The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureGray MattersChicks on The RightFirst Things PodcastDaily SignalThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourHillsdale DialoguesThe Glenn ShowMom WarsConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Main Feed/
  2. Microsoft and Johnson & Johnson Are Safer Than The US Treasury
May 18, 2025 at 11:00 AM

Microsoft and Johnson & Johnson Are Safer Than The US Treasury

Ekosj
@Ekosj

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark20likesJoin to like43comments

On Friday, Moody’s capitulated. They finally downgraded the US’s credit rating from Aaa to Aa1. In this downgrade, they joined Fitch and Standard & Poor's, which each downgraded the US years ago. That leaves two U.S. institutions with an Aaa credit rating… Microsoft and Johnson & Johnson. Which is to say that it’s safer to lend money to them than to the US. Why the downgrade? Debt, pure and simple. That and our continued inability to do anything about it. Politicians of all stripes are addicted to spending and otherwise using the Treasury to bribe their voters. Even today, the “big beautiful bill” is chock-a-block with giveaways that take effect immediately and “cuts” that start conveniently after the 2028 election… i.e., never. There is nothing now but time between us and a ruinous financial disaster.

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (43)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Subcomandante America@TheReticulator·1y

    Financial disasters come and go. The Soviet Union had a financial disaster. The earth is still turning on its axis. People are still enjoying themselves and making babies. It wasn't the end of the world.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Ekosj@Ekosj·1y
    ReplyingtoSubcomandante America

    Subcomandante America (View Comment):

    Financial disasters come and go. The Soviet Union had a financial disaster. The earth is still turning on its axis. People are still enjoying themselves and making babies. It wasn’t the end of the world.

    “It’s the end of the world as we know it. (And I feel fine.) - REM

    Let’s see …in the Russian financial crisis of 1998 Russian inflation hit 84%. Banks failed. People lost their savings. It brought us Putin eventually. It wasn’t worse because Russia is a net exporter and the cratering ruble helped their exports.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Old Bathos@OldBathos·1y

    Trump Derangment Syndrome is preventing the spenders from seeing what a gift DOGE is. If Elon were allowed to find that bogus trillion and thus preserve the health of all the programs that matter to voters (unlike insider grift like USAID), that would prevent that big clownshow on the hill from having to make significant cuts sooner and may even help to foster enough economic growth to increase revenues without new taxes and at least stop the bleeding.

    Attacking Musk rather than let Trump do anything positive is malignant insanity.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Ekosj@Ekosj·1y
    ReplyingtoOld Bathos

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Trump Derangment Syndrome is preventing the spenders from seeing what a gift DOGE is. If Elon were allowed to find that bogus trillion and thus preserve the health of all the programs that matter to voters (unlike insider grift like USAID), that would prevent that big clownshow on the hill from having to make significant cuts sooner and may even help to foster enough economic growth to increase revenues without new taxes and at least stop the bleeding.

    Attacking Musk rather than let Trump do anything positive is malignant insanity.

    True. So is spending more money we don’t have.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y
    ReplyingtoEkosj

    Ekosj (View Comment):

    True. So is spending more money we don’t have.

    Verily.

+38 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 43 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •