Rob Long · October 4, 2012 at 8:47am

Here's a screenshot from Reuters, a few hours after the -- to my memory, anyway -- most one-sided presidential debate in recent political history:

Untitled

Sure, they admit it was a "good" night for Romney.  But it's irresistible to the left wing lickspittle Obama media -- they have to make his arguments for him.  Even after the worst debate performance by a presidential candidate in decades -- maybe ever -- the press still feels the need to step in and say, in effect, here's what our candidate should have said.

Pathetic.

That's what the next few days will be: Obama's too smart, he's too cerebral, he's too thoughtful, he's too professorial.

Anything but the truth: he's a rotten candidate and a lousy president and he's got precisely zero to run on.

The words he didn't say "spoke the loudest?"  He said plenty.  And America heard it.  And it can all be boiled down to this:  I'm out of gas.

UPDATE:  This hilarious and utterly indefensible sentence from the National Journal:

Privately, some Democratic strategists said the challenger got the best of the president. “We got our clock cleaned,” said a Democratic strategist who spoke on condition of anonymity out of fear of retribution. The Democrat had reviewed results of polls and focus groups of the debate.

To be fair, the deck was stacked against Obama, who came into the debate with a lead over Romney plus the baggage of incumbency.

The "deck was stacked against Obama?"  What planet are they living on?

Comments:


Joan of Ark La Tex
Joined
Jun '12
Joan Greathouse

They can say what they like, just look at Frank Luntz's focus group. Of course, Newshounds has this headline "Luntz’ Presidential Debate Focus Group Has A Suspicious Makeup". Hope you feel better Mr Long and good for 5 more weeks. 

Edited on October 4, 2012 at 9:02am
Scott Reusser
Joined
May '10
Scott [roy-sir]

If it's true that the media's take on the debate is every bit as important as the debate itself, then this episode gets better still. Surfing for positive takes on Obama's performance yields ... nothing. There's universal agreement that Mitt won, so even the non-viewer (shame on him) will get the proper message.

It's going to be so interesting to see how Obama responds to such a humbling -- craving adulation as he does. 

Edited on October 4, 2012 at 9:08am
Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

Obama did not mention Romney's work at Bain Capital...

Obama resisted chiding Romney about the former Massachusetts governor's reluctance to release more than two years of his income taxes...

But Obama's most startling omission was not uttering a phrase that has dominated the campaign for much of the past two weeks: "47 percent." ...

Yes, I too was extremely "startled" when Obama suddenly didn't mention the 47 percent.

And I won't even mention that Reuters is so mired in leftist groupthink that its editors will approve a "news" article about what the Democrat did not say, containing seven paragraphs trashing the Republican and none praising him, followed by several paragraphs praising the Democrat and a few more wondering when he's gonna get out the big guns.

(See: apophasis)

Edited on October 4, 2012 at 9:21am

Joined
Sep '12
Alan Peugh

I bet the reason Obama didn't mention the "47 percent" contreversy or Bain is because Mitt's performance and demeanor made him too afraid of a counterpunch. Also, spouting out those lies and cheap shots in ads is easier to do than in a presidential setting like that.

Cutlass
Joined
Apr '11
Cutlass
Evan Pokroy
Joined
Sep '12
Evan Pokroy
Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

Evan, that's funny. A Facebook acquaintance said that on the radio, it was obvious that Obama fell on his face.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

Obama should have borrowed Clint Eastwood's chair to stand in for him. It would have put up more of a fight than he did.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

Really, the best that can be said of Obama's performance is that he at least didn't refer to a "breathalyzer" when talking about ObamaCare and healthcare cost containment.

Evan Pokroy
Joined
Sep '12
Evan Pokroy
Stuart Creque: Obama should have borrowed Clint Eastwood's chair to stand in for him. It would have put up more of a fight than he did. · 2 minutes ago

@Bob_Owens posted about that too. 

How bad was Romney’s beat-down of Obama tonight?

Joined
Sep '12
Alan Peugh

Take a look at this.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/81999.html

Glenn Thrush spins this basically by saying how "badly Romney needed this perforamance" and that he "now has a new lease on political life".  So now they are spinning this race as being tied. He also talks about how "Romney kept his awkward outbursts to a minimum."

 

Dan Hanson
Joined
Aug '10
Dan Hanson

"The baggage of incumbency?"  As I recall, being the incumbent has always been seen as an overall advantage.  The president is supposed to have the gravitas the challenger lacks and the advantage of all that on-the-job learning and insider knowledge.  

On the other hand, maybe they were speaking only of Obama's specific incumbency as in, "boy, I'd sure hate to have to be the guy defending THAT track record..."

Anyway, if Obama really wants to leverage the last four years of his experience he should consider becoming a golf analyst or perhaps the new head of the SEIU.

Crow's Nest
Joined
Mar '11
Crow's Nest

Scott [roy-sir]: If it's true that the media's take on the debate is every bit as important as the debate itself, then this episode gets better still. Surfing for positive takes on Obama's performance yields ... nothing. There's universal agreement that Mitt won, so even the non-viewer (shame on him) will get the proper message.

It's going to be so interesting to see how Obama responds to such a humbling -- craving adulation as he does. 

I am told that buried by the Member Feed there is a possible explanation as to why the media responded with such overwhelming adulation.

Travis McKee
Joined
Sep '12
Travis McKee

I don't know Ron Fournier, who has the byline for that National Journal article, but I can tell just from that excerpt that he doesn't understand the card game reference he used. Just like Obama, actually, if you remember his encounter with Eric Cantor.


Joined
Aug '11
Mimi

The lefties are living on the Victim Star where Business is the Enemy.

outstripp
Joined
May '10
outstripp

Maybe Obama is suffering from depression.  Really.

Stu In Tokyo
Joined
May '11
Stu In Tokyo

Joan Greathouse: They can say what they like, just look at Frank Luntz's focus group. Of course, Newshounds has this headline "Luntz’ Presidential Debate Focus Group Has A Suspicious Makeup". Hope you feel better Mr Long and good for 5 more weeks.  · 2 hours ago

Edited 2 hours ago

(tongue placed firmly in cheek)

Aw come on Joan that Luntz focus group had obviously just taken their white sheets and pointy hats off before they sat down.....

Anyone want to bet that the race card gets tossed regarding that Luntz focus group?

David Deeble
Joined
Sep '12
David Deeble

In defense of President Obama, he had been told that there would be no math.

Percival
Joined
Mar '11
Percival

What is best in life?

To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of Chris Matthews.

Robert Lux
Joined
Nov '10
Robert Lux
Scott [roy-sir]:   Surfing for positive takes on Obama's performance yields ... nothing. There's universal agreement that Mitt won, so even the non-viewer (shame on him) will get the proper message.

Not quite true. Michelle Cottle of TNR (see the full 16 minute Daily Beast talk), Kevin Drum and Jonathan Chait all think Romney came across badly in many ways, and they all seem to think it was a draw. Chait's piece -- I just re-read it -- is a rather breathtaking testimony to deep Cool-Aid saturation. At least two of the paragraphs simply reiterate arguments Obama presented in the debate, and Chait presumes these suffice to diminish Romney:

Obama also effectively summed up a trope that he had failed to highlight – Romney’s lack of details. On issue after issue, Romney promised an unseen plan would reform taxes, reform health care, and regulate Wall Street. Obama spent the first two-thirds of the debate engaging with this on an intellectual level before finally switching to a gut-level attack: “is the reason Gov. Romney is keeping all these plans secret because they’re too good?”

Edited on October 4, 2012 at 12:00pm

Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In