Obama’s ‘Root Causes’ Crusade

 

And you thought Nationwide’s Super Bowl ad was depressing. The President spoke at Thursday’s National Prayer Breakfast, but instead of focusing on faith, hope and love, he dwelt on violence, anti-Semitism and the Crusades.

Obama cataloged an impressive list of Islamist terror attacks, oddly never mentioning Islam. But he wasn’t so careful when it came to calling out those dastardly Christians.

http://youtu.be/CcPSLgXr1vQ

We see sectarian war in Syria, the murder of Muslims and Christians in Nigeria, religious war in the Central African Republic, a rising tide of anti-Semitism and hate crimes in Europe, so often perpetrated in the name of religion…

And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.

Ah yes, the Crusades; the ne plus ultra of root causes. Whenever a terror attack is perpetrated by Al Qaeda, Boko Haram or ISIS, a flock of secularists will mutter, “to be fair, Sir Godfrey of Bouillon got a little chippy with the Antiochians in 1097.”

We’ve all heard radicals like Jeremiah Wright excuse Islamist violence as “chickens coming home to roost,” but even President Clinton named the Crusades as the root cause of the West’s conflict with Muslims.

Contra Edward Said, the Crusades were primarily defensive campaigns which sought to liberate once-Christian lands from their Muslim conquerors. Expansionist Islam had overrun heavily Christian Palestine, Syria, Egypt, North Africa, and Spain. Once Mohammed’s heirs took Asia Minor, the emperor in Constantinople begged western Christendom for help.

Once the Crusades were launched, awful things happened on both sides; war is indeed hell. But to claim 800 years later that malcontents flew airplanes into towers half the world away to protest their brusque treatment at the siege of Acre is tough to swallow.

The second most popular root cause is the mere existence of the state of Israel. So provocative is the presence of Jews in their ancestral homeland that zealots from Paris to Sydney to Ottawa are forced to shoot up markets and chocolate shops.

The funny thing about root causes is that they always stop precisely when the West can be blamed. Israeli independence is considered a root cause, but not the Arab attacks on Jews that helped motivate that independence. The Crusades are the root cause, not the capture of Christian Jerusalem by the Caliph Umar. If you follow any historical path back far enough, you can always pin the blame on the out group. So why do Western leftists always stop at the incident where they can blame their own culture?

Ultimately every root cause winds up at Adam and Eve, so maybe Obama can focus on them at next year’s prayer breakfast.

Published in General
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 34 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. user_370242 Inactive
    user_370242
    @Mikescapes

    “At heart, Obama is still a Muslim” according to Charles Horton. Maybe so, I can’t be sure. I am sure that he is practicing Black Liberation Theology, according to Jeremiah Wright.

    It’s quite scary that he goes to such lengths to protect Muslims from scrutiny. Why? His exposure to Islam when young? The Muslim vote? No way. Identification with people of color? The underdog? He really believes Islam is a religion of peace? Not quite true. So what’s in it for him?

    All anyone asks is that he say “Radical Islam”. Or some variation like “hijacked religion”, if he needs to distinguish terrorism from Islam. He could advance his religion of peace mantra without too much reaction. Most Americans, not me, want to believe that only 1% of the Muslim world engage in jihad. Yet, he can’t even bring himself to pretend that a handful of people in the Muslim world have gone off the rails, and practice something other than Islam. Curious. And sinister. I think the answer to his refusal to make even the most nebulous link between the two can be found in his real religion, the aforementioned Black Liberation Theology.

    • #31
  2. Concretevol Thatcher
    Concretevol
    @Concretevol

    Western Chauvinist:

    SoDakBoy:My 15 year old daughter heard his comments on the radio this AM during the drive to school. She merely said, “doesn’t he know what the Crusades were?”.

    Unfortunately, most Americans truly think the Crusades were Christian wars of aggression. At a recent PTA meeting, one parent proposed changing our high school mascot from “the crusaders” (Catholic school, even if it’s just nominal) to something “less offensive to Muslims”. Is it even possible to find a name less offensive than to be named after a bunch of soldiers who fought a defensive war and lost?

    The most damaging thing about the Obama presidency is that it is making it near impossible to have any respect for 51% of my fellow citizens.

    You know what should be offensive to Muslims? That (some) Westerners think it necessary to condescend to them by lying about our history and beliefs because they’re such precious little snowflakes.

    Why?  It’s not offensive to most african Americans that liberals believe them of basic functions like obtaining an ID to vote or choosing what school their kids should attend.

    • #32
  3. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    SoDakBoy:

    Is it even possible to find a name less offensive than to be named after a bunch of soldiers who fought a defensive war and lost?

    Perfect.

    Also, why is there something called a National Prayer Breakfast, and why is the President at it?

    • #33
  4. Ricochet Member
    Ricochet
    @

    Charlotte:

    SoDakBoy:

    Is it even possible to find a name less offensive than to be named after a bunch of soldiers who fought a defensive war and lost?

    Perfect.

    Also, why is there something called a National Prayer Breakfast, and why is the President at it?

    It’s a conglomeration of religious leaders from across the World that seek to offer ideas that will bring peace among religions. The President acts as the ambassador to the U.S. for the event. It’s a tradition of salutation for all that attend.

    • #34
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.