Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
If you bought an April 3rd edition of the New York Times Newspaper and opened it up to page A8 (my picture attached), you'd see the following headline:
A North American Treaty Organization Without America?
This is listed under "News Analysis" of the so-called paper of record. It was written by Steven Erlanger. It's my understanding that sometimes an editor picks the headline and not the column author. Or perhaps both are responsible for this fun "Gulf of America" inspired headline. Maybe the Atlantic has been renamed the American Ocean when I wasn't looking.
At first I thought maybe the headline or article was the result of some history-challenged, woke journalist kid fresh out of some program from a big-name school. I decided to read the NYT bio of Mr Erlanger. This is what it includes:
Steven ErlangerI am the chief diplomatic correspondent for The New York Times, covering Europe. I’m based in Berlin.
What I Cover
Foreign policy, European policy, diplomacy, conflict, migration, integration. More recently, NATO, American foreign policy, Russia and the war in Ukraine.
My Background
I studied political philosophy and government at Harvard, taught in the Kennedy School of Government, and having grown up with the Vietnam War, went to Woodstock and fell happily into journalism, first at The Boston Globe, then, in 1987, at The Times. I have reported from more than 120 countries, some of them gone, and been bureau chief in London, Bangkok, Moscow, Paris, Jerusalem, Berlin, Brussels, Prague and Belgrade, as well as chief diplomatic correspondent in Washington. Among other awards, I have shared in two Pulitzer Prizes, one for Al Qaeda in 2002 and one for Russia in 2017.
Journalistic Ethics
I aspire to be fair and empathic, to listen more than speak, to have my own opinion on what I cover to be something of a mystery, to be clear, analytical and thoughtful, even, at times, original. I think The Times, to which I have devoted my career, has a special place in our political life, one that carries enormous responsibility. I try to live up to that responsibility. You can learn more about The Times’s ethics policy here.
Hum, so Mr Erlanger went to Woodstock (no spring chicken) and "more recently" started covering NATO, etc. Expanding your career roles and covering and learning new things is indeed exciting, regardless of age. Perhaps the first thing to do when covering a story is to learn abbreviations or jargon. He studied at Harvard and taught in the Kennedy School of Government, so this should come naturally to him. Learning a long list of alphabet words is standard for government stuff. Maybe the headline of "North American Treaty Organization" was simply intended as some kind of word play and "without America" was inspired by some old Woodstock? Get it? Me neither. Maybe, I would if that's what NATO stood for. Perhaps we can read his article to learn that the purpose of NATO is: "Keep the Europeans down, the Americans out, and the Russians (and ally Iran) supplying the oil and gas in". Yes, I think that's how I remember the short-hand description. As a sweetener, he's based in Berlin.
Since the NYT has popular word puzzles and games, why not incorporate that here? Let's get the award-winning journalist Steven Erlanger to include a question for the readers to solve:
What does the acronym NATO mean?
(a) New Amsterdam Trade Organization
(b) National American Trump Orange-Organization
(c) North American Treaty Organization
(d) No Americans Treaty Organization
(e) None of the Above
(f) All of the Above
(g) or finally both answers (b) and (b) a second time.
So, as for the correct answer... hold on to buy next week's Erlanger foreign policy column. You'll get no spoilers from me.
At least the NYT can easily change the headline on their online platform, and nobody will be the wiser. See, paper copies still have a purpose :-)
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (12)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I must confess that having already heard about NATO and the prospects of America pulling out, my mind initially skipped over the substitution of American for Atlantic in the picture. I even missed the big red arrow at first look. One might suppose that the NYT would look at the headline a little more carefully than I did.
Considering the current status of the Royal Navy, maybe a renaming of the ocean is not too far-fetched.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Perhaps the headline was a psychological slip. Since everyone knows who carries the weight in the alliance.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
What's truly embarrassing is that the thesis of the article is based on the mistaken notion that NATO stands for North American Treaty Organization. So, not just an error in the headline. The whole bloody article is imbecilic.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You think anyone at the NYTimes will get fired for this?
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Of course, the real problem is that the Department of Education was always underfunded.
You're seeing five of twelve comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.