Salon: Iran Deal Is a Travesty

 

Credit: Reuters/Caren Firouz/Kevin Lamarque

Your eyes do not deceive you. In the wake of the $400 million laundered cash “ransom” payment to Iran for return of American hostages, Carrie Sheffield writes for Salon’s shocked readers that:

On state-affiliated media, Khamenei reportedly blasted “the futility of negotiations with the Americans” and said the United States wasn’t keeping its promises under the nuclear agreement. The deal itself was signed under constitutionally questionable circumstances — it essentially amounted to a treaty, which would have required congressional approval–over the protests of Congress, including many Democrats like Sen. Chuck Schumer.

These latest developments undoubtedly confirm what conservatives and other pro-Israel activists have been arguing throughout this entire episode. They’re yet another reason why people who don’t like flawed GOP nominee Donald Trump will still have a hard time voting for Hillary Clinton, given her prominent role in helping usher in this flawed deal. They also tarnish President Obama’s legacy, despite his brag last week at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia that he’d “shut down Iran’s nuclear weapons program.”

Of course Salon.com’s stalwart readership’s heads are exploding as demonstrated within the comment section. The left’s anti-Semitic liberal think is on full display:

Rhsper

Carrie Sheffield, an amazing disguise you have there! How did you hide that hooked nose and all those warts?!

SlapOfTruth

It just occurred to me why Salon is posting a right wing author’s article about Iran…now that it has to be in the tank for Hillary it is taking her extreme pro-Israel positions.

Another siren song on behalf of the original Mideast terrorist state: Israel.

In true fashion the Left either attack the messenger (she also wrote for Forbes! Hackery at it’s finest!) or run and hide under Vox.com’s convoluted justifications which puts the blame for “bad messaging” at the feet of DC politicos. “It’s not a ransom, it’s a refund!”

Most of us remember being bombarded by an ’80s media hyperventilating adnauseum over the Iran-Contra hearings during President Reagan’s second term. As Middle East geopolitics contributor Ellen Wald writes at the aforementioned Forbes: The Iran Ransom 2016 (is a) “Bigger Deal than Iran-Contra 1985.”

There are many comparisons between the Iran-Contra Affair in the 1980s and the Iran ransom scandal of today. However, in at least one significant way, the ransom scandal does more harm to American travelers and businesses. Just as Americans and Europeans are being encouraged to do business and invest in Iran, entrenched organizations in Iran’s government are using this incident to justify further arrests and imprisonment of Americans and Europeans.

Those of us who loudly vocalized our horror at this obvious legacy-minded play by President Obama, which clearly emboldens our enemies while threatening our allies, are not surprised. Unlike his other legacy item, the bankrupt Obamacare (which full employer mandate implementation has been delayed until they leave office), the Iran Deal never received full Democratic support.

Pro-Israel Democrats, always foremost concerned with re-election and thus their Jewish constituents (how “brave” of you Chuck Schumer to await confirmation there were enough votes, so yours wasn’t necessary), voiced their “concerns” yet have largely stood on the sidelines with fingers crossed hoping the Iran Deal was not the cluster-fudge it appeared to be.

But now, with 90 days until we swap disastrous 44 for disastrous 45, how much attention will the media give what would clearly be a major issue if President Obama had an (R) next to his name.

The eloquent Charles Krauthammer says it best.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 35 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Annefy Member
    Annefy
    @Annefy

    Dave Sussman:

    Front Seat Cat:Israel and the world will pay dearly for the stupidity of the deal – it is sick. If you vote in the Clintons again, and yes, they are a package deal, you will get more of the same.

    A couple of weeks ago I met with Michael Medved. Our entire discussion was about the Iran Deal and who would be better for Israel in this election. I’m paraphrasing him: ‘Either of these two candidates will be better for Israel than Obama’.

    Have you written anything about your meeting with MM? I agree with his opinion – it would be hard to get a worse President than Obama – but am curious whether you have details to share.

    I haven’t listened to him much of late – he seems determined to stay above the fray, which makes him come across as aloof; at least to me.

    • #31
  2. Man With the Axe Inactive
    Man With the Axe
    @ManWiththeAxe

    MJBubba:I haven’t seen where any of the NeverTrumpQuislings had any reaction to this story.

    I’m one of those quislings, so here’s my reaction:

    Obama is terrible. Hillary is even more terrible. And Trump is worse than either of them. Not in the same way. They are both evil and stupid.  Trump, on the other hand, is stupid, ignorant, childish, boorish, and crazy. If he is elected we can expect him to violate Article 12 of the Constitution.

    Disclaimer: This comment is not intended as an insult to Trump supporters. I wouldn’t dream of insulting them. I wouldn’t want them to feel so insulted that they would desert the party and stay home or vote for Hillary, as we were warned they would do if in fact they did feel insulted. No quislings among that group.

    • #32
  3. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    More spin coming from O:

    http://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-rejects-obamas-assertion-that-israel-now-supports-iran-accord/

    • #33
  4. Teresa Mendoza Inactive
    Teresa Mendoza
    @TeresaMendoza

    MarciN:When this news broke about a year ago, I nearly spilled my coffee. It seemed to me Obama was openly asking for Americans to be kidnapped. Of all the things he has done, this is the one that I think is the worst. Most of all, why did he publicize that he was doing it:

    In a move that critics said will endanger more Americans, President Obama announced Wednesday that he will allow U.S. officials to negotiate directly with terrorist groups holding Americans hostage, saying the government “must do better” for families of captives who want to make ransom payments.

    Mr. Obama said he was “clarifying” that federal policy allows U.S. officials to contact terrorists on behalf of families seeking the return of their loved ones. U.S. policy forbids the government itself from making ransom payments.

    “Our policy does not prevent communication with hostage-takers by our government, by the families of hostages or third parties who help these families,” Mr. Obama said at the White House. “When appropriate, our government may assist these families and private efforts in those communications, in part to ensure the safety of family members and to make sure they’re not defrauded.”

    I had forgotten this. Shocking.

    • #34
  5. Dave Sussman Member
    Dave Sussman
    @DaveSussman

    Annefy:

    Dave Sussman:

    Front Seat Cat:Israel and the world will pay dearly for the stupidity of the deal – it is sick. If you vote in the Clintons again, and yes, they are a package deal, you will get more of the same.

    A couple of weeks ago I met with Michael Medved. Our entire discussion was about the Iran Deal and who would be better for Israel in this election. I’m paraphrasing him: ‘Either of these two candidates will be better for Israel than Obama’.

    Have you written anything about your meeting with MM? I agree with his opinion – it would be hard to get a worse President than Obama – but am curious whether you have details to share.

    I haven’t listened to him much of late – he seems determined to stay above the fray, which makes him come across as aloof; at least to me.

    Hi Anne!

    His interview is still in the chamber. Need to fix some audio as it was a ‘walking’ conversation with different levels of background noise. Hope to finish next week.

    • #35
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.