Appreciating John McCain

 

For many years, conservatives were ideological zealots. Like Spanish inquisitors, they were on guard for the slightest indications of heresy. Talk radio gurus in particular were punctilious keepers of the flame. If a Republican figure was thought to be “squishy” on any matter – guns, spending, immigration, or anything else – he or she was reviled. Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator who headed the Heritage Foundation for a time, said in 2009 that he’d rather have 30 conservative purists in the senate than 60 Republicans of varying hues.

Now the Republican Party is led by a man who donated to Democrats, promised never to reform entitlements, insisted more than once that we should “take the oil” from the Middle East, and spewed more apostasy in five minutes than most Republicans could manage in a lifetime. Accordingly, we are told that personality is more important than substance.

I still care a great deal about substance, but character more. Before too long, many Americans may conclude that we need dull competence in public life and particularly in government. The spirit of President Calvin Coolidge would be salutary. He was laconic even by the standards of the early 20th century, but when he spoke or wrote, it was after thinking. He observed about politicians that:

The political mind is the product of men in public life who have been twice spoiled. They have been spoiled with praise and they have been spoiled with abuse. With them nothing is natural, everything is artificial. They live in an artificial atmosphere of adulation, which sooner or later impairs their judgment.

He was wry. “What I have ever been able to do has been the result of first learning how to do it. I am not gifted with intuition. I need not only hard work but experience to be ready to solve problems.” Quaint, right?

On the subject of character, this seems a good time to praise John McCain. McCain is one of those Republican Party squishes whose lily liver — or something – supposedly drove heaps of disgusted voters to choose a reality TV star. Being human, McCain isn’t perfect. Being a politician, he has compromised and trimmed many times. But his courage and dignity are magnificent things to behold.

I have no idea how McCain will vote on the latest Obamacare modification bill. But when it comes to human rights, the Arizona senator has always been stalwart. When Bill Browder knocked on his door looking for justice for the murdered Sergei Magnitsky, McCain didn’t hesitate. He became one of the first sponsors of the Magnitsky Act. When Secretary of State Rex Tillerson intimated that human rights were all very well, but henceforth America’s foreign policy would be based on hard-headed self-interest and realism, McCain fired off a passionate defense of human rights, denying that they are in conflict with our interests.

I consider myself a realist. What I’ve learned is that it is foolish to view realism and idealism as incompatible. In the real world, as lived and experienced by real people, the demand for human rights and dignity, the longing for liberty and justice and opportunity, the hatred of oppression and corruption and cruelty is reality. By denying this experience, we deny the aspirations of billions of people, and invite their enduring resentment.

McCain, who has already survived melanoma, is now undergoing treatment for an aggressive brain tumor. Within days of receiving the devastating diagnosis, he was thanking well-wishers and quipping that “Even those that want me to die don’t want me to die right away, so that’s good.” Who is that droll in the face of such news?

In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, McCain demonstrated that same spirit – a blend of grace and impishness all his own. There were two ways of dealing with challenges like this, he reflected, and one was “to celebrate” (he didn’t say what the other was). “I am able to celebrate a wonderful life and I will be grateful for whatever additional time I have.” He quoted a playwright who said he knew that no one was immortal but always hoped there would be one exception. He was optimistic about his treatment so far, pausing to praise the doctors, nurses, and others who had, he winked, “inflicted so much pain on me,” but acknowledged that he was facing a “vicious form of cancer.” He would do everything possible to fight it, but “every life has to end one way or another.” How did he wish to be remembered? “He served his country.”

Did he ever. He flew combat missions, endured years of torture and refused early release that would have placed him ahead of others captured before him, spoke up for prisoners, refugees, freedom fighters, the American military, and American values. He does us proud to this day. This is American greatness.

Published in Politics
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 110 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Curt North (View Comment):

    As for Mona, I no longer read or listen, but just check in occasionally to make sure she’s being fact checked when she does her typical assault from the opera box, from the looks of things on this thread we’re having none of it from her and her ilk. Good on ya deplorables!

    With Mona, it’s swine before pearls.

    I was a huge Mona fan back in the Capital Gang days.  I met her at the 1993 NRI summit in Washington in January 1993, and she probably put me on the “potential stalker” list, I was so tongue-tied when I was speaking with her in the hallway.

    But I haven’t been able to listen to her podcast or read her stuff in a couple years.

     

    • #31
  2. Archie Campbell Member
    Archie Campbell
    @ArchieCampbell

    ThomasAnger (View Comment):
    My take is that McCain’s innate recklessness and narcissism (which is right up there with Trump’s) put him in the seat of an A-4. This, in turn, led to his capture by the North Vietnamese.

    There’s no way to know that. I’ve never read an account of him that said he wasn’t a good pilot. Even the best pilots can get shot down.

    Yes, he was treated brutally and survived, which is no more than one would expect of any red-blooded male (dare I say that?). But McCain’s accidental “heroism” hardly puts him in a league with true military heroes.

    Except that he could’ve come home five years early, but chose to stay with his compatriots.

    So let’s not get carried away here. It isn’t necessary to denigrate his true heroism in order to deplore his record as a Senator.

    • #32
  3. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Don Tillman (View Comment):

    Mona Charen: Now the Republican Party is led by a man who donated to Democrats

    McCain actively campaigned for Obama in 2008, both by suspending his campaign, and by declaring, “You have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency.”

    Oh come on.  McCain actively campaigned to be elected as President.  He just refused to go along with rabid people who claimed that Obama was a Muslim.

    • #33
  4. Curt North Inactive
    Curt North
    @CurtNorth

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):
    I was a huge Mona fan back in the Capital Gang days. I met her at the 1993 NRI summit in Washington in January 1993, and she probably put me on the “potential stalker” list, I was so tongue-tied when I was speaking with her in the hallway.

    But I haven’t been able to listen to her podcast or read her stuff in a couple years.

    I used to listen regularly to NTK and read her columns, all prior to Trump’s arrival.  Ever since that bull charged into her china shop and started breaking things, I’ve found her unbearable.

    • #34
  5. Curt North Inactive
    Curt North
    @CurtNorth

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Don Tillman (View Comment):

    Mona Charen: Now the Republican Party is led by a man who donated to Democrats

    McCain actively campaigned for Obama in 2008, both by suspending his campaign, and by declaring, “You have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency.”

    Oh come on. McCain actively campaigned to be elected as President. He just refused to go along with rabid people who claimed that Obama was a Muslim.

    Gary, whatever your feelings, you have to admit McCain didn’t seem to really want to win very much did he?

    • #35
  6. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    There sure is a bunch of McCain hatred going on in these comments.

    Would the commentators be willing to acknowledge that during the surge, McCain helped save Iraq by being the strongest supporter of the surge?  (Only to have Obama throw it all away…)  How about his service as the Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee?

    McCain has his weaknesses.  And I am proud that he is my Arizona Senator.

    • #36
  7. Jager Coolidge
    Jager
    @Jager

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    How about his service as the Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee?

    Sure, one would think that he would use this position of power to fix the VA.

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/02/09/vets-continue-to-die-phoenix-hospital-at-center-va-scandal-ranked-among-nations-worst.html

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/va-only-filling-half-of-its-medical-appointments-while-veterans-wait-for-weeks/article/2634652

    As a Veteran who has power in the Senate you would think he would want to help Veterans. I do blame McCain and Graham for not force a fix to these problems.

    • #37
  8. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Would the commentators be willing to acknowledge that during the surge, McCain helped save Iraq by being the strongest supporter of the surge? (Only to have Obama throw it all away…) How about his service as the Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee?

     

    No. Iraq is a huge mistake beginning to end. The surge was a short term measure that would have had nothing to do with what was going to happen eventually – Iraq becoming an Iranian satellite. Bush and Obama have managed to turn the land from Iran to Lebanon into a Shia crescent.

    • #38
  9. Archie Campbell Member
    Archie Campbell
    @ArchieCampbell

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Would the commentators be willing to acknowledge that during the surge, McCain helped save Iraq by being the strongest supporter of the surge? (Only to have Obama throw it all away…)

    Yep, his support of the surge was a good thing. But then there is most everything else. I mean, maybe he prevented another Babbitt or Udall from running, but that’s damning with faint praise.

    • #39
  10. Quinnie Member
    Quinnie
    @Quinnie

    This article isn’t about John McCain, it is about trashing President Trump.   If only Evan McMullen would have been elected we would have been saved from all of this winning.

    • #40
  11. Curt North Inactive
    Curt North
    @CurtNorth

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    There sure is a bunch of McCain hatred going on in these comments.

    Would the commentators be willing to acknowledge that during the surge, McCain helped save Iraq by being the strongest supporter of the surge? (Only to have Obama throw it all away…) How about his service as the Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee?

    McCain has his weaknesses. And I am proud that he is my Arizona Senator.

    I think history will have to tell the full story on Iraq.  Granted, the surge saved it at the time, but long term we still don’t know.

    • #41
  12. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Archie Campbell (View Comment):

    ThomasAnger (View Comment):
    My take is that McCain’s innate recklessness and narcissism (which is right up there with Trump’s) put him in the seat of an A-4. This, in turn, led to his capture by the North Vietnamese.

    There’s no way to know that. I’ve never read an account of him that said he wasn’t a good pilot. Even the best pilots can get shot down.

    Yes, he was treated brutally and survived, which is no more than one would expect of any red-blooded male (dare I say that?). But McCain’s accidental “heroism” hardly puts him in a league with true military heroes.

    Except that he could’ve come home five years early, but chose to stay with his compatriots.

    So let’s not get carried away here. It isn’t necessary to denigrate his true heroism in order to deplore his record as a Senator.

    Thank you, Archie! This blind hatred is disgraceful. Anybody who resorts to denigrating someone who underwent such savage treatment should be ashamed. And all because the person doing these things doesn’t like some votes that were cast. Is this what conservatism has come to stand for: If you don’t cast the right votes, you are devil? It is, as I say, shameful!

    • #42
  13. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Don Tillman (View Comment):

    Mona Charen: Now the Republican Party is led by a man who donated to Democrats

    McCain actively campaigned for Obama in 2008, both by suspending his campaign, and by declaring, “You have nothing to fear from an Obama presidency.”

    Oh come on. McCain actively campaigned to be elected as President. He just refused to go along with rabid people who claimed that Obama was a Muslim.

    He suspended his campaign because, not understanding any economic or financial matters he didn’t know what to say or do.  He was afraid to point out that Obama was unqualified, without real experience had been a radical anti American leftist, and a race bater, pro abortion and close to corruption from the get go.   He was intimidated by Obama’s race and like most mainstream Republicans didn’t know how to handle it and didn’t know enough of what we might call conservative rooted literature, history or economics to rise above his white guilt and, floundered from the beginning.  It had nothing to do with the folks who called him a Muslim.   McCain was picked by the mainstream media who also know how to intimidate the stupid party.

    • #43
  14. Roberto Inactive
    Roberto
    @Roberto

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    Thank you, Archie! This blind hatred is disgraceful. Anybody who resorts to denigrating someone who underwent such savage treatment should be ashamed. And all because the person doing these things doesn’t like some votes that were cast. Is this what conservatism has come to stand for: If you don’t cast the right votes, you are devil? It is, as I say, shameful!

    What would you call the conduct of a man who abandoned the wife who waited for him all those years in order to marry a younger woman who is heir to a fortune?

    Oh and the wife had also suffered crippling auto accident. What would you call that?

    • #44
  15. Curt North Inactive
    Curt North
    @CurtNorth

    Roberto (View Comment):
    What would you call the conduct of a man who abandoned the wife who waited for him all those years in order to marry a younger woman who is heir to a fortune?

    Oh and the wife had also suffered crippling auto accident. What would you call that?

    I read the linked piece, I recall something about a prior wife but didn’t know the details.  The article certainly doesn’t paint him in a very good light, not sure if The Daily Mail has built-in bias or not, but the facts don’t seem to be in dispute.

    • #45
  16. Goldwater's Revenge Inactive
    Goldwater's Revenge
    @GoldwatersRevenge

    McCain finished near the bottom of his class at Annapolis. His skill as a pilot was not exceptional, causing the loss of one or more multimillion dollar aircraft. Did the fact he was the son of a famous Admiral give him a pass? His capture and torture in Vietnam Nam caused many of us to overlook his future failures. All public figures would prefer to be judged only by their attributes, not their failures. We have accepted his irrational positions/behavior as a virtue to our own peril. It’s time to hold him accountable for his failures as well as his sacrifice.

    • #46
  17. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Archie Campbell (View Comment):

    ThomasAnger (View Comment):
    My take is that McCain’s innate recklessness and narcissism (which is right up there with Trump’s) put him in the seat of an A-4. This, in turn, led to his capture by the North Vietnamese.

    There’s no way to know that. I’ve never read an account of him that said he wasn’t a good pilot. Even the best pilots can get shot down.

    Yes, he was treated brutally and survived, which is no more than one would expect of any red-blooded male (dare I say that?). But McCain’s accidental “heroism” hardly puts him in a league with true military heroes.

    Except that he could’ve come home five years early, but chose to stay with his compatriots.

    So let’s not get carried away here. It isn’t necessary to denigrate his true heroism in order to deplore his record as a Senator.

    Thank you, Archie! This blind hatred is disgraceful. Anybody who resorts to denigrating someone who underwent such savage treatment should be ashamed. And all because the person doing these things doesn’t like some votes that were cast. Is this what conservatism has come to stand for: If you don’t cast the right votes, you are devil? It is, as I say, shameful!

    I don’t dislike him for one or two votes,  I detest him for the Unconstitutional abomination that is McCain/Feingold.

    • #47
  18. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Curt North (View Comment):
    Gary, whatever your feelings, you have to admit McCain didn’t seem to really want to win very much did he?

    Now, your reading minds?

    • #48
  19. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    I Walton (View Comment):
    It had nothing to do with the folks who called him a Muslim. McCain was picked by the mainstream media who also know how to intimidate the stupid party.

    If I said what I was thinking, I’d get into trouble with the Code of Conduct. But saying that McCain was picked for our party by the mainstream media is not very bright.

    • #49
  20. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Roberto (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    Thank you, Archie! This blind hatred is disgraceful. Anybody who resorts to denigrating someone who underwent such savage treatment should be ashamed. And all because the person doing these things doesn’t like some votes that were cast. Is this what conservatism has come to stand for: If you don’t cast the right votes, you are devil? It is, as I say, shameful!

    What would you call the conduct of a man who abandoned the wife who waited for him all those years in order to marry a younger woman who is heir to a fortune?

    Oh and the wife had also suffered crippling auto accident. What would you call that?

    I don’t know anything about his personal life. And neither do you, really. And this not what the reckless and hateful diatribe was about anyway.

    • #50
  21. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Archie Campbell (View Comment):

    ThomasAnger (View Comment):
    My take is that McCain’s innate recklessness and narcissism (which is right up there with Trump’s) put him in the seat of an A-4. This, in turn, led to his capture by the North Vietnamese.

    There’s no way to know that. I’ve never read an account of him that said he wasn’t a good pilot. Even the best pilots can get shot down.

    Yes, he was treated brutally and survived, which is no more than one would expect of any red-blooded male (dare I say that?). But McCain’s accidental “heroism” hardly puts him in a league with true military heroes.

    Except that he could’ve come home five years early, but chose to stay with his compatriots.

    So let’s not get carried away here. It isn’t necessary to denigrate his true heroism in order to deplore his record as a Senator.

    Thank you, Archie! This blind hatred is disgraceful. Anybody who resorts to denigrating someone who underwent such savage treatment should be ashamed. And all because the person doing these things doesn’t like some votes that were cast. Is this what conservatism has come to stand for: If you don’t cast the right votes, you are devil? It is, as I say, shameful!

    I don’t dislike him for one or two votes, I detest him for the Unconstitutional abomination that is McCain/Feingold.

    McCain/Feingold was all that. It was a silly and reckless thing to sponsor. But for that you detest the man? Shameful!

    • #51
  22. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    There sure is a bunch of McCain hatred going on in these comments.

    Would the commentators be willing to acknowledge that during the surge, McCain helped save Iraq by being the strongest supporter of the surge? (Only to have Obama throw it all away…) How about his service as the Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee?

    McCain has his weaknesses. And I am proud that he is my Arizona Senator.

    Gary, the blind haters should realize one thing: There is a Judgment  Day. And I would hate to be them when it comes.

    • #52
  23. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Curt North (View Comment):
    I think history will have to tell the full story on Iraq. Granted, the surge saved it at the time, but long term we still don’t know.

    We can speculate. And I speculate that, were it not for Obama, Iraq would have gone down as a Bush Triumph.

    • #53
  24. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    McCain/Feingold was all that. It was a silly and reckless thing to sponsor. But for that you detest the man? Shameful!

    And for this you don’t?  Very strange.

    • #54
  25. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Skyler (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    McCain/Feingold was all that. It was a silly and reckless thing to sponsor. But for that you detest the man? Shameful!

    And for this you don’t? Very strange.

    I’m strange??! I don’t detest people for a lapse in judgement. For God’s sake, the man didn’t kill anyone! To spend your life hating someone on account  of politics goes beyond strange. It speaks to the disgusting priorities of someone who has no idea what life is all about!

    • #55
  26. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Skyler (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    McCain/Feingold was all that. It was a silly and reckless thing to sponsor. But for that you detest the man? Shameful!

    And for this you don’t? Very strange.

    I’m strange??! I don’t detest people for a lapse in judgement. For God’s sake, the man didn’t kill anyone! To spend your life hating someone on account of politics goes beyond strange. It speaks to the disgusting priorities of someone who has no idea what life is all about!

    Lapse in judgment?  Really?  That’s what you attribute all his malfeasance to?

    A lapse in judgment could be overlooked if something were done in the heat of a moment or with improper information.  McCain/Feingold was deliberate and there was nothing rushed or uninformed about it.  It was very intentional, he was warned of its ill effects, and all of history should lead a prudent person to realize that the warnings were justified.  The same could be said of his entire career.

    John McCain has spent his life trying to hobble my freedom.  Yes,  detest him.  He was only better than Obama when running for president because the alternative was perceived as, and proven out to be, much worse, but I never kidded myself that John McCain isn’t an enemy of freedom.

    • #56
  27. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Skyler (View Comment):
    but I never kidded myself that John McCain isn’t an enemy of freedom.

    An enemy of freedom? He fought for freedom, and not only had his liberty taken from him for years but was tortured and brutalized for years. He loves his country  so much that he refused early relief. McCain is not the detestable one here!

    • #57
  28. BD1 Member
    BD1
    @

    “In the 2008 presidential primaries, exit polls prove John McCain failed to win a single race among registered Republican voters in open primaries up to Super Tuesday, yet during that same period he went from also-ran to front runner because most non-Republicans who crossed over voted for him.  In New Hampshire, Romney won among registered Republicans, but McCain won overall.  Likewise, in South Carolina, Huckabee won among registered Republicans, but McCain won the state.”

    • #58
  29. Jager Coolidge
    Jager
    @Jager

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Skyler (View Comment):
    but I never kidded myself that John McCain isn’t an enemy of freedom.

    An enemy of freedom? He fought for freedom, and not only had his liberty taken from him for years but was tortured and brutalized for years. He loves his country so much that he refused early relief. McCain is not the detestable one here!

    I am not sure you should really be saying other members are detestable.

    McCain/Feingold was terrible. It is not just “one vote” but a bill he sponsored.  Just one vote would be opposing the Bush tax cuts, or maintaining Obamacare.

    He was labeled the Maverik because he was most likely to oppose his own party. He calls his opponents Waco birds and Hobbits (name calling quaint from McCain and uncouth from Trump?) There is reporting that he has physically assaulted people in disagreements. McCain himself admits to having a temper.

    I respect him as a veteran. As a pilot he fought for freedom. As a Senator, he is at best a mixed bag.

    • #59
  30. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Jager (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Skyler (View Comment):
    but I never kidded myself that John McCain isn’t an enemy of freedom.

    An enemy of freedom? He fought for freedom, and not only had his liberty taken from him for years but was tortured and brutalized for years. He loves his country so much that he refused early relief. McCain is not the detestable one here!

    I am not sure you should really be saying other members are detestable.

    McCain/Feingold was terrible. It is not just “one vote” but a bill he sponsored. Just one vote would be opposing the Bush tax cuts, or maintaining Obamacare.

    He was labeled the Maverik because he was most likely to oppose his own party. He calls his opponents Waco birds and Hobbits (name calling quaint from McCain and uncouth from Trump?) There is reporting that he has physically assaulted people in disagreements. McCain himself admits to having a temper.

    I respect him as a veteran. As a pilot he fought for freedom. As a Senator, he is at best a mixed bag.

    A few things:

    • I acknowledged that sponsoring McCain/Feingold was wrong. It does not deserve the vitriol that too many people have served up here.
    • I know nothing about fistfights. I think this may be just a rumor. Why do you take something from as gospel, which you like, while decrying other reporting?
    • he doesn’t call everyone he disagrees with a name. When he does, he is wrong. But they are mild names compared to what he is called.
    • As far as me calling names: Some people on Ricochet have called Mona Charen Swine. They’ve said as bad things about McCain and others. How you can call a fine lady like Mona Charen swine is beyond me. My labeling people what they are is truth-in-advertising!
    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.