Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 302 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Mike LaRoche Inactive
    Mike LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Not a good outcome at all for Cruz.  He needed to finish at least a strong second.

    Nonetheless, Rubio has no chance.  The nomination is Trump’s to lose.

    • #1
  2. LilyBart Inactive
    LilyBart
    @LilyBart

    Ok, I’m officially tired of Trump and tired of Trumpers.  I know they’re (justifiably) angry, but Trump is boorish, he’s interested only in Trump (not you), and he’s neither an economic nor social conservative.

    But I also believe that we’re here, in this position today, because the republican “leaders” have tried and tried again to cram amnesty down the throats of a population that has been asking for years that their laws be enforced.   (edit:)  Trump is just exploiting this.

    • #2
  3. Redneck Desi Inactive
    Redneck Desi
    @RedneckDesi

    As a non-Christian, what type of evangelical votes for trump? I will hang up and listen

    • #3
  4. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Disappointed, but not shocked. Respectfully disagree with Brother LaRoche. Cruz and his PAC’s spent half as much as Rubio, had no meaningful endorsements, and finished a close 3rd. Not great, but not bad.

    However if someone has every endorsement in the state and spends that much money to get his butt kicked by a real estate agent with $0 PAC funds how does that get positive spin?

    • #4
  5. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    It’s from January 19, but still, the analysis seems right. Stanford Political Journal — Donald Trump Will Not Win the Nomination.

    • #5
  6. Douglas Inactive
    Douglas
    @Douglas

    Redneck Desi:As a non-Christian, what type of evangelical votes for trump? I will hang up and listen

    The fed up kind. It’s not cognitive dissonance. It’s a statement of their trust in “Name Brand Conservative” politicians (hint: zip, nada, none, shot). The rebellion lane, if you want to call it that, encompasses Trump, Cruz, and Carson. That’s, what, 67% of the vote? That’s why the assumption that if it’s down to Trump and Rubio, then all of support of other candidates voters goes to Rubio is delusional. No one is going to buy Rubio as a revolt candidate. By week’s end, the establishment itself will brand him as the face of the establishment.

    • #6
  7. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Has there ever been a candidate that won 2/3 of the first states and not gone on to the nomination.

    Please excuse me while I call my Ammo supplier.

    • #7
  8. Frozen Chosen Inactive
    Frozen Chosen
    @FrozenChosen

    Either Cruz or Rubio will become the primary challenger to a Trump depending on where Bush, Carson and Kasich supporters go. I don’t believe they will break evenly – if they do Trump wins because I don’t see either Rubio or Cruz dropping out if they are neck and neck

    • #8
  9. Douglas Inactive
    Douglas
    @Douglas

    BrentB67:Has there ever been a candidate that won 2/3 of the first states and not gone on to the nomination.

    Lease excuse me while I call my Ammo supplier.

    Nope, which Coulter was excitedly tweeting, to which Jonah Goldberg replied (paraphrasing), “Yeah, but this election is different”.

    • #9
  10. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Check out the net negatives. Only three of this year’s candidates fall on the positive side. Care to guess? Hint: It’s not Trump (net -30%). SPOILER:

    ——————————————

    SPOILER: Sanders and Kasich are both +5%; Rubio is +1%

    Felony is -11%

    I’m thinkin’ a Rubio/Kasich ticket, but that’s just me. And, yes, all I care about at this point is winning.

    • #10
  11. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    If Rubio/Kasich = Winning. Uuuggghhh

    • #11
  12. Douglas Inactive
    Douglas
    @Douglas

    Western Chauvinist:Check out the net negatives. Only three of this year’s candidates fall on the positive side. Care to guess? Hint: It’s not Trump (net -30%). SPOILER:

    ——————————————

    SPOILER: Sanders and Kasich are both +5%; Rubio is +1%

    Felony is -11%

    I’m thinkin’ a Rubio/Kasich ticket, but that’s just me. And, yes, all I care about at this point is winning.

    “I’m not voting because I like this guy but because I hate the other guy” tickets don’t win. All you’ll have to hope for is the possibility that the Bernie voters stay home too, and it’s a race for which side is less enthusiastic.

    • #12
  13. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    I think Douglas has this correct.

    • #13
  14. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Politico calls this a crushing defeat. Math? How do it werk?

    • #14
  15. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Douglas:

    Western Chauvinist:Check out the net negatives. Only three of this year’s candidates fall on the positive side. Care to guess? Hint: It’s not Trump (net -30%). SPOILER:

    ——————————————

    SPOILER: Sanders and Kasich are both +5%; Rubio is +1%

    Felony is -11%

    I’m thinkin’ a Rubio/Kasich ticket, but that’s just me. And, yes, all I care about at this point is winning.

    “I’m not voting because I like this guy but because I hate the other guy” tickets don’t win. All you’ll have to hope for is the possibility that the Bernie voters stay home too, and it’s a race for which side is less enthusiastic.

    I like Rubio. I don’t entirely trust him, and I think he has the potential to choke, but I like him and I think that’s what his net positive polling indicates.

    If Americans decide they like Bernie more?? There’s no saving us anyway.

    If we can get Rubio over the finish line, that’s when the real work begins of influencing imperfect politicians to do the right thing.

    • #15
  16. Douglas Inactive
    Douglas
    @Douglas

    BrentB67:Politico calls this a crushing defeat. Math? How do it werk?

    Did you see their “Rubio = Romney 2.0” thing? That’s exactly what the Democrats are gonna use, so you might as well get used to it.

    • #16
  17. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    Cruz and Rubio need to do a deal. If the field is narrow enough, Trump loses.

    The Republic needs it.

    I suggest Rubio offers the SCOTUS nomination to Cruz. Both men should take that deal.

    • #17
  18. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    iWe:Cruz and Rubio need to do a deal. If the field is narrow enough, Trump loses.

    The Republic needs it.

    I suggest Rubio offers the SCOTUS nomination to Cruz. Both men should take that deal.

    My thoughts exactly. It’s predicated on Republicans not folding and being able to fight the media narrative on “obstructing” Obama’s nominee, though. But, I believe Cruz would make a much better justice than president, and he’s unlikely to win the general anyway.

    • #18
  19. RyanM Inactive
    RyanM
    @RyanM

    Western Chauvinist:It’s from January 19, but still, the analysis seems right. Stanford Political Journal — Donald Trump Will Not Win the Nomination.

    This is the most encouraging thing I’ve read in a long time, although it is old…   But it does support the idea that what we really need to observe is whether Trump outperforms or underperforms projections.  So far, he has underperformed in every primary to date.

    • #19
  20. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    BrentB67:Disappointed, but not shocked. Respectfully disagree with Brother LaRoche. Cruz and his PAC’s spent half as much as Rubio, had no meaningful endorsements, and finished a close 3rd. Not great, but not bad.

    However if someone has every endorsement in the state and spends that much money to get his butt kicked by a real estate agent with $0 PAC funds how does that get positive spin?

    He did it with two maybe three guys dragging him down. Who has had as much money spent against him as Rubio?

    Rubio has been fighting off everyone including the midget governors. If those guys weren’t in the race Rubio may have beaten Trump, or at least it would have been much closer.

    • #20
  21. BrentB67 Inactive
    BrentB67
    @BrentB67

    Rubio cannot nominate Cruz to SCOTUS since apparently Cruz doesn’t speak Spanish. That isn’t going to work after we open the borders and have to push 2 for English.

    • #21
  22. RyanM Inactive
    RyanM
    @RyanM

    Douglas:

    Western Chauvinist:Check out the net negatives. Only three of this year’s candidates fall on the positive side. Care to guess? Hint: It’s not Trump (net -30%). SPOILER:

    ——————————————

    SPOILER: Sanders and Kasich are both +5%; Rubio is +1%

    Felony is -11%

    I’m thinkin’ a Rubio/Kasich ticket, but that’s just me. And, yes, all I care about at this point is winning.

    “I’m not voting because I like this guy but because I hate the other guy” tickets don’t win. All you’ll have to hope for is the possibility that the Bernie voters stay home too, and it’s a race for which side is less enthusiastic.

    Well, she said that Rubio/Kasich are net positive, which implies that people would be voting because they like the candidates, and because they hate the other guy.  I think that is a decent strategy, though I would not like Kasich as Veep.

    • #22
  23. MarciN Member
    MarciN
    @MarciN

    I’ve been trying to picture the upcoming debates between Trump and Sanders. Can Trump convince the American public that Sanders’ tax increases will not be worth the value of his giveaways? Let us hope.

    • #23
  24. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    BrentB67:If Rubio/Kasich = Winning. Uuuggghhh

    Don’t shoot the messenger.

    • #24
  25. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    RyanM: I think that is a decent strategy, though I would not like Kasich as Veep.

    I’m not crazy about the idea either, but if he helps bring Ohio??? Whaddya gonna do?

    • #25
  26. RyanM Inactive
    RyanM
    @RyanM

    Western Chauvinist:

    BrentB67:If Rubio/Kasich = Winning. Uuuggghhh

    Don’t shoot the messenger.

    VP is somewhat irrelevant, and Kasich in the senate wouldn’t be such a terrible thing.  I think a Rubio presidency could help restore some sanity to this country after 8 years of the most polarizing administration in history.  If he stays off of late night television, stays respectful even to the other side, and ignores the media, I think it could be extremely good for this country, apart from the SC nominees.

    • #26
  27. RyanM Inactive
    RyanM
    @RyanM

    Western Chauvinist:

    RyanM: I think that is a decent strategy, though I would not like Kasich as Veep.

    I’m not crazy about the idea either, but if he helps bring Ohio??? Whaddya gonna do?

    Yeah, and see my comment #26.  I’m not crazy about Kasich, but if that was the ticket I would happily vote.  Of course, VP is almost always a surprise.  Heck, it could even be Walker.  :)  Why else did he drop out so early?

    • #27
  28. Lidens Cheng Member
    Lidens Cheng
    @LidensCheng

    Western Chauvinist:

    I’m thinkin’ a Rubio/Kasich ticket, but that’s just me. And, yes, all I care about at this point is winning.

    Not John Kasich. I want to slit my wrist every time I hear Kasich speak. At least with Trump we’ll get amused as we’re hurling ourselves off the cliff.

    • #28
  29. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    RyanM:

    Western Chauvinist:

    BrentB67:If Rubio/Kasich = Winning. Uuuggghhh

    Don’t shoot the messenger.

    VP is somewhat irrelevant, and Kasich in the senate wouldn’t be such a terrible thing. I think a Rubio presidency could help restore some sanity to this country after 8 years of the most polarizing administration in history. If he stays of of late night television, stays respectful even to the other side, and ignores the media, I think it could be extremely good for this country, apart from the SC nominees.

    Right. I would have hope for the country if he won. However, I understand the concerns of the anti-Rubio crowd (less so the pro-Trump people). I’ve long said Rubio doesn’t seem to be a fully formed conservative, and he would likely disappoint those of us who have a sense of urgency about the reforms needed to save the Republic.

    However, the (Democrat) alternatives are much, much worse, in my opinion.

    • #29
  30. Sash Member
    Sash
    @Sash

    Western Chauvinist:It’s from January 19, but still, the analysis seems right. Stanford Political Journal — Donald Trump Will Not Win the Nomination.

    That supposes that Cruz always gets the majority of the Evangelical vote.  And that vote is split.  That probably changes things a lot.

    Also, Trump brings in Democrats, so his level of support goes up.

    I’d like to see the analysis that same chart was started from today.

    Most analysis I’ve seen shows it is only impossible for Cruz to win unless he can expand outside his narrow Evangelical appeal.

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.