3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Quote of the Day - Liberty and Free Speech
February 4, 2024 at 8:50 AM

Quote of the Day - Liberty and Free Speech

Seawriter
@Seawriter

CONTRIBUTOR

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark25likesJoin to like6comments
Liberty is meaningless where the right to utter one’s thoughts and opinions has ceased to exist. That, of all rights, is the dread of tyrants. It is the right which they first of all strike down. They know its power. - Frederick Douglass

This is as true today as it was when Douglass first spoke these words at an 1860 speech in Boston. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which among other things guarantees freedom of speech, is virtually unique among the nations of the world. Only it guarantees free speech as an absolute right. Virtually every other nation with a "free speech" clause in its written or unwritten constitution hedges that right with weasel words abridging the right under certain conditions.

Even in this country freedom of speech is under assault. Universities behave as if there is a "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment (there isn't), as if free speech can be limited to approved zones. Administrators of our public schools ignore Tinker vs Des Moines. Major corporations at the behest of the Federal Government censor opinions contrary to those desired by the government. (For private property enthusiasts, the rights of businesses to restrict speech is not unlimited, if the privately-owned space serves as a public forum. When working in collusion with a government, it becomes still more limited, since they are acting as an agent of the government.)

Rights not defended are easily lost. Push back aggressively against any efforts to limit your right to utter your thoughts and opinions. Do so wherever and whenever you can. Do so even when it is inconvenient. Take legal action when necessary. Do not allow yourself to be silenced.

Free speech is the most precious of all rights, because it is the only way one can peaceably rally others to a cause or to persuade others of the errors in their beliefs. If one is forced to abandon the soap box, the ballot box and the jury box will also soon be lost. The only redress may lay in the cartridge box. Opening that opens a Pandora's Box of other troubles. It should be saved as an absolute last resort.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (6)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Lilly B@LillyB·2y

    I’m following whether Mark Steyn’s push back against Michael Mann will have any effect. When the Mann v Steyn defamation case can be dragged out for 12 years, and Donald Trump is ordered to pay $83 million for defaming E. Jean Carroll (whereas she can say any reputation-damaging thing she wants about Trump without consequence), the state of free speech in America is not looking good. And those are only high-profile examples of how the legal system can chill free speech. We can’t really quantify the impact on millions of normal Americans who prefer to stay silent rather than be fired or subject to demoralizing re-education.

    ***** This the Quote of the Day for February 3rd. If you have a quote to share, please speak up and signup here to post!

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Seawriter@Seawriter·2y
    ReplyingtoLilly B

    Lilly B (View Comment):

    We can’t really quantify the impact on millions of normal Americans who prefer to stay silent rather than be fired or subject to demoralizing re-education.

    As I said, if you don't fight for a right, you lose it. A saying of my Greek grandparents applies: "It's better to die on your feet than live on your knees." The anti-free speech crowd is all about forcing others to live on their knees. Let me again quote Churchill:

    “Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” – Winston Churchill

    That is where we are now. We can still win without bloodshed and at a price not to costly. But if too many stay silent for fear of being fired or being subject to re-education the cost of regaining our freedom will rise. Until the only option left is the cartridge box. At that point the price will be almost unthinkable.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Lilly B@LillyB·2y
    ReplyingtoSeawriter

    Lilly B (View Comment):
    We can’t really quantify the impact on millions of normal Americans who prefer to stay silent rather than be fired or subject to demoralizing re-education.

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    As I said, if you don’t fight for a right, you lose it. A saying of my Greek grandparents applies: “It’s better to die on your feet than live on your knees.” The anti-free speech crowd is all about forcing others to live on their knees. Let me again quote Churchill:

    “Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” – Winston Churchill

    That is where we are now. We can still win without bloodshed and at a price not to costly. But if too many stay silent for fear of being fired or being subject to re-education the cost of regaining our freedom will rise. Until the only option left is the cartridge box. At that point the price will be almost unthinkable.

    I completely agree. I often try to talk to friends about thorny issues in our current culture and find that unless they already agree with me, I get criticized for being impolite. It’s not that my behavior is impolite, but bringing up divisive topics at all, or rather responding when others bring them up, is itself problematic in an otherwise friendly context. Since I am not usually debating on a public platform, with the exception of Ricochet where I am not doing so under my own name, I don’t know how to handle these situations. I suppose the cost is losing friends, and maybe that’s a price worth paying, but then we can only talk to others who are already on our side. It’s probably a whole post in itself, but it’s one that I struggle to write.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    JoelB@JoelB·2y
    Seawriter (View Post):
    If one is forced to abandon the soap box, the ballot box and the jury box will also soon be lost. The only redress may lay in the cartridge box. Opening that opens a Pandora’s Box of other troubles.

    Nice little bit of writing. The sequence of boxes.

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Seawriter@Seawriter·2y
    ReplyingtoJoelB

    JoelB (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Post):

    Seawriter (View Post):
    If one is forced to abandon the soap box, the ballot box and the jury box will also soon be lost. The only redress may lay in the cartridge box. Opening that opens a Pandora’s Box of other troubles.

    Nice little bit of writing. The sequence of boxes.

    I didn't invent the four boxes. Douglass did.

Scroll for later comments
+1 more comment
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of six comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •