3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. How Totalitarianism Happens
November 19, 2025 at 12:25 PM

How Totalitarianism Happens

Bill Berg
@BillBerg

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark16likesJoin to like31comments

My post on “The Psychology of Totalitarianism” is pinned at the top of my substack because I believe totalitarianism is the greatest danger of our time.

This is a Facebook post that does a nice summary of our peril as described by Hannah Arendt, a Holocaust survivor.

My view is that the Internet and social media make our peril greater because people increasingly give up on any foundation of truth and believe the narrative they listen to is “as good as any, and better than yours.” Everyone gets their own “truth.” A couple of quotes from the FB post:

She sat in Berlin cafés where professors who once debated philosophy now whispered propaganda, testing each other to see who could be trusted. She read newspapers that contradicted themselves daily until facts became meaningless. She saw neighbors grow cynical, exhausted, indifferent—shrugging and saying “everyone lies anyway” until they stopped trying to know what was real. She watched people surrender their minds before the first camps were built. And she understood: the real danger wasn’t that people believed Nazi lies. It was that they stopped believing in truth at all.

One of Arendt's most chilling conclusions:

“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

The temptation is finally to shrug, turn off the “news” and believe whatever you want to because you are just too tired of being constantly lied to. You give up on truth.

I’m tempted too, however, as a Christian. I believe that there is an I AM, as in “I AM the way, the truth, and the life.” Nietzsche said that “without God, everything is permitted.” Christ is God, Christ is truth. Nietzsche also said that God was dead … and he said it as a lament because he probably realized the grave danger of the “Übermensch,” the ideal superior man that would rise up in the future, destroy Christianity and create and impose his own values. Hitler, Stalin, Mao and others have filled the role with less than utopian results. No Christ, no truth, and all is permissible.

The UN wants to control “disinformation,” an unsubtle way of saying that they want thought control. Biden took a shot at creating a “Disinformation Board."

Jankowicz weighed in more recently on Elon Musk’s bid to buy Twitter, writing, “I shudder to think about if free speech absolutists were taking over more platforms, what that would look like for the marginalized communities … which are already shouldering … disproportionate amounts of this abuse.

One can’t be too careful about those “free speech absolutists!”

You can go out and look at how they were proceeding if you want. Thankfully it didn’t actually get created - or did it? I recommend as much vigilance as we can muster … many sources, books, post-narrative-of-the-day analyses, searching for context, avoiding the quick, simple conclusion, etc.

Totalitarians are experts at the “Weapon of Mass Confusion.” They want to wear us down so we quit thinking critically by getting us to refuse to listen to opposing views, to “cancel” people who hold different views, stop discussing issues, accept censorship, etc.

In short, just accept things like Hillary Clinton’s comment on the Benghazi attack in which 4 Americans were killed and the US refused to allow ready troops to go defend the embassy.

”At this point, what difference does it make?”

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (31)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Chuck@Chuckles·47w

    Thank you.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Mark Camp@MarkCamp·47w
    Bill Berg (View Post):

    My post on “The Psychology of Totalitarianism” is pinned at the top of my substack because I believe totalitarianism is the greatest danger of our time.

    You would be very interested to learn what methodology it is that Von Mises applies the pejorative label “scientism” to!

    It is precisely the assumption that the methodology that must be used for knowing the causal relationships governing physical atoms is applicable to knowing the causal relationships governing the atoms of human purposeful action—which methodology cannot possibly apply, as can be seem immediately by reflection.

    I gave a reading list for learning Austrian theory recently. The fourth book, especially, documents the fallacy that could appropriately be called “scientism”.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (Here.We.Go.)@DonG·47w

    Totalitarianism is the end state of all political systems. Some systems can be made especially to prevent it, but they people will eventually erode the safeguards and vote for totalitarianism. Prove me wrong.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Ekosj@Ekosj·47w

    I’m reminded of a quip from the old Soviet Union… The Future Is Certain; It’s the Past Which Is Unpredictable.

    Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski had the following example…

    A very small and innocent anecdote. In 1950, in Leningrad, I visited the Hermitage in the company of a few Polish friends. We had a guide (a deputy director of the museum, as far as I remember) who was obviously a knowledgeable art historian. At a certain moment – no opportunity for ideological teaching must be lost – he told us: ‘We have in our cellars, comrades, a lot of corrupt, degenerate bourgeois paintings. You know, all those Matisses, Cézannes, Braques and so on. We have never displayed them in the museum but perhaps one day we will show them so that Soviet people can see for themselves how deeply bourgeois art has sunk. Indeed, Comrade Stalin teaches us that we should not embellish history.’ I was in the Hermitage again, with other friends, in 1957, a time of relative ‘thaw,’ and the same man was assigned to guide us. We were led to rooms full of modern French paintings. Our guide told us: ‘Here you see the masterpieces of great French painters – Matisse, Cézanne, Braque and others. And,’ he added (for no opportunity must be lost), ‘do you know that the bourgeois press accused us of refusing to display these paintings in the Hermitage? This was because at a certain moment some rooms in the museum were being redecorated and were temporarily closed, and a bourgeois journalist happened to be here at that moment and then made this ridiculous accusation. Ha, ha!’
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    EODmom@EODmom·47w

    I’m relieved when someone skips the ping pong-ing between socialism and communism and goes straight to the point of it - it’s totalitarianism. Thank you. Debating which is which and where we are on the continuum is a sideshow while the power hunger march on to totalitarianism. Thank you.
    Since it’s back to basics, I think it’s time to get a FREEDOM T-shirt.

Scroll for later comments
+26 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 31 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •