The Chronicle of Higher Education reports on a Hamilton College sophomore who created a life-size Barbie to illustrate how unrealistic body images feed (no pun intended) eating disorders in young women. The student took a Barbie doll, added lessons she learned from her geometry class, and built a proportional model she calls Get Real Barbie. Here's the photo:

nedawbarbie-300x225
>

More From Bill McGurn:

Maryland's Professor of the Year

What Happens in Vegas

Sex and the City and the GOP

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

 Ahem.  While it is the bedrock of my foreign policy to avoid calling bull-puckey on sorority girls, that is total horse neers.  Come on, moms, that does not remotely resemble a Barbie doll.  Barbie's far better looking.  The head?  The arms?  The bustier?

If they wanted to make a "Get Real Barbie" make it at least look like the doll.  I call Shenanigans on the whole enterprise.

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

Are you sure that isn't the famous "Morganna, the Kissing Bandit" in the middle?

Our culture took a major hit when she quit running out onto the field to kiss baseball players.  Guess she decided to go back to school. 

Tommy De Seno

Is it the girl in the middle?

I like the girl in the middle.

anon_academic
Joined
Aug '10
anon_academic

I guess they modeled this one on the new "Shrunken Head Barbie"(TM).*

____________________________

* Cannibal Dream Hut(TM) sold separately.

David Nordmark
Joined
Nov '10
David Nordmark

I would just point out that this whole body image thing is affecting boys as well. I remember the Star Wars figures I used to play with when I was a kid. They were made with fairly normal proportions. Today, however, the action figures all look like Arnold Schwarzenegger. I suspect this is a major reason why steroid abuse is such a big issue now with young men.

I also agree with the comment above. That Barbie looks seriously deformed compared to a real barbie doll. I'd like to see the math they used to create this thing.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

I guess this girl flunked Geometry.

From a BBC News article:

But what if, instead, Libby's height of 5ft 6ins (1.68m) was to remain unchanged. Doing the maths, Libby would have an extraordinarily tight waist of just 20ins (50.8cm), while her bust would be 27ins (68.5cm) and her hips 29ins (73.6cm). Even the famously slight Victoria Beckham reportedly only has a 23ins (58.4cm) waist. But neither are they unheard of - Brigitte Bardot was famous for her 20ins (50.8cm) waist.

Famed for her 20ins waist - model Brigitte Bardot

"People keep repeating this suggestion that Barbie would fall over and have to crawl around if she was real size, but it's just not the case," says Moira Redmond, writer and Barbie fan. "I find this suggestion more misogynistic than anything Barbie is accused of standing for. It's a nasty, sexual image.

Edited on Mar 9, 2011 at 11:35am
StickerShock
Joined
Jun '10
StickerShock

 I sure wouldn't trust the math department at Hamilton College if this is an example of using lessons learned in geometry class!    These girls need a math tutor quickly.  A Barbie doll's head is enormous in proportion to her bust.  Barbie's hips are tiny in proportion to the bust.  Can't see the feet, but a real life Barbie would be unable to walk if the proportions held true.  These girls need to learn how to use a measuring tape.

My mother wouldn't buy me Barbie dolls because of their ridiculous proportions.   I let my own daughter have tons of them and she loved playing with them for hours.  No harm done.  In fact, she just worked as a Barbie Princess character at a three year old's birthday party & made some nice cash.

The fuss made over Barbie's image being harmful to young girls is just so overdone.

Edited on Mar 9, 2011 at 11:31am
Foxman
Joined
Dec '10
Foxman
Stuart Creque: I guess this girl flunked Geometry. · Mar 9 at 11:27am

Math is hard!

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith

 On a more serious note, our geometry skills are falling way behind China.  I blame it on the lamentable Larry Summersesque trend of girls to major in Fashion Merchandising, Exercise Physiology and (shudder) Psychology.  May as well just go for the MRS degree and have done with it.

My Little Sis (Cleopatra Licentia Smith, pictured here) at least majored in Accounting as a fall-back.

show PJ's comment (#10)

Joined
May '10
PJ
David Nordmark: I'd like to see the math they used to create this thing. · Mar 9 at 11:24am
Stuart Creque: I guess this girl flunked Geometry. · Mar 9 at 11:27am

C'mon guys, math is hard.

StickerShock
Joined
Jun '10
StickerShock

"Math is hard!"

Yes it is.  At least for these Hamilton College gals.

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

If I were her teacher I'd flunk her for pure unoriginal thinking. The "real world" translations of Barbie's measurements (36-18-33) have been floating around for over a decade now. Mother Jones did a story about it when Mattel redesigned the doll in 1997.

The left clings to certain memes like a religious orthodoxy. Toys, to them, are some sinister plot to force societal norms onto their children. And after being told that Ken is a back alley abortionist terminating Barbie's unwanted pregnancy with the miniature clothes hanger Barbie's dress came on, they wonder why their children spend the rest of their lives in therapy.

StickerShock
Joined
Jun '10
StickerShock

 I think Barbie being clueless enough to waste her youth "dating" Ken, an obviously gay man, is reason enough to need therapy.

anon_academic
Joined
Aug '10
anon_academic
EJHill: If I were her teacher I'd flunk her for pure unoriginal thinking.

Exactly. As a social science professor I can assure you that it is routine to the point of cliche for an undergrad (usually a middle class white girl) to write a thesis or create a multimedia presentation documenting the unrealistic body images in popular culture (usually fashion magazines, but occasionally Barbie) and then making a glib assertion that there is a causal connection with anorexia.

Johannes Allert
Joined
Dec '10
Johannes Allert

They ACTUALLY recieved a grade for THAT?  Where on earth did they get the head? From a head hunter? It's shrunken..! 

Bill McGurn

There were no comments at the Chronicle piece, so I don't know whether any of these objections have been raised before. Maybe I'll google "Hamilton" and "Get Real Barbie."

Robert Barraud Taylor
Joined
Jul '10
Robert Barraud Taylor

anon_academic

Exactly. As a social science professor I can assure you that it is routine to the point of cliche for an undergrad (usually a middle class white girl) to write a thesis or create a multimedia presentation documenting the unrealistic body images in popular culture (usually fashion magazines, but occasionally Barbie) and then making a glib assertion that there is a causal connection with anorexia. · Mar 9 at 11:44am

Amen to that.  When I've taught American women's history, I always have to head off a few "reveal-the-conspiracy-of-unrealistic-body-images-across-time papers" before it's too late for the would-be writer.

Bill McGurn

Here's the Mother Jones piece. Interesting. I think the girl in question took the most extreme measurements in every direction (e.g., 18" waist, 40" bust, height 7'). This also says that Barbie was sized down a few years ago.

I have three daughters. Only one I believe had a Barbie, and even she wasn't that into it.

Bryan G. Stephens
Joined
May '10
Bryan G. Stephens

I find it hard to believe that girls or boys are pushed over the edge into an eating disorder because their dolls are unrealistically proportioned. I just do not think we can boil down things to just barbie. Eating disorders are complex, with more going on than just cultural stereotypes.

I might point out that when you scale things up or down, proportions can change so they still look "right".

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Voodoo dolls fit more common proportions. They are clearly the preferred gifts of responsible parents.

I'm sure body confidence couldn't have anything to do with TV and Hollywood... another industry dominated by puritanical right-wingers.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In