Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Milo to be Keynote Speaker at CPAC
CPAC has announced that this year’s keynote speaker will be Milo Yiannopoulos, the controversial Breitbart editor whose talk was shut down earlier this month through violence at the University of California at Berkeley.
Yiannopoulos told The Hollywood Reporter that he will discuss his “experiences in America battling feminists, Black Lives Matter, the media, professors and the entertainment industry.”
…According to The Hollywood Reporter, those protests are part of the reason CPAC Chairman Matt Schlapp decided to host Yiannopoulos as the meeting’s keynote speaker.
“An epidemic of speech suppression has taken over college campuses,” Schlapp said. “Milo has exposed their liberal thuggery and we think free speech includes hearing Milo’s important perspective.”
Yiannopoulos appeared on HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher” on Friday, where he sparred with the show’s liberal host and took aim at high-profile female celebrities, including Lena Dunham and Amy Schumer.
The Conservative Political Action Conference will be held February 22-25, just outside of Washington at National Harbor, MD.
The first CPAC in 1974 featured Ronald Reagan as the keynote speaker. Gay conservative groups were banned from having a booth at the conference until last year.
Exit question: What do you think it says about the state of the conservative movement that CPAC has chosen as its keynote speaker an openly gay free speech activist with alt-right leanings? A good move, bad move, or somewhere in between?
Published in Politics
We don’t pay Pethokoukis.
That makes one of us…… I don’t think he should be censored or anything but that doesn’t mean he should be giving a keynote address at a “conservative” conference. In my opinion he is a bore and an ass who makes a good living pissing gullible people off by purposefully being inflammatory. Not my thing I reckon.
I can’t continue to participate in a thread that has descended into madness.
You need to be fair and quote Ben taking shots at Milo’s sexual activity as well. He gave as good as he got:
There is a clear line between the personal jesting they used to do between one another and where Milo eventually ended up (along with his many followers).
So, to sum up, Ben Shapiro is Juvenal and Milo is juvenile.
For what does it profit a man to “be in the arena and fighting” but to lose his soul?
In other news, Bill Kristol will be the keynote speaker at the DeepStatePAC in Langley, VA.
Broccoli is also good raw, but I wouldn’t call it “very tasty” in that state. It’s good to munch on, and not something I’m likely to get carried away with (unlike cauliflower, raw or steamed or whatever, which is always “very tasty”).
So is this Milo thing going to keep any Ricochetti from going to CPAC? (Assuming there is such a thing as going to CPAC. Seems to me there was a big controversy about it on Ricochet last year, but I don’t remember what about. It would probably be hard for me to continue to be conservative if I had to take part in something like that, though I don’t remember why. I would still be conservative, but why make it more difficult for myself?)
Nothing ruins commitment to an ideology more than socializing with its other adherents.
Not familiar with Pethokoukis’s work but a brief survey of Milo’s has been sufficient to convince me that if you object to lazy liberal caricatures of conservatives as uniformly fascistic and ill-educated, you might not want to glorify someone who lazily characterizes all feminists as fat & ugly, all Muslims as fundamentalist thugs, etc. (Of course Klavan and many other conservatives take the same approach to feminism. I don’t quite get why.)
That said, I will gladly be burned at the stake for Milo’s or anyone else’s right to talk whatever idiotic nonsense blows their skirt off.
I have watched/listened to many Milo speeches and I believe there is a lot more depth to his thought that people realize.
I love seeing the old men who think we are in a “war” and we have to make Stalin like allies to defeat the enemy. It would be funny to watch this war with the most common uniform being black socks with sandals. Quite the warriors.
Also, when he says feminists are fat and ugly he’s joking.
No ignorance here. I watched that presentation about a year ago when it came out. I am not saying that Milo isn’t an ally I just think he is not as effective as Gavin, Shapiro, or Crowder. These three have real intellectual and honesty behind them, whereas Milo does not.
lol you’re having a bit of cognitive dissonance, you were previously discussing cowardice and bravery and are now switching to intellectuality and honesty!
Exactly. This isn’t an argument about whether Milo should be free to say any asinine or reprehensible thing he likes. It’s not about free speech. It’s about whether a professional troll and occasional pedophelia advocate should be giving the keynote address at the premiere forum for conservative activism in the United States. That so many people are so intent on eliding that distinction is more than a bit disheartening.
My apologies. I was exhausted and sloppy that night but the clarification of terms remains.