Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Why Do They Hate Hillary Clinton?
“Why do people hate Hillary Clinton so much?” a reporter from the Canadian Broadcasting Company asked me this week.
I responded that the pitiless rancor of American politics today is out of all proportion to our real challenges – but it’s worth recalling how Hillary Clinton earned her miserable reputation. It was the flagrant and prodigious lies. She has arguably abused power, enriched herself and her family with blatant influence selling, and betrayed an arrogant disregard for the normal rules.
In the past few weeks, since she defeated Bernie Sanders, Mrs. Clinton has been impersonating a centrist. Her foreign policy speech was crafted to contrast sharply with Trump’s illiterate eruptions. She praised NATO, upheld the importance of alliances with Japan and South Korea, defended John McCain’s heroism, stressed the centrality of American world leadership, and promised to harness allies in the war to defeat ISIS. The speech was miles to Trump’s right.
A couple of weeks later, she recounted her fond recollection of the letter that President George H. W. Bush left for Bill Clinton on his first day in the Oval Office. It was very gracious and she quoted from it at length, claiming that it “moved [her] to tears.” (Doubtful, but never mind.) This was the peroration:
‘You will be our President when you read this note. I wish you well. I wish your family well. Your success is now our country’s success. And I am rooting hard for you. George.’
That’s the America we love. That is what we cherish and expect.
Who is the target audience for these reflections? Not the Democratic base. No, the message is aimed at troubled Republicans: “Come on over. I’m safe, familiar, and not cracked.”
Many Republicans, appalled at the ranting ignoramus Republicans appear poised to nominate, may be taking another look at Clinton. If they do, their hearts will sink.
That was a moving story about G.H.W. Bush. But remember, it was First Lady Hillary Clinton who fired the White House usher when she learned that he took a few calls from Barbara Bush to give her computer help. Petty much? Vindictive? Paranoid?
Lest we forget, this is the person who, as first lady of Arkansas, turned a $1000 commodity futures investment into $100,000 windfall ten months later. Asked about her extraordinary investment strategy, she explained that she studied the Wall Street Journal. It was revealed later she had the obliging help of James Blair. He was outside counsel to Tysons Foods, one of Arkansas’ biggest businesses. Appearance of corruption?
Mrs. Clinton participated in disparaging the characters of women who accused Bill Clinton of harassment. Feminist icon?
This is the woman who “lost” the Rose Law Firm billing records that were under subpoena for two years. The records proved that she lied when she denied participation in a sham land deal. This is the woman who fired seven White House travel office employees and ruined some of their lives by charging financial improprieties, just in order to give patronage jobs to her friends. Did I mention that she denied involvement in their persecution? A memo surfaced later proving that she lied, and that it was a Hillary show from the start.
Her corrupt approach to power has been further unmasked this year. The email arrangement violated State Department policy and arguably the law, perhaps endangering national security. The Clinton Foundation’s contributions (and Bill’s speaking fees) seem to have blossomed under her tenure at State. She lied about Benghazi – even to grieving family members – because a terror attack was a political liability and had to be spun as a protest gone wrong.
Is Hillary Clinton truly a centrist on foreign policy? She stood by President Obama’s utterly disastrous policies in Syria (though leaks suggest she favored arming the anti-Assad rebels), and toward Russia. She could have resigned. She berated Binyamin Netanyahu and has maintained a close relationship with Israel-basher Sidney Blumenthal, though she has pushed back against the BDS-supporting Sanders delegates to the Democratic Convention. Worst of all, she participated in and continues to defend the Iran deal – surely the worst debacle of the Obama years.
She is whatever she feels the need to be in the moment: pro and anti free trade, anti and pro same sex marriage, anti and pro raising the minimum wage, and pro and anti drivers licenses for illegal immigrants. Where she is consistent, it does her no honor. She warned abortion opponents moved by faith that their “religious beliefs” would “have to change.”
Even her most devoted admirers must wonder how far they can trust a person in whom shreds of integrity cannot be detected with a microscope.
If Joseph de Maistre was right that people “get the governments they deserve,” we have much to answer for in what the Democrats and Republicans have yielded up. It may be fantasy to hope for another alternative – but patriotic fantasy.
Published in General
She still hasn’t come in her GAZ Volga to take me to camp like she promised. I’ve had my suitcase packed and repacked, and ready to go next to the door.
True and insightful!
For my part, I just take the longer view.
I very much doubt that either of Clump will save America. I want the candidate that will most rapidly divide the nation, motivating freedom-loving Americans to start again, with constitutional principles. In a word: #Texit.
Trump might prolong the agony. Clinton might shorten the agony. It is a dog’s breakfast either way.
If you were speaking of the Texas I grew up in you might have an argument.
But you’re not, and you don’t.
The bureaucracy is the biggest part of the problem. They are not accountable to anyone, have too much power, are crushing the economy and Hillary will increase their numbers and their power. They also overwhelmingly vote Democrat.
They are the ones who target conservative organizations, and who leak personal information of conservatives to trolls, pranksters and other creeps. They are the ones who give their weakest points to Leftist organizations, who find friendly Leftist courts in which to sue the government, and then these traitors deliberately lose in court. This allows them to grow government power under the excuse “but we are under a court order.”
I do not expect that Trump will do anything but slow down the Leftist takeover of the Executive Branch, but Hillary would advance the statist cause and encourage and embolden the worst actors to greater mischief.
See my further thoughts on this reason to hate Hillary here:
http://ricochet.com/leftist-horde-two-thousand-reasons-to-vote-for-trump/
Did anyone mention that Hillary lied about Benghazi while eulogizing the four dead Americans ?
Does anybody remember her “3:00 a.m. call” ad during the 2008 primaries? The one where she claimed she was knowledgeable and tough enough deal with international crises in the middle of the night?
Well, the 3:00 a.m. call came in at 4:30 in the afternoon, but by 10:00 pm the Ambassador and one other were dead. It was continued refusal to act that led to the deaths of the other two guys hours later.
You could also hate Hillary for the way the Leftist mass media give her a pass. Things that would gin up days of outrage if revealed about a conservative get a two-sentence paragraph on page A-7, and then disappear. When it comes to Hillary, the Leftist mass media have no curiosity. They report campaign press releases from Hillary as if they were news.
Here is an example. Though it doesn’t name Hillary, she is in this up to her eyeballs. The Leftist mass media pass along her talking points instead of investigating.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/30/bill-clinton-and-loretta-lynch-dont-have-an-optics-problem-they-have-a-corruption-problem/
To hate Hillary is to hate the news media and vice versa.