In Foreign Policy Speech, Hillary Eviscerates The Donald

 

This is a preview from Friday morning’s The Daily Shot newsletter. Subscribe here free of charge.

The Daily ShotYesterday, Hillary Clinton gave a major foreign policy speech in San Diego. If you’re interested in seeing it for yourself, the video is here, and the transcript is here. However, we watched it all (35 minutes worth) so you don’t have to (and you damn well better freakin’ love us for it). In the speech Clinton laid out how her ideas for a “smart and disciplined foreign policy” contrast with Donald Trump’s, which she called “dangerously incoherent” and “not even really ideas – just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds, and outright lies.”

Clinton actually was able to execute a merciless takedown of Trump’s general disconnectedness from reality, without her trademark shrillness. She also presented a plan that was designed to sound calm and reasonable with little that anyone could strongly disagree with. (Of course, it falls apart on the details.)

The entire speech was filled with brutal shots at Trump, but there were a couple of stunners up front: “He is not just unprepared – he is temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability, and immense responsibility,” and “This is not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes – because it’s not hard to imagine Donald Trump leading us into a war just because somebody got under his very thin skin.” (And then she stomped on his corpse.)

Clinton listed her qualifications: She “wrestled with the Chinese” over a climate deal, negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, worked out a nuclear weapons reduction with the Ruskies, arranged international sanctions against Iran, and “stood up for the rights of women, religious minorities and LGBT people around the world.” (Again: Those pesky details…)

She set out her foreign policy plan thusly: Strength at home (infrastructure spending, education spending, blah, blah, blah), strong alliances, “embrac[ing] all the tools of American power” (whatever the hell that means), being “firm but wise with our rivals,” and an unspecified plan for terrorism.

Clinton also appealed to American exceptionalism, quoted Lincoln, played the Bin Laden card, and said all the calm, reasonable sounding things that her focus group testing told her she needed to say. It was a pretty solid speech. Unfortunately it came out of the mouth of Hillary Clinton.

This is a preview from Friday morning’s The Daily Shot newsletter. Subscribe here free of charge.

Published in Foreign Policy
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 66 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Speaking of Fred, I notice he just dropped out. Wonder if he will come back.

    • #61
  2. Tom Riehl Member
    Tom Riehl
    @

    Franco:You mean those nuclear codes foreign intelligence got off Hillary’s server?

    The Chinese, Putin, and the Iranians, know more about our plans than our own Congress. They know who our spies are they know our methods.

    I’m sure with Clinton in the White House we, and our men and women in uniform and working around the world for our nations security, will be in the very best of hands.

    Sarc off.

    Once again, Franco, another one right between the eyes!  I may write you in on the ballot.

    • #62
  3. TKC1101 Member
    TKC1101
    @

    Franco:Just unsubscribed.

    Joined you

    • #63
  4. Damocles Inactive
    Damocles
    @Damocles

    TKC1101:

    Franco:Just unsubscribed.

    Joined you

    likewise

    • #64
  5. MJBubba Member
    MJBubba
    @

    Fred,  Fred.

    I have been reading “Daily Shot” since you first rolled it out.  It was a very good thing that I got to meet you last year in Nashville.  Now when I read “Daily Shot” I can hear your voice in my head.

    I think you have done a great job of maintaining a consistent tone in the “Daily Shot.”  I think that would be a very hard task for me, and I appreciate that you bring it every day.  Consistently.   I know that what I am reading is going to range from sardonic to sarcastic.

    So, knowing to expect sardonic or sarcastic going in, I fully expect to see some statements that would read very differently if they were read with a neutral tone and taken at face value.

    Occasional readers, or readers with a chip on their shoulder, or readers with an especially emotional dislike for the subject, can all be understood when they missed your tone and took the headline at face value.

    Regular readers know your intense dislike for former Secretary Clinton, and we share that view.

    Don’t be discouraged by this little dust-up.   Keep it up at the “Daily Shot.”   I enjoy it, daily.

    Thanks.

    • #65
  6. Fred Cole Inactive
    Fred Cole
    @FredCole

    Thank you. I really needed that.

    • #66
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.