Don Tillman · Aug 11, 2011 at 12:33pm
Google's fertility chart

Google has a very well implemented visualization of the fertility rates of the world. Check it out here.

Play around with it. I think you'll find it interesting, especially as a companion to the demographic points in Mark Steyn's America Alone.

I'm assuming for the moment that the data is roughly correct, and the measurements are roughly consistent.

It's generally understood that a fertility rate of 2.1 children per female is the replacement rate, the rate required for a stable society. This makes sense.  The US is currently at 2.05, and has been hovering around that rate for a couple decades, less in the 70's and early 80's, more before then.  That's pretty stable.

The northern European nations are near there; the UK, France, and the Scandinavian countries are pretty consistently in the range 1.8 to 2.2.  Not bad.

The southern European nations are significantly lower; Portugal, Germany, Austria, Spain, Poland, Italy are all consistently in the range 1.3 to 1.5.  That's dangerously low.  And they've been running low for a couple decades.

On the other side of the world, Japan is at 1.37.  Also dangerously low.

India's fertility rate used to be huge, almost 6.0, but has been steeply declining on a ruler-straight line for five decades.

I think this is fascinating.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Equally important as a nation's ability to keep a steady supply of healthy young people is its ability to maintain basic cultural unity. Some of those "replacement rate" statistics are misleading because it's not just their numbers being replaced — it's their national identities.

Fifty years from now, the present political borders in Europe might be basically the same as today, but different peoples will be living there.

It's like when nearly every member of a rock band is replaced and the music sounds completely different, but the band's name and logo remain. The new members might even occasionally play old songs, but everyone understands the original band is long gone.


Joined
Jun '11
michael kelley

Thanks for these charts.  You are right - fascinating.

You could envision a point in the future where the Central Planners run advertising campaigns scoffing at abortions and encouraging procreation.  I've read that in Russia, they are already doing this.

Now, after the abortions of nearly 60 million potential citizens in this country since Roe v. Wade, after the elimination of generations of taxpayers at a time in history when we need more citizen taxpayers, wouldn't that be a kick?

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Michael, your post reminds me of a Monty Python skit: "Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who." Condemning abortion because we need more young citizens to pay into social programs is like condemning rape because happy women make more productive employees. Only politicians could be satisfied by such an argument.

Mel Foil
Joined
Jun '10
etoiledunord

According to a study,

For mathematics research papers, the mean age for first contributions by an author is 27.3 years, and the mean age for "best" contributions is 38.8 years. And of course, to produce those people, you need a large enough population of children to produce the rare math genius once in awhile. It also helps if you can produce 50 mathematicians that work together and talk to each other, rather than just 5.

Dan Hanson
Joined
Aug '10
Dan Hanson

Japan's problem is probably most severe, because their immigration rate is almost zero.  Other countries are replacing their natural population loss with immigration which, while it has its own problems, will at least allow those countries to maintain a workforce to support retirees.

At current trendlines, Japan is forecast to have its population decline by perhaps 30 million people by 2050, and of those that remain, more than 1/3 will be retired.  Japan could ultimately lose more than half of its population,  which will not be enough to maintain its infrastructure or support its ever-aging population.

In Europe, the problem is more than the natural population loss is being being made up through immigration, and the immigrants are often poor people from high birthrate countries who are not assimilating and are slowing changing the cultural fabric of Europe.

For the world as a whole, the fear of overpopulation appears to be groundless.  The U.N. has been steadily revising its estimates of world population growth downwards - a trend that's been going on for the last 20 years.  In the lowest birthrate scenario, world population could actually crash to about 3.6 billion people by 2100.

Snow Bird
Joined
Feb '11
Snow Bird

michael kelley:

Now, after the abortions of nearly 60 million potential citizens in this country since Roe v. Wade, after the elimination of generations of taxpayers at a time in history when we need more citizen taxpayers, wouldn't that be a kick?

Not when you calculate how many of those 60 million would be a burden rather than a boon.

Edited on Aug 11, 2011 at 1:17pm
Aodhan
Joined
Nov '10
Aodhan

I also note a slight uptick in Western countries in the last few years. Could be mild grounds for optimism.

Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson
Aaron Miller: Michael, your post reminds me of a Monty Python skit: "Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who." Condemning abortion because we need more young citizens to pay into social programs is like condemning rape because happy women make more productive employees. Only politicians could be satisfied by such an argument. · Aug 11 at 12:48pm

Aaron, have you seen the recent remake of Battlestar Galactica?  The interim president banned abortion by executive order in spite of her ideological support of a "woman's right to choose", because the human population couldn't afford not to have those babies.

Michael Horn
Joined
Dec '10
Michael Horn

Mark Wilson

Aaron Miller: Michael, your post reminds me of a Monty Python skit: "Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who." Condemning abortion because we need more young citizens to pay into social programs is like condemning rape because happy women make more productive employees. Only politicians could be satisfied by such an argument. · Aug 11 at 12:48pm

Aaron, have you seen the recent remake of Battlestar Galactica?  The interim president banned abortion by executive orderin spite of her ideological support of a "woman's right to choose", because the human population couldn't afford not to have those babies. · Aug 11 at 1:46pm

Mark, because you have referenced BSG in this thread, you are my new favorite member.

To the Finest Ship in the Fleet!

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa

Great chart. These data underlie many of the arguments made in Mark Steyn's last book.  When the rate falls below 1.5 for an extended period of time, it becomes virtually impossible for a nation to turn it around.  

Pretty sad when the human race cannot even be relied upon to reproduce itself.

David Williamson
Joined
Mar '11
David Williamson

It's unfortunate that I am too old to have a significant impact on these numbers.

Aaron Miller
Joined
May '10
Aaron Miller

Michael Horn

Mark Wilson

Aaron Miller: Michael, your post reminds me of a Monty Python skit: "Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who." Condemning abortion because we need more young citizens to pay into social programs is like condemning rape because happy women make more productive employees. Only politicians could be satisfied by such an argument.

Aaron, have you seen the recent remake of Battlestar Galactica?  The interim president banned abortion by executive orderin spite of her ideological support of a "woman's right to choose", because the human population couldn't afford not to have those babies.

Mark, because you have referenced BSG in this thread, you are my new favorite member.

To the Finest Ship in the Fleet! 

The modern Battlestar Galactica series has actually been my Netflix project for the past few weeks. It raises some great philosophical questions. That abortion bit did make me cringe, but I'm not driven to skip entire episodes as I am with some other series.

thelonious
Joined
May '11
thelonious

 Interesting how wealth lowers birth rates.  If we eliminate poverty from the world would we "wealth"  our way out of existence?

George Savage
Aaron Miller The modern Battlestar Galactica series has actually been my Netflix project for the past few weeks. It raises some great philosophical questions. That abortion bit did make me cringe, but I'm not driven to skip entire episodes as I am with some other series. · Aug 11 at 2:14pm

I was a big BSG fan--despite my wife's protests about the nihilistic undertow--right up until the writers decided to abandon the oblique references and go head-to-head with a much more unambiguous threat than the genocidal Cylons.  I refer, of course, to George W. Bush.  When our heroes, the colonials on New Caprica, became suicide bombing "insurgents" fighting the evil Cylon occupiers...well, I dial up the SyFy channel to have a few moments escape.  If I wanted Iraq War sermonizing, I could always get the mainstream version from CNN, or head over to MSNBC for the the full-frontal fire and brimstone package.

Stuart Creque
Joined
Dec '10
Stuart Creque

My wife and I have three daughters.  We've done our bit for America's future.

thelonious
Joined
May '11
thelonious
Stuart Creque: My wife and I have three daughters.  We've done our bit for America's future. · Aug 11 at 3:15pm

Antonio Cromartie of the New York Jets has done 3 times as much for America's future than you have.  With 8 different women.  Check out his you tube clip from HBO's "Hard Knocks" of him trying to remember all his kids names and ages.  Hilarious and depressing at the same time.


Joined
Feb '11
Hang On

The fertility numbers have been flat since the 1980s. Have we disappeared yet? Not that I've noticed. These numbers are only a portion of the picture.  The other portion is life expectancy. Japan has the lowest fertility rate and the highest life expectancy.  Coincidence?  Fertility is flat and life expectancy is increasing and will probably increase at an accelerating rate. So the idea of population collapse is not one I'd put much stock in.

Give Me Liberty
Joined
Mar '11
Give Me Liberty

The Japanese solution to their birth rate problem, robots.

tabula rasa
Joined
Jun '10
tabula rasa
Hang On: The fertility numbers have been flat since the 1980s. Have we disappeared yet? Not that I've noticed. These numbers are only a portion of the picture.  The other portion is life expectancy. Japan has the lowest fertility rate and the highest life expectancy.  Coincidence?  Fertility is flat and life expectancy is increasing and will probably increase at an accelerating rate. So the idea of population collapse is not one I'd put much stock in.

I disagree.  It takes several decades to reach stability, so, assuming America's fertility rate remains at about 2.1, it will reach a point of population stability in a few decades (of course, immigration can affect that).

Japan, and other countries, have passed the tipping point.  Check out this website, where the CIA tracks fertility rates and population loss and gain. In 2011, Japan will lose .3 percent of its population, Germany more than .2 percent, Russia .6 percent, and Spain .6 percent.  Life expectancy is not outstripping their low fertility rates:  Japan (1.21), Germany (1.41), Russia (1.42), Spain (1.47).  Japan has high life expectancy, but will soon be in a population death spiral.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In