Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Between now and the spring, the Supreme Court will rule on at least three cases involving Donald Trump. Two questions: What should the Court’s rulings be? What will they be? To answer those questions and more, we turn to our in-house legal experts: NYU Law School’s Richard Epstein and Berkeley Law School’s John Yoo.
Recorded on January 12, 2024
Discussion (3)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Case #1
If an unarmed insurrection exists without a congressional declaration, what do you call a million people breaking into this country with the assistance of the current president? If a blue state can apply a definition of insurrection and interfere with a federal election, why can't a red state do the same against Biden?
I would wholeheartedly accept this argument if a state defines an insurrection and bars someone from a same state office. The federal government shouldn't interfere in state matters unless it's unconstitutional. The state should not interfere in federal matters as well.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I haven't listened to this yet. But, boy could I go for a pork sandwich.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Looking forward to listening to this one.