Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
“There is Another Choice” A Report on the Evan McMullin Kick-off
I’ve been a NeverTrumper for nearly a year now. The day Senator Ted Cruz dropped out, I began searching for a candidate who wasn’t merely the least-evil, but whose candidacy advocated for policies I support. I flirted with the Libertarians, but found Gary Johnson lacking, especially on religious liberties.* The other libertarians I hear from keep doing the best they can to convince me they aren’t really serious.
Then came the Constitution Party. They were very friendly, even going so far as to invite me to attend their state committee meeting. But I had some major questions about their party platform, especially on foreign policy. I asked a few questions at the committee meeting, and was promised their vice presidential candidate, Scott Bradley, would answer me personally. (This was the genesis for a solicitation of questions post I wrote back in May; nothing happened with it because Bradley never called, despite five promises from the state chair that he would). Bradley, after all, was the best qualified person to answer my questions. At the state party meeting one of the committee members actually asked one of my questions to the Party’s chair — “What’s our position on Israel?” — and the chair didn’t know the answer. They had to look it up. Answer: “We don’t want any foreign entanglements; Israel is perfectly capable of taking care of itself if the US just stays out of its way.” By mid-June I was convinced I’d be leaving my vote for president this year blank. But then Monday arrived, with the surprise announcement of an Independant run from Evan McMullin.
Now, I didn’t know McMullin from Fred Cooper Ronaldson (a name I made up just now), but his Open Letter to America said things I’d been thinking. I read his interview with National Review and watched his appearance on Fox News opposite Rudy Gulianni. For a new-comer to the public eye, he was making quite a splash. I visited his website and read his positions on a handful of issues. (They’re a little brief right now, but I’m told they will be fleshed out in the coming few weeks). I liked a lot of what I read, but I still wasn’t convinced. Was he in this to play the spoiler? How much of this does he actually believe and what’s there for political expediency? How much of my liking him comes from my distaste for the other candidates and how much is because he actually represents my values and positions?
I wanted answers to those questions. So when I heard that Mr. McMullin was holding his Kick-off Event in Salt Lake City last night, I found a way to be there.
A little before 6:30 PM, the doors opened. As we entered the building, a long table covered with ballot-access petitions separated us from the doorway to the stairs that led up to the third floor loft where the event would be held. Almost everyone in line was more than happy to sign. By my guess is that they gathered around 250 signatures last night (with only 1,000 needed, total, in the state of Utah to be on November’s ballot) and had a little over 300 in attendance.
Upstairs, cameras from the local news stations and an Internet live-stream stood, forming — with the walls and stage — a bull-pen for the gathering crowd. While waiting for the event to start, I spoke with two gentlemen in white shirts and ties. Both had been at their respective workplaces when they saw an announcement about the event, one on Facebook just an hour before, the other on TV earlier in the day. I asked them why they’d come. The first said, “I’m just hoping for anything better than Trump and Hillary.” The other nodded in agreement. Had either of them looked at other parties? “I have,” said the second. He’d spent a lot of time with Johnson and, he said, “In many ways Trump’s better than Johnson, especially on drugs and religion.”
McMullin’s state campaign manager took the stage and led the gathering in the Pledge of Allegience. After thanking us for coming, he said, “You are the rock being thrown into the water.” The one that will ripple throughout the nation, telling everyone, “We will not accept unacceptable candidates.” He introduced McMullin with much of the same bio I’d read on the campaign website, but with a few personal flourishes, as they’ve known each other since college.
Then McMullin himself came to the podium. After what was, in my opinion, some quite humble words of gratitude for his family and friends who were present, he spoke a bit about the whirlwind that had begun following Monday’s announcement. He gave a few statistics: In the 24 hours after the announcement, they had 60,000 volunteers signed up with the campaign nation-wide and were on track to double that shortly (I can’t read my notes for certain). Google had called to let the campaign know McMullin was being googled more than Trump. (That doesn’t surprise me very much; people already know who Trump is).
Here are a few quotes from his speech that resonated the most with me:
Good report. The Constitution Party’s answer seems reasonable. I don’t think Evan will be on the ballot in Texas, but will consider him based on your report.
Thanks for the report. Off to read his interview in “National Review” now.
Back again. I thought the interview was rather short and shallow; McMullin comes through in a positive way, but it was not a good enough intro. The Fox News segment was better, because his personal manner is appealing. A quick internet search, though, shows very little indeed. Do you know what he is doing to get his name out?
Thanks, Liz, I hadn’t seen it yet. Here’s a link.
Hope springs eternal. Maybe he will be on the Ricochet Podcast. It’s probably not a bad venue for him actually.
Cc @blueyeti @peterrobinson
And a vote for this guy is going to have a greater impact than just writing in M. Mouse or S. Claus because . . . ?
On the one hand, I’m deeply disappointed that it took this long to find someone so obscure who actually seems sensible and worth supporting.
On the other hand, beggars can’t be choosers and what little I’ve seen of McMullin is impressive.
Isn’t it a bit late to be running for the highest office in the country, with little experience – does he have any $ to compete? I saw an interview with him on Fox, and he sounds good, but that is hardly enough at this late date. It will just take away votes and land H in the Oval Office. This whole political season is off the cliff. I even heard a story about a prominent Republican presenting an offer to Hilary if they go for her, to let the Republicans pick the Supreme Court judges……..really? Like he has so many votes in his pocket?
If this is the one you’re talking about, he’s a terrible political communicator, unless the point was solely to flatter Utahns (entirely possible). I’ve got a pretty good idea what he means when he talks about civil rights for LGBT people, not so much what he means by protections for religious people. Especially when “freedom of association” in the current context of debate overlaps quite a bit with what he calls “discrimination”
Also: “Thus, in response to a question thrown at me while walking down a street (in the rain), I expressed my reservations rather emphatically.” Really? You’re running for president. People are going to be asking you questions while walking in all weather conditions. If you don’t like people quoting you when you’re feeling snippy (which seems to be common for Johnson), don’t answer questions. Or don’t run for president in the first place.
In my opinion, it would be a way to tell the Republican party and the big backers that they should have originally chosen a candidate who the common people feel closer to (although Trump is already proving that in a big way). I say this as a voter who has not decided for any presidential candidate and may even leave that vote blank. I have decided that I don’t have to decide until Nov. 8 and until then I can just be taking in information.
It’s a day late and a dollar short. The only possible aim could be to help Hillary. And I find this on the Main Feed? Please.
THIS really speaks to me.
If you look at statements from folks like Bret Stephens, excerpted on Andrew Klavan’s podcast, it’s pretty clear McMullen is just another way to teach GOP voters a lesson about who they’re allowed to nominate.
No doubt he’s a good man. There is also no doubt there are thousands just like him in our great country, probably some even right here on Ricochet. Unfortunately they are also just as unknown to 99.99% of the voters in this country as is Evan McMullin. Knock yourselves out folks. This is an exercise in CoC , if you know what I mean.
Haha. I have a feeling he’s a good man too. But we’d have known for sure if he’d gone through the primary process like everyone else. Doing it this way just feels like the GOP is shoving him down our throats and/or using him to scold the primary voters. And it helps Hillary. I’m starting to wonder if that isn’t their main goal.
I’m sure McMullin’s a good man. If he cares this much about our nation he should wait till after the election, then start building a base so he can be in the primaries in 2020. Doing this now just throws more weight to Hillary.
We have already reached Peak Message this cycle. That mailbox is full, please try back again in January.
Never Trumpers never die they just elect Hillary.
How is the GOP shoving him down anyone’s throat? He’s not running as a Republican.
Tom, while Priebus and Ryan might be quietly furious about the matter it’s people like Ricochet’s Own Rick Wilson behind the bid.
There is a faction of the GOP infrastructure opposed enough to Trump as nominee that they’e actively working to ensure Trump’s defeat, which means electing Hillary.
If Rick’s candidate, Rubio, had won and Trump was mounting an independent bid how do you think Rick would respond?
What a bizarre thing to say given that the vast majority of the GOP establishment is pushing Trump as much as they can.
Okay, but that’s Rick Wilson, not the GOP.
That’s one possible outcome of this. But it’s not the only one: third-party votes are also a means of sending a message regarding future elections. But if Trump loses decisively — as I think he likely will — then that information will come at a low cost and can be useful.
One might say that message is too weak to matter under the circumstances, but that’s another matter.
Frankly I regard a Hillary presidency as a high cost considering her overt hostility to two basic rights enshrined in the constitution as well as her slightly more covert hostility to at least two more.
Rick’s not the only person who’s part of the traditional GOP machine behind McMullin’s candidacy.
While McMullin might not be an official GOP candidate but he’s not some fly-by-night adventurer blown in out of nowhere or a DNC agent either. I think it’s fair to use “GOP” as a shorthand in a comment on the internet.
Being in a non swing state, my vote is good for only one thing – a show of approval. Voting third party in general signifies a dissatisfaction with the two parties, but votes for the green party will be interpreted differently from votes for the libertarians. So far it sounds like McMullen is my best option for a protest vote.
Isn’t it a bit late to be running for the highest office in the country, with little experience
Trump has less experience than this guy, and is unfit. Hillary has lots of experience, and is still unfit.
It will just take away votes and land H in the Oval Office.
Neither Trump or Hillary had my vote anyway. And if the GOP wanted to keep Hillary out of office, they ought not to have nominated such a repellant nutcase.
But the GOP didn’t nominate him. Voters disgusted and betrayed by the GOP did, and he is their fault.
But the GOP didn’t nominate him. Voters disgusted and betrayed by the GOP did, and he is their fault.
True, it’s the voters that nominated him, but I think the party establishment could have done something –anything! — to keep him from being the party’s nominee. For starters, requiring that someone seeking the nomination actually have coherent and consistent positions in accordance with the party platform. Requiring nominees to release tax returns. But something!
Its rather ironic that people who claim that Trump represents a group of people ignored by their political leaders are now lambasting those people who have decided that the political leaders are ignoring them.
I just don’t understand all this belated recrimination. It’s done, it’s over, he is our nominee. Not supporting him doesn’t seem to be enough. Too many feel the need to vocalize their “principles” by tearing him, and by extension our party, down publicly, and all I’m saying is it’s not helpful and it helps HER. I mean Charles Krauthammer is in a new Hillary campaign ad for pete’s sake.
I think it’s kind of funny the shoe’s on the other foot for both sides this election actually.