Republicans Working Hard to Save Obama’s Legacy

 

Republicans in the House and Senate are working on a scheme to codify Barack Obama’s unconstitutional Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Illegal Immigrant Amnesty Program) into law.

Conservative lawmakers led by Thom Tillis are crafting a bill they call the conservative Dream Act that would provide a path to permanent residency to people brought here illegally as children, offering President Donald Trump an escape hatch on one of his most vexing immigration challenges

All the “Conservative Dream Act” does is codify DACA into law. How is this “conservative?”

And Republican Governor John Kasich… who did an end-run around his own state legislature to implement the Obamacare Medicaid expansion in Ohio… has teamed up with Democrat Governor John Hickenlooper to propose a plan for making Obamacare subsidies to insurance companies permanent.

The Trump Administration should commit to making cost sharing reduction (CSR) payments. … Also, Congress should put to rest any uncertainty about the future of CSR payments by explicitly appropriating federal funding for these payments at least through 2019. This guarantee would protect the assistance working Americans need to afford their insurance, give carriers the confidence they need to stay in the market, increase competition, and create more options for consumers. Because the cost of this initiative is already included in the budget baseline, the appropriation would not have budget consequences.

Congress should create a fund that states can use to create reinsurance programs or similar efforts that reduce premiums and limit losses for providing coverage. The House and Senate each recently proposed $15 billion annually for states to address coverage and access disruption in the marketplace with a goal of lowering premiums and saving money on premium subsidies.

So, with a Republican majority in Congress and a Republican in the White House… we get a proposal to pass Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants and a proposal to lock Obamacare into place.

What’s the point?

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 66 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Basil Fawlty (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):
    Can we at least agree to stop calling them “Dreamers”?

    Of course not! Are you trying to disrupt an official Two Minutes Love?

    Yes?

    • #61
  2. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    DrewInWisconsin (View Comment):
    Can we at least agree to stop calling them “Dreamers”?

    Mark Steyn certainly agrees.

    • #62
  3. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Matt White (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    One statistic that I have not heard rebutted is that the average DACA Dreamer is 26 years old, and has been here for 20 years, since the age of six. Do you deny that? If a six year old commits a crime, even murder by intentionally shooting a gun, they are not prosecuted, as they are too young to have a Mens rea which is a legal phrase as to the mental state a person must have before they can be held accountable for a crime. A six year old is a legal innocent. Or are you suggesting that a child who is brought here at the age of six should have objected to their parents for breaking the law?

    If you really want to follow that analogy, you have to let the 6 year old killer keep the gun and tell him to keep shooting.

    No you take away the gun.  But you don’t incarcerate the six year old.  In patient care, yes.  Incarcerate, no.

    • #63
  4. Matt White Member
    Matt White
    @

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Matt White (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    One statistic that I have not heard rebutted is that the average DACA Dreamer is 26 years old, and has been here for 20 years, since the age of six. Do you deny that? If a six year old commits a crime, even murder by intentionally shooting a gun, they are not prosecuted, as they are too young to have a Mens rea which is a legal phrase as to the mental state a person must have before they can be held accountable for a crime. A six year old is a legal innocent. Or are you suggesting that a child who is brought here at the age of six should have objected to their parents for breaking the law?

    If you really want to follow that analogy, you have to let the 6 year old killer keep the gun and tell him to keep shooting.

    No you take away the gun. But you don’t incarcerate the six year old. In patient care, yes. Incarcerate, no.

    Right, so your analogy is invalid until you find an advocate for locking up all the illegal immigrants.

    • #64
  5. CJ Inactive
    CJ
    @cjherod

    One statistic I have not heard rebutted is that exactly zero of the countries from which the <s>DREAMers</s> illegal immigrants come are prison colonies.

    Let’s say the rosy picture that Gary Robbin’s sources paint of these adult illegals–conscientious, intelligent, driven, etc.–is 100% accurate. That makes me feel even more confident that they would manage just fine in their home countries.

    I’m curious what the numbers are on those who have been deported (if any ever had). Did they die? Have they turned to lives of crime? Are they making a decent living and raising a family? Have they applied for green cards?

    If the media wanted to more effectively propagandize this issue, wouldn’t they interview the many deportees whose lives have actually been ruined, rather than playing on the imaginary fear that their lives could be ruined?

    • #65
  6. CarolJoy Coolidge
    CarolJoy
    @CarolJoy

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    But the Dreamers have been educated; wouldn’t it be better to take advantage of allowing educated people have legal status and to contribute to the economy?

    No, because the negative externalities of giving the Democrats almost a million new voters in strategic states are more important than any economic benefit accrued……especially when many of those ‘educated’ people were really just indoctrinated into Anti-Americanism Studies instead of an economically useful degree.

    The point you make for us, lowtech redneck, is a most valid one. The Dems love expanding their voting base.

    But in Calif, where 20 billion bucks is spent annually on immigrants and immigration related issues, this expenditure  means that few city council people, few county officials, no state officials, wish to give up the Goose that keeps laying the Golden Egg. So it is not only about helping the Democratic Party keep for itself ever expanding numbers of  voters inside various states who will vote for them, it is the tremendous enslavement that happens when Big Government Funding is ubiquitous.

    • #66
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.