Music, Milo, and Pin-Ups of the Heart

 

Conservatives are not exhibitionists. But real Americans value real-life experience. Which means, if you write, putting your real life on display. I was thinking this as I read @therightnurse’s recent, very frank post on fibromyalgia, written with a kind of directness I’m quite honestly not brave enough to attempt in front of a full audience.

Like many children with a musical ear, I used to improvise at the piano a lot. The impromptus weren’t technically brilliant – I was (and still am) clumsy at the keyboard –  but you could always tell a piano what you really thought, and it wouldn’t judge you. Instead, it would make music for you, music which could be judged, if there was anyone around to judge it (and often there was not), for itself alone. Some found the music beautiful, some found it annoying, but in either case, the music could be valued for itself rather than for the experience of the one who made it. For a shy child, that was mostly an asset.

Shy people may remain shy even when they’ve disguised themselves with music, and for years I had horrible stage fright. I still do, I suppose, it’s just now I’m marginally better at managing ways around it. Some audiences are less scary than others, though. Friends’ families, babysitting charges… “Why are all the songs so sad?” one littler kid my older-kid self was babysitting once asked me. “Those aren’t sad, just minor. Minor is beautiful.” It wasn’t a lie. Minor is beautiful. Even for those who tend to live life in a minor key.

Pin-up art nostalgia is pretty common here at Ricochet. It’s not hard to get conservatives to hold forth on why pin-up art, which reveals a lot, but not everything, is superior to today’s exhibitionism. Where is the thrill of transgressing boundaries when there’s no longer a sense of boundaries to transgress, and so forth? Even Milo Yiannopoulos, who is an exhibitionist, displays this aesthetic. He quips gay is boring when it’s no longer transgressive. He’s Catholic and happy to be a bad Catholic, one who jokes about his latest shag and how he once seduced a parish priest as an underage teen. (NSFW) Exhibit. Exhibit. Exhibit. As long as there are boundaries. After all, there must be at least some fig leaf to distinguish us salt-of-the-earth folk from the exhibitionists we decry.

Gross exhibitionism, exhibitionism without reserve or regard for what others want to see, is not even seductive, we say. Either display less than is seductive, or seduce, but for heaven’s sake, don’t display more than that! Not that everyone wants to be seduced, either – a serial seductress is manipulative, and good Americans also hate being manipulated.

So, what do we choose to exhibit, and what do we choose to keep covered up?

I know when I write an essay, the more personal the topic, the more careful I am about what’s showing, for fear of immodesty. Many conservative women are happy to admit they have two reasons to fear bodily immodesty: virtue and vanity. Writing is the same. Expose what is flattering, cover what is not – not just for your own sake, but for the sake of the poor reader whose eye you have caught and who has to look at it. And if you feel silly displaying yourself as too much the protagonist when you know you’re not (a predicament I often find myself in), tell the same story, but about other people, or abstracted altogether.

Sure, not everyone claims to like the abstract, but that doesn’t mean the abstractions we assemble aren’t rooted in real experience. A musician talks to his instrument, using the abstraction of music to say the real things he couldn’t say otherwise. Nor is music the only abstraction we speak through, it’s merely one of the most abstract: music is an end in itself, can be judged for itself, and in that sense is intensely impersonal, although everyone knows how personal it can be.

Other times, maybe, the abstraction is just a personal mythology, not “high abstraction”. But we can’t get away from abstraction, nor should we if we wish to reveal our hearts without disgusting exhibitionism.

So sometimes we’re “artless” and “tell it like it is”. Other times, we artfully leave something (maybe a lot) up to the imagination. It’s a pin-up artistry of the heart, hopefully seductive enough to catch some reader’s fancy, but not the kind of shameless seduction that just makes people feel used.

In the past two years, there’s been a lot I found I just couldn’t talk about politely in public, and no, most of it hasn’t been about US politics. It would simply be too absurd if all told, and gross. Maybe cheaply manipulative, too. If acceptable revelation proceeds in true pin-up fashion, the license to bare one thing is purchased by deciding to cover something else. Which means, if you’re not sure what to keep covered, not baring in the first place. And even those of us bravely “baring it all” on one matter might be quite reticent on others.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 192 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Simon Templar (View Comment):
    Better dial it back there team. Think we’re on the mainline.

    We were discussing pin-up girls and tramp stamps long before it was promoted.

    Main Feed=Buzzkill.

    • #181
  2. Nanda Panjandrum Member
    Nanda Panjandrum
    @

    Arahant (View Comment):

    RightAngles (View Comment):
    As a matter of fact, I have just written an ode to @simontemplar.

    Ah, an ode to Simon. This should be good. What rhymes with doghouse? Louse? Souse? Yes, should be delicious.

    Booo, Hiss, @arahant!  Please forbear to grouse re: ST when @rightangles and I are in da house…

    • #182
  3. Rosie Inactive
    Rosie
    @Nymeria

    I have always viewed pinups as a fun and cheeky way to show hot and sexy ladies. In fact, given our porn saturated culture it is fun seeing naughty cheeky pinups that tease rather show all.  The pinups evoke visceral feminine sexual energy which many women are scared to tap. They are also great references to spice things up.  ;)

    • #183
  4. Rosie Inactive
    Rosie
    @Nymeria

    As to Milo, as shown in various pictures in the comments he is a flamboyant individual.  He is using theatrical approaches to confront the ridiculous leftist identity politics.  Thus his dressing in drag, using a mariachi band to introduce him at a speaking gig, having straight white males wearing MAGA caps carry him on a dais to the podium, wearing flamboyant clothing, going on about his love for well endowed black men.  In all this he is using the left’s tactics against them, showing the left as puritan scolds, and challenging people to preserve Western Civilization. You may not agree with his provocateur style yet he is one of the few who is getting through to the masses. Moderates and Center left people are listening to him.

    • #184
  5. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    RightAngles (View Comment):

    Simon Templar (View Comment):

    Mike LaRoche (View Comment):
    So, what’d I miss?

    STRAngles was mere seconds away from posting a bunch of pictures of herself in her birthday suit. I said something stupid. Now I’m as good as dead.

    No no no. I said “hit the SEND button,” which means I was emailing them to you at your Undisclosed Location. You thought I was posting them HERE!? GAH. That’s why I didn’t understand why you feared getting killed. I thought you must have a wife who would kill you. Okay glad that’s been cleared up.Hi Mikey

    Hi Righty!

    Glad I’ve never been sent to the doghouse. 8-)

    • #185
  6. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Titus Techera (View Comment):
    would also be an improvement for the disgusting mindlessness of the American sophisticated classes–architecture is a misery–fashion is a misery–there is nothing worth saying in favor of American sophisticates now

    Don’t sugar coat it, Titus.

    • #186
  7. DetteM Inactive
    DetteM
    @DetteM

    Arahant (View Comment):
    Y’all need your eyes checked. It is a lovely bathing suit with a teardrop cutout in the back. It is creased a bit because of her position. No tramp stamp

    • #187
  8. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Damocles (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    So, Midge, boxers or briefs?

    Why is this always posed as an either/or question???

    So, the other choices are both, or commando?

    • #188
  9. Simon Templar Member
    Simon Templar
    @

    DetteM (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):
    Y’all need your eyes checked. It is a lovely bathing suit with a teardrop cutout in the back. It is creased a bit because of her position. No tramp stamp

    Maybe you’re right, but it still reminds me of the nice young lady who told me she was thinking about getting a tramp stamp of an arrow pointed down.  Said it might help her husband.  Never could figure out what she was talking about.

    True story.  Except for the last sentence.

    • #189
  10. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Titus Techera (View Comment):
    I wonder whether there’s any market in America for public personages of some fame or even notoriety who dress elegantly.

    There’s a lot to be said for elegance.  Myrna Loy was elegant in The Thin Man series.

    • #190
  11. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Midget Faded Rattlesnake (View Comment):
    But @sabrdance‘s right – the perspective is a little weird, and the longer you look at it…

    That’s because the piece of furniture she is sitting on has been edited out. Quit looking at her butt. Notice her eyes and her smile?

    No.

    • #191
  12. Simon Templar Member
    Simon Templar
    @

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Notice her eyes and her smile?

    No.

    That wasn’t a rhetorical question?

    • #192
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.