3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Bibi: Don’t Be an Idiot!
October 23, 2023 at 7:30 PM

Bibi: Don’t Be an Idiot!

iWe
@iWe

CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark16likesJoin to like25comments

I previously posted a proposal for Gaza: simply lay siege, allow all who want to live to walk out, and anyone who chooses death over surrender is welcome to die from dehydration or disease.

Since Israel has not yet taken my idea (or indeed, committed to any other!), there is still a window of opportunity that was minimize the loss of innocent life. But because of events that have happened since my original proposal, I want to adjust it as follows: Instead of setting up temporary housing in Israel for those who surrender (and have committed no acts of terror), Israel can use Gaza instead. It should be done in a few steps.

Here is how it works:

1: Gaza itself is about 25x6 miles in dimension. But the middle of Gaza is basically empty. So Israel starts by bisecting Gaza: cut it in half with the army, sealing off the North entirely.

Then Israel besieges the North. Cut off all power, food, water, and especially, communications. Stop all images, video, text... everything. All who want to live just need to go through a checkpoint from North to South, and pass a security check. Then they can go live temporarily in the bottom half of Gaza, while Israel waits for everyone in the North who chose not to surrender, to die.

2: Once the North has no living people left, Israel flips the script. It turns on power and water and food to the North. Israel besieges the South, allowing all who want to live to walk to the North. Same rules of engagement: the checkpoint(s) have strict rules and any violators are shot.

Israel then besieges the South, with as much Egyptian support as can be secured. Take as long as it takes, but do not send troops in except for hostage-release commandoes on a case-by-case basis.

This would end up ridding Gaza of Hamas. All who want to live can do so. And Israel does not have to send troops into urban hellscapes.

In all steps, Israel seeks to block absolutely all communications in and out of Gaza: without video and images, Hamas loses its most potent weapon. Any journalists in a besieged part of Gaza are to be treated the same as anyone else. Walk out and live, or stay and die.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (25)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·2y

    Except I'm sure that "international pressure" would require Israel to build new housing for those who return to North Gaza after it gets flattened, and then in South Gaza after THAT gets flattened.

    Which I expect the Gazans would then destroy, as they've done before, and that would also somehow be Israel's fault...

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    iWe@iWe·2y
    Replyingtokedavis

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Except I’m sure that “international pressure” would require Israel to build new housing for those who return to North Gaza after it gets flattened, and then in South Gaza after THAT gets flattened.

    Which I expect the Gazans would then destroy, as they’ve done before, and that would also somehow be Israel’s fault…

    No flattening needed. Israel has nothing against the buildings. This is part of the beauty of it: Israel does not have to do more harm to Gaza's buildings or infrastructure.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·2y
    ReplyingtoiWe

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Except I’m sure that “international pressure” would require Israel to build new housing for those who return to North Gaza after it gets flattened, and then in South Gaza after THAT gets flattened.

    Which I expect the Gazans would then destroy, as they’ve done before, and that would also somehow be Israel’s fault…

    iWe (View Comment):

    No flattening needed. Israel has nothing against the buildings. This is part of the beauty of it: Israel does not have to do more harm to Gaza’s buildings or infrastructure.

    Well, the flattening has already begun, of course.

    I don't know if the "besieging" idea would work, there are already lots of people who think Israel owes it to the Gazans to provide food and water etc, even as they're being attacked.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    cdor@cdor·2y
    KC is correct, I believe. Your plan, IWe, is great except it would take too long and as people started dying the international pressure on Israel would force an end to the siege before it was successful.
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    iWe@iWe·2y
    Replyingtocdor

    cdor (View Comment):

    KC is correct, I believe. Your plan, IWe, is great except it would take too long and as people started dying the international pressure on Israel would force an end to the siege.

    That is why you cut comms. Jam all signals of all kinds. No data, less pressure.

    It astounds me that Israel has allowed comms so far.

Scroll for later comments
+20 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 25 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •