Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
An inference to the best explanation should, as much as possible, do three things:
Some of the major things to be explained concerning Jeffrey Epstein are these:
Among the things we know are these:
So here's what happened to Epstein:
Did his handlers do some real good with his information? Probably. Did they do some real harm? Probably. Was it worth it? No.
Were intel agencies not just putting up with him? Did they actually make him? I think that is possible, but the explanation does not require it.
What was the specific despair or threat that motivated him to do himself in? I don't know.
Did his handlers directly arrange for his death, or did they merely not prevent some other enemy from arranging it? I don't know.
When will we get more intel, and how much will be kept hidden? Will some future Silberman ever get a look at all the leftovers? I don't know.
What about reports of injuries on his body that don't seem like self-hanging, or of the difficulty of hanging oneself in that cell? Well, you can't expect every one of his last conversations to be quasi-civilized cigar-smoking sessions with Robert Duvall. I wouldn't be surprised if someone roughed Epstein up a bit while making him a final offer, or even if someone showed up to help arrange the sheets.
I think this is, more or less, the truth about Epstein.
Is there something it doesn't explain? Is there some other explanation that explains more? Does the other explanation make things more complicated than this one does?
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (116)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I'm going to approach this a little bit differently.
Or was there? It's a Federal lockup. Cameras are cheap. If I were setting up camera coverage of an incarceration facility, would I limit coverage to one camera per cell? No. I'd want to know who was in the hallways as well. So perhaps that is the video that Bongino is referring to. Epstein being escorted to his cell, the escort retreating immediately, then no further outside contact until Epstein's body is discovered.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Those details all seem to me to make sense.
What conclusion do we get from them--same as mine?
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Independent of yours. I'm trying to justify Bongino's conversion and his brief reference to the video that apparently he's seen that the rest of us have not.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
There were other cameras in the space that did not directly pick up what happened, but provide indirect evidence. Or so he says.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I missed that. I only saw the interview with Patel and Bongino. It was an off-the-cuff comment that drew a lot of fire immediately.
You're seeing five of 116 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.