can’t remember the last time I was drunk enough for this stuff to make sense.

    I didn’t mean it would help make sense.  I meant you wouldn’t give a s*** about it . . .

    • #98
  9. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Nanda Panjandrum (View Comment):

    Can they use the neologism: womyn, instead? Curiouser and curiouser…

    Sure… if they want to abandon all pretense of scholarship, adulthood, and seriousness. ;)

    Given that those are part of the patriarchy, yes, they do want to abandon those.  They thank you for finally getting it.  

    • #99
  10. WalterWatchpocket Coolidge
    WalterWatchpocket
    @WalterWatchpocket

    Great post and comments!  I don’t remember when I’ve laughed as much ( or should I be crying). I’ve been trying to watch the Miss State women’s game vs NC State.   It’s over and I don’t know who won.

    • #100
  11. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    It would have been simpler and more clear if they had just said that they would accept anyone other than straight men. And I mean anyone – including genders that don’t technically exist.

    If I identify as a woman and a valedictorian, can I get an academic scholarship?

    • #101
  12. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Misthiocracy, Joke Pending (View Comment):
    I bet women’s sports would get way better tv ratings if all the players were trans.

    I remember a late night comedian joking about Dr. Renee Richards, and how professional tennis had to come up with a new bracket: “mixed singles”.

    • #102
  13. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    ST (View Comment):

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):
    cisgender

    Had to look it up. When and why did we decide we needed a word like that?

    Normally, we don’t.  However, we only use the language of the left to mock them.

    • #103
  14. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Stad (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    It would have been simpler and more clear if they had just said that they would accept anyone other than straight men. And I mean anyone – including genders that don’t technically exist.

    If I identify as a woman and a valedictorian, can I get an academic scholarship?

    Why not simply self-identify as someone who has already paid her tuition?

    • #104
  15. Nanda Panjandrum Member
    Nanda Panjandrum
    @

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    It would have been simpler and more clear if they had just said that they would accept anyone other than straight men. And I mean anyone – including genders that don’t technically exist.

    If I identify as a woman and a valedictorian, can I get an academic scholarship?

    Why not simply self-identify as someone who has already paid her tuition?

    Brilliant!

     

    • #105
  16. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    It would have been simpler and more clear if they had just said that they would accept anyone other than straight men. And I mean anyone – including genders that don’t technically exist.

    If I identify as a woman and a valedictorian, can I get an academic scholarship?

    Why not simply self-identify as someone who has already paid her tuition?

    That would be silly.

    • #106
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.