Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Men's fashions circa 1930 to 1950 versus men's fashions today:
What explains this?
A. Chemicals in food (breakfast cereals, junk food)?
B. A recurring cycle of social decay and deviancy? (See also the Rococo period prior to the French Revolution.)
C. The devouring mother complex? (See also Jordan Peterson)
D. The feminist movement?
E. All of the above.
F. None of the above.
G. Other: ___________
Note: The Amazon ad was screen-grabbed from X this morning. Is it unfair to suggest that a man who wears that outfit should immediately be considered an idiot?
On a related topic, why is it that Hollywood celebrities seem to have a disproportionate number of offspring who are transgender?
Discussion (44)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I blame polyester.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Ugliness is a political statement. It's relativism; there is no truth or beauty, only power.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I recommend the death penalty.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
But those are not really "men's fashions" today. Except for the jorts, they're Halloween costumes you'll only see on a freak show stage somewhere.
You're seeing five of 44 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.