The Tragedy of 2016

 

Hillary Clinton’s speech about Donald Trump and the alt-right is excoriating. She didn’t need to lie, spin, or exaggerate. All she needed to do was describe Trump and the company he keeps. She did so competently.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP6Q-OEXm4k

The odds seem to me overwhelmingly high that she’ll be elected. She may well be working with a Democratic Congress. GOP primary voters handed her the only candidate in the firmament whom she could handily trounce.

Midway through, she says, “The last thing we need in the situation room is a loose cannon who cannot tell the difference — or doesn’t care to — between fact and fiction. And who buys so easily into racially tinged rumors.” Any other candidate would have been able to keep the focus on Clinton’s own inability to distinguish between fact and fiction. But Clinton’s species of dishonesty pales in comparison. Hers is the typical self-serving dishonesty of all politicians, magnified. Trump’s is that of a man living in a malign fantasy world. He seems to believe his own lies. They’re dangerous lies to believe.

And what a tragedy. The Republican Party will not easily recover from this. GOP primary voters have in effect left us with a one-party state. The party with which we’re left is full of rotten ideas, but this election won’t be about that. It will — properly — be about keeping a loose cannon who can’t tell between fact and fiction out of the White House.

I’ve read the Democratic Platform through. The word “investment” is used 74 times. In almost all cases, it’s a euphemism for “increased federal spending.”

We need an economy that prioritizes long-term investment over short-term profit-seeking.

The Democratic Party believes that supporting workers through higher wages, workplace protections, policies to balance work and family, and other investments will help rebuild the middle class for the 21st century.

We will increase investments to make quality childcare more affordable.

And we will fight for robust funding to end homelessness in our cities and counties once and for all, through targeted investments to provide the necessary outreach, social services, and housing options for all populations experiencing homelessness.

If we are serious about reversing the decline of the middle class, we need major federal investments to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure and put millions of Americans back to work in decent paying jobs in both the public and private sectors.

And we will protect public health and safety by modernizing drinking and wastewater systems. These investments will create secure, good-paying middle-class jobs today and will substantially increase demand for American-made steel and other products manufactured in the United States.

Democrats will make investments to spur the creation of millions of jobs for our young people.

Democrats will spur investment to power the rural economy.

And we will make investments in affordable housing near good jobs and good schools.

We will continue to work on a government-to-government basis to address chronic underfunding, and provide meaningful resources and financial investments that will empower American Indian tribes through increased economic development and infrastructure improvements on tribal lands.

We believe that by making those at the top and the largest corporations pay their fair share we can pay for ambitious progressive investments that create good-paying jobs and offer security to working families without adding to the debt.

Bold new investments by the federal government, coupled with states reinvesting in higher education and colleges holding the line on costs, will ensure that Americans of all backgrounds will be prepared for the jobs and economy of the future.

There is almost no discussion of the conditions that lead to private investment. There is not a single use of the phrase “national debt.” The word “debt” is used 21 times; of these, 13 involve promises to make college debt-free. In one case, it explains: “We believe that by making those at the top and the largest corporations pay their fair share we can pay for ambitious progressive investments that create good-paying jobs and offer security to working families without adding to the debt.” No hard numbers are on offer. There is the usual promise to make the shortfall appear by “[tackling] waste, fraud, and abuse.”

Suggesting that the Democrats haven’t learned a thing from experience, there’s this promise: “We must make sure that everyone has a fair shot at homeownership. We will keep the housing market robust and inclusive by supporting more first-time homebuyers and putting more Americans into the financial position to become sustainable homeowners.”

This election should have been about these ideas. Instead, it’s about keeping an outright lunatic away from the nuclear codes. “A man with a long history of racial discrimination, who traffics in dark conspiracy theories drawn from the pages of supermarket tabloids and the far reaches of the internet, should never run our government or command our military,” she said. And she’s right.

Had the GOP leadership been braver, Paul Ryan would have given the speech Hillary Clinton gave. He could have defined conservatism in opposition to Trump. But he didn’t. The failure of the GOP leadership to repudiate Trump ensures that the GOP will be tainted by him, and in all likelihood unelectable, for years to come. The GOP was given a choice between Clinton and dishonor. They chose dishonor, and now we will have Clinton.

 

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 278 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Cat III Member
    Cat III
    @CatIII

    (Cont.)

    Clinton reads the headlines of posts written by Milo Yiannopoulos, a man who has made a career of being an anti-PC provocateur. He delights when people take his bait, but usually it’s pink-haired street protesters who lose their minds (admittedly not a big loss) over his snark. The fact that Hilary flippin’ Clinton held a press conference to express how she just can’t believe what he says is in Yiannopoulos’ world like winning the lottery and the superbowl on the same day. An attention whore couldn’t hope for a better John.

    As for the intellectual side of alt right, there is Taki’s Mag and The Unz Review (among others, of course). Some of the writers have connections to mainstream conservatism. Some aren’t conservatives at all. These sites peddle conspiracy theories, general garbage and some thoughtful essays. I won’t hold it against anyone who doesn’t want to sift through the muck to find any gems, but not everything associated with the movement is to be dismissed.

    Even so, there isn’t reason to believe that the intellectual underpinnings of Trump’s campaign are borrowed from the alt right, not least of all because Trump has no underpinnings, intellectual or otherwise.

    • #271
  2. Cat III Member
    Cat III
    @CatIII

    And now the real purpose of the OP is clear: to encourage me to upgrade to Thatcher for that extra word count. Well-played, Berlinski.

    • #272
  3. Cat III Member
    Cat III
    @CatIII

    Martel:Bush’s mistakes regarding Iraq:

    1. Underestimating the level of hostility Iraqi factions would have against us, thus advocating a “light footprint” model that could never work.
    2. Underestimating DOMESTIC hostility to the Iraq war. Unless everything went swimmingly and ended in two months, the left would do everything in its power to discredit the efforts, cry “quagmire”, get the public sick of the whole damn thing, etc. There’s no way they could accept a victory under a Republican. (As for the “war weary” American public, the Marines got “war weary”, the American public just got bored.) Bush either failed to recognize this or thought things would go so well so fast that it wouldn’t matter.
    3. Failing to recognize that the domestic PR front was a WAR FRONT. The Senate Majority leader claiming that the war was already lost was a massive VICTORY for our enemies, but Bush didn’t care. “Bush lied, people died” didn’t just reflect badly on Bush himself and his precious dignity, it wore down support for the troops’ efforts. But he was too “classy” to respond, and it squandered our military victory.

    And not that it’s particularly relevant to any of the points I’m making, I served (Afghanistan).

    4. Emphasizing the WMD angle in the run-up.

    • #273
  4. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Cat III: 4. Emphasizing the WMD angle in the run-up.

    There actually were WMD and WMD precursors, particularly in the form of Yellowcake uranium.

    • #274
  5. genferei Member
    genferei
    @genferei

    Cat III: And now the real purpose of the OP is clear: to encourage me to upgrade to Thatcher for that extra word count.

    Or you could just write a post: this series of comments is the best thing I’ve read about the Alt-Right, and makes points so necessary to make just at a time that a fantastical notion of the phenomenon is becoming Conventional Wisdom.

    • #275
  6. skipsul Inactive
    skipsul
    @skipsul

    Instugator:

    Cat III: 4. Emphasizing the WMD angle in the run-up.

    There actually were WMD and WMD precursors, particularly in the form of Yellowcake uranium.

    Which actually goes to another problem with Iraq, and the Bush administration in general: it was just awful about not defending itself from the press.  It may have been the polite thing to do, its refusal to rise to baiting by the press, but it was politically unsound.

    • #276
  7. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    skipsul:

    Instugator:

    Cat III: 4. Emphasizing the WMD angle in the run-up.

    There actually were WMD and WMD precursors, particularly in the form of Yellowcake uranium.

    Which actually goes to another problem with Iraq, and the Bush administration in general: it was just awful about not defending itself from the press. It may have been the polite thing to do, its refusal to rise to baiting by the press, but it was politically unsound.

    Rove?

    • #277
  8. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    skipsul:

    Instugator:

    Cat III: 4. Emphasizing the WMD angle in the run-up.

    There actually were WMD and WMD precursors, particularly in the form of Yellowcake uranium.

    Which actually goes to another problem with Iraq, and the Bush administration in general: it was just awful about not defending itself from the press. It may have been the polite thing to do, its refusal to rise to baiting by the press, but it was politically unsound.

    Speaking of politically unsound, how about not having Dick Cheney resign mid-way in the second term in order to at least give some gravitas to a potential future POTUS from your own Party as a VP who didn’t have health issues preventing their own run.

    I think the blame for this … and the pansy response to attacks by press … Rove!

    rove

    • #278
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.