SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided US v. Jones, a case I posted about a little while ago. The case involved an investigation into a suspected drug runner, Antoine Jones. The police secretly attached a small GPS tracker to the underside of Jones' car. Once installed (and serviced when the batteries ran down), it remained on the Jeep around the clock for 28 days, producing a 2,000-page log of Jones's whereabouts. Kinda creepy, no?
The question in Jones was whether the installation of a GPS device constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." The Court held that it is a "search." However - and this is the annoying part - the Court did not say whether the search was "reasonable" in Jones's case, or whether it would ever be reasonable. There's a good recap of reactions to the decision over at Scotusblog.
Justice Scalia, bless him, struggled to find an 1791 analogy to GPS devices: Back then, Scalia suggested, “a constable” might conceal himself “in the target’s coach in order to track its movements.” I'm an originalist, too, but sometimes, we have to reason from slightly more abstract principles (which Nino usually does, but perhaps he was just having fun sparring with Justice Alito, who countered that “this would have required either a gigantic coach, a very tiny constable, or both.")
- Comment (7)
- · Quote
- · UnfollowFollow (3)
Comments :
Jul '10
Re: SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
That left a lot of ambiguity for a 9-0 vote.
Sep '10
Re: SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
Adam,
Did anyone think about this being applied to a tax case? I'm thinking the IRS could justify a warrantless GPS on a corporate vehicle to track mileage claimed, or am I nuts?
Edited on Jan 24 at 9:33amAug '10
Re: SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
Pseudodionysius: Adam,
Did anyone think about this being applied to a tax case? I'm thinking the IRS could justify a warrant to track vehicle usage, or am I nuts? · 1 hour ago
Unless I'm mistaken, the case was only about warrantless GPS tracking.
Sep '10
Re: SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
Misthiocracy
Pseudodionysius: Adam,
Did anyone think about this being applied to a tax case? I'm thinking the IRS could justify a warrant to track vehicle usage, or am I nuts? · 1 hour ago
Unless I'm mistaken, the case was only about warrantless GPS tracking. · 19 minutes ago
Oops. Looks like I need an edit.
Aug '10
Re: SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
I'll make an appointment with the veterinarian...
Re: SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
I'm glad you guys cleared that up. But yes, the Court didn't reach the warrant issue, but commentators are saying that the strong implication is that the government had better get a warrant to do this sort of tracking.
Aug '10
Re: SCOTUS Puts Limits on Secret GPS Tracking
That is, if the government plans to use the evidence in court.
I think the government could still use warrantless GPS to track terrorism suspects in order to prevent an attack.