This is a pretty damning video from Breitbart.com:

The most damning part isn't the students happily signing a petition to reduce the airtime or eliminate altogether the Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Reilly or Glenn Beck shows.  They just seem pleasantly clueless and utterly out of it.  Some don't even know what the First Amendment is.

The most infuriating part is when older folks -- administrators or teachers, I'm guessing -- cheerfully and eagerly sign a petition to eliminate the free speech rights of people they don't agree with.

Without shame.  Without a second thought.  Without even a tiny voice in the back of their heads saying "This isn't right."  Without even a hesitation.  Without a glance back at the school building in the background, which is only there in the first place because of the principles of free inquiry, free debate, and free speech.

American academia is a swamp.  It needs draining.

  • Comment Filters
Contributor Comments
Member Comments
Comment Popularity

Comments :

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

Shut up, Rob. 

Mike LaRoche
Joined
Oct '10
Mike LaRoche

Good God, that's depressing.  It's long past time that academia's Berlin Wall was torn down.

Freesmith
Joined
Jan '11
Freesmith

Thanks for the video.

It's important to understand exactly how Democrats and proto-Democrats "think." This is a good illustration.

Once you understand that, ignoring all of their so-called arguments, and instead mocking them relentlessly is much easier.

The New Clear Option
Joined
Apr '11
Gen. Victor Ball

 I'm speechless.

anon_academic
Joined
Aug '10
anon_academic

Wow.

What amazes me is how it was such a simple pitch. I kind of expected it to be gussied up with some language about "the public airwaves" or "the fairness doctrine" and some Media Matters pull quotes or "civility" talk. But it was just bluntly, "wanna kick these guys off the radio?" and the interviewers even them reminded them about free speech and the 1st amendment. 

Just wow.

Kenneth
Joined
Jul '10
Kenneth

It becomes clear - from a reverse standpoint - why the Bolsheviks went after the intelligentsia first. 

Come the Revolution, what else is a stalwart American Kulak to do?

Dave Carter

I wonder if they would have also cheerfully signed a petition calling for a book burning, and if not, why not?

Kennedy Smith
Joined
May '10
Kennedy Smith
Dave Carter: I wonder if they would have also cheerfully signed a petition calling for a book burning, and if not, why not? · May 20 at 11:57am

Only if the book was Liberal Fascism.  So many levels of irony I can't tell what's real any more.  Like Scream 4.

Kervinlee
Joined
May '10
Kervinlee

If the public education system can't transmit the country's civic principles it is time for it to be scrapped.

mesquito
Joined
May '10
mesquito

A little hint: If it's easy, it ain't tolerance.

David Williamson
Joined
Mar '11
David Williamson

Rob Long

American academia is a swamp.  It needs draining. ·

By whom?

Well, I guess Glenn Beck, after his show on Fox is finished and he has saved Israel, will move on to drain Academia, along with S.E. Cupp (hopefully dressed as a schoolgirl).

I wish I were a little more optimistic that they will succeed.

Oh, not to worry, tis the end of the World tomorrow, anyway...

Nathaniel Wright
Joined
Aug '10
Nathaniel Wright

This is just further proof that we are doing a poor job of educating our citizens to the ideals of democratic virtue and celebrating democratic vices.  For a democracy to be virtuous, it must defend individual rights including property (Madison's defense of property is eloquent and excellent).  A democracy that doesn't believe in individual rights quickly becomes tyranny.  There is a reason that Plato and Aristotle both discuss it as one of the worst regimes.

Rob Long

Kenneth: It becomes clear - from a reverse standpoint - why the Bolsheviks went after the intelligentsia first. 

Come the Revolution, what else is a stalwart American Kulak to do? · May 20 at 11:53am

Exactly.  It's the "intellectuals" who are the first to deny people their freedoms.

dogsbody
Joined
Sep '10
dogsbody

The self-righteous woman at 2:11--I meet so many like her.  It's like what Rob says about Hollywood--the default assumption on campus is that you're leftist, so within its bounds they say what they really think.

Songwriter
Joined
Aug '10
Songwriter

Man - that was depressing.


Joined
May '10
Paul Stinchfield

This doesn't surprise me in the least. It has long been clear that fascism permeates academia.

Crab bait
Joined
Apr '11
Crab bait

That was an eye opening video.  How many students/faculty wouldn't sign the petition.  I understand that you're going to find hypocrites if you want to, but I'd like to know what proportion of the school population they represent.


Joined
May '10
Paul Stinchfield

Bolsheviks, fascists, what's the difference?

Our caring, humanitarian progs will always embrace fascism, as long as it's called "progressivism" or "liberalism".

Walter Berns, writing about the thoroughly fascistic nature of the student radicals who took over the Cornell University campus in 1969:Walter Berns, writing about the thoroughly fascistic nature of the student radicals who took over the Cornell University campus in 1969:
"I proved this when to an American Government class at the height of the Cornell crisis I read some speeches analyzing the situation and calling for what ought to be done. The radicals in the class were enthusiastic until I revealed that the speeches were by Mussolini."
--Democracy and the Constitution, by Walter Berns, footnote 17 to I-failed-to-record-which-chapter

Edited on May 20, 2011 at 12:59pm
Steven Drexler
Joined
Sep '10
Steven Drexler

 Another point - and almost as depressing - how easy it was to get those people to sign a petition. I didn't notice anyone taking time to actually READ the petition. Or to engage in a little devil's advocate discussion before signing.

Where is the cynicism? No rhetorical combativeness? Only one guy challenged the concept of "limiting their airtime" and then folded immediately. Like, "I agree with you, so I'll just jettison my core principles for your petition."


Joined
May '10
Paul Stinchfield
Kenneth: It becomes clear - from a reverse standpoint - why the Bolsheviks went after the intelligentsia first.  · May 20 at 11:53am

What's amazing is how easy it was: In the 1960's the intellectuals surrendered without a fight. So how much was this due to cowardice and how much to sympathy? I'm inclined to say about 50-50. First, most academics didn't have any moral principles that they were willing to fight for, and second, they differed with commies and fascists mostly in the labels they chose to describe themselves and in the tactics they preferred to use.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading
Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In