Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
“Wreck-It Donald” Is Breaking Conservatism from Within
It’s always easier to destroy than to create. GOP frontrunner Donald Trump has spent his candidacy showing Republicans just how easy it is. Media organizations, think tanks, and the electoral process itself have seen decades of hard work reversed in months by Wreck-It Donald.
Consider this partial accounting of the wreckage he’s left behind, starting with Fox News:
During a discussion about the fractured GOP today, The Five‘s Greg Gutfeld brought up how the current GOP fight has been a source of tension not just on their show, but on Fox News as a whole.
“We as a show,” he said, “are facing internal strife, from a micro level to a macro level… Look at The Five. On any given day, we have tension over this nomination, over this candidate. You can look at our network as a whole.”
He said this is true of pretty much “every area where there is conservatism” these days, but pointed to specific “issues within a family of anchors” that has fractured the anti-Obama unity they once enjoyed.
Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields has resigned from the conservative news site over its response to her alleged assault by Donald Trump’s campaign manager.
Three of her colleagues also resigned from Breitbart: editor-at-large Ben Shapiro, national security reporter Jordan Schachtel and Jarrett Stepman, an editor.
In his departing statement on Sunday, Shapiro said the site should be “ashamed” of “their treatment” of Fields, whose allegations of assault came amid escalating violence in and around Trump campaign events.
The chairman of Liberty University’s executive committee is knocking the endorsement of Donald Trump by the Christian school’s president.
“Donald Trump is the only candidate who has dealt almost exclusively in the politics of personal insult,” Mark DeMoss, who sits on the Liberty University’s board, told The Washington Post in a story published Tuesday…
“I’ve been concerned for Liberty University for a couple of months now, and I’ve held my tongue,” DeMoss continued. “I think a lot of what we’ve seen from Donald Trump will prove to be difficult to explain by evangelicals who have backed him.”
Longtime conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly’s endorsement of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has led to internal strife — and what she claims was an attempt to oust her — at the organization she formed nearly a half-century ago to help defeat the Equal Rights Amendment.
The 91-year-old said six of the Eagle Forum’s 11 board members, including one of her daughters, met improperly by telephone Monday “to wrest control of the organization from me” and “seize access to our bank accounts.” She said in a statement she was kicked off the call when she objected.
Following a fawning editorial endorsing Donald Trump in the New York Observer, which is owned by Trump’s son-in-law, the paper’s national political reporter, Ross Barkan announced he was leaving.
“I knew going into this there would be complications with covering Donald Trump and working for the New York Observer,” Barkan told CNNMoney. “I did not imagine that the events would transpire the way they did.”
Republican National Convention:
Donald Trump warned on Wednesday that his supporters could riot at the Republican convention in Cleveland if he is not “automatically” made the party’s nominee if he arrives with the most votes but fails to secure a majority of convention delegates.
Speaking to Chris Cuomo on CNN, Trump said that he hoped to win the nomination outright before the convention in July, but warned that if he goes to Cleveland with more delegates than any of his rivals and the nomination goes to anyone else, “I think you’d have riots.”
Longtime Donald Trump ally Roger Stone is threatening to make public the hotel room numbers of Republican National Convention delegates who switch from Trump to another candidate.
“We’re going to have protests, demonstrations. We will disclose the hotels and the room numbers of those delegates who are directly involved in the steal,” Stone said Monday in a discussion with Stefan Molyneux on Freedomain Radio, as he alleged that Trump’s opponents planned to deny the democratic will of Republican primary voters.
“If you’re from Pennsylvania, we’ll tell you who the culprits are. We urge you to visit their hotel and find them. You have a right to discuss this, if you voted in the Pennsylvania primary, for example, and your votes are being disallowed,” Stone said.
Wreck-It Donald seems to break another conservative institution each week, not to mention the continuing damage to years-long efforts promoting limited government and civic virtue, denouncing crony capitalism and personality cults, and reaching out to women and minorities. Much of movement conservatism has outlived its usefulness, but 2016 isn’t a case of free-market “creative destruction.” It’s just destruction with nothing to take its place except dyed hair, a fake tan, and a big mouth.
As damaging as President Obama and Secretary Clinton have been, they were never able to infiltrate conservativism and tear it down from within. Sure, they could peel off a squish here and there, but imploding right-leaning media was beyond the limits of even the most statist IRS commissioner or NSA director. One big-government liberal was able to slap an R at the end of his name and leave chaos in his wake.
Breaking stuff is easy, but building things (e.g., state campaign infrastructure, detailed get-out-the-vote strategy) takes a lot of hard work. Despite the tacky buildings sporting Trump’s name in all caps, Ted Cruz is the only candidate who is creating institutions to advance conservatism.
For the sake of our Republic, let’s hope he succeeds.
Published in General
I gotta say, this is pitch perfect Capitol Hill GOP:
(1) My reality is the reality (and ain’t no improvin’ on it, Dog).
(2) Can’t do anything unless we have everything, a bar that rises with every new gain.
(3) Whatever we do is the best that can be done! Dig it, tool!
(4) Listen up, Peeps, here’s what you gotta do . . . ain’t no ‘what we gonna do for you‘ chump, it’s what you gonna do for us!?
(5) Damn you, stupid voters! You messed up my plans for
meyou . . . which were never proposed, fought for or passed into law, but ‘nuf of that technical caca! When I start mouthing conservative memes on the campaign trail, you dolts damn well better take me at my word! Who are you to question authority . . . I’m an elected GOP lifer, punk!It is clear that Trump found a crack in the Republican coalition and split it wide open. The question remains if this split would have occurred if Trump hadn’t entered the race?
If it had come down to a Bush – Cruz race would the same (or different) split have occurred?
Jim Geraghty on TML today said that there is about 37% Trump supporters, 37% NeverTrumpers, which leaves 26% on the fence.
About 100% of the NeverTrumpers won’t vote for Trump. What percentage of Trump supporters will vote for Cruz?
Who were you speaking of when you said, “Democrats didn’t tell themselves same sex marriage is unrealistic?” Was it elected officials or grassroots activists?
The political ‘reality’ IS subjective. But the GOP believes that their view is objective and scientific. They won’t depart from their script, despite serial losses and profound discontent and alienation of their natural constituencies.I.E. They take a poll with skewed questions (they wrote or green-lighted the questions since they commissioned the poll) and they get answers back that confirm their desires and bias, and they call this objectivity. The political ‘reality’ that we can agree upon is that they have been losing (or barely winning) Presidential elections for decades with the exception of 2004 which was an incumbent at wartime against, well, John Kerry.
2. An unfounded assertion.
3. Evidence of outcomes from alternate scenarios is impossible. I think you have heard by now what critics of GOP establishment (which is non-existent) have been demanding, with a smug tag line indicating your conceit of superiority and maturity.
4. This is an elision into an appeal for conservatism, indicating you don’t understand the difference between representative government and personal responsibility. We elect them to represent our interests and to fight against leftism. You are claiming here that they can abdicate their duties and we are supposed to make do as resourceful individuals, and actually abdicate our responsibility to hold them to account. Very weak, but revealing nonetheless.
5. Strawman argument