Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
The jab is a vaccine, or at least that’s what it’s called, but it really isn’t. It is not a vaccine as vaccines were once understood. It is an invasive genetic delivery therapy and consists of an injected mixture containing nanocarbon fibers, lipids, and strands of mRNA designed specifically to reprogram a cell’s DNA, its genes, and its purpose. Instead of say, assembling within a scaffold of proteins designed to contract on command (example: muscle cell), the former muscle cell is reprogrammed by the mRNA to give up its duties and madly make COVID spike proteins until it burns out.
mRNA must work quickly or it breaks down. It cannot enter a cell on its own. Enter dense lipids, to protect the mRNA, and carbon nanoparticles to penetrate cell walls and allow the mRNA to enter a cell. The manufactured spike proteins leak out of the now compromised cell and drift though the circulatory and lymphatic systems, until they locate an ACE2 receptor on the surface of cell and bind with it. In theory, this would close a pathway for a potential COVID cell infection. In addition, these circulating spike proteins will eventually be recognized by your immune system as invasive and will prompt an antibody response to neutralize them. These same antibodies would respond to actual proteins on a COVID spike, effectively neutralizing any COVID viruses post-exposure.
Historically, vaccines for viral infections have been incredibly effective. Small pox? Eradicated. Polio? Virtually eliminated. Chickenpox, the mumps, the measles, rubella, whooping cough? Gone. In the public mind, viral vaccinations are miraculous. So, when this new mRNA technology was elevated to “vaccine” status, the CDC and NIH effectively tapped into the public’s vaccine goodwill. But this new “vaccine” wasn’t a vaccine at all. It was gene therapy, both unproven and unapproved. The definition change is an old-fashioned bait and switch.
Redefining vaccines to include invasive mRNA genetic therapy also served another, more nefarious purpose. It allowed the manufacturers to hide behind the legal liability shield provided generally to producers of vaccines. Had the therapy been relegated to therapeutic status, producers would have to defend themselves against civil claims for possible harmful, even fatal, side effects. And they might lose.
I submit, dear readers, that had the public known these things, many more folks would have been reluctant to participate in mass injection. Further, if they knew that cell lines harvested from aborted fetuses were needed to develop the tests for the efficacy and safety of this therapy, even more people would have balked.
Further, the NIH, CDC, and vaccine manufacturers obviously did not know whether these new “vaccines” would be effective. Authorizations were “emergency”. They hoped they would be effective and if wishing were real, they all would have been, but wishing is never a good reason to place a bet. These new vaccines have now proven to be largely ineffective. They are not lasting, hence require constant boosters. They do not prevent infection, hence breakthrough cases are now the norm. They do not staunch infectiousness as those who get COVID, even if vaxed, boosted and asymptomatic, still shed virus and infect others. They are not durable as new strains of the virus, like Omicron, are not deterred by the vaccines. The only thing we know for certain: breakthrough cases are less mortal than infections in the unvaxed. However, as with all respiratory viruses, evolved variants are also proving to be less harmful and more virulent than their predecessors
It is clear now that mRNA so-called vaccines seem to do only one thing; they reduce the severity of a COVID 19 infection. There is a medical term for a treatment that reduces the severity of a viral infection: a therapeutic. Government agencies have oversold this mRNA technology at every turn, even elevating it to “vaccine” status. This was an abuse of language for political ends, largely benefitting the virus purveyors and their investors. It’s time this mRNA therapy is purged from the definition of what constitutes a vaccine. It is an invasive gene therapy. At best, mRNA therapy has proven to be only therapeutic, a treatment whose benefits are limited and may not outweigh the risks for many easily discernable segments of the population. The vaccine liability shield should not apply to these therapies. Perhaps it is time to alert the trial lawyers. The immense gains accumulated by the hucksters pushing this stuff have proven illegitimate. And the therapy itself may well prove harmful to many while those harmed have had no good recourse.Published in