The Hole Truth

Yes, we discuss that phrase, but no, we don’t say the word. Instead, we do a deep dive on immigration with two of the sharpest minds on the issue: the Center for Immigration Studies’s Mark Krikorian and our good pal Mickey Kaus. Dig in.

Music from this week’s podcast: Dreamer by Super Tramp

Subscribe to The Ricochet Podcast in Apple Podcasts (and leave a 5-star review, please!), or by RSS feed. For all our podcasts in one place, subscribe to the Ricochet Audio Network Superfeed in Apple Podcasts or by RSS feed.

Now become a Ricochet member for only $5.00 a month! Join and see what you’ve been missing.

There are 144 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. CarolJoy Coolidge
    CarolJoy
    @CarolJoy

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    But…… Trump is not a child. He is over 70, which is even older than me. He remembers Reagan, and what the culture used to be like.

    The guy I voted for in the primary was at least my fourth choice. It was not Trump. The PotUS candidates I wanted more fell by the wayside before the Michigan Primary. Stuff occurs. I have never gotten my first choice for President or even in the primary. SNIP

    Trump is not the PotUS I wanted, but he is PotUS and he is who he is. He is getting things done. Some may say that is despite who he is. Others are saying that only Trump could have moved things as much as he has. Is moving towards a crasser culture a good thing? Not in my opinion. SNIP eviscerating PC is a very, very good thing, SNIP. Take the good with the bad. The man is who he is.

    As much I respect what you are saying here, Arahant, I am not giving up. His supporters want a fighter? SNIP  If Trump’s why of doing things was so good, why are his poll numbers in the commode? Why are we in danger of losing Congress? When I say that Reagan managed to be a gentleman while winning two landslides, the best I get is that those were different times. Granted. And they were better times. But going downhill in terms morality has only made our chances of “winning” even worse!

    I would say that Trump’s poll numbers are in the commode on account of an unrelenting press that has yammered on for over a year about collusion that never occurred. The man can’t sneeze without someone in the press stating that the President has been infected with ebola and he will infect us and we are all going to die. I was channel surfing one day, and someone on the Money Channel stated this as fact: “Trump is  literally Hitler.” So either the cloning specialists are far more advanced than they have let on, or that yet again, another Talking Head is a total  ignoramus.

    The Republican Party is in danger of losing the elections due to the fact that they cannot wrap their heads around the new reality: American voters loyal to Republicans make up less than 30% of all Americans. That has been a fact since 2008. The only upside for the “R”‘s on this is that loyal Democrats number around the same percentage factor. So that leaves the majority of American voters in the category of “You better give us someone who is libertarian on many issues and who understands that immigration (or Latino Culture Uber Alles) needs to be reigned in, or you will find people either staying at home or voting for their cat.”

    • #91
  2. Don Tillman Member
    Don Tillman
    @DonTillman

    Greg Gutfeld’s take on this is awesome.

    https://youtu.be/Z6RFXHbaY8g

    • #92
  3. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    CarolJoy (View Comment):
    I would say that Trump’s poll numbers are in the commode on account of an unrelenting press that has yammered on for over a year about collusion that never occurred.

    I’m sorry, I just can’t buy this. Sure, much of the media out to get Trump. It is right to say that the man can’t sneeze without a negative story being written about him. But I’ve conceded that. Many times. And you are saying that this is the whole of it. The poll numbers are bad because of his bad press? Nevermind the fact that we are also told that a large number of people don’t believe what the press is saying. But, when it comes to Trump, people believe the media? And it has nothing to do with his fighting with Gold Star Families? Nothing to do with his attacks on own Attorney General? Nothing to do with vulgar language? With his Tweets? Or with his going in front of the boy scouts and putting on a vulgar display of self-congratulations? These things are televised. People don’t need the filter of the press to tell them what this man is like. We have eyes. The man is a vulgarian. This is why his poll numbers are in the tank.

    • #93
  4. mesulkanen Member
    mesulkanen
    @

    Patrick McClure (View Comment):
    TDS is strong in this thread. The level of spittle spewing hatred is amazing. The President is neither as good as his ardent supporters say, or as bad as Julia and George think.

    Yes, discussions on this subject are pretty much at a dead end. No real attempts at persuasion are occurring, just lobbing plague-infected bodies over each others’ walls.

    • #94
  5. mesulkanen Member
    mesulkanen
    @

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    CarolJoy (View Comment):
    I would say that Trump’s poll numbers are in the commode on account of an unrelenting press that has yammered on for over a year about collusion that never occurred.

    I’m sorry, I just can’t buy this. Sure, much of the media out to get Trump. It is right to say that the man can’t sneeze without a negative story being written about him. But I’ve conceded that. Many times. And you are saying that this is the whole of it. The poll numbers are bad because of his bad press? Nevermind the fact that we are also told that a large number of people don’t believe what the press is saying. But, when it comes to Trump, people believe the media? And it has nothing to do with his fighting with Gold Star Families? Nothing to do with his attacks on own Attorney General? Nothing to do with vulgar language? With his Tweets? Or with his going in front of the boy scouts and putting on a vulgar display of self-congratulations? These things are televised. People don’t need the filter of the press to tell them what this man is like. We have eyes. The man is a vulgarian. This is why his poll numbers are in the tank.

    Yes, we have a slob as President. Some people think it is unacceptable, others think it is irrelevant. The discussion is pretty much over.

    • #95
  6. mesulkanen Member
    mesulkanen
    @

    mesulkanen (View Comment):

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    CarolJoy (View Comment):
    I would say that Trump’s poll numbers are in the commode on account of an unrelenting press that has yammered on for over a year about collusion that never occurred.

    I’m sorry, I just can’t buy this. Sure, much of the media out to get Trump. It is right to say that the man can’t sneeze without a negative story being written about him. But I’ve conceded that. Many times. And you are saying that this is the whole of it. The poll numbers are bad because of his bad press? Nevermind the fact that we are also told that a large number of people don’t believe what the press is saying. But, when it comes to Trump, people believe the media? And it has nothing to do with his fighting with Gold Star Families? Nothing to do with his attacks on own Attorney General? Nothing to do with vulgar language? With his Tweets? Or with his going in front of the boy scouts and putting on a vulgar display of self-congratulations? These things are televised. People don’t need the filter of the press to tell them what this man is like. We have eyes. The man is a vulgarian. This is why his poll numbers are in the tank.

    Yes, we have a slob as President. Some people think it is unacceptable, others think it is irrelevant. The discussion is pretty much over.

    And, yes, another group denies he is a slob, but a visionary truth-teller.

    • #96
  7. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    mesulkanen (View Comment):

    Yes, we have a slob as President. Some people think it is unacceptable, others think it is irrelevant. The discussion is pretty much over.

    And, yes, another group denies he is a slob, but a visionary truth-teller.

    And never the twain shall meet!

    • #97
  8. Mrs. Ink Inactive
    Mrs. Ink
    @MrsInk

    On the other hand, the NFIB Index of Small Business Optimism is at an all-time high. This is significant because small business owners and entrepreneurs risk their own money. I think that they are also the kind of people who are more inclined to vote. Scott Adams of Dilbert fame claims that this is a much more reliable indicator of the president’s popularity, and I am inclined to agree with him.

    • #98
  9. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    mesulkanen (View Comment):
    No real attempts at persuasion are occurring, just lobbing plague-infected bodies over each others’ walls.

    Well, gotta have a hobby. ?

    • #99
  10. dicentra Inactive
    dicentra
    @dicentra

    blood thirsty neocon (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    @bloodthirstyneocon

    CATO has gigantic files and reports on why identity politics is good for the country. I am not making that up. This topic doesn’t lend it’s self to normal civic engagement, unfortunately.

    The problem begins with a P and ends with a C. That was always one of Pres. Trump’s top selling points to me: he was against PC.

    So Trump doesn’t bow to the demands of the PC harpy squad. Has it made you and I more free to speak our minds? Have Google, Twitter, and Facebook stopped with their censorship or have they stepped it up?

    Trump’s blunt-force PC-busting hasn’t made questioning the orthodoxy a respectable position: anyone who calls shenanigans on the left’s absurdities is Just Like Trump rather than Having A Point.

    Look what they’re doing to Margaret Atwood! Trump is making the right people crazy, but we don’t need the crazies to get crazier! We need them to knock it off!

    Trump’s crudeness is not pushing us toward that goal.

    • #100
  11. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    Peter Robinson (View Comment):
    About half of Italians returned to Italy, but you’re basic point is correct, I think: Only in the southwestern United States, and only in the past couple of decades, have we had immigrants who could go back and forth to the home country quite often. As the late Samuel Huntington of Harvard argued, this is almost certain to slow the old processes of assimilation–if not nullify them altogether.

    But, haven’t Mexicans been crossing the US border in that region for much longer than the last 40 some years? Also, while this is a logical hypothesis, how does it actually bare out? How many decades did it take for previous immigrants to assimilate? Have we really gone over that time period? Are third generation Mexicans in the US less assimilated than 3rd generation Italians were?

    • #101
  12. JuliaBlaschke Lincoln
    JuliaBlaschke
    @JuliaBlaschke

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    Trump hasn’t accomplished anything. [etc. etc.]

    Well, in fairness, he has nominated quite a few really good justices. He could have easily done the opposite, but he listened to the right people on that.

    And, again in fairness, he’s appointed some really good people to top-level executive positions. He could have done a lot worse (and, occasionally, did).

    And, just to be fair, he did campaign on a promise of deregulation and then pretty aggressively push for exactly that. So it’s hard not to give him credit for that as well.

    I mean, there’s good and there’s bad. Right?

    I don’t think Trump nominated anyone. He doesn’t know enough to nominate anyone. He outsourced everything to Pence because he is smart enough to know he doesn’t know anything angd that is the only thing I will give him credit for. Pence or someone like Pence told Trump who to appoint and thank God he listened. The deregulation is good but once again Trump doesn’t even know how to go about it. He has people telling him how to do it. The only good is that Trump realizes he is clueless so he listens to wiser heads – most of the time. Again, thank God. But that doesn’t make Trump himself into a good President. He just doesn’t know how.

    • #102
  13. JuliaBlaschke Lincoln
    JuliaBlaschke
    @JuliaBlaschke

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    Trump hasn’t accomplished anything. [etc. etc.]

    Well, in fairness, he has nominated quite a few really good justices. He could have easily done the opposite, but he listened to the right people on that.

    And, again in fairness, he’s appointed some really good people to top-level executive positions. He could have done a lot worse (and, occasionally, did).

    And, just to be fair, he did campaign on a promise of deregulation and then pretty aggressively push for exactly that. So it’s hard not to give him credit for that as well.

    I mean, there’s good and there’s bad. Right?

    I think Henry is closer to the truth that Julia. I hate disagreeing with Julia, even more than I hate disagreeing with Gary. She seems to be fine, thoughtful lady, and I certainly agree that not enough credit is given to Pence and all the people and organizations (like Heritage) around Trump. But, to be fair (and that is what we need to be in this trying time for our Republic), Trump did appoint these people. And he listens to them. He need not. He has shelved a lot of the ananities he campaigned on, for the wisdom of McMaster, Kelly, and some of the others.

    I wish Trump would resign. I shake my head at his antics, and am embarrassed for my country every day at the things he says and Tweets. But he isn’t going to resign. Charlie is right that we have to put up with this shame. To take him forcefully would affect the nation badly, in my judgement. So we have to wait him out. But it will never stop me from voicing my pain and disgust that he is there.

    But he has to listen to those people. He doesn’t understand the issues. He cannot speak coherently about the issues. He needs those people. Trump had no choice but to appoint those people because without them all you have is babbling. I am grateful he did and I agree we have to put up with him. But I refuse to give him any credit for tax cuts, judges, deregulation or anything else because he doesn’t understand any of it and he never will. Yes it is way better than Hillary but we could have had a thinking, intelligent President and I will never forgive Trump for taking that away from us to serve his stupendous ego.

    • #103
  14. JuliaBlaschke Lincoln
    JuliaBlaschke
    @JuliaBlaschke

    Patrick McClure (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    Now we got OUR fascist thug in control.

    Except that Trump is not even close to being a Fascist thug. He has been helping remove regulations. He has been working with Congress. He has reversed some of Obama’s over-reaches. He has been devolving some things back to state control. He has been trying to work within the law and through the Constitutional processes. Would a Fascist thug do any of that? What has he actually done that is Fascistic?

    Amen

    Trump is too stupid to be a fascist. He doesn’t even know what a fascist is. He’s just a babbling fool in way over his head.

    • #104
  15. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    I don’t think Trump nominated anyone. He doesn’t know enough to nominate anyone. He outsourced everything to Pence because he is smart enough to know he doesn’t know anything angd that is the only thing I will give him credit for. Pence or someone like Pence told Trump who to appoint and thank God he listened. The deregulation is good but once again Trump doesn’t even know how to go about it. He has people telling him how to do it. The only good is that Trump realizes he is clueless so he listens to wiser heads – most of the time. Again, thank God. But that doesn’t make Trump himself into a good President. He just doesn’t know how.

    Seems to me that you are defining how. You listen to experts in areas where they know more and you delegate, because a President cannot do everything in a 4,000,000+ person organization.

    • #105
  16. JuliaBlaschke Lincoln
    JuliaBlaschke
    @JuliaBlaschke

     

    There is also no acknowledgement of how he stages various “media brouhaha’s” to allow something he needs to have happen come about.

    Stages? So you think he is playing 3D chess? Yeah right. You are definitely looking through the offal for a grain of wheat.

    • #106
  17. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    Trump is too stupid to be a fascist. He doesn’t even know what a fascist is. He’s just a babbling fool in way over his head.

    Julia, Sweetie, bless your heart, I think you may not be qualified to evaluate the man’s intelligence, what he knows, and what he doesn’t know. A lot of people, even in the Republican Party said the same things about Ronald Reagan. He’s just a dumb actor. He’s senile. He doesn’t know what’s going on. Other people are running things. I remember hearing that for eight years.

    Now, DJT has never been as classy, as suave, or as eloquent as RWR. I’ll give you and everyone else that. On the other hand, I look around me, and all I see is the 1980’s all over again but multiplied by a million in the media. They were harsh with Reagan and they made up stuff, but they have gone to Ludicrous Speed with Trump. And people like you are swallowing the Flavor-Aid.

    • #107
  18. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    mesulkanen (View Comment):

    Patrick McClure (View Comment):
    TDS is strong in this thread. The level of spittle spewing hatred is amazing. The President is neither as good as his ardent supporters say, or as bad as Julia and George think.

    Yes, discussions on this subject are pretty much at a dead end. No real attempts at persuasion are occurring, just lobbing plague-infected bodies over each others’ walls.

    I want to address both of these quotes.

    I do think a lot of the discussion has reached a dead-end. Most people here have made up their minds. But, speaking for myself, I am trying to persuade. I always give concrete reasons for my thinking, and always try to say that, yes, the President has done good things in terms of policy, but that the Presidency is about more than just policy.  The trouble comes when my antagonists do not want to come to grips with the fact that, when we have our minds focused on just policy, we will come to rue the day.

    As far as Trump being neither as bad as I think, not as good as his defenders think: Being good conjures in the mind a moral thing. Is he a good person? I cannot judge his heart; only God can do that. I do say that the way he expresses himself does not compute with deep thoughts. Nor kind thoughts. And that leads to ineffectiveness, in terms of conveying what good has been done, and what you hope to accomplish. This is the simple thing I wish to get across. To me it is simple: In the deepest recesses of your soul, you may be a good person; but, if you come across as a clown, you are undoing any good that you wish to accomplish.

    • #108
  19. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    JuliaBlaschke (View Comment):
    But he has to listen to those people. He doesn’t understand the issues. He cannot speak coherently about the issues. He needs those people. Trump had no choice but to appoint those people because without them all you have is babbling. I am grateful he did and I agree we have to put up with him. But I refuse to give him any credit for tax cuts, judges, deregulation or anything else because he doesn’t understand any of it and he never will. Yes it is way better than Hillary but we could have had a thinking, intelligent President and I will never forgive Trump for taking that away from us to serve his stupendous ego.

    But he doesn’t have to, Julia. I understand your bitterness, and I share much of it. But, for the sake of the country, and yourself, we have to move beyond it. Trump could have stuck with the crazy things he said in the campaign, but he didn’t. I am not smart enough, not can I intuit, why he changed, but he did. Again, for our country’s sake, we need to be grateful for the growth, for whatever reason, that this man/child has achieved.

    Arahant (View Comment):
    Now, DJT has never been as classy, as suave, or as eloquent as RWR. I’ll give you and everyone else that. On the other hand, I look around me, and all I see is the 1980’s all over again but multiplied by a million in the media. They were harsh with Reagan and they made up stuff, but they have gone to Ludicrous Speed with Trump. And people like you are swallowing the Flavor-Aid.

    Charlie, I really am shocked. You are much smarter than this. Yes, Julia is too bitter. But to blame this all on the media? Come on?!! There is no excuse for much of the media. But Trump does give them ammunition. And (I know I say this a lot), to be fair, many in the media do give him credit, at times, such as that cabinet meeting he had a week or so ago. As far as Reagan being classier? Of course he was. But, c’mon, man, it was more than that. Reagan was Governor of California; he  was a union president; he wrote radio speeches; he was plenty smart, not just suave and eloquent. I will accept that is unfair to say that someone isn’t bright, because we don’t know. On the other hand, both of us know that no one who is truly bright would go around telling us how bright he is.

    • #109
  20. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    How is Trump a man child and not Bill Clinton?

    It is amazing to me all this noise over what Trump Maynor may not have said in a private mee.

    At the end of the day, the people upset, want to be upset with Trump. They are looking to be upset. They want to be unhappy.  They need to be unhappy with Trump.

    As he might say: sad.

    • #110
  21. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Moderator Note:

    By all means feel free to disagree with Bryan's assessment, but please try to take it a little less personally. Thank you.

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    How is Trump a man child and not Bill Clinton?

    It is amazing to me all this noise over what Trump Maynor may not have said in a private mee.

    At the end of the day, the people upset, want to be upset with Trump. They are looking to be upset. They want to be unhappy. They need to be unhappy with Trump.

    As he might say: sad.

    I really resent this, Bryan. I do not wish to be to be unhappy! This is disgusting. Don’t do this again. I have been fair with you. I love my country, deeply, and everything I write is because of that.

    And Clinton is a man/child. Very much so. What does this have to do with Trump? Talk about a non-sequitur!!

    • #111
  22. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    How is Trump a man child and not Bill Clinton?

    It is amazing to me all this noise over what Trump Maynor may not have said in a private mee.

    At the end of the day, the people upset, want to be upset with Trump. They are looking to be upset. They want to be unhappy. They need to be unhappy with Trump.

    As he might say: sad.

    I really resent this, Bryan. I do not wish to be to be unhappy! This is disgusting. Don’t do this again. I have been fair with you. I love my country, deeply, and everything I write is because of that.

    And Clinton is a man/child. Very much so. What does this have to do with Trump? Talk about a non-sequitur!!

    Taking it from the bottom:

    I don’t think calling Trump a “man/child” is fair or reasonable. That term, in recent years, has been used for young men unable to succeed. Trump is a success. And it does matter that Clinton is one, because the rules for Trump now appear totally different than for the previous men. Trump’s less than stellar character appears to wax more important than anything  else for people all over the nation now. It is very odd none of this came up with previous occupants.

    I was on my tablet so both quotes I tried to put in there did not work. It is 100% clear to me that for some conservatives, there is nothing Trump can do to make them happy. They are determined to give Trump no credit for anything, and they are going to be unhappy with Trump no matter what. JB appears to be doing just this. So, this part was actually meant to be supportive towards your argument, not at you per say, and due to the limitations of my interface, I botched it.

    I don’t question your love of country.

    • #112
  23. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Moderator Note:

    Please see mod note on comment #111.

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    I don’t question your love of country.

    Thank you for that. But you directed your comments to me, by referring to what I had written. and, I repeat, your saying that I wish to be unhappy is disgusting. I have never, despite how much I disagree with you, imputed feelings to you that you may not may not have. I know you won’t do this. but you owe me an apology. If I don’t get it, I am done with you.

    • #113
  24. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    In effect, we have a growing population of unassimilated native-born Americans, people who reject the idea that America is distinctive in a good way.

    Yah we call them progressives. Hi o…

    Frankly I’m skeptical of the the claims of unassimilation. America has always had strong ethnic enclaves. The American system is designed with such groupings in mind, back when people made far greater deal of the distinctions between the various British peoples of different faiths. The principles still apply though to modern times. The culture is crafted by human interaction. Distinctly American is easy, how can it be anything else. Only we have this unique melange of peoples living under our Constitution. I think a lot of cultural angst comes from having a fix vision of the cultural end product. This though I think is a mistaken way to look at culture.

    • #114
  25. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    Frankly I’m skeptical of the the claims of unassimilation. America has always had strong ethnic enclaves. The American system is designed with such groupings in mind, back when people made far greater deal of the distinctions between the various British peoples of different faiths. The principles still apply though to modern times. The culture is crafted by human interaction. Distinctly American is easy, how can it be anything else. Only we have this unique melange of peoples living under our Constitution. I think a lot of cultural angst comes from having a fix vision of the cultural end product. This though I think is a mistaken way to look at culture.

    I believe this is a mistaken impression. It sounds plausible the way you put it. But there is so much playing to identity politics today. More than ever, I believe. People seem to be identifying more with the group to which they belong, than are able to realize that all these groups put together are what we call “America”.

    • #115
  26. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    Frankly I’m skeptical of the the claims of unassimilation.

    It would actually be good to look at statistics about that — and I haven’t done so. What are second and third generation immigrants doing, compared to those of the previous century? In terms of language acquisition, civic participation, work participation, naturalization — how have these patterns changed? Or have they?

    I’ll look into it.

    • #116
  27. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    George Townsend (View Comment):

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    I don’t question your love of country.

    Thank you for that. But you directed your comments to me, by referring to what I had written. and, I repeat, your saying that I wish to be unhappy is disgusting. I have never, despite how much I disagree with you, imputed feelings to you that you may not may not have. I know you won’t do this. but you owe me an apology. If I don’t get it, I am done with you.

    I explained the botched post and what I had meant to do. I suppose that was insufficient. Sorry. I’ll do better in the future and not attempt complex posts off the keyboard.

    If you want to be done with me that is OK too.

    • #117
  28. mesulkanen Member
    mesulkanen
    @

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):
    Frankly I’m skeptical of the the claims of unassimilation.

    It would actually be good to look at statistics about that — and I haven’t done so. What are second and third generation immigrants doing, compared to those of the previous century? In terms of language acquisition, civic participation, work participation, naturalization — how have these patterns changed? Or have they?

    I’ll look into it.

    I’d like a historian to compare assimilation of immigrant groups now vs. in the past. There may be some special circumstances now, such as the left using ethnic identity to purposefully prevent assimilation.

    • #118
  29. George Townsend Inactive
    George Townsend
    @GeorgeTownsend

    Moderator Note:

    Again, please see mod note on comment #111.

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):
    I explained the botched post and what I had meant to do. I suppose that was insufficient. Sorry. I’ll do better in the future and not attempt complex posts off the keyboard.

    If you want to be done with me that is OK too.

    Complex posts? It is never you fault, is it? The more I read you, the more I understand how you can be such a devoted fan of our president. Good Luck to the both of you.

    Good bye, Bryan.

    • #119
  30. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    George Townsend (View Comment):
    But to blame this all on the media?

    You misunderstood. I am not blaming it “all” on the media. Reagan did a few things that handed them ammo, too. Reagan might hand them a few rounds of .22 long rifle, and the press would fire those and add in a maelstrom of larger ammunition that Reagan weathered fairly well.

    Now, Trump may give the media a variety of pistol and rifle ammunition, but the press are replying by nuking him and the American people every chance they get. Unfortunately, Trump is like the lizards that begin the Godzilla films. You make him radioactive, and he just gets bigger and gains new powers to destroy. Returning fire or setting one’s hair on fire is not the way to deal with Trump. Just ask those other sixteen candidates what happened in 2016.

    • #120
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.