Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
It is being reported in the media that the Trump transition team is skipping the FBI background check for nominees. Instead, they are using private investigative organizations. Naturally, there is a lot of tut-tutting among our political betters.
The concern is that the officials (e.g. FBI Director Christopher Wray) overseeing the background checks are the very ones that Trump has promised to fire. It would be tempting for them to interfere or to use the information developed against the nominees. In addition, FBI background checks are notoriously slow, so it delays the point when confirmation hearings can start and lengthens the time that the Deep States can do its Trump-proofing. It shows how broken the confirmation process is when you have to outsource the background checks.
As an aside, I once participated in a background check for one of my Chinese ESL students who had joined the Army and needed a Top Secret clearance. The student listed me a reference, and an investigator came to my house. The final question was whether I would give my former student a Top Secret clearance if it were my decision and why. I said, "No, because he has family in China who could be pressured." The investigator told me that was not a valid reason and that I had to give an answer based only on my personal knowledge of the student. So I finally said "Yes," but I thought that was the craziest way to make a security clearance decision.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (22)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The fact that he has relatives in China is baked into the cake, already. He had to divulge close family in the application. If you had said he once expressed concern about his family being in China, that might have been a different discussion. Since Clinton, China has not usually been dealt with as a hostile power, and I have worked with Chinese natives in the federal environment on multiple occasions. I am not personally endorsing the policy.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That's an interesting perspective on the clearance process. It can be jiggered to produce a desired outcome by controlling the informal context of the formal question.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Things have changed then, because one of my office mates waited for months for his clearance, and it was denied because he still had family (grandparents) in the PRC. He needed the clearance to do the work he had been hired for, so he wasn't there much longer.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That distinction makes sense, and I hadn't thought of it that way. My concern was based on a general knowledge of how a Confucian society works instead of anything specific that he had said.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have to say , I am just loving Trump 2.0 . He is approaching taking power in DC just like you would approach a wild dangerous animal . With cunning ;) .
You're seeing five of 22 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.